The AI Doomsday Future Is Not Inevitable

Read the original at The Intercept ↗
Cite

Briefing, T. I. (2026, September 14). The AI Doomsday Future Is Not Inevitable. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2026/09/14/surveillance-tech-ai-military-flock/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Intercept · collected 2026-09-14 · by The Intercept Briefing

Quick Summary

The article discusses how private corporations are increasingly involved in government surveillance activities in the United States, with companies like Palantir and Flock playing significant roles without clear oversight. It highlights concerns about bypassing warrant requirements and the potential for creating a privacy-focused coalition across political lines to regulate these practices. The conversation emphasizes that while technology is advancing rapidly, it’s driven by human decisions and can be regulated to prevent an "AI doomsday" future.
Written by AI on 2026-09-16, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On a special recording of The Intercept Briefing podcast in Los Angeles, independent tech outlet 404 Media co-founder Jason Koebler and The Intercept team discussed how private companies like Palantir and Flock are helping the U.S. government surveil and track individuals both domestically and internationally. Local police departments use Flock cameras to monitor license plates, while ICE employs Palantir software for immigrant tracking. Koebler highlighted that surveillance technology is increasingly privatized, with many lesser-known companies pushing ethical boundaries in data collection. Sam Biddle from The Intercept noted that government agencies can easily acquire advanced surveillance tools previously restricted to state spy agencies, illustrating the growing role of private firms in governmental surveillance activities.

Written for “AI Future Concerns” on 2026-10-29, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Future Concerns
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
Hedges 9 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects and concerns related to AI usage, rather than a single specific incident.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns, with Article A focusing on warnings about potential future dangers of AI and Article B discussing current surveillance practices involving AI technology.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and surveillance in the US without describing the same specific incident.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles cover different topics and discussions about AI, with Article A focusing on surveillance and data collection by government agencies and private corporations, while Article B discusses a journalist's concern about AI evading or eliminating humans to complete tasks.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 8 of 52 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI and surveillance concerns without describing the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 26 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI and surveillance without focusing on the same specific incident.”
Dawn
Hedges 4 of 8 claims Outlet record 71/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns; one focuses on government surveillance and data usage, while the other addresses warnings from an ex-researcher about potential existential risks posed by AI.”
Semafor
Hedges 1 of 32 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI and surveillance, with Article A focusing on government use of private companies for data collection and surveillance, while Article B addresses AI companies' stance towards regulation.”
Fox News
Hedges 2 of 49 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI and surveillance concerns, with distinct viewpoints and no overlap in specific incidents or dates.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 7 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and surveillance, not a single specific event.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
431
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
15 of 431 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
97/100
The Intercept's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · source text last changed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Intercept · 136 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

The Intercept Briefing
6 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Washington also speaks with Rozina Ali — a journalist covering the war on terror, Islamophobia, the Middle East, South Asia, and literature — and Will Sommer, a senior reporter covering right-wing media and conspiracy theories at The Bulwark.
2026-10-16 · assertive framing · DHS Was Designed as a Weapon
🔮 The religious fundamentalists who helped elect Donald Trump, wanting to hasten along a violent Armageddon so Jesus will return.
🔮 While Palantir and Flock have become household names, Koebler says, “anything that can be surveilled is being surveilled, and a lot of this is happening from companies that very few people have heard of, and companies that are willing to push the envelope on what they’re willing to do, like how far they’re willing to go to surveil people.”
2026-09-14 · assertive framing · The AI Doomsday Future Is Not Inevitable
🔮 A quarter century after the September 11 attacks emboldened then-President George W. Bush to launch the “war on terror,” many Americans might like to think they’re wiser than the politicians and pundits who unleashed a flood of anti-Muslim hatred and eroded civil liberties through warrantless wiretaps and racist deportation campaigns.
🔮 But it will impact you.”
2026-08-28 · assertive framing · Right-Wing Trans Hate Comes for the WNBA
🔮 “They don’t have even the basic sort of guarantee that there is a cloak of security allowing them to operate in the traditional ways that they would like to.”
2026-08-24 · assertive framing · What American Doctors Saw in Gaza
Also by The Intercept Briefing
DHS Was Designed as a Weapon
2026-10-16 · The Intercept
Right-Wing Trans Hate Comes for the WNBA
2026-08-28 · The Intercept
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 6 articles by The Intercept Briefing →

Topics

404 Media Flock Palantir The Intercept Briefing U.S.

Subjects

404 Media ORG · 3× Akela Lacy PERSON · 3× Koebler PERSON · 3× U.S. GPE · 3× Biddle PERSON · 2× Iran GPE · 2× Los Angeles GPE · 2× Palantir ORG · 2× The Intercept ORG · 2× The Intercept Briefing ORG · 2×

Narrative

This week, for a special recording of the podcast, independent tech outlet 404 Media and The Intercept teamed up in front of a live audience in Los Angeles to discuss how the U.S. government weaponizes private data to surveil and kill abroad and at home, the resulting backlash and potential regulations on the table, what tangible actions the average person can take to “divest from the contemporary surveillance hellscape,” and refocusing AI-ending-humanity doomerism.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
🔮 While Palantir and Flock have become household names, Koebler says, “anything that can be surveilled is being surveilled, and a lot of this is happening from companies that very few people have heard of, and companies that are willing to push the envelope on what they’re willing to do, like how far they’re willing to go to surveil people.”
2026-09-16 · The Intercept
The AI Doomsday Future Is Not Inevitable · assertive framing

Claims (431 extracted, 15 hedged)

Local police departments use Flock cameras to track license plates. asserted
departments → use → plates
ICE uses Palantir software to track and round up immigrants. asserted
ICE → use → immigrants
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s war department uses Claude to bomb Iran. asserted
department → use → Iran
The U.S. government spends billions employing private corporations to obtain mountains of data — and the surveillance space is only getting more privatized in Donald Trump’s second term. “It really has become a Wild West,” 404 Media co-founder Jason Koebler tells host Akela Lacy on The Intercept Briefing, on the state of the U.S. surveillance apparatus today. asserted
Koebler → spend → apparatus
While Palantir and Flock have become household names, Koebler says, “anything that can be surveilled is being surveilled, and a lot of this is happening from companies that very few people have heard of, and companies that are willing to push the envelope on what they’re willing to do, like how far they’re willing to go to surveil people.” asserted
they → become → people
“A lot of the stuff that you used to associate with the NSA or CIA or another state spy agency, those kinds of capabilities you can now just buy,” Intercept senior technology reporter Sam Biddle notes of the ease and accessibility of the tools now available to the government. asserted
Biddle → use → government
“You don’t need to be a top-secret government agency. asserted
You → need → ?
“It’s a way to sidestep warrant requirements,” says Koebler. asserted
Koebler → ’ → requirements
Surveillance contractors “are doing things that if the government were doing directly, they would need to get a warrant in order to do it.” asserted
they → do → it
This week, for a special recording of the podcast, independent tech outlet 404 Media and The Intercept teamed up in front of a live audience in Los Angeles to discuss how the U.S. government weaponizes private data to surveil and kill abroad and at home, the resulting backlash and potential regulations on the table, what tangible actions the average person can take to “divest from the contemporary surveillance hellscape,” and refocusing AI-ending-humanity doomerism. asserted
person → team → doomerism
“When you ascribe motives and agency to AI, you’re letting Sam Altman off the hook,” says Biddle. asserted
Biddle → ascribe → hook
It’s not inevitable. asserted
It → ’ → ?
This doomsday future is not inevitable,” adds Koebler. asserted
Koebler → add → ?
“We can’t bury our heads in the sand and say, ‘This is not changing society in some way.’ asserted
This → bury → way
But it is being driven by very rich humans, and they can be regulated. asserted
they → drive → humans
They can be held to account.” asserted
They → hold → account
“What’s been really interesting about the Flock backlash, and heartening, is that it is completely apolitical, or it’s nonpartisan. asserted
it → hearten → backlash
It is completely — from the deepest red to the people in this room right now — the entire political spectrum hates these,” says Biddle. asserted
Biddle → hat → these
“There’s the real potential for the first time in a while to create a pro-privacy coalition that bridges a lot of the otherwise pretty giant political gaps.” asserted
that → ’ → gaps
For more, listen to the full conversation of The Intercept Briefing on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you listen. asserted
you → listen → Podcasts
Welcome to The Intercept Briefing, I’m Akela Lacy, senior politics reporter at The Intercept. asserted
I → welcome → Intercept
Today we’re coming to you live from Los Angeles for a special episode in collaboration with 404 Media. asserted
we → come → Media
We’re talking lethal autonomous weapons; AI-assisted strikes in Iran; mining your digital footprint and even your financial activity to track you down; and surveillance cameras coming soon to a neighborhood near you. asserted
We → talk → you
Just this week, warnings from Anthropic researchers that AI could kill humanity set off alarm bells on Capitol Hill and prompted a bipartisan group of lawmakers to call for immediate action to regulate the AI industry — from Republican Sen. Ted Cruz to Independent populist Bernie Sanders, who is organizing senators for a briefing next week on the “extraordinary dangers” of AI. uncertain
who → kill → AI
The world we’ve long been told to fear is here. asserted
we → tell → ?
But how much do we actually know about these tools and how the government is using them — not just against you and your neighbors, but around the world? To take us down the rabbit hole, I’m joined by my colleague, Intercept reporter Sam Biddle, a senior technology reporter who focuses on issues of surveillance, privacy, and corporate power. asserted
who → know → surveillance
Also joining us is Jason Koebler, co-founder of 404 Media, where he writes about surveillance and AI. asserted
he → join → surveillance
We’re very excited. asserted
We → ’re → ?
To start, can you all just paint us a picture of what the broad surveillance tech apparatus looks like today? asserted
apparatus → start → what
Many of our listeners are familiar with some of the biggest players, like the data mining government contractor Palantir or Flock, the operator of surveillance hardware marketing itself as a friendly neighborhood public safety tool. asserted
Many → market → tool
But let’s zoom out a little bit. asserted
’s → let → ?
Like, how did we go from the days of the National Security Agency and Edward Snowden, to this largely privatized and, in many ways, even more lawless world of mass surveillance? asserted
we → go → surveillance
Sam, I’ll start with you. asserted
I → start → you
What’s stayed the same since that NSA era, and what’s new now? asserted
what → stay → era
The NSA is still here, to say the least. asserted
NSA → say → least
I don’t think you have this conversation, or certainly not in the form that we’re going to have it tonight, without 9/11. asserted
we → think → 9/11
I think that the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, the private sector economy that you described, billions and billions of dollars, is all downstream of 9/11. asserted
you → think → 9/11
I looked it up: In 2006, the DHS budget was, like, $30-something billion. asserted
budget → look → 2006
The presidential request for next year is $118 billion, and a lot of that is flowing to contractors like Palantir. asserted
lot → flow → Palantir
To answer your question, Snowden taught us correctly that we have a lot to fear from the government, but there was not as much emphasis on the companies that empower the government. asserted
that → answer → government
…and 391 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support