The supreme court on Monday rejected Donald Trump’s mail ballot restrictions for now, capping a flurry of last-minute legal action with voting in the midterm elections already underway.
asserted
voting → reject → elections
The decision allows states to continue sending out mail ballots under the same processes they have used for years.
asserted
they → allow → years
The Trump administration had asked the court, once again at the center of a roiling political controversy, to clear the way for restrictions before the pivotal November contests for control of Congress.
asserted
administration → ask → Congress
The case has major implications because nearly one-third of the country votes by mail.
asserted
third → have → mail
“The government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge to the district court’s preliminary injunction,” states the one-paragraph unsigned order.
asserted
order → succeed → injunction
“And the equitable factors applicable for obtaining emergency relief from this court do not favor a stay.”
asserted
factors → obtain → stay
Justice Brett Kavanaugh filed a concurrence, ruling that he believed the government had “at least a fair prospect” of success defending the plan, but that implementation so close to election day would be “arbitrary and capricious”.
asserted
implementation → file → day
Justice Samuel Alito dissented, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas.
asserted
Alito → dissent → Thomas
In the dissent, Alito blamed the litigating states for creating the conditions of a ruling so close to an election, and wrote that they should not benefit from a protracted process that they created with their suit.
asserted
they → blame → suit
“The plaintiff states cannot claim the timing of the rule tilts the equities in their favor when they, and courts hearing their claims, are responsible for so much of the delay,” he wrote.
uncertain
he → claim → delay
Civil rights groups lauded the decision.
asserted
groups → laud → decision
“It is alarming what the administration was seeking to do here,” said Kristen Clarke, NAACP general counsel and former head of the justice department’s civil rights division.
asserted
Clarke → seek → division
“This was an 11th-hour effort by the administration to hijack the way that we vote by mail in our country.”
asserted
we → hijack → country
Civil rights groups could not have moved faster, she said.
uncertain
she → move → ?
“At the earliest opportunity, civil rights organizations like the NAACP took to the court to stand up for voters.
asserted
organizations → take → voters
It’s important to remember that the final rule was not issued until about roughly 10 days ago.
asserted
rule → ’ → ?
So, I find Justice Alito’s statements disingenuous …
asserted
statements → find → ?
We should focus on the fact that the court is leaving in place an injunction that prevents this administration from turning our electoral system on its head.
asserted
that → focus → head
What the administration was attempting to do here would have unleashed chaos across the country.
asserted
attempting → attempt → country
”
“The supreme court has done the right thing by protecting the American people’s right to vote,” said Robert Garcia, a Democratic representative from Long Beach, California.
asserted
Garcia → do → Beach
“Donald Trump tried to illegally interfere with our elections and undermine vote-by-mail for millions of Americans and failed.
asserted
Trump → try → Americans
We will keep fighting to protect the right to vote of every single citizen in this country.”
asserted
We → keep → country
The case stems from an executive order issued by Trump on 31 March requiring the post office to refrain from delivering ballots for mail-in voting to registered voters deemed ineligible when compared with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other federal records.
asserted
case → stem → Security
Voting rights groups, joined by 23 states and the District of Columbia, sued the administration to stop the proposed rule, arguing that the US constitution provides no authority for the president to issue orders governing the administration of elections.
asserted
president → join → elections
Election officials have said there was simply no way to carry out a complete overhaul in the weeks before the midterms.
asserted
officials → say → midterms
Indeed, Alabama, North Carolina and Wisconsin began sending mail ballots to voters over the past week while the new system was still not active.
asserted
system → begin → week
The Trump administration plan would require states to adopt a uniform envelope style and submit lists of eligible voters to an online portal.
asserted
plan → require → portal
The postal service could refuse to deliver ballots to states that didn’t comply.
uncertain
that → refuse → states
A whistleblower report, though, said the postal system’s requirements could lead to millions of mail ballots never being sent, because the portal wasn’t properly built and a single bar code error could result in an entire batch of ballots being tossed out.
uncertain
batch → say → ballots
Democratic state officials and voting rights groups challenged the restrictions in court, arguing the president has no constitutional authority to set election rules that would “virtually eliminate mail voting on the eve of a major election”.
asserted
that → challenge → election
Lower courts agreed.
asserted
courts → agree → ?
But an initial injunction issued by US district judge Indira Talwani was overturned on procedural grounds in July, but was reinstated after the USPS posted a final rule on ballot delivery.
asserted
USPS → issue → delivery
Monday’s ruling upholds that injunction.
asserted
ruling → uphold → injunction
The Trump administration appealed to the supreme court, arguing that federal control of the postal service allows them to set rules for mail ballot handling and that compliance was possible.
asserted
compliance → appeal → handling
The federal government won an early procedural decision at the supreme court, but the justices pointedly did not decide the legality of the plan.
asserted
justices → win → plan
Trump has long opposed mail voting and falsely blamed it for his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden, even though he often uses that method to cast his own ballot, including as recently as this year.
“The court’s ruling is a massive sigh of relief for local election officials and voters – especially for the thousands of service members abroad whose ballots are legally required to be sent by all 50 states within the next five days,” said Samantha Tarazi, co-founder and CEO of the Voting Rights Lab.
asserted
Tarazi → oppose → Lab
This administration will keep testing every avenue to manipulate our elections and sow doubt in results he doesn’t like.
asserted
he → keep → results
Today is yet another example of President Trump’s extreme elections agenda losing in the courts and with the American people.
asserted
agenda → lose → people
The bottom line is simple: states run our elections – not the president.”
asserted
states → run → elections
The Aporia
