Photo via Dawn

Ex-Google DeepMind researcher adds to warnings that AI could 'kill all humans'

Read the original at Dawn ↗
Cite

Reuters. (2026, September 15). Ex-Google DeepMind researcher adds to warnings that AI could 'kill all humans'. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2030082/ex-google-deepmind-researcher-adds-to-warnings-that-ai-could-kill-all-humans

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Dawn · collected 2026-09-15 · by Reuters

Quick Summary

Bilal Chughtai, a former Google DeepMind research engineer who worked there until July 2026, recently warned that artificial intelligence could potentially kill all humans. He joins other researchers like Jacob Coxon from Anthropic, who suggested there’s more than a 10% chance AI could cause such an outcome within the next decade. Chughtai emphasizes the need for coordinated efforts to slow down AI development and manage emerging risks before they become catastrophic.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A former Google DeepMind researcher named Bilal Chughtai warned on X (formerly Twitter) that artificial intelligence (AI) could potentially “kill all humans,” echoing similar concerns from other AI experts. Chughtai, who worked at Google DeepMind as a research engineer until July 2026 and contributed to AGI safety research, expressed urgency about the need for coordinated efforts among tech companies to manage AI development responsibly. He stressed that time might be running out to prevent catastrophic outcomes, citing the importance of pacing AI advancements so they do not outstrip society’s ability to handle emerging risks. This comes after an Anthropic researcher and CEO issued calls for slowing down the rapid pace of advanced AI development, a position backed by influential figures like Elon Musk and Sam Altman from SpaceXAI and OpenAI respectively.

Written for “AI Safety Concerns” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Safety Concerns
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 50% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Free Press
Hedges 4 of 41 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of warnings about AI, with Article A providing a general overview and mentioning multiple topics, while Article B focuses on a specific warning from an ex-DeepMind researcher.”
TIME
Hedges 2 of 40 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A reports on Jacob Coxon's resignation announcement, while Article B discusses subsequent public warnings and responses following his resignation.”
BBC News
Hedges 9 of 29 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different events: Article A discusses Anthropic blocking attempts to use their AI for malicious purposes, while Article B reports on warnings from former researchers about the existential risks posed by AI.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 24 claims
“While both articles discuss warnings about AI from researchers, they describe different occurrences: Article A focuses on Jacob Coxon's resignation and warning, while Article B mentions a former Google DeepMind employee adding to the warnings initiated by Coxon.”
NBC News
Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss separate warnings about AI risks from different researchers at different times.”
South China Morning Post
Hedges 1 of 7 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to AI but describe distinct events with separate dates and contexts.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 9 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different events related to concerns about AI but do not report on the same specific incident.”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 8 of 31 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles discuss related concerns about AI risks but describe different warnings from various researchers over time, not a single identical incident.”
TIME
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 19 of 111 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different topics: one covers an incident of AI agents hacking Hugging Face, while the other discusses warnings about the potential danger of AI from researchers.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 10 of 54 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of concerns over AI, with Article A focusing on President Trump's stance and Article B reporting a warning from an ex-employee of Google DeepMind.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
8
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
50%
4 of 8 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
72/100
Dawn's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Dawn · 2513 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Reuters
801 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “Whatever could go wrong, did,” said Stefano Roffi, director of the private foundation that runs the museum.
🔮 Set 288 for victory, Australia were rocked early on and could manage only 111 to lose the third Test by 176 runs, following their defeat by an innings and 31 runs in the second match in the series.
🔮 “Listening to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state will form an important part of this process, and I am open to them,” he added.
🔮 Some have proposed freezing utility rate increases and slashing guaranteed returns, steps that could have sweeping consequences for the country’s utility industry.
🔮 Coinbase said it made adjustments to its systems that store cryptocurrency keys offline “solely out of an abundance of caution”, while Kraken said it was monitoring industry incidents for lessons it could apply to its defences.
🔮 Published Oct. 31, 2026, 2:20 a.m. ET The US State Department said on Friday it had approved the sale of 500 Patriot PAC-3 missiles to Ukraine for an estimated $2.1 billion, in what would be one of the most significant steps to supply defensive weapons to Kyiv since the start of the second Trump administration. Zelensky said on Monday that Ukraine had been waiting for almost a month for the US to sign off on critical missile supplies, as Russia stepped up attacks on energy and civilian infrastructure.
🔮 More than 160,000 people across Germany are expected to join demonstrations on Saturday, organisers say, as a youth-led movement inspired by protests elsewhere in Europe takes to the streets to demand better education and lower living costs.
🔮 “Why would the Field Marshal be going twice if it is not for some positivity?
🔮 “Why would the Field Marshal be going twice if it is not for some positivity?
🔮 Meta had settled with S.J. days before the trial, so Friday’s settlement with K.D.B. means the trial is expected to proceed against Snap only.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Reuters
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 801 articles by Reuters →

Topics

Anthropic DeepMind Google Google DeepMind LinkedIn

Subjects

Anthropic ORG · 2× Chughtai PERSON · 2× Google ORG · 2× Google DeepMind ORG · 2× Bilal Chughtai PERSON · 1× Coxon PERSON · 1× DeepMind ORG · 1× Evan Hubinger PERSON · 1× Jacob Coxon PERSON · 1× LinkedIn ORG · 1×

Narrative

Following recent concerns, Anthropic Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Dario Amodei called for a slowdown in the pace of advanced AI development over the weekend, winning rare backing from SpaceXAI’s Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and sparking a debate over AI “doomerism”. Chughtai also said that navigating AI safely was possible but would require coordination “to avoid this manic race between AI companies”. “We need to pace AI development to a speed that society can handle, where emerging risks can be addressed before extreme harm is realised,” he added.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 A former Google DeepMind employee on Monday became the latest AI researcher to warn that the technology could “kill all humans”, saying time could be running out to avoid the outcome.

Claims (8 extracted, 4 hedged)

A former Google DeepMind employee on Monday became the latest AI researcher to warn that the technology could “kill all humans”, saying time could be running out to avoid the outcome. uncertain
time → become → outcome
Public alarm about the potential danger posed by AI is growing, after Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon said last week he had resigned, in part because the “people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.” Anthropic scientist Evan Hubinger then responded to Coxon’s comments, saying he was correct and that he believed there was a greater than 10 per cent chance that AI could kill all humans within the next decade. uncertain
AI → pose → decade
“I recently resigned from Google DeepMind, where I worked on AGI safety and alignment research,” Bilal Chughtai wrote on X. asserted
Chughtai → resign → X.
“I earnestly believe that AI has the potential to kill us all, and that we might be running out of time to avoid this outcome.” uncertain
we → believe → outcome
Chughtai, who co-authored research papers while at Google DeepMind, worked there as a research engineer and left the company in July 2026, according to his LinkedIn profile. uncertain
who → co → profile
Google did not respond to a request for comment outside regular business hours. asserted
Google → respond → hours
Following recent concerns, Anthropic Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Dario Amodei called for a slowdown in the pace of advanced AI development over the weekend, winning rare backing from SpaceXAI’s Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and sparking a debate over AI “doomerism”. Chughtai also said that navigating AI safely was possible but would require coordination “to avoid this manic race between AI companies”. “We need to pace AI development to a speed that society can handle, where emerging risks can be addressed before extreme harm is realised,” he added. asserted
he → follow → that
President Donald Trump, however, has dismissed the warnings, saying on social media the AI industry’s call for regulation is a “hoax.” asserted
call → dismiss → regulation
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support