Reining in Big Tech: How California lawmakers plan to regulate AI and social media

Read the original at Los Angeles Times ↗
Cite

Wong, Q., & Smith, D. (2026, September 3). Reining in Big Tech: How California lawmakers plan to regulate AI and social media. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-08-31/reigning-in-big-tech-how-california-lawmakers-plan-to-regulate-ai-social-media

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Los Angeles Times · collected 2026-09-03 · by Queenie Wong, Dakota Smith

Quick Summary

California lawmakers have passed bills to regulate Big Tech's power over addictive social media, artificial intelligence in the workplace, and data centers amid growing public concerns about technology's harms. Key measures include barring features that can harm children under 16, exposing platforms to $1 million penalties for harming kids, and requiring human oversight of AI tools disciplining or firing workers. The bills now go to Governor Gavin Newsom, who must weigh the demands for tougher regulations against Silicon Valley's warnings about stifling innovation and increasing costs. Lawmakers are trying to balance regulation with allowing the tech industry to continue driving California's economy.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-03, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

California lawmakers have passed new regulations aimed at curbing the power of Big Tech companies, particularly when it comes to social media, artificial intelligence, and data centers. The package of bills, which now heads to Governor Gavin Newsom for approval, includes measures that would ban "addictive" features on social media platforms for users under 16, impose million-dollar penalties on companies that harm children, and require human oversight when AI tools discipline or fire workers. These regulations come as a response to growing public anxiety over the harms caused by technology, and follow pressure from National and state union leaders who have warned that AI poses an "existential threat" to democracy if not properly controlled. The new laws are part of an effort to protect California's children, communities, and workers from the negative impacts of Big Tech, while also addressing concerns that excessive regulation could stifle innovation and raise costs for companies.

Written for “Regulating Artificial Intelligence” on 2026-10-19, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Regulating Artificial Intelligence
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Trump Hands Dems Their Best Gift Yet different event · 90%
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 6% hedged 3 of 49
“Article A mentions Trump's social media post as a quote from Monday morning, while Article B discusses California lawmakers' plans to regulate Big Tech, which is not directly related to Trump's statement”
Deutsche Welle
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 26 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses California state regulations on Big Tech, while Article B reports on a ban announced by New York City Mayor Mamdani on AI use in public schools”
NPR
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 9% hedged 4 of 45 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A describes a legislative plan to regulate AI and social media, while Article B reports on political ads mentioning data centers, which is a related but distinct issue”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 26 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A describes California lawmakers' plan to regulate AI and social media, while Article B discusses Labor's plan to crack down on social media algorithms in Australia”
The Hindu
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 51 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses California lawmakers planning to regulate AI and social media, while Article B reports on a moratorium imposed by New York City's Mayor on student-facing AI tools”
Noahpinion
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 9% hedged 10 of 107
“Article B discusses a general trend and conventional wisdom in the tech industry, while Article A reports on specific regulatory bills proposed by California lawmakers to curb Big Tech's power”
NPR
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 2 of 13 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles cover different legislative proposals in different countries, with no mention of a shared specific event or incident”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 18% hedged 6 of 33 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles cover regulation plans in different countries (California and Australia), with distinct details on proposed laws”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 4 of 39 📰 publisher trust 74
“Article A discusses proposed regulations by California lawmakers on AI and social media, while Article B reports on a hack at Hugging Face and concerns about rogue swarms of AI systems”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 3 of 21 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A describes proposed legislation in California, while Article B mentions a protest network's fight against data centers and Flock cameras without clear connection to the legislative package”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
80
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
7 of 80 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
95/100
Los Angeles Times's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Los Angeles Times · 214 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Queenie Wong
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The drop in tech talent in the Bay Area comes as workers grow more worried that AI could lead to fewer jobs.
🔮 The settlement would resolve a multistate lawsuit that alleged Meta designed and deployed addictive features that harmed young people and misled the public about the potential dangers.
🔮 Measures would bar ‘addictive’ features for users under 16, expose platforms to million‑dollar penalties for harming kids, and require human oversight when AI tools discipline or fire workers.
🔮 The proposed settlement, which still needs approval and would be the largest legal action against the tech titan, cuts short a high-profile trial that started a little more than a week ago in a federal court in California.
🔮 The 440-acre property could be worth more than $25 million , according to the Irish Times, which first reported on the purchase.
2026-08-24 · assertive framing · Mark Zuckerberg buys an Irish castle
Also by Queenie Wong
Mark Zuckerberg buys an Irish castle
2026-08-24 · Los Angeles Times
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
Dakota Smith
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 They sought the devices as part of their inquiry into whether Swalwell violated a federal law that makes it a crime for anyone acting under official government authority to willfully deprive a person of their constitutional rights, according to the court filings.
🔮 Measures would bar ‘addictive’ features for users under 16, expose platforms to million‑dollar penalties for harming kids, and require human oversight when AI tools discipline or fire workers.
Also by Dakota Smith
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

California Californians Instagram SACRAMENTO TikTok

Subjects

California GPE · 5× Newsom PERSON · 3× Gavin Newsom PERSON · 2× Josh Lowenthal PERSON · 2× Lowenthal PERSON · 2× Californians NORP · 1× Instagram ORG · 1× Long Beach GPE · 1× SACRAMENTO GPE · 1× TikTok ORG · 1×

Narrative

National and state union leaders have urged California legislators and Newsom to protect workers from being replaced by AI, saying it posed an existential threat to the foundation of a healthy, productive democracy. “AI must remain a tool controlled by humans, not the other way around,” said Sen. Jerry McNerney (D-Pleasanton).
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-03
🔮 Measures would bar ‘addictive’ features for users under 16, expose platforms to million‑dollar penalties for harming kids, and require human oversight when AI tools discipline or fire workers.
2026-09-03 · Los Angeles Times
Reining in Big Tech: How California lawmakers plan to regulate AI and social media · assertive framing

Claims (80 extracted, 7 hedged)

Reining in Big Tech: How California lawmakers plan to regulate AI and social media asserted
lawmakers → rein → AI
- California lawmakers advance sweeping bills to curb Big Tech’s power, targeting addictive social media, artificial intelligence in the workplace and voracious data centers amid mounting public anxiety over technology’s harms. - asserted
lawmakers → advance → harms
Measures would bar ‘addictive’ features for users under 16, expose platforms to million‑dollar penalties for harming kids, and require human oversight when AI tools discipline or fire workers. asserted
tools → bar → workers
- The package now heads to Gov. Gavin Newsom, who must weigh voters’ demands for tougher safeguards against Silicon Valley’s warnings that new rules could stifle innovation and raise costs. uncertain
rules → head → costs
Long the epicenter of the global tech industry, California is taking more action to shield its children, communities and workers from the threats posed by the very industry that’s become central to the state’s identity and enviable economy. asserted
that → take → identity
State lawmakers on Monday passed new safeguards around social media, artificial intelligence and data centers at a time when technology has become intertwined with people’s daily lives. asserted
technology → pass → lives
Efforts to rein in the power of Big Tech extend beyond concerns that TikTok, Instagram and other social media platforms are harming young children. asserted
TikTok → rein → children
Unions and workers worry that AI will take their jobs, and lawmakers are trying to tackle privacy and safety issues as AI features get added into smart glasses and toys. asserted
features → worry → glasses
Californians are concerned that the proliferation of data centers will increase their electricity bills and strain water supplies. asserted
proliferation → concern → supplies
“There’s a heightened level of tech anxiety right now, and that manifests itself from social media to data centers to AI taking jobs,” said Assemblyman Josh Lowenthal (D-Long Beach). asserted
Lowenthal → ’ → jobs
“People are coalescing and they’re demanding that policymakers make change.” asserted
policymakers → coalesce → change
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has previously vetoed some bills aimed at adding restrictions on Silicon Valley businesses, will still have to weigh in on whether to sign the pieces of legislation into law. asserted
who → veto → law
The Democratic governor has acknowledged the challenge of adopting regulations that protect the public without going too far and potentially stifling the technology industry’s growth, which brings critical revenue to the state budget. asserted
which → acknowledge → budget
“I think that’s the constant tension,” Newsom said in an interview earlier this summer. asserted
Newsom → think → interview
“We’re constantly sort of fighting that balance.” asserted
We → fight → balance
The governor, who has close relationships in the technology industry from his time in San Francisco, said only a couple of other states have attempted to regulate artificial intelligence. asserted
couple → have → intelligence
California, he said, leads on regulation of social media. asserted
he → say → media
“We’re not rolling over, certainly,” Newsom said. asserted
Newsom → roll → ?
“We’re leaning forward, and we’re iterating. asserted
we → lean → ?
We will push the boundaries and litigate.” asserted
We → push → boundaries
The looming restrictions on social media follow a landmark Meta Platforms legal settlement aimed at making social media safer for young people. asserted
media → loom → people
Parents, politicians and child advocacy groups are worried that social media is contributing to depression, anxiety, eating disorders and other issues. asserted
media → worry → depression
The actions being pushed in the California Legislature are more sweeping than that settlement, however. asserted
actions → push → settlement
One of the bills passed by lawmakers on Monday, Assembly Bill 1709, would bar certain online platforms from providing an “addictive feature” to users under 16 years old and add ways to verify users’ ages. asserted
One → pass → ages
Under the bill, prohibited addictive features include autoplay and feeds that display recommended content. asserted
that → prohibit → content
The addictive nature of autoplay and other features is “harmful, full stop, and that they’re not appropriate for the developing brain,” said Lowenthal, who authored the bill. asserted
who → ’re → bill
Newsom, who chatted with lawmakers at the Capitol on Monday in what will be his last regular legislative session as governor, praised Lowenthal and the bill. asserted
what → chat → Lowenthal
“I’m really proud of the work that we did together on that. asserted
we → ’m → that
My legislator of the year is Josh Lowenthal,” Newsom said. asserted
Newsom → say → year
“California will continue to lead in this area as we must continue to lead in this area.” asserted
we → continue → area
After watching technology “run free” in California for years, legislators are now seeking to “pump the brakes a little bit,” said Samantha Vigil, a UC Davis researcher who built a registry tracking social media legislation in states across the country. asserted
who → watch → country
“They want to reevaluate what is working,” Vigil said. asserted
Vigil → want → ?
“What is healthy and beneficial, and what is progress just for the sake of having a new iteration of something? asserted
progress → have → something
” All 50 states have introduced or passed some type of digital media or technology-related legislation, tackling smartphone use in schools, social media and chatbots, Vigil said. asserted
Vigil → introduce → schools
Other countries have taken more stringent steps to limit social media use among young people. asserted
countries → take → people
Australia banned social media use for those under 16, but enforcing the law has been challenging because young people have tried to get around the restrictions. asserted
people → ban → restrictions
California isn’t trying to ban social media; instead, it’s trying to limit how platforms design their features. asserted
platforms → try → features
Parents and state attorneys general have not waited for policymakers to act. asserted
policymakers → wait → ?
They have sued Meta, Google and other tech companies over the alleged harms their products have done to young people. asserted
products → sue → people
In late August, Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, agreed to pay up to $17 billion and make child-safety changes to resolve a multistate lawsuit alleging the tech company designed and deployed harmful features while misleading the public about them. asserted
company → own → them
…and 40 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support