Reps. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) and Eric Burlison (R–Mo.) this week introduced the Flock-Off Act, a bill that would bar federal funding of automated license plate readers (ALPRs) except at the border or for toll enforcement.
asserted
that → introduce → enforcement
"The federal government shouldn't provide 'security' grants to cities and police departments that have gone beyond the pale and turned their communities into a version of 1984," Massie said on Wednesday.
asserted
Massie → provide → Wednesday
"Federal taxpayers should not be forced to fund the surveillance state.
asserted
taxpayers → force → state
The bill—the name of which calls out Flock Safety, the leading ALPR vendor—is cosponsored by Rep. Ro Khanna (D–Calif.) along with four Republicans: Reps. Lauren Boebert (Colo.), Paul Gosar (Ariz.), Chip Roy (Texas), and Victoria Spartz (Ind.).
asserted
name → call → Republicans
It illustrates the bipartisan, trans-ideological nature of the backlash against AI-assisted ALPRs, which cities across the country installed without giving much thought to privacy concerns or the potential for abuse.
asserted
cities → illustrate → abuse
During the last year or so, Americans across the political spectrum, including national politicians, local legislators, and police officials, have belatedly recognized the implications of a nationwide surveillance network that operates without judicial oversight and often without meaningful supervision of any sort.
asserted
that → include → sort
"On the right, critics typically attack the cameras as government overreach," Vox writer Caitlin Dewey noted last week.
asserted
Dewey → attack → overreach
"On the left, critics frequently link the cameras to corporate surveillance, racist policing, the erosion of abortion rights, and immigration enforcement.
asserted
critics → link → rights
Civil liberties groups such as the Institute for Justice, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation have been sounding the alarm about ALPR surveillance for years.
asserted
groups → sound → years
But thanks partly to revelations about blatant police abuse of ALPR databases, including cops who have used them to stalk ex-girlfriends, possibly unfaithful spouses, objects of romantic interest, or personal nemeses, public opinion is starting to reflect those organizations' concerns.
uncertain
opinion → include → concerns
In a national YouGov survey conducted last week, 46 percent of respondents said they would oppose the use of ALPRs "for law enforcement purposes" in their communities, including 31 percent who were "strongly" opposed.
asserted
who → conduct → percent
Just 38 percent favored ALPRs, while 17 percent were unsure.
asserted
percent → favor → ALPRs
A year ago, by contrast, YouGov found that 45 percent of Americans supported ALPRs, while 33 percent opposed them, including 20 percent who were "strongly" opposed, and the rest were undecided.
asserted
rest → find → percent
In both surveys, Democrats and independents were more likely than Republicans to oppose ALPRs.
asserted
Democrats → oppose → ALPRs
But last week's survey suggested growing qualms among Republicans, 33 percent of whom were against police use of the technology, up from 29 percent last year, including 20 percent who had strong views on the subject, up from 18 percent in 2025.
uncertain
who → suggest → 2025
A few weeks ago, a NextGen survey in Arizona, a state that President Donald Trump won in 2016 and 2024, found even stronger opposition to Flock cameras: 63 percent of registered voters opposed police use of ALPRs, while 82 percent were "concerned" about "misuse."
asserted
percent → win → misuse
Even more striking: Around the same time, a Spry Strategies survey of likely voters in decidedly Republican and conservative Knox County, Tennessee, found that 58 percent opposed Flock cameras, including 42 percent who were "strongly" opposed.
asserted
who → find → percent
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, one of the most prominent Republicans to express sympathy for that view, seems to know which way the wind is blowing.
asserted
wind → express → view
ALPR cameras are "out of control," he told reporters last week.
asserted
he → tell → reporters
"I'm all about law enforcement having tools to hold criminals accountable…
asserted
criminals → have → tools
But I don't want to have this become a surveillance state."
asserted
this → want → ?
Notably, DeSantis alluded to outrageous examples of what can happen when police officers across the country have easy, essentially unsupervised access to ALPR databases they can use to track drivers, predict their itineraries, identify other vehicles near them, and, with the help of other records, assemble detailed information about their lives.
asserted
they → allude → lives
The Institute for Justice has identified "well over 100 incidents of ALPR abuse," which it notes "may be just the tip of the iceberg" given the reality of lax oversight and widespread, often informal sharing of ALPR data.
uncertain
it → identify → data
"When I see, like, a police officer using this to track, like, an ex-girlfriend," DeSantis said, "I'm like, you know, what the hell's going on?"
asserted
you → see → girlfriend
Local officials are beginning to ask the same question.
asserted
officials → begin → question
The Institute for Justice counts "157 local governments" that have canceled or declined to renew ALPR contracts since the beginning of 2025.
asserted
that → count → 2025
While that represents a tiny share of the 7,000 or so U.S. law enforcement agencies that use Flock cameras, the trend is not positive for a company whose CEO until recently dismissed privacy concerns about his equipment and software, condemning "terroristic organizations like DeFlock," which has used crowdsourcing to map more than 138,000 ALPR cameras in the United States.
asserted
which → represent → States
In contrast with the political breakdown in the YouGov surveys, the congressional reaction to those cameras has been driven almost entirely by Republicans.
asserted
reaction → drive → Republicans
The Surveillance Accountability Act, which Massie introduced in April, would generally require that police obtain a warrant to search ALPR data, which is similar to the policy that the Institute for Justice favors.
asserted
Institute → introduce → Justice
That medicine evidently is too strong for Massie's colleagues, only one of whom, Boebert, has cosponsored the bill so far.
asserted
one → cosponsor → bill
The PRIVACY Act, which Rep. Keith Self (R–Texas) introduced on July 15, has attracted a bit more support.
asserted
Self → introduce → support
That bill would bar federal law enforcement agencies from using state or local ALPR information to "circumvent warrant requirements."
asserted
bill → bar → requirements
It has attracted half a dozen cosponsors, all Republicans, including Burlison.
asserted
It → attract → Burlison
The Protection Against Mass Surveillance Act, which Rep. Tim Burchett (R–Tenn.) introduced on July 21, would prohibit federal agencies from "purchasing or accessing automated surveillance systems that identify, track, or record individuals."
asserted
that → introduce → individuals
It has seven cosponsors, including Burlison and six other Republicans.
asserted
It → have → Burlison
Although that is not exactly a groundswell of congressional concern, the reaction from conservative Republicans shows that objections to ALPRs are not limited to libertarian or left-leaning critics.
asserted
objections → show → critics
The right-wing, Trump-supporting Epoch Times, for instance, recently gave sympathetic coverage to the anti-Flock backlash, noting concerns about misuse of ALPR data for personal purposes, mistaken identification of suspects, and violation of the Fourth Amendment's ban on unreasonable searches.
asserted
Times → we → searches
Last week, Sen. Josh Hawley (R–Mo.), no one's idea of a libertarian, announced that he was launching an investigation of Flock's "collection, retention, and dissemination of the data generated by its artificial intelligence surveillance cameras."
asserted
he → announce → cameras
He noted that "the overwhelming majority of the Americans captured in those records did nothing wrong," adding that "Americans do not surrender their privacy rights when they drive to work, drop their kids off at school, or go to church."
asserted
they → note → church
The Supreme Court, he emphasized, has recognized that "a comprehensive, retrospective record of a person's movements is different in kind from ordinary observation in public."
asserted
record → emphasize → public
…and 11 more, not listed.
