Photo via Los Angeles Times

Democratic leaders panic and GOP divides as AI fears spread

Read the original at Los Angeles Times ↗
Cite

Wilner, M. (2026, September 14). Democratic leaders panic and GOP divides as AI fears spread. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-09-14/democratic-leaders-panic-gop-divides-as-ai-fears-spread

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Los Angeles Times · collected 2026-09-14 · by Michael Wilner

Quick Summary

President Trump dismissed warnings about artificial intelligence's risks as a "hoax" and emphasized U.S. technological competition with China. In contrast, industry leaders like Sam Altman from OpenAI and Dario Amodei from Anthropic are urging for collaborative efforts to manage AI development responsibly. Bipartisan legislation is being drafted in Congress to address potential catastrophic risks associated with AI. However, despite these calls for caution, Trump maintains that a strong presidential leadership alone can control any negative outcomes of AI advancements.
Written by AI on 2026-09-14, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

President Trump dismissed growing concerns about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence (AI), asserting that there is no need for additional regulation or "guardrails" on AI development. In posts on social media and comments to reporters, he claimed that the United States already has a sufficient safeguard in his presidency, stating, “The only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT.” Trump also accused unnamed forces of exaggerating risks and engaging in a "SICK conspiracy" against AI companies. This stance contrasts with calls from leading scientists and tech CEOs like Dario Amodei from Anthropic and Sam Altman from OpenAI, who advocate for slowing down the pace of AI development due to safety concerns. The disagreement comes as Chinese President Xi Jinping is set to visit Washington on September 24 for an official summit where AI will be a key topic of discussion between the two nations.

Written for “Trump AI Rants Condemning Critics” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 40 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump AI Rants Condemning Critics
Politics · 41 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 70/100
Semafor
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different events: one discusses disagreements during AI safety talks on September 11, while the other mentions President Trump's response to AI fears and calls for slowing development on September 14.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 3 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles cover reactions to AI fears but describe different aspects: Article A focuses on Jacob Coxon's resignation and concerns about Anthropic, while Article B discusses political responses from President Trump and Democratic leaders.”
NPR
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 12 of 79 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns; one focuses on a researcher's resignation, while the other discusses political reactions to AI fears.”
CBC News
Hedges 15 of 43 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles discuss related themes of AI risks but describe different aspects: one breaks down fears about existential risk from AI, while the other covers political reactions to those fears.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 44 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI development and its political impact, not the same specific incident.”
Global News
Hedges 11 of 30 claims Outlet record 63/100
“Article A focuses on Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's warnings and proposed safety measures for AI, while Article B discusses political reactions to AI concerns without referencing Amodei or his specific statements.”
The Intercept
Hedges 15 of 431 claims Outlet record 97/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI and surveillance concerns without describing the same specific incident or occurrence.”
September 13, 2026 Different event
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 10 of 65 claims
“Article A discusses Dario Amodei's essay about slowing down AI development, while Article B covers President Trump's reaction to AI fears and rejection of calls to slow AI development.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
52
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
8 of 52 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
95/100
Los Angeles Times's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
41
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Los Angeles Times · 256 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Michael Wilner
18 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 But the midterms will also serve as a reckoning for one of the least productive sessions of Congress in a century.
2026-10-31 · assertive framing · A historically paralyzed Congress faces its voters
🔮 Economists warn that Trump has overseen fiscal policy that would give the federal government fewer tools than it has had in the past to respond to a crisis.
🔮 Marco Rubio, the president’s secretary of state and national security advisor, has been silent on Trump’s decision to cut a deal with Moscow on diesel sales that could fuel Russia’s war against Ukraine.
🔮 Lawmakers and AI industry leaders have also called for guardrails on the nascent technology, which experts warn could soon surpass human understanding.
🔮 Xi Jinping’s remarks reflect growing concern within China over whether governments in Washington or Beijing will be able to contain a technology with potentially transformative capabilities, according to a U.S. official.
🔮 “Will a deal be made with Iran that lets them rebuild and create a far greater country than it ever was before — maybe one of the greatest in the Middle East or even the world?
🔮 Click here to listen to this article - - China’s spy chief warned that runaway AI capabilities could threaten Communist Party control. -
🔮 The president’s position has put him at odds with a growing chorus of industry leaders and bipartisan lawmakers warning that AI could soon advance beyond human control.
🔮 Chinese President Xi Jinping will visit Washington on Sept. 24 for an official summit and state dinner, with AI development expected to top the agenda.
🔮 Questions swirl over Trump’s pledge to give $5,000 payouts if GOP wins - Click here to listen to this article - - President Trump vowed to send every U.S. adult a $5,000 “Trump Dividend” if Republicans keep control of Congress, a stunning midterm gambit that would cost more than $1 trillion and need lawmakers’ approval.
Also by Michael Wilner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 18 articles by Michael Wilner →

Topics

Anthropic China Democratic OpenAI Washington

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 7× Amodei ORG · 4× Anthropic ORG · 3× China GPE · 3× Altman PERSON · 2× Democratic NORP · 2× Hillary Clinton PERSON · 2× OpenAI ORG · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Washington GPE · 2×

Narrative

“This is something that is moving very fast in private hands, and if we don’t get on top of it, I think can be dangerous.” California lawmakers call for criminal penalties and emergency legislation as tech leaders warn of existential risks from rogue AI. The following day, Clinton said AI was becoming “too dangerous” for partisanship to paralyze Washington.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
🔮 The president’s position has put him at odds with a growing chorus of industry leaders and bipartisan lawmakers warning that AI could soon advance beyond human control.
2026-09-14 · Los Angeles Times
Democratic leaders panic and GOP divides as AI fears spread · assertive framing

Claims (52 extracted, 8 hedged)

Democratic leaders panic and GOP divides as AI fears spread asserted
fears → panic → ?
- Click here to listen to this article - - President Trump blamed the political backlash on a ‘conspiracy’ perpetuated by China, the only major competitor in the field. - asserted
Trump → click → field
Hillary Clinton said that AI was becoming ‘too dangerous’ for partisanship to paralyze Washington. asserted
partisanship → say → Washington
President Trump on Monday forcefully rejected calls to slow the development of artificial intelligence, dismissing concerns about its risks as a “hoax” and warning the United States remains locked in a fierce technological race with China. asserted
States → reject → China
The president’s position has put him at odds with a growing chorus of industry leaders and bipartisan lawmakers warning that AI could soon advance beyond human control. uncertain
AI → put → control
Top executives from three of the country’s leading AI companies — OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Anthropic’s Dario Amodei and SpaceXAI’s Elon Musk — issued exceptional calls this past weekend for collaboration on a path forward that could “pace the frontier” of AI development. uncertain
that → lead → development
Rare flashes of bipartisanship have also emerged on Capitol Hill, where Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a Republican, is working with Democrats on legislation aimed at guarding against AI’s most catastrophic risks, including its potential use to develop biological weapons. asserted
Thune → emerge → weapons
And Democratic elders, including former President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, have urged their party to treat the threats posed by AI as an acute national security crisis. But Trump remained steadfast in his pushback, blaming the political backlash on a “conspiracy” perpetuated by China, the only major competitor in the field. asserted
Trump → include → field
Alarm mounted throughout the summer as researchers at leading AI labs found the pace of development far outstripping their expectations. asserted
pace → mount → expectations
“AI taking over the World, destroying Humanity, and all other things bad, is a HOAX,” Trump wrote in a series of social media posts. asserted
Trump → take → posts
“The only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!” asserted
U.S.A. → need → spades
The Trump administration, the president continued, “has stopped AI ‘people’ from doing bad, or potentially bad, ‘things,’ like Dario (Anthropic!), who is now pretending to be a ‘perfect little angel’ — and we will continue to do so! asserted
we → continue → Dario
We already have tremendous CRIMINAL and REGULATORY power over these companies! asserted
We → have → companies
” Calls for action have grown since a former researcher at Anthropic posted a dire alert on social media that AI development could lead to an extinction-level event. uncertain
development → grow → event
His message went viral, prompting Amodei, the founder of Anthropic, to issue a public letter calling for a slowdown. asserted
message → go → slowdown
Altman said he agreed with Amodei, announcing the company would delay its initial public offering until 2027 over safety concerns. asserted
company → say → concerns
In July, OpenAI discovered a swarm of rogue AI agents had secretly plotted to escape their virtual sandbox, infiltrating the open internet and hacking a private company — a spectacular omen of how quickly AI systems could become difficult to contain. uncertain
systems → discover → company
“Given the accelerating rate of AI capability development, it’s my worry that in 6–12 months such a swarm could be capable of taking over the entire internet with a persistent botnet, potentially causing hundreds of billions of dollars in damage,” Amodei wrote over the weekend, “and that the scale of damage would continue to increase from there if AI becomes more powerful without the necessary guardrails. uncertain
AI → give → guardrails
Still, Trump and several of his Republican allies rejected the prospect of government regulation — or cast doubt on Altman and Amodei’s motives. asserted
Trump → reject → motives
The Defense Department posted a graphic on X promoting “AI-First,” and stating the government would advocate “Americanism, not effective altruism.” asserted
government → post → altruism
The image appeared generated by artificial intelligence. asserted
image → generate → intelligence
“If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible,” David Sacks, Trump’s former AI czar now serving as co-chair of the president’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, wrote on X. “But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission. asserted
you → think → permission
Stop pretending antitrust law has to be suspended so you can form a cartel. asserted
you → pretend → cartel
Stop pretending you need a regulatory approval process that supersedes product liability. asserted
that → pretend → liability
“Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic,” Sacks added. asserted
Sacks → pretend → all
“You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack.” asserted
products → face → cyberattack
Regardless of the companies’ motives, Democrats are seizing the moment as an opportunity to pursue meaningful regulatory reforms. asserted
Democrats → seize → reforms
At a Thursday fundraiser with Democratic Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the House minority leader, Obama said AI should move to the center of the Democratic agenda, both in Congress and on the campaign trail ahead of the 2028 presidential primary. asserted
AI → say → primary
“I would strongly urge that the Democrats put together a framework for a very public conversation,” Obama said. asserted
Obama → urge → conversation
“This is something that is moving very fast in private hands, and if we don’t get on top of it, I think can be dangerous.” California lawmakers call for criminal penalties and emergency legislation as tech leaders warn of existential risks from rogue AI. The following day, Clinton said AI was becoming “too dangerous” for partisanship to paralyze Washington. asserted
partisanship → move → Washington
“The one good thing that Donald Trump did in his first term was Warp Speed,” Clinton said on MS NOW’s “Morning Joe,” referring to a federal program in Trump’s first term to expedite the development of a vaccine for COVID-19. asserted
Clinton → do → COVID-19
“Let’s put an AI commission on warp speed, and figure out what we’re going to do to sensibly regulate.” asserted
we → let → what
AI leaders “are basically saying, ‘Stop us before something really bad happens,’” Clinton continued. asserted
Clinton → say → us
“‘Help us stop.’ asserted
us → help → ?
The president of China is coming to the White house in two weeks. asserted
president → come → weeks
” But China’s rapid progress in AI has so far pushed Trump to let U.S. industry move ahead with few constraints. asserted
industry → push → constraints
China’s spy chief issued a rare warning Monday that AI development could risk the future of Chinese Communist Party control over the country. uncertain
development → issue → country
But China’s foreign ministry responded defensively to the U.S. debate. asserted
ministry → respond → debate
“Fearmongering, confrontation and vicious competition will only disrupt the process of global AI governance which serves no one’s interest,” a spokesperson said. asserted
spokesperson → disrupt → interest
Leading AI companies in the United States have begun using their most advanced models to train new ones, in a process known as recursive self-improvement. asserted
companies → lead → improvement
…and 12 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support