Photo via The Independent

Supreme Court deals humiliating blow to Trump by throwing out mail ballot ban

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Whitehurst, L. (2026, September 15). Supreme Court deals humiliating blow to Trump by throwing out mail ballot ban. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-supreme-court-mail-in-ballot-midterms-b3050387.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-09-15 · by Lindsay Whitehurst

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court rejected President Trump's request to limit mail-in voting for the midterm elections, allowing states to continue distributing ballots as usual. This decision came after several urgent legal challenges and despite efforts by Trump’s administration to impose restrictions on vote-by-mail procedures in key swing states like Alabama, North Carolina, and Wisconsin, which were already mailing out ballots. The ruling prevents potential disruption to election processes that rely heavily on mail-in voting, emphasizing the impracticality of overhauling systems so close to election day.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Postmaster General David Steiner announced that the U.S. Postal Service has halted work on a controversial computer system developed under President Donald Trump's executive order, aimed at limiting voting by mail. This decision follows Supreme Court rulings striking down the executive order and issuing injunctions against implementing it. The suspension was confirmed in an interview with The Associated Press, where Steiner, who previously worked as CEO of Waste Management, emphasized his agency’s role as independent from political directives despite navigating financial hardships and political turbulence caused by Trump's policies. Unlike Trump, who criticized the court decisions, Steiner avoided commenting on the rulings' merits or implications for voter eligibility ahead of critical midterm elections in November.

Written for “Trump Mail Voting Restrictions” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 46 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Mail Voting Restrictions
Politics · 47 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Euronews
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Guardian
Hedges 4 of 39 claims Outlet record 66/100
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 9 of 73 claims Outlet record 95/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 36 claims Outlet record 60/100
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 6 claims Outlet record 64/100
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 38 claims Outlet record 66/100
BBC News
Hedges 7 of 45 claims Outlet record 68/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 32 claims Outlet record 64/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
14%
4 of 28 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
47
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3448 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Lindsay Whitehurst
18 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 But in the Big Bend region, the administration has run into opposition from ranchers, residents, business owners and environmentalists who argue the projects are a waste of money in an area of historically low illegal immigration and that construction could harm the region’s scenic landscapes.
🔮 The justices will hear an appeal from energy companies trying to block dozens of lawsuits seeking to hold them liable in court for damage related to climate change.
🔮 And it does feel like maybe the oil and gas industry should have a part in this.”
🔮 Since then, an appeals court has upheld a Boston-based judge’s final ruling that migrants must have a meaningful chance to argue a third-country deportation would put them in danger of persecution or torture.
🔮 Lawyers for the couple had urged the court to reject the request, questioning what an intervention would do for medical decision-making at an already chaotic time.
🔮 None of the three justices wrote about their rationale for joining the majority opinion, though Justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated he might see things differently if the election wasn’t coming up so quickly.
🔮 The Supreme Court majority indicated that the effort to enact these restrictions this year would probably prove unsuccessful legally, though its brief emergency order provided no extensive rationale.
🔮 In the filing, Solicitor General John Sauer said: “Ballots have already begun to be mailed in North Carolina, and more States will begin the mailing process as the injunction remains in place — including Alabama on September 9 and at least five States the week of September 13.”
🔮 The legal wrangling comes even as states start sending out mail ballots, leaving the administration little time to make big changes in mail ballot rules. “Ballots have already begun to be mailed in North Carolina, and more States will begin the mailing process as the injunction remains in place — including Alabama on September 9 and at least five States the week of September 13,” Solicitor General John Sauer said in the filing.
🔮 Backers of the referendum have said a statewide vote would give the state’s residents a voice in the process.
Also by Lindsay Whitehurst
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 18 articles by Lindsay Whitehurst →

Topics

Congress Democratic Supreme Court the Postal Service the Supreme Court

Subjects

Democratic NORP · 3× Donald Trump PERSON · 3× Supreme Court ORG · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× State ORG · 2× the Postal Service ORG · 2× the Supreme Court ORG · 2× Clarence Thomas PERSON · 1× Congress ORG · 1× Samuel Alito PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Lower courts moved to block Trump’s plan, including through a preliminary injunction issued by a judge nominated by the president. However, the Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that federal authority over the Postal Service allows it to set mail ballot rules and that compliance was possible.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 The Supreme Court majority indicated that the effort to enact these restrictions this year would probably prove unsuccessful legally, though its brief emergency order provided no extensive rationale.
2026-09-15 · The Independent
Supreme Court deals humiliating blow to Trump by throwing out mail ballot ban · assertive framing

Claims (28 extracted, 4 hedged)

On Monday, the Supreme Court turned down President Donald Trump's request to limit mail-in voting ahead of the midterm elections, ending a series of urgent legal challenges as voting is already underway. asserted
voting → turn → challenges
This ruling allows states to keep distributing mail ballots using long-standing procedures that have traditionally accounted for roughly a third of all votes. asserted
that → allow → votes
The outcome delivers a major setback to Trump on a key priority he has repeatedly framed as essential to election integrity, despite virtually no evidence of fraudulent mail balloting. asserted
he → deliver → balloting
The Supreme Court majority indicated that the effort to enact these restrictions this year would probably prove unsuccessful legally, though its brief emergency order provided no extensive rationale. asserted
order → indicate → rationale
Two justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, publicly dissented. asserted
justices → dissent → ?
Placed once more at the center of a turbulent political dispute, the justices had been urged by the Trump administration to facilitate the restrictions before crucial November elections for control of Congress. asserted
justices → place → Congress
In his dissent, Alito asserted that the Postal Service "has broad authority to regulate the mail" and likely possesses the power to implement Trump's policy. asserted
Service → assert → policy
Meanwhile, Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred that the changes should not take effect during the midterms, but hinted he might side with the Trump administration if the dispute returns to the court later. uncertain
dispute → concur → court
Ruling ensures 2026 midterm mail ballots will go out as normal Election officials said a complete overhaul of election procedures in the final weeks before the midterms was simply impossible. asserted
overhaul → ensure → midterms
Alabama, North Carolina, and Wisconsin had already started mailing ballots to registered voters over the past week, even as the proposed system remained inactive. asserted
system → start → week
The plan proposed by Donald Trump's administration would obligate individual states to implement a standardized envelope design and submit voter eligibility lists through an online portal. asserted
plan → propose → portal
Under the proposal, the Postal Service would be empowered to refuse delivery of mail-in ballots from any state that failed to comply with these rules. asserted
that → empower → rules
The legal push came as Donald Trump repeatedly sought Supreme Court intervention over restrictions on mail-in voting ahead of the looming midterm elections. asserted
Trump → come → elections
An appeals court had previously defeated Donald Trump over his executive order on vote-by-mail policies. asserted
court → defeat → policies
However, the Supreme Court ultimately removed the cloud of uncertainty hanging over the midterms, allowing vote-by-mail ballots to be delivered to voters as normal. asserted
ballots → remove → voters
These administrative efforts threatened significant disruption, particularly in states that rely primarily on mail-in voting. asserted
that → threaten → voting
Washington Democratic Secretary of State Steve Hobbs explained that the court ruling ensures efforts "to carry out a safe, secure, and accurate election" may proceed "without having to upend our election processes to meet unrealistic ballot mail requirements." uncertain
efforts → explain → requirements
Similarly, in Arizona, another state that relies predominantly on voting by mail, Democratic Secretary of State Adrian Fontes emphasized: "it is crucial for us to continue rejecting the notion that access and security are mutually exclusive when it comes to running strong elections." asserted
it → rely → elections
Adding to the bipartisan consensus among state officials, Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson, a Republican serving as the state’s chief election officer, posted on social media that the Supreme Court ruling ensures "Utahns can have confidence that the 2026 election will proceed as normal." asserted
election → add → confidence
While neither the White House nor the Justice Department immediately replied to requests for comment, officials have previously described the proposed rules as sensible modifications designed to safeguard election security. asserted
officials → reply → security
Leaked report revealed glitchy portal could toss millions of mail-in votes over barcode errors Voting rights organizations and Democratic state officials challenged the restrictions in court, asserting that the president lacks constitutional authority to enact rules that would "virtually eliminate mail voting on the eve of a major election." A whistleblower report warned that the postal system's requirements could prevent millions of mail ballots from ever being sent, noting that glitches in an unready portal meant a single bar code mistake could cause an entire batch to be discarded. uncertain
batch → reveal → portal
According to documents submitted to the court, several states lack the necessary infrastructure to rapidly shift back to in-person voting. uncertain
states → accord → voting
The League of Women Voters, serving as a plaintiff in the legal case, described the proposed rules as "an extraordinary attempt to interfere with voting" and warned they would throw elections into chaos. asserted
they → serve → chaos
"Voters should never be caught in the middle of a political power warfare," said CEO Celina Stewart. asserted
Stewart → catch → warfare
Lower courts moved to block Trump’s plan, including through a preliminary injunction issued by a judge nominated by the president. However, the Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that federal authority over the Postal Service allows it to set mail ballot rules and that compliance was possible. asserted
compliance → move → rules
The federal government secured an early procedural decision from the Supreme Court, but the justices explicitly refrained from deciding the plan's ultimate legality. asserted
justices → secure → legality
Trump has long opposed mail voting and falsely blamed the process for his 2020 defeat to Democrat Joe Biden, despite frequently using that method to cast his own ballot, including as recently as this year. asserted
Trump → oppose → year
A report published by the Brookings Institution in 2025 found that mail voting fraud occurred in only about four cases out of every 10 million mail ballots cast. asserted
fraud → publish → ballots
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support