Story summary
Lindsay Clancy, a 36-year-old former nurse, is on trial for the murder of her three young children, Cora (5), Dawson (3), and Callan (8 months), who were killed in January 2023 at their family's home in Duxbury, Massachusetts. Clancy has pleaded not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility due to postpartum psychosis. The prosecution argues that she knowingly murdered her children, while the defense claims she was in a state of altered reality and unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions.
The trial has featured 85 witnesses, including psychologists and psychiatrists who have offered differing conclusions about Clancy's mental state at the time of the killings. One witness, Dr. Gregory Saathoff, testified that he does not believe Clancy heard a voice ordering her to kill the children, as she claims. The jury will now deliberate on the verdict, considering options such as first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, or not guilty by reason of insanity.
The trial has also sparked debate about maternal health and the need for better support systems for new mothers. Clancy's supporters, mostly women, have gathered outside the court to advocate for change and highlight the struggles many face in accessing mental health resources. The case has generated widespread interest on social media platforms like TikTok.
The jury is currently deadlocked, with some jurors disagreeing on whether Clancy was criminally responsible for her actions. A supporter of Clancy's, Dawn Light, was arrested outside the court for allegedly filming jurors as they left the building. The trial is expected to continue, with the outcome hanging in the balance.
Written for “Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial” on 2026-09-10,
grounded in this article and the 72 other(s) covering the same event.
Lindsay Clancy could try to use the fact that jurors nearly found her not guilty of murder for strangling her kids to leverage a settlement — potentially millions of dollars — in her lawsuits against the doctors she claimed failed her, experts told The Post.
uncertain
experts → try → Post
The gripping triple murder case against the 36-year-old Duxbury, Massachusetts mom ended with a deadlocked jury Friday but several jurors have since revealed that 11 out of the 12 panelists were prepared to find her not guilty by reason of insanity and didn’t buy the prosecutions’ case.
asserted
her → end → case
Clancy could use to bolster negotiations in the civil case, legal observers say.
uncertain
observers → use → case
“It’s like a leverage play when you’re negotiating or mediating,” said Seth Zuckerman, a New York lawyer who handles both criminal and civil cases.
asserted
who → ’ → cases
“[It’s] a case to say, look jurors have already heard this evidence and thought that the hospital was wrong and misdiagnosed her.
asserted
hospital → ’ → her
And 11 out of 12 were prepared to find her not guilty because of this defect, which means basically that they didn’t think that the medical providers did the right thing by her.
asserted
providers → prepare → her
Another expert suggested the settlement could reach seven figures.
uncertain
settlement → suggest → figures
At trial, Clancy’s criminal attorney, Kevin Reddington, asked jurors to find her not criminally responsible based on the claim she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis made worse by several psychiatric medications her doctors gave her.
uncertain
doctors → ask → her
Clancy is suing hospitals, doctors and other providers who treated her in the four months before the murders when she mentally spiraled as she desperately battled insomnia, anxiety, depression and intrusive thoughts about suicide and harming her kids.
asserted
she → sue → kids
Her lawsuit claims her providers failed to properly diagnose her and put her on a revolving door of powerful medications, ultimately leading to her killing Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, on Jan. 24, 2023 before she tried to take her own life.
uncertain
she → claim → life
Clancy’s then-husband Patrick Clancy also has a lawsuit pending against her providers.
asserted
husband → have → providers
“It’s persuasive if you’re talking to the defense attorney or insurance carrier as to why they should settle this because you already have some anecdotal knowledge from the from a juror as to what they thought of this,” Zuckerman said.
asserted
Zuckerman → ’ → this
Three jurors revealed in an interview with NBC 10 Boston they felt the prosecution’s case was “harsh” and that they failed to put on any witnesses who said Clancy was a bad mom, leading the jurors to believe she “snapped.”
asserted
she → reveal → jurors
Another jury member told CBS News Boston the prosecution “didn’t have a figurative smoking gun” and the case had “too much gray area.”
asserted
case → tell → area
Here’s the latest on Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial:
asserted
latest → ’ → trial
Medical malpractice lawyer, Doug Burnetti, told The Post Clancy’s civil team probably “feels emboldened to some extent.”
asserted
team → tell → extent
Clancy could potentially settle with the medical providers for millions, Burnetti said.
uncertain
Burnetti → settle → millions
Some other ways the criminal trial could impact the civil case include that Clancy can’t be forced to sit for a deposition by the lawyers representing the hospitals and doctors she is suing until her criminal case has fully concluded.
uncertain
case → impact → hospitals
Until that point, Clancy could plead the Fifth Amendment in the civil case in order to ensure she doesn’t incriminate herself further in the criminal case.
“She still has a Fifth Amendment right to not say anything,” attorney John W. Day told The Post.
uncertain
Day → plead → Post
“And so what happens sometimes is judges say, ‘All right, the lawsuit can proceed, but if you want to take her sworn deposition, that has to wait until there’s no chance of any criminal prosecution.’
asserted
that → happen → prosecution
Also, testimony from the criminal trial could be used against witnesses that may also testify in the civil case.
uncertain
that → use → case
Clancy is suing psychiatrist, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, who met with Clancy over a dozen times in the months before the tragedy, claiming she failed to diagnose her with bipolar disorder and the doctor even gave her an SSRI drug, which can worsen symptoms for someone with the disorder.
asserted
which → sue → disorder
Tufts testified for two days at the criminal trial which included hours of blistering cross-examination by Reddington.
asserted
which → testify → Reddington
Tufts would presumably be deposed and testify in any civil case, as the lead defendant and her testimony from the criminal case could be used against her — like to catch out inconsistencies.
uncertain
defendant → depose → inconsistencies
Burnetti said Reddington may have been cognizant about the fact that Tufts would likely also be called in the civil case and that could have been another reason for him to leave no stone unturned during her cross-examination.
uncertain
him → say → examination
Burnetti also said the enormous media and public frenzy surrounding the trial could make it difficult to get an unbiased jury in the civil case.
uncertain
it → say → case
“There is going to be an impact because if you’ve heard of it, you’ve formed some opinion one way or the other,” he said.
asserted
he → be → opinion
“Even if you stand up in front of the judge and say, ‘Well, I’ve heard about it, but I have no opinion.
asserted
I → stand → opinion
That’s hard to believe fully because everybody has their built-in biases.”
asserted
everybody → ’ → biases
Burnetti said in general the type of medical malpractice case Clancy has brought is difficult to prove because the doctors only need to prove they provided Clancy with the “standard of care, which is not perfection.”
asserted
which → say → care
“If the defendants can prove by a preponderance of evidence that they met the standard of care, even though the outcome was horrible, the jury could find a way to rule in their favor,” Burnetti explained.
uncertain
Burnetti → prove → favor
Lindsay Clancy could use her criminal case to leverage a deal in her lawsuit against the doctors she claimed failed her.
uncertain
she → use → her
Lindsay Clancy alleged in her lawsuit that her doctors failed to properly diagnose her and overmedicated her.
asserted
doctors → allege → her
AP
A judge declared a mistrial in her case Friday after the jury said they were hopelessly deadlocked.
asserted
they → declare → case
Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, on Jan. 24, 2023. Instagram/@heardwithlove
Clancy is suing psychiatrist, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, who met with Clancy over a dozen times in the months before the tragedy. via REUTERS
asserted
who → strangle → REUTERS
