That is 0 articles you have read today.
The Aporia is free and carries no advertising, so readers are the only
thing paying for it. If you are getting this much out of it, a small
donation is what keeps it independent.
You have read 0 articles today.
That is more than the 15 a day The Aporia gives away,
and well past what it can carry on nothing. Your allowance resets at
midnight.
There is no advertising here and nothing about you is sold, so readers
are the only thing paying for it. If the site is worth this much of
your day, it is worth a few dollars.
Everything else stays open: the maps, the
directory and search do
not count against this, and neither does re-opening something you have
already read today.
US Supreme Court blocks Trump mail ballot restrictions before midterms
South China Morning Post
· collected 2026-09-15 · by Agence France-Presse
On Monday, the US Supreme Court denied President Trump's request to lift an order that halted his plan to restrict mail-in voting ahead of the November midterm elections. The majority opinion, with only two conservative justices dissenting, ruled against the president’s attempt, maintaining current state voting procedures. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer commented that the president’s proposal was unconstitutional and praised the court for its decision.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-15,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event.
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted
verbatim and was checked against the article text before being
stored, so you can find it in the original.
US Supreme Court dealt a major blow Monday to President Donald Trump’s attempts to restrict mail-in voting before the November midterm elections, denying his request to lift an order halting the divisive plan.
leftdescribes Trump's actions negatively as 'divisive'
Score
-0.35Confidence
high1 quote(s) discarded as
not found in the article
⚖️ leaning not scored
🔴 7% hedged
1 of 14📰 publisher trust 77
“The articles discuss different legal actions: one is about a lawsuit to block ICE and federal agents at polling sites, while the other is about Supreme Court decisions on mail ballot restrictions.”
⚖️ leaning not scored
🔴 5% hedged
1 of 19📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles describe different court rulings on Trump's bid to restrict mail-in voting: an appeals court decision and a subsequent Supreme Court ruling.”
⚖️ Leans left
🔴 40% hedged
2 of 5📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A describes a decision by Judge Carl Nichols to block Trump's mail-in voting restrictions, while Article B reports on the US Supreme Court rejecting Trump's request to overturn an order blocking these restrictions.”
⚖️ Leans strongly left
further left than this
🔴 13% hedged
3 of 23📰 publisher trust 92
“The articles describe different judicial actions regarding Trump's executive order on mail-in voting; Article A refers to a decision by the First Circuit Court of Appeals, while Article B reports on the US Supreme Court's ruling.”
⚖️ leaning not scored
🔴 22% hedged
7 of 32📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes warnings from California and other states to the Supreme Court about potential chaos if USPS rules stand, while Article B reports on the Supreme Court's decision to block Trump's mail ballot restrictions.”
⚖️ Leans left
🔴 13% hedged
7 of 52📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses Trump's efforts and legal challenges to mail-in voting restrictions, while Article B specifically reports on a US Supreme Court decision that blocked those restrictions before midterms.”
🔮 Trump says Kennedy Centre to close after judge bars name change
The president says the venue’s board voted to shut the centre down for renovations, but it will not reopen unless the judgment is overruled
US
🔮 Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a concurring opinion with the majority, said Trump’s plan may ultimately be legal in the long run, but “state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections”.
🔮 Newsom won’t run for US president in 2028 if Harris does
California governor says both he and former vice-president Kamala Harris campaigning would be a ‘gift’ to Republicans
California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who is widely considered a contender for the 2028 presidential election, will not enter the race if former US vice-president Kamala Harris runs again, he told CNN in a clip shared on Monday.
🔮 EU to propose curbing social media, online games for under 15s
The European Commission has come under pressure from some EU member states to take bloc-wide measures to protect children
The European Union is set to propose curbing access to social media, video-sharing platforms, chatbots and online games to children under the age of 15, according to a draft legal document seen by AFP.
🔮 The UN Security Council will hold a meeting on artificial intelligence next week amid growing international concern over the threat from the fast-moving technology, a French diplomatic source said on Monday.
🔮 The Kim dynasty is now in its third generation ruling the closed-off nation, and the current leader’s children would be potentially poised to take over one day.
🔮 Rhoad’s mother Page compared the crime to an execution.
“I miss my son every day, and I don’t know if I will ever be able to regain my balance,” she testified.
framing: assertive ·
carried by 1 article(s) ·
first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a concurring opinion with the majority, said Trump’s plan may ultimately be legal in the long run, but “state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections”.
US Supreme Court blocks Trump mail ballot restrictions before midterms
asserted
Court → block → midterms
Justices reject White House bid to restrict mail-in ballots, leaving state voting procedures intact
The US Supreme Court dealt a major blow Monday to President Donald Trump’s attempts to restrict mail-in voting before the November midterm elections, denying his request to lift an order halting the divisive plan.
asserted
Court → reject → plan
Only two of the six conservative justices on the nine-member panel offered a dissent.
asserted
justices → offer → dissent
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a concurring opinion with the majority, said Trump’s plan may ultimately be legal in the long run, but “state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections”.
uncertain
officials → concur → elections
After the decision came down, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said the president’s “plan to make it harder to vote was obviously unconstitutional.
asserted
it → come → ?
The Supreme Court had no choice but to make the right decision”.
asserted