Meta to pay $17 billion, overhaul Facebook and Instagram in teen addiction settlement
asserted
Meta → pay → settlement
-
Click here to listen to this article -
- Meta agrees to a $17-billion settlement with 47 states, ending a landmark teen social media addiction trial and averting Mark Zuckerberg’s expected testimony in California federal court.
-
asserted
Meta → click → court
The deal compels Facebook and Instagram to adopt new child-safety rules, including daily time caps, school-hour notification bans, stronger age checks and expanded parental controls aimed at harmful content.
asserted
deal → compel → content
- The settlement caps years of mounting evidence and lawsuits alleging Meta engineered addictive features that worsened youth mental health while collecting data on children under 13 without parental consent.
asserted
that → cap → consent
Meta agreed to pay up to $17 billion and make changes to its Facebook and Instagram platforms as part of a landmark settlement to resolve a child safety lawsuit that involved California and other states.
asserted
that → agree → California
The proposed settlement, which still needs approval and would be the largest legal action against the tech titan, cuts short a high-profile trial that started a little more than a week ago in a federal court in California.
asserted
that → propose → California
It’s the latest example of how the world’s largest social media giant is grappling with legal challenges that seek to hold the company accountable for allegedly harming children.
uncertain
company → ’ → children
California was among dozens of states that sued Meta in 2023, alleging in a lawsuit that the social media giant intentionally designed harmful and addictive features to hook children while misleading the public about the dangers.
asserted
giant → sue → dangers
Some of the harms included depression, anxiety, addiction and body image issues as young people compare themselves to others on social media.
asserted
people → include → media
The states accused Meta of violating state consumer protection laws and a federal law that protects the online privacy of children under13.
asserted
that → accuse → children
This is a major step forward in the ongoing quest and journey to make sure that our children are safe everywhere, including online,” said California Atty. General Rob Bonta in a press conference on Wednesday morning.
asserted
Bonta → make → morning
As part of the proposed settlement to settle claims filed by 47 states, California would receive between $1.5 billion to $2.1 billion.
uncertain
California → propose → billion
The California governor and legislature would decide how most of that money will be spent, Bonta said, but it will be used to address child safety on social media.
asserted
it → decide → media
While Bonta called the settlement amount “historically high,” he said the major focus is on the changes that Meta agreed to make to its platforms so they’re safer for children.
asserted
they → call → children
Among several solutions such as time limits and muting notifications during certain hours, the changes include giving teens the option to choose to view a non-algorithmic social media feed that isn’t personalized.
asserted
that → mute → feed
Social media platforms show people videos and other content they might be interested in viewing, keeping them scrolling online for hours.
uncertain
they → show → hours
Meta said it would also give teens the ability to not play content automatically, hide likes and reactions and block teens from using extreme makeup filters, which can potentially harm a person’s self-esteem.
asserted
which → say → esteem
The settlement also includes solutions that would only kick in if Meta’s rivals such as YouTube and TikTok also implemented similar measures.
asserted
rivals → include → measures
“Because teens move fluidly across dozens of apps, we need an industry-wide solution.
asserted
we → move → solution
We therefore call on our industry peers, TikTok, Snap, and YouTube, to implement this new framework, right away,” Meta’s Chief Legal Officer C.J. Mahoney, said in a statement.
asserted
Officer → call → statement
TikTok, YouTube and Snap didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
asserted
TikTok → respond → comment
Although the $17 billion is the biggest penalty yet against the platform, experts and child safety advocates say the agreed-upon changes are far more significant for both users and the company’s bottom line.
asserted
changes → say → users
“They may be even more stressed out about that,” said Peter Jackson, a privacy and cybersecurity attorney in Los Angeles, in an interview prior to the settlement announcement.
uncertain
Jackson → stress → announcement
“You could see other jurisdictions outside the U.S. pushing for similar restrictions.”
uncertain
jurisdictions → see → restrictions
Forrester’s Principal Analyst Kate Winick said that while the potential penalty is large, the changes that Meta agreed to make “fall within the bounds of product changes Meta has already been required to make in other markets.”
asserted
Meta → say → markets
Indeed, some investors seemed relieved by the settlement.
asserted
investors → seem → settlement
Meta shares rose around 1% to end the day at $576.14.
asserted
shares → rise → 576.14
The settlement also comes as federal and state lawmakers are trying to pass new legislation to make online platforms and AI safer for kids.
asserted
platforms → come → kids
Continuing with the trial carried some risk for Meta because the company lost several child-safety cases this year, including one in Los Angeles.
asserted
company → continue → Angeles
In August, shortly before the trial kicked off in California, a New Mexico court ordered Meta to pay $942 million and take steps to make the platform safer, including preventing minors from engaging in romantic or sexualized interactions with its AI chatbots.
asserted
platform → kick → chatbots
Meta’s settlement follows a day of testimony from current and former Meta employees about the design and deployment of its existing safety features.
asserted
settlement → follow → features
“One of the reasons the features were developed were to protect us in future lawsuits,” said former Meta data scientist George Volichenko.
asserted
Volichenko → develop → lawsuits
Across hours of tense questioning, he and other witnesses revealed that they were told to keep such features “opt in” despite only a tiny fraction of users adopting them — a move meant in part to keep eyeballs on the app.
asserted
they → reveal → app
“We received guidance not to proceed with the feature as opt out,” Volichenko said of Meta’s widely touted “take a break” tool.
asserted
Volichenko → receive → tool
“I would expect [use] to be much larger, orders of magnitude.
asserted
use → expect → magnitude
[But] we were not allowed to do that.”
asserted
we → allow → that
Attorneys also routinely edited internal documents to remove sensitive information before it could be seen by Meta Chief Executive and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg and other top brass, in part so they could not be asked to testify about it later, witnesses said.
uncertain
witnesses → edit → it
“I’m not sure what the reasons might be for removing information from presentations before they might get to me, but I’m not encouraging my team to try to hide anything,” Instagram boss Adam Mosseri testified Tuesday.
uncertain
Mosseri → ’m → anything
A trial got underway Tuesday in California’s multibillion-dollar lawsuit against Meta, a case that experts say could have major implications for how social media companies operate and target young users.
uncertain
companies → get → users
As part of the agreement, those features will now default on.
asserted
features → default → agreement
…and 7 more, not listed.
The Aporia
