Can Trump and Xi cooperate to guide humanity through the AI revolution? Humanity might depend on it | Alan Finkel

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
The Guardian · collected 2026-09-20 · by Alan Finkel

Quick Summary

Alan Finkel discusses the urgency of regulating artificial intelligence due to rapid technological advancement and potential risks highlighted by researchers like Jacob Coxon. As unregulated competition between tech companies and nations threatens global stability, Finkel sees an opportunity for President Donald Trump and China’s President Xi Jinping to address these issues during their summit. He emphasizes that while AI offers significant benefits, the need for oversight is urgent given its exponential growth rate, which now doubles every four months according to METR research.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-20, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Before the Xi-Trump summit last week, analysts expected soybeans to be included in tariff-reduced arrangements between China and the U.S., but China excluded them from a tariff-reduction list released on September 28, 2026, despite cutting tariffs on other agricultural goods like corn, wheat, meat, and dairy. This decision disappointed American farmers, such as John Bartman, an Illinois-based soybean farmer who called it "a missed opportunity." U.S. soybeans still face an additional tariff of 10%, which traders say is too high for private crushers to absorb, even as Chinese state buyers have stepped up purchases. Despite this exclusion, both sides agreed to form a trade council to discuss reciprocal tariff cuts on $30 billion worth of products and stabilize economic ties.

Written for “US-China Tariff Cuts Deal” on 2026-10-05, grounded in this article and the 283 other(s) covering the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
41
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
12%
5 of 41 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Correction & hedging signals
59.7
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
284
Economy/Business
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-20 · how these are computed

Story

📰 US-China Tariff Cuts Deal
Economy/Business · 284 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
TIME
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 4 of 52 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles discuss related topics concerning AI and relations between the U.S. and China but describe different occurrences.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 38 📰 publisher trust 61
“The articles discuss similar themes but describe different events; one is about PM Albanese urging China and the US to make a deal on AI, while the other focuses on concerns raised by a researcher at Anthropic.”
NPR
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 1 📰 publisher trust 60
“While both articles discuss a summit between Trump and Xi, they cover different aspects and timelines around the event.”
The Independent
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 6 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles describe different aspects of a summit between Trump and Xi, but they do not report on the exact same occurrence. Article A sets up the context for the importance of the upcoming summit, while Article B reports on an actual meeting and discussion that took place after the summit had occurred.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 8% hedged 5 of 64 📰 publisher trust 72
“The articles discuss related themes of AI regulation and a summit between Trump and Xi but describe different aspects and incidents.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 27 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A discusses Trump's announcement about creating 'AI Force' and appointing an AI czar, while Article B focuses on the broader context of international cooperation between the US and China regarding AI regulation.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 4 of 49 📰 publisher trust 63
“The articles discuss different aspects: one focuses on AI regulation during a summit between Trump and Xi, while the other reports on Trump's rhetoric about communism ahead of a state visit by Xi.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 33% hedged 1 of 3 📰 publisher trust 67
“The articles discuss related topics about AI competition between the US and China but do not describe the same specific incident or summit.”
Los Angeles Times · 0.90 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 16% hedged 7 of 44 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles describe the summit meeting between President Trump and Xi Jinping focused on AI control, indicating they are reporting on the same specific event.”
The Straits Times · 0.89 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 7% hedged 2 of 29 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles discuss different aspects of the AI rivalry and upcoming talks between Trump and Xi but do not clearly describe the same specific incident or meeting.”

Publisher

The Guardian · 956 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)
2026-10-03
Prison chief in Christa Pike case oversaw five ‘botched’ executions, lawyers say
2026-09-20
Judge orders Kennedy Center to give 30 days’ notice before major physical changes
2026-09-07
Former Louisiana mayor completes 90-day jail term for raping 16-year-old boy

Who wrote this

Alan Finkel
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In the spirit of never letting a good crisis go to waste, an important opportunity will come with the summit this week between the US president, Donald Trump, and China’s president, Xi Jinping.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Anthropic ChatGPT 6-Astra China Claude Fable 5.1 METR

Subjects

Anthropic ORG · 5× China GPE · 3× Coxon PERSON · 1× Dario Amodei PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Jacob Coxon PERSON · 1× METR ORG · 1× OpenAI ORG · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1× Xi Jinping PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Neither the Anthropic approach to implementing guardrails through a constitution nor my approach to implementing guardrails through fundamental rules will have a chance of being universally effective unless governments step up and make either or both approaches a strict requirement.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-20
🔮 In the spirit of never letting a good crisis go to waste, an important opportunity will come with the summit this week between the US president, Donald Trump, and China’s president, Xi Jinping.

Claims (41 extracted, 5 hedged)

Recently, Jacob Coxon, a researcher at Anthropic, quit his job over concerns that AI was on a collision course with humanity. asserted
AI → quit → humanity
A flurry of headlines put the spotlight on the current crisis: unregulated competition between technology companies and between the US and China is putting our global infrastructure at risk at the very least, and threatening human existence at worst. asserted
competition → put → existence
One’s mind fills with pictures of robot armies or systematic blackmail. asserted
mind → fill → armies
In the spirit of never letting a good crisis go to waste, an important opportunity will come with the summit this week between the US president, Donald Trump, and China’s president, Xi Jinping. asserted
opportunity → let → president
It is powerful, helping us as individuals to plan our travel, book our gym classes and order takeaway food, while at the institutional level it is boosting the efficiency of businesses and bureaucracies. asserted
it → help → businesses
In academia it is providing stunning breakthroughs in mathematics that have eluded the best theoretical mathematicians for decades. asserted
that → provide → decades
In the sense that AI is widely available and can do a lot of good, it is like medicines, electricity and road vehicles. asserted
it → do → medicines
But unlike these technologies, we have not yet worked out how to ensure that the benefits of AI outweigh the risks. asserted
benefits → work → risks
In contemplating the way forward, it is worth thinking about how much time we have, or don’t have, to get it right. asserted
it → contemplate → time
Technology development used to be slow. asserted
development → use → ?
The first use of stone tools began 3.4m years ago and barely changed for the next 2m years. asserted
use → begin → years
Computer chips have been doubling their capacity every two years from 1965 to the present. asserted
chips → double → present
That is fast, but slow compared with AI development. asserted
That → compare → development
According to the METR research institute, generative AI capability doubled every seven months from 2020 to 2024. uncertain
capability → accord → 2024
Since then, generative AI capability has been doubling every four months, and with the recent release of ChatGPT 6-Astra and Claude Fable 5.1, the doubling rate is most likely even faster. asserted
rate → double → Astra
Just a few days after Coxon’s resignation, Anthropic’s CEO, Dario Amodei, expressed the same concerns, and called for a slowdown of AI development. asserted
CEO → express → development
He was quickly backed by OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, and xAI’s CEO, Elon Musk. asserted
He → back → CEO
In defence of unregulated AI development, Trump dismissed their concerns, saying that statements to the effect that AI might destroy or massively harm humanity are a hoax and that calls to slow down AI development are a plot that will benefit China. uncertain
that → dismiss → China
He denied the need for AI guardrails, saying that all that is needed is a “strong and smart (high IQ!) president, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!” asserted
U.S.A. → deny → spades
Governments could wait it out. uncertain
Governments → wait → it
If they do, something serious will happen. asserted
something → do → ?
With luck, it will be bad enough to shock governments and industry into action, but not so bad that it has catastrophic consequences. asserted
it → shock → consequences
It could be a power blackout across one or more states, bank withdrawals blocked for a week, or a deliberate overload of the global internet so that information flows grind to a halt. uncertain
flows → block → halt
Some of the frontier AI companies are trying to do that. asserted
Some → try → that
Anthropic’s aptly named “constitution” tries to enforce ethical behaviour of its AI models. asserted
constitution → name → models
The trouble is that it suffers from ever increasing complexity. asserted
it → suffer → complexity
When it was publicly announced in 2023, the Anthropic constitution was a 2,700-word document; the current version contains 23,000 words. asserted
version → announce → words
It is inevitable that much of it will be subject to interpretation, by the AI and by the humans who train it. asserted
who → train → it
Indeed, Anthropic disclosed in July that despite its constitution, its Claude agents broke out of a test environment and attacked three external organisations. asserted
agents → disclose → organisations
My preferred approach to guardrails is to keep them simple, deeply fundamental and aligned to human values. asserted
approach → keep → values
Indeed, I have proposed three laws of AI that in the ideal world would be built into the innermost circle of code of every foundational AI model to ensure that foundational AI and its derivatives will not harm or deceive human beings, and will behave lawfully and ethically. asserted
AI → propose → beings
Neither the Anthropic approach to implementing guardrails through a constitution nor my approach to implementing guardrails through fundamental rules will have a chance of being universally effective unless governments step up and make either or both approaches a strict requirement. asserted
approaches → implement → chance
The prospect of the AI industry as a whole doing so is not realistic. asserted
industry → do → whole
Something needs to be done, and it needs to be done very soon. asserted
it → need → ?
Last century, we faced the prospect of mutually assured destruction from the nuclear arms race. asserted
we → face → race
The two nuclear superpowers – the US and the former Soviet Union – agreed on treaties to cap and ultimately reduce the number of nuclear weapons. asserted
superpowers → agree → weapons
In the case of AI, the two countries that now lead AI development must take the lead in avoiding possible threats to humanity. asserted
that → lead → humanity
An ideal opportunity is the state visit this week of Xi to meet Trump. asserted
opportunity → meet → Trump
Imagine if both could agree that for the sake of the human race, the US and China will collaborate to implement an international agreement to regulate the AI industry. uncertain
US → imagine → industry
If AI poses even a fraction of the risk that leaders in the sector are describing, we are well past the point where the existing hands-off attitude can be justified versus the approach we take in every other sector to keep humanity safe. asserted
we → pose → humanity
…and 1 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support