On September 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected President Trump’s attempt to restrict mail-in ballots by refusing to lift a lower court injunction that blocks a Postal Service rule targeting such ballots ahead of November’s midterm elections. The decision, with no public dissents other than from Justices Alito and Thomas, upholds rulings against the measure made by two federal judges within days. Critics argue the rule could disrupt legitimate ballot delivery, while the administration claims it aims to prevent voter fraud, though evidence of such fraud is scarce.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-15,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Story summary
A second federal judge in Washington, Carl Nichols, blocked the Trump administration's new US Postal Service rule that would have tightened mail-in voting requirements, just days before November 3 midterms. The rule, which required unique barcodes and design compliance for ballot envelopes and mandated states to upload voter information into a federal online portal, was deemed unlawful by Judge Nichols. This follows a similar ruling from another judge, leaving the Trump administration relying on the Supreme Court to overturn these decisions. However, in a decisive move on Monday, the Supreme Court denied an emergency appeal from Trump's lawyers, upholding existing mail-in voting processes. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented, but the majority opinion emphasized the impracticality of implementing such changes so close to election day. This decision ensures states can continue using their current systems for distributing ballots without facing new regulations that could disenfranchise voters.
Written for “Supreme Court Rejects Trump Mail Voti…” on 2026-09-17,
grounded in this article and the 36 other(s) covering the same event.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday (September 14, 2026) to let the U.S. Postal Service enforce a rule targeting mail-in ballots, dealing a setback to President Donald Trump’s effort to restrict voting by mail ahead of November’s midterm elections that will determine control of Congress.
asserted
that → decline → Congress
The Justices denied the Justice Department’s request to lift a ruling by Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani that blocked the Postal Service from enforcing the measure while legal challenges by states and voting-rights groups proceed.
asserted
challenges → deny → states
The agency adopted the measure after Trump issued a March executive order aimed at tightening rules governing mail voting.
asserted
Trump → adopt → voting
“The government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge to the District Court’s preliminary injunction,” the court said in its brief, one-paragraph order.
asserted
court → succeed → order
Justice Samuel Alito, joined by fellow conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, dissented from Monday’s decision, comparing some of the challengers’ claims to a “Hail Mary pass” that is “unlikely to be successfully completed,” using a football analogy.
uncertain
that → join → analogy
“The Postal Service has broad authority to regulate the mail,” Justice Alito added.
asserted
Alito → have → mail
No other Justice dissented publicly.
asserted
Justice → dissent → ?
The court has a 6-3 conservative majority.
asserted
court → have → majority
Mr. Trump’s fellow Republicans are locked in a tight battle to retain control of Congress in the midterms.
asserted
Republicans → lock → midterms
Restricting mail-in ballots would stand to benefit Republicans given that Democratic voters disproportionately use mail-in ballots, according to various surveys.
uncertain
voters → restrict → surveys
Another federal judge, Washington, D.C.-based U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, also ruled against the new rule on Sunday (September 13, 2026).
asserted
judge → rule → Sunday
Under the new rule, States would have to provide lists of mail ballot recipients to the Postal Service and use agency-approved outbound and return ballot mail envelopes outfitted with unique barcodes.
asserted
States → have → barcodes
The Postal Service could then refuse to send out ballots that do not comply with the new standards or are associated with voters who do not appear on the lists.
uncertain
who → refuse → lists
Critics have said the plan could disrupt the delivery of thousands of legitimate ballots as the November 3 vote approaches and cause chaos given imminent plans by many states to send out mail ballots to eligible voters.
uncertain
vote → say → voters
The administration has said the new rule will prevent voter fraud, though evidence of such fraud is rare.
asserted
evidence → say → fraud
Mr. Trump signed his executive order targeting mail-in ballots after years of casting doubt on their security, though he often votes by mail himself.
asserted
he → sign → mail
Trump has made false claims of widespread fraud in U.S. elections including his 2020 loss to former Democratic President Joe Biden.
uncertain
Trump → make → Biden
The administration in a September 6 emergency request urged the Supreme Court to allow it to implement an “important federal policy to protect the mails from being used to commit voter fraud.”
asserted
it → urge → fraud
States challenged the rule
asserted
States → challenge → rule
A coalition of States, most of them Democratic-governed, and Washington, D.C., as well as a number of voting-rights groups, challenged the new USPS rule.
asserted
coalition → govern → rule
Judge Talwani imposed an injunction on September 4 blocking the rule, finding that it likely violated the U.S. Constitution, under which states administer elections.
asserted
states → impose → elections
She also said it would be impossible for the States to comply given the rapidly approaching midterms.
asserted
States → say → midterms
The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused last Thursday to put Judge Talwani’s order on hold.
asserted
Court → base → hold
The 1st Circuit said that the rule “will likely result in the disenfranchisement of millions of voters across the country while providing minimal — if any — gains in combating voter fraud.”
asserted
rule → say → fraud
Judge Nichols granted a request from the Democratic Party and groups including the NAACP for a preliminary injunction blocking the rule.
asserted
Nichols → grant → rule
He wrote that the rule could make it harder for some people to vote by mail and that it exceeded the Postal Service’s authority.
uncertain
it → write → authority
“No statute grants the Postal Service the power to issue key parts of the rule,” Judge Nichols wrote.
asserted
Nichols → grant → rule
All 50 States allow for some form of mail-in voting.
asserted
States → allow → voting
Of those, 29 states allow voters to ask to cast ballots by mail without providing a reason, and eight conduct their elections entirely by mail.
asserted
eight → allow → mail
The battle over mail ballots is one in a series of efforts by the administration to boost federal involvement in voting ahead of the midterms.
asserted
battle → boost → midterms
On August 24, the Supreme Court lifted an earlier injunction imposed by Judge Talwani in June blocking Mr. Trump’s executive order, including the USPS rule before it had been finalised.
asserted
it → lift → rule
The Aporia
