Photo via Euronews

US Supreme Court deals blow to Trump's attempts to restrict mail ballots ahead of midterm election

Read the original at Euronews ↗
Cite

Fisayo-Bambi, J. (2026, September 15). US Supreme Court deals blow to Trump's attempts to restrict mail ballots ahead of midterm election. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/2026/09/15/us-supreme-court-rejects-trump-mail-ballot-restrictions-ahead-of-midterms

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Euronews · collected 2026-09-15 · by Jerry Fisayo-Bambi

Quick Summary

The US Supreme Court denied President Trump's request to restrict mail ballots for the midterm elections, allowing states to continue their usual processes. This decision affects nearly one-third of votes cast and represents a significant defeat for Trump, who has long opposed mail voting despite using it himself. The ruling came after some states had already begun sending out ballots, making any last-minute changes impractical.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Postmaster General David Steiner announced that the U.S. Postal Service has halted work on a controversial computer system developed under President Donald Trump's executive order, aimed at limiting voting by mail. This decision follows Supreme Court rulings striking down the executive order and issuing injunctions against implementing it. The suspension was confirmed in an interview with The Associated Press, where Steiner, who previously worked as CEO of Waste Management, emphasized his agency’s role as independent from political directives despite navigating financial hardships and political turbulence caused by Trump's policies. Unlike Trump, who criticized the court decisions, Steiner avoided commenting on the rulings' merits or implications for voter eligibility ahead of critical midterm elections in November.

Written for “Trump Mail Voting Restrictions” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 46 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Mail Voting Restrictions
Politics · 47 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 21% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
Hedges 4 of 39 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 4 of 28 claims Outlet record 59/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 6 of 36 claims Outlet record 60/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 4 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 3 of 32 claims Outlet record 64/100
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 6 claims Outlet record 64/100
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 9 of 73 claims Outlet record 95/100
UPI
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 56/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 7 of 43 claims Outlet record 66/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
21%
5 of 24 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
Euronews's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
47
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Euronews · 1130 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jerry Fisayo-Bambi
9 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Reporter jumps into floodwater to rescue trapped driver One of the most dramatic moments of the crisis unfolded in Morayfield on Thursday, when Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) reporter Will Murray and a bystander jumped into floodwaters to rescue a driver trapped in a rapidly sinking car.
🔮 Bukele warned that failure to free the men who have been missing since Sunday’s attack on an armoured vehicle would trigger a far more powerful operation.
🔮 A “yes” result would have set Alberta on a path toward a later vote on leaving Canada.
🔮 US President Donald Trump said Monday he is willing to sit down with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping in China next month, confirming media reports that the three leaders could meet on the sidelines of an Asia-Pacific summit in Shenzhen next month. Trump said such a summit would centre on denuclearisation but might also touch on the war in Ukraine.
2026-10-20 · assertive framing · Trump says he’s ready to meet Putin and Xi in China
🔮 Russia and China have vetoed a United Nations resolution that would have allowed independent experts to continue monitoring sanctions reimposed on Iran over its nuclear programme, dealing a blow to international oversight efforts.
🔮 Trump on Wednesday warned he would impose heavy tariffs on Europe if he judged the bloc's intentions to be unfavourable, while leaving the door open if they were not.
🔮 Deported in May by Venezuela’s acting President Delcy Rodriguez in response to pressure from the US, which has been targeting the Colombian-born businessman for more than a decade, Saab is charged with a single count of money laundering tied to an alleged conspiracy to create fake companies, falsify shipping records and skim from government contracts to import food from Colombia and Mexico.
🔮 Alito in his dissent said the Postal Service “has broad authority to regulate the mail” and likely does have the power to enforce Trump’s restrictions, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed that the restrictions should not go into effect for the midterms but indicated he might rule in favour of the Trump administration if the issue comes back before the court at a later time.
🔮 After hitting a serve winner, he dropped back behind the baseline as if set to return.
Also by Jerry Fisayo-Bambi
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 9 articles by Jerry Fisayo-Bambi →

Topics

Democrat State Supreme Court the Postal Service the US Supreme Court

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 6× Democrat NORP · 2× State ORG · 2× the Postal Service ORG · 2× Alito PERSON · 1× Clarence Thomas PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Samuel Alito PERSON · 1× Supreme Court ORG · 1× the US Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

Even though he uses the method to cast his own ballot, including as recently as this year, Trump has long opposed mail voting and falsely blamed it for his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden. Mail ballots already being sent to voters US election officials have said there was simply no way to carry out a complete overhaul in the weeks before the midterms.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 Alito in his dissent said the Postal Service “has broad authority to regulate the mail” and likely does have the power to enforce Trump’s restrictions, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed that the restrictions should not go into effect for the midterms but indicated he might rule in favour of the Trump administration if the issue comes back before the court at a later time.

Claims (24 extracted, 5 hedged)

The decision allows states to continue sending out mail ballots under the same processes they’ve used for years and have accounted for nearly a third of votes cast. asserted
they → allow → votes
US President Donald Trump's attempt to limit mail-in ballots for the midterm elections was denied by the US Supreme Court on Monday, ending a flurry of last-minute legal action with voting already under way. asserted
attempt → limit → way
The decision allows states to continue sending out mail ballots under the same processes they’ve used for years and have accounted for nearly a third of votes cast. asserted
they → allow → votes
According to the Supreme Court majority, the Trump administration’s push to implement the restrictions this year is likely to lose in court, though the brief emergency order didn’t detail its reasoning. uncertain
order → accord → reasoning
Two justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, publicly dissented. asserted
justices → dissent → ?
Alito in his dissent said the Postal Service “has broad authority to regulate the mail” and likely does have the power to enforce Trump’s restrictions, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed that the restrictions should not go into effect for the midterms but indicated he might rule in favour of the Trump administration if the issue comes back before the court at a later time. uncertain
issue → say → time
The decision represents a stark defeat for Trump on an issue he consistently has emphasised as vital to ensuring election integrity even though there is virtually no evidence of fraud with mail ballots. asserted
he → represent → ballots
The Trump administration had asked the justices to clear the way for restrictions before the pivotal November contests for control of Congress. asserted
administration → ask → Congress
Even though he uses the method to cast his own ballot, including as recently as this year, Trump has long opposed mail voting and falsely blamed it for his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden. Mail ballots already being sent to voters US election officials have said there was simply no way to carry out a complete overhaul in the weeks before the midterms. asserted
officials → use → midterms
Indeed, Alabama, North Carolina and Wisconsin began sending mail ballots to voters over the past week while the new system was still not active. asserted
system → begin → week
The Trump administration plan would require states to adopt a uniform envelope style and submit lists of eligible voters to an online portal. asserted
plan → require → portal
The Postal Service could refuse to deliver ballots to states that didn’t comply. uncertain
that → refuse → states
The administration’s efforts had the potential to be especially disruptive in states that send out ballots entirely by mail. asserted
that → have → mail
Washington’s Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, a Democrat, said the decision means work “to carry out a safe, secure, and accurate election” can continue ”without having to upend our election processes to meet unrealistic ballot mail requirements.” asserted
work → say → requirements
In Arizona, another largely vote-by-mail state, Democratic Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said, "It is crucial for us to continue rejecting the notion that access and security are mutually exclusive when it comes to running strong elections.” asserted
it → vote → elections
Utah Lt Gov Deidre Henderson, a Republican serving as the state’s chief election officer, said on social media that the Supreme Court’s decision means “Utahns can have confidence that the 2026 election will proceed as normal.” asserted
election → serve → confidence
The White House and Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment but have in the past framed the restrictions as commonsense changes aimed at keeping elections secure. asserted
House → respond → elections
State officials and voting rights groups pushed back Democratic state officials and voting rights groups challenged the restrictions in court, arguing that the president has no constitutional authority to set election rules that would “virtually eliminate mail voting on the eve of a major election.” asserted
that → push → election
Meanwhile, a whistleblower report said the postal system’s requirements could lead to millions of mail ballots never being sent, because problems with the not-yet-operational portal meant a single bar code error could result in an entire batch of ballots being tossed out. uncertain
batch → say → ballots
Some states don’t have the infrastructure to quickly pivot back to in-person voting, according to court documents. uncertain
states → have → documents
The League of Women Voters, a plaintiff in the case, called the proposed restrictions “an extraordinary attempt to interfere with voting” and said it would have thrown elections into chaos. asserted
it → call → chaos
“Voters should never be caught in the middle of a political power warfare,” said CEO Celina Stewart. asserted
Stewart → catch → warfare
Lower courts agreed to block Trump’s plan, including a preliminary injunction issued by a judge nominated by the president. But the Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that federal control of the Postal Service allows them to set rules for mail ballot handling and that compliance was possible. asserted
compliance → agree → handling
The federal government won an early procedural decision at the Supreme Court, but the justices pointedly did not decide the legality of the plan until now. asserted
justices → win → plan
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support