The AI Doomsday Future Is Not Inevitable

The Intercept · collected 2026-09-14 · by The Intercept Briefing
Read the original at The Intercept ↗

Summary

The Intercept and 404 Media discuss how U.S. government agencies use private companies like Palantir and Flock for surveillance and data collection, often bypassing warrant requirements. Speakers Jason Koebler and Sam Biddle argue that while the use of AI and surveillance technology is extensive and may seem inevitable, it stems from human decisions and can be regulated to ensure accountability. They also highlight a potential bipartisan movement towards privacy protections in response to growing concerns over these technologies.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
432
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
3%
15 of 432 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
97.1
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-14 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

On a special recording of The Intercept Briefing podcast in Los Angeles, independent tech outlet 404 Media co-founder Jason Koebler and The Intercept team discussed how private companies like Palantir and Flock are helping the U.S. government surveil and track individuals both domestically and internationally. Local police departments use Flock cameras to monitor license plates, while ICE employs Palantir software for immigrant tracking. Koebler highlighted that surveillance technology is increasingly privatized, with many lesser-known companies pushing ethical boundaries in data collection. Sam Biddle from The Intercept noted that government agencies can easily acquire advanced surveillance tools previously restricted to state spy agencies, illustrating the growing role of private firms in governmental surveillance activities.

Written for “AI Future Concerns” on 2026-09-14, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 4 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 8668: no verified evidence · logged 2026-09-14

Story

📰 AI Future Concerns
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 50% hedged 9 of 18 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles describe different aspects and concerns related to AI usage, rather than a single specific incident.”
WATCH: Insiders' new AI warning different event · 95%
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 50% hedged 1 of 2 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns, with Article A focusing on warnings about potential future dangers of AI and Article B discussing current surveillance practices involving AI technology.”
US AI regulation calls gather pace different event · 95%
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and surveillance in the US without describing the same specific incident.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 5 of 42 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles discuss different topics related to AI and surveillance, not the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 58 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles discuss different themes related to surveillance and AI but do not describe the same specific incident.”

Publisher

The Intercept · 43 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

The Intercept Briefing
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 While Palantir and Flock have become household names, Koebler says, “anything that can be surveilled is being surveilled, and a lot of this is happening from companies that very few people have heard of, and companies that are willing to push the envelope on what they’re willing to do, like how far they’re willing to go to surveil people.”
2026-09-14 · assertive framing · The AI Doomsday Future Is Not Inevitable
🔮 A quarter century after the September 11 attacks emboldened then-President George W. Bush to launch the “war on terror,” many Americans might like to think they’re wiser than the politicians and pundits who unleashed a flood of anti-Muslim hatred and eroded civil liberties through warrantless wiretaps and racist deportation campaigns.
🔮 But it will impact you.”
2026-08-28 · assertive framing · Right-Wing Trans Hate Comes for the WNBA
🔮 “They don’t have even the basic sort of guarantee that there is a cloak of security allowing them to operate in the traditional ways that they would like to.”
2026-08-24 · assertive framing · What American Doctors Saw in Gaza
Also by The Intercept Briefing
Right-Wing Trans Hate Comes for the WNBA
2026-08-28 · The Intercept
What American Doctors Saw in Gaza
2026-08-24 · The Intercept
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

404 Media Flock Palantir The Intercept Briefing U.S.

Subjects

404 Media ORG · 3× Akela Lacy PERSON · 3× Koebler PERSON · 3× U.S. GPE · 3× Biddle PERSON · 2× Iran GPE · 2× Los Angeles GPE · 2× Palantir ORG · 2× The Intercept ORG · 2× The Intercept Briefing ORG · 2×

Narrative

This week, for a special recording of the podcast, independent tech outlet 404 Media and The Intercept teamed up in front of a live audience in Los Angeles to discuss how the U.S. government weaponizes private data to surveil and kill abroad and at home, the resulting backlash and potential regulations on the table, what tangible actions the average person can take to “divest from the contemporary surveillance hellscape,” and refocusing AI-ending-humanity doomerism.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
🔮 While Palantir and Flock have become household names, Koebler says, “anything that can be surveilled is being surveilled, and a lot of this is happening from companies that very few people have heard of, and companies that are willing to push the envelope on what they’re willing to do, like how far they’re willing to go to surveil people.”
2026-09-14 · The Intercept
The AI Doomsday Future Is Not Inevitable · assertive framing

Claims (432 extracted, 15 hedged)

Local police departments use Flock cameras to track license plates. asserted
departments → use → plates
ICE uses Palantir software to track and round up immigrants. asserted
ICE → use → immigrants
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s war department uses Claude to bomb Iran. asserted
department → use → Iran
The U.S. government spends billions employing private corporations to obtain mountains of data — and the surveillance space is only getting more privatized in Donald Trump’s second term. “It really has become a Wild West,” 404 Media co-founder Jason Koebler tells host Akela Lacy on The Intercept Briefing, on the state of the U.S. surveillance apparatus today. asserted
Koebler → spend → apparatus
While Palantir and Flock have become household names, Koebler says, “anything that can be surveilled is being surveilled, and a lot of this is happening from companies that very few people have heard of, and companies that are willing to push the envelope on what they’re willing to do, like how far they’re willing to go to surveil people.” asserted
they → become → people
“A lot of the stuff that you used to associate with the NSA or CIA or another state spy agency, those kinds of capabilities you can now just buy,” Intercept senior technology reporter Sam Biddle notes of the ease and accessibility of the tools now available to the government. asserted
Biddle → use → government
“You don’t need to be a top-secret government agency. asserted
You → need → ?
“It’s a way to sidestep warrant requirements,” says Koebler. asserted
Koebler → ’ → requirements
Surveillance contractors “are doing things that if the government were doing directly, they would need to get a warrant in order to do it.” asserted
they → do → it
This week, for a special recording of the podcast, independent tech outlet 404 Media and The Intercept teamed up in front of a live audience in Los Angeles to discuss how the U.S. government weaponizes private data to surveil and kill abroad and at home, the resulting backlash and potential regulations on the table, what tangible actions the average person can take to “divest from the contemporary surveillance hellscape,” and refocusing AI-ending-humanity doomerism. asserted
person → team → doomerism
“When you ascribe motives and agency to AI, you’re letting Sam Altman off the hook,” says Biddle. asserted
Biddle → ascribe → hook
It’s not inevitable. asserted
It → ’ → ?
This doomsday future is not inevitable,” adds Koebler. asserted
Koebler → add → ?
“We can’t bury our heads in the sand and say, ‘This is not changing society in some way.’ asserted
This → bury → way
But it is being driven by very rich humans, and they can be regulated. asserted
they → drive → humans
They can be held to account.” asserted
They → hold → account
“What’s been really interesting about the Flock backlash, and heartening, is that it is completely apolitical, or it’s nonpartisan. asserted
it → hearten → backlash
It is completely — from the deepest red to the people in this room right now — the entire political spectrum hates these,” says Biddle. asserted
Biddle → hat → these
“There’s the real potential for the first time in a while to create a pro-privacy coalition that bridges a lot of the otherwise pretty giant political gaps.” asserted
that → ’ → gaps
For more, listen to the full conversation of The Intercept Briefing on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you listen. asserted
you → listen → Podcasts
Welcome to The Intercept Briefing, I’m Akela Lacy, senior politics reporter at The Intercept. asserted
I → welcome → Intercept
Today we’re coming to you live from Los Angeles for a special episode in collaboration with 404 Media. asserted
we → come → Media
We’re talking lethal autonomous weapons; AI-assisted strikes in Iran; mining your digital footprint and even your financial activity to track you down; and surveillance cameras coming soon to a neighborhood near you. asserted
We → talk → you
Just this week, warnings from Anthropic researchers that AI could kill humanity set off alarm bells on Capitol Hill and prompted a bipartisan group of lawmakers to call for immediate action to regulate the AI industry — from Republican Sen. Ted Cruz to Independent populist Bernie Sanders, who is organizing senators for a briefing next week on the “extraordinary dangers” of AI. uncertain
who → kill → AI
The world we’ve long been told to fear is here. asserted
we → tell → ?
But how much do we actually know about these tools and how the government is using them — not just against you and your neighbors, but around the world? To take us down the rabbit hole, I’m joined by my colleague, Intercept reporter Sam Biddle, a senior technology reporter who focuses on issues of surveillance, privacy, and corporate power. asserted
who → know → surveillance
Also joining us is Jason Koebler, co-founder of 404 Media, where he writes about surveillance and AI. asserted
he → join → surveillance
We’re very excited. asserted
We → ’re → ?
To start, can you all just paint us a picture of what the broad surveillance tech apparatus looks like today? asserted
apparatus → start → what
Many of our listeners are familiar with some of the biggest players, like the data mining government contractor Palantir or Flock, the operator of surveillance hardware marketing itself as a friendly neighborhood public safety tool. asserted
Many → market → tool
But let’s zoom out a little bit. asserted
’s → let → ?
Like, how did we go from the days of the National Security Agency and Edward Snowden, to this largely privatized and, in many ways, even more lawless world of mass surveillance? asserted
we → go → surveillance
Sam, I’ll start with you. asserted
I → start → you
What’s stayed the same since that NSA era, and what’s new now? asserted
what → stay → era
The NSA is still here, to say the least. asserted
NSA → say → least
I don’t think you have this conversation, or certainly not in the form that we’re going to have it tonight, without 9/11. asserted
we → think → 9/11
I think that the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, the private sector economy that you described, billions and billions of dollars, is all downstream of 9/11. asserted
you → think → 9/11
I looked it up: In 2006, the DHS budget was, like, $30-something billion. asserted
budget → look → 2006
The presidential request for next year is $118 billion, and a lot of that is flowing to contractors like Palantir. asserted
lot → flow → Palantir
To answer your question, Snowden taught us correctly that we have a lot to fear from the government, but there was not as much emphasis on the companies that empower the government. asserted
that → answer → government
…and 392 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support