How Lindsay Clancy’s criminal case could help her leverage ‘million-dollar’ settlement in lawsuit against docs

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

DeGregory, P. (2026, September 10). How Lindsay Clancy’s criminal case could help her leverage ‘million-dollar’ settlement in lawsuit against docs. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/10/us-news/how-lindsay-clancys-criminal-case-could-help-her-leverage-settlement-in-lawsuit-against-docs-experts/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-10 · by Priscilla DeGregory

Quick Summary

Lindsay Clancy's lawyer, Kevin Reddington, argued in her murder trial that she was not criminally responsible due to severe postpartum psychosis exacerbated by psychiatric medications. A deadlocked jury has sparked speculation that Clancy may use this evidence to negotiate a large settlement in her civil lawsuit against the doctors and hospitals who treated her. Experts suggest the settlement could reach seven figures, with one lawyer noting that jurors' statements about the prosecution's case being "harsh" and lacking a clear smoking gun will be persuasive in negotiations. The potential impact of the criminal trial on the civil case has likely emboldened Clancy's civil team to pursue a larger payout.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-10, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of September 2026, Lindsay Clancy's murder trial in Duxbury, Massachusetts ended in a mistrial after five weeks due to a hung jury. The case involves the deaths of Clancy’s three young children—5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan—in January 2023. Clancy did not testify but admitted to killing her children while arguing she was suffering from postpartum psychosis at the time. The prosecution presented over 70 witnesses, including an FBI psychiatrist who testified that he does not believe Clancy heard a voice ordering her actions, suggesting she had control over her decisions.

The defense highlighted systemic failures in mental health support and rallied public sympathy by highlighting the challenges new mothers face when seeking help. However, one juror’s alleged misconduct prompted Clancy's attorney to ask Judge William Sullivan to investigate his phone use during deliberations and review a questionnaire he filled out prior to the trial. The judge is now considering whether Desronvil shared information or used his phone improperly during jury deliberation hours, which lasted seven days without reaching a verdict.

Written for “Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial” on 2026-10-27, grounded in this article and the 112 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial
Crime & Law · 113 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 40% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 20% hedged 13 of 64 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles refer to the Lindsay Clancy trial, which resulted in a deadlocked jury and several jurors stating they would have voted for not guilty by reason of insanity.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 20% hedged 10 of 50 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the same mistrial verdict in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial, specifically mentioning the jurors failing to come to a unanimous verdict and referencing the same date (Friday)”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 17% hedged 9 of 54 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles describe a mistrial in the murder case against Lindsay Clancy, with Article A reporting on the trial's outcome and Article B discussing potential implications of the trial's outcome”
National Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 30 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles are reporting on the same trial, including its outcome (a deadlocked jury) and a key detail about the jurors' deliberations.”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 4 of 37 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles report on the outcome of the Lindsay Clancy trial, specifically the declaration of a mistrial after a deadlocked jury.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 24% hedged 10 of 42 📰 publisher trust 69
“Both articles describe a mistrial declared in Lindsay Clancy's murder case due to a deadlocked jury, with Article A focusing on the mistrial declaration and Article B discussing the potential implications of the trial outcome.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 17% hedged 8 of 48 📰 publisher trust 69
“Both articles describe the same Lindsay Clancy murder trial, with Article A discussing the public support for her and Article B referencing the jury's verdict”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 9% hedged 6 of 69 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the trial of Lindsay Clancy, specifically the outcome where a jury nearly found her not guilty and was deadlocked.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 33% hedged 2 of 6 📰 publisher trust 69
“Both articles report on the mistrial of Lindsay Clancy's murder trial, where jurors were unable to reach a unanimous verdict.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 69
“Both articles describe the Lindsay Clancy trial, which resulted in a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury, with the exact same details about the case and outcome.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
35
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
40%
14 of 35 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
113
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-10 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 14218 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Priscilla DeGregory
22 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Vincent Battiloro’s attorneys told a judge that they would bring up the teen’s mental health to try to get him off the hook for killing 17-year-old Cranford High School seniors Maria Niotis and Isabella Salas on Sept. 29, 2025.
🔮 Chilling new photos and maps surfaced Monday from the New Jersey crash that killed NHL star Johnny Gaudreau and his brother — and suggest the alleged drunken driver may not have been reckless when he smashed into them, the defense said.
🔮 The Post could not confirm whether the man in the video was the alleged assailant or had anything to do with the incident.
🔮 Farwell killed Birchmore to ensure she couldn’t make good on threats to expose him to his wife about their seven-year sexual relationship, began with him abusing Birchmore when she was just 15, prosecutors alleged.
🔮 A London rape trial against British comedian and actor Russell Brand is slated to kick off Wednesday with jurors expected to hear opening statements in the case alleging the actor sexually assaulted six women.
🔮 But a married Farwell — who allegedly began sexually abusing Birchmore when she was just 15 — made “a complete 180” in the days leading up to Birchmore’s Feb. 1, 2021, murder, no longer acting angry toward her, the prosecutor claimed. “He lulled her into feeling safe so that he could kill her,” Cummings said.
🔮 They were spending a lot of money planting new trees and whenever I would do my morning walk, I’d say hello,” the 73-year-old neighbor said, noting both David and Lora worked on their landscaping.
🔮 “As student safety and well-being remain our highest priorities, the District will cooperate fully with law enforcement,” the superintendent said.
🔮 Several plaintiffs seated in the courtroom gallery applauded after Simpson finished his arguments, earning a light chastising from Circuit Court Judge William Nardini. “Please, this is not a moment for such things,” Nardini said after hearing the smattering of clapping.
🔮 Family-court Judge Bruce Buechler ruled against sealing the entire testimony of Overdeck’s expert financial witness, Todd Povlich — but agreed that the parts of Povlich’s testimony that could reveal Two Sigma’s company secrets should happen behind closed doors.
Also by Priscilla DeGregory
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 22 articles by Priscilla DeGregory →

Topics

Duxbury Massachusetts NBC 10 Boston New York The Post

Subjects

Clancy PERSON · 11× The Post ORG · 3× Cora PERSON · 1× Dawson PERSON · 1× Duxbury GPE · 1× Kevin Reddington PERSON · 1× Lindsay Clancy PERSON · 1× Massachusetts GPE · 1× New York GPE · 1× Seth Zuckerman PERSON · 1×

Narrative

The gripping triple murder case against the 36-year-old Duxbury, Massachusetts mom ended with a deadlocked jury Friday but several jurors have since revealed that 11 out of the 12 panelists were prepared to find her not guilty by reason of insanity and didn’t buy the prosecutions’ case.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-10
🔮 Lindsay Clancy could try to use the fact that jurors nearly found her not guilty of murder for strangling her kids to leverage a settlement — potentially millions of dollars — in her lawsuits against the doctors she claimed failed her, experts told The Post.

Claims (35 extracted, 14 hedged)

Lindsay Clancy could try to use the fact that jurors nearly found her not guilty of murder for strangling her kids to leverage a settlement — potentially millions of dollars — in her lawsuits against the doctors she claimed failed her, experts told The Post. uncertain
experts → try → Post
The gripping triple murder case against the 36-year-old Duxbury, Massachusetts mom ended with a deadlocked jury Friday but several jurors have since revealed that 11 out of the 12 panelists were prepared to find her not guilty by reason of insanity and didn’t buy the prosecutions’ case. asserted
her → end → case
Clancy could use to bolster negotiations in the civil case, legal observers say. uncertain
observers → use → case
“It’s like a leverage play when you’re negotiating or mediating,” said Seth Zuckerman, a New York lawyer who handles both criminal and civil cases. asserted
who → ’ → cases
“[It’s] a case to say, look jurors have already heard this evidence and thought that the hospital was wrong and misdiagnosed her. asserted
hospital → ’ → her
And 11 out of 12 were prepared to find her not guilty because of this defect, which means basically that they didn’t think that the medical providers did the right thing by her. asserted
providers → prepare → her
Another expert suggested the settlement could reach seven figures. uncertain
settlement → suggest → figures
At trial, Clancy’s criminal attorney, Kevin Reddington, asked jurors to find her not criminally responsible based on the claim she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis made worse by several psychiatric medications her doctors gave her. uncertain
doctors → ask → her
Clancy is suing hospitals, doctors and other providers who treated her in the four months before the murders when she mentally spiraled as she desperately battled insomnia, anxiety, depression and intrusive thoughts about suicide and harming her kids. asserted
she → sue → kids
Her lawsuit claims her providers failed to properly diagnose her and put her on a revolving door of powerful medications, ultimately leading to her killing Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, on Jan. 24, 2023 before she tried to take her own life. uncertain
she → claim → life
Clancy’s then-husband Patrick Clancy also has a lawsuit pending against her providers. asserted
husband → have → providers
“It’s persuasive if you’re talking to the defense attorney or insurance carrier as to why they should settle this because you already have some anecdotal knowledge from the from a juror as to what they thought of this,” Zuckerman said. asserted
Zuckerman → ’ → this
Three jurors revealed in an interview with NBC 10 Boston they felt the prosecution’s case was “harsh” and that they failed to put on any witnesses who said Clancy was a bad mom, leading the jurors to believe she “snapped.” asserted
she → reveal → jurors
Another jury member told CBS News Boston the prosecution “didn’t have a figurative smoking gun” and the case had “too much gray area.” asserted
case → tell → area
Here’s the latest on Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial: asserted
latest → ’ → trial
Medical malpractice lawyer, Doug Burnetti, told The Post Clancy’s civil team probably “feels emboldened to some extent.” asserted
team → tell → extent
Clancy could potentially settle with the medical providers for millions, Burnetti said. uncertain
Burnetti → settle → millions
Some other ways the criminal trial could impact the civil case include that Clancy can’t be forced to sit for a deposition by the lawyers representing the hospitals and doctors she is suing until her criminal case has fully concluded. uncertain
case → impact → hospitals
Until that point, Clancy could plead the Fifth Amendment in the civil case in order to ensure she doesn’t incriminate herself further in the criminal case. “She still has a Fifth Amendment right to not say anything,” attorney John W. Day told The Post. uncertain
Day → plead → Post
“And so what happens sometimes is judges say, ‘All right, the lawsuit can proceed, but if you want to take her sworn deposition, that has to wait until there’s no chance of any criminal prosecution.’ asserted
that → happen → prosecution
Also, testimony from the criminal trial could be used against witnesses that may also testify in the civil case. uncertain
that → use → case
Clancy is suing psychiatrist, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, who met with Clancy over a dozen times in the months before the tragedy, claiming she failed to diagnose her with bipolar disorder and the doctor even gave her an SSRI drug, which can worsen symptoms for someone with the disorder. asserted
which → sue → disorder
Tufts testified for two days at the criminal trial which included hours of blistering cross-examination by Reddington. asserted
which → testify → Reddington
Tufts would presumably be deposed and testify in any civil case, as the lead defendant and her testimony from the criminal case could be used against her — like to catch out inconsistencies. uncertain
defendant → depose → inconsistencies
Burnetti said Reddington may have been cognizant about the fact that Tufts would likely also be called in the civil case and that could have been another reason for him to leave no stone unturned during her cross-examination. uncertain
him → say → examination
Burnetti also said the enormous media and public frenzy surrounding the trial could make it difficult to get an unbiased jury in the civil case. uncertain
it → say → case
“There is going to be an impact because if you’ve heard of it, you’ve formed some opinion one way or the other,” he said. asserted
he → be → opinion
“Even if you stand up in front of the judge and say, ‘Well, I’ve heard about it, but I have no opinion. asserted
I → stand → opinion
That’s hard to believe fully because everybody has their built-in biases.” asserted
everybody → ’ → biases
Burnetti said in general the type of medical malpractice case Clancy has brought is difficult to prove because the doctors only need to prove they provided Clancy with the “standard of care, which is not perfection.” asserted
which → say → care
“If the defendants can prove by a preponderance of evidence that they met the standard of care, even though the outcome was horrible, the jury could find a way to rule in their favor,” Burnetti explained. uncertain
Burnetti → prove → favor
Lindsay Clancy could use her criminal case to leverage a deal in her lawsuit against the doctors she claimed failed her. uncertain
she → use → her
Lindsay Clancy alleged in her lawsuit that her doctors failed to properly diagnose her and overmedicated her. asserted
doctors → allege → her
AP A judge declared a mistrial in her case Friday after the jury said they were hopelessly deadlocked. asserted
they → declare → case
Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, on Jan. 24, 2023. Instagram/@heardwithlove Clancy is suing psychiatrist, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, who met with Clancy over a dozen times in the months before the tragedy. via REUTERS asserted
who → strangle → REUTERS
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support