End of USMCA would be ‘severe but not cataclysmic’ for Canada’s economy, Deloitte says

The Globe and Mail · collected 2026-09-06 · by Lauren Krugel
Read the original at The Globe and Mail ↗

Summary

A Deloitte Canada report predicts a "severe but not cataclysmic" impact on the country's economy if the USMCA is withdrawn, with a 1.6% drop in real GDP and 163,000 lost jobs annually over the next decade. The worst-case scenario projects significant losses for specific sectors, including motor vehicles (-28%), electronics (-21%), and oil and gas (-11% sales to the US). In contrast, the best-case scenario assumes Canada maintains existing trade agreements while forging new ones, leading to a 0.6% increase in real GDP and job creation. The report's authors argue that diversification alone is insufficient and that Canada needs to pursue policies enabling greater self-sufficiency through interprovincial trade and industry development.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
22
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
14%
3 of 22 hedged
Leaning
Centre
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
41.5
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Deloitte Canada has released a report predicting the impact on Canada's economy if the USMCA trade pact falls apart. According to the report, if the US were to withdraw from the agreement, Canada's real gross domestic product would fall by 1.6%, or $402-billion, over two years. This decline is considered a "severe" but not "cataclysmic" hit to Canada's economy. The US currently accounts for about 70% of Canada's exports. To mitigate this impact, the report recommends that Canada look beyond trade diversification and consider measures such as removing interprovincial trade barriers and fostering new industries.

Written for “Impact of USMCA Loss on Canada” on 2026-09-07, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score +0.15 Confidence high
Leaning score +0.15 for article 6383 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-09-07

Story

📰 Impact of USMCA Loss on Canada
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads centre and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 5% hedged 7 of 137 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses President Trump's tariffs, while Article B refers to a hypothetical scenario where the US withdraws from the North American trade pact (USMCA)”
National Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 9% hedged 3 of 34 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles cover different topics, with Article A discussing counter-tariffs and the federal gasoline tax, while Article B discusses the potential impact of USMCA withdrawal on Canada's economy”
TIME
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 11% hedged 5 of 45 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses a breakdown in trade talks between the U.S. and Canada, while Article B refers to a hypothetical withdrawal from the USMCA and its potential economic impact.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 58 📰 publisher trust 42
“Article A reports on the collapse of a trade deal between Canada and the U.S., while Article B discusses a report on the potential economic impact of the US withdrawing from the North American trade pact, which implies that the agreement has already been reached or collapsed.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 28 📰 publisher trust 42
“Article A reports on Canadians' support for Carney's counter-tariff measures, while Article B discusses a Deloitte report on Canada's economy and potential effects of USMCA withdrawal”
Just In
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 8% hedged 3 of 36 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles discuss different aspects of US-Canada trade relations and do not clearly report on one single occurrence or incident.”
World News Today: International News Headlines - The Hindu | The Hindu
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses Trump's statement, while Article B discusses a Deloitte report on the potential effects of USMCA withdrawal on Canada's economy”
www.thestar.com - RSS Results of type article
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 11 📰 publisher trust 62
“Article A discusses a scheduled event (counter-tariffs taking effect) and an upcoming financial conference, while Article B reports on a hypothetical economic scenario related to trade pact withdrawal”
CBC | Top Stories News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 19% hedged 6 of 32 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A is discussing counter-tariffs affecting semi-trailers, while Article B is about a Deloitte report on the impact of USMCA withdrawal on Canada's economy”
National Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 32 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses a Postmedia Leger poll about Canadian sentiment towards a tariff war and US President Trump, while Article B mentions Deloitte Canada's report on the economic impact of a potential US withdrawal from the North American trade pact.”

Publisher

The Globe and Mail · 120 article(s) · 9 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.075 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.069 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 1.000 0.35
Running correction rate · 9 correction(s)
2026-09-07
Morning Update: Tumbler Ridge survivors file new lawsuits
2026-09-06
Morning Update: Made-in-Canada trains
2026-08-31
Ontario plan to stop mandatory inquests for inmate deaths a mistake, advocates say
2026-08-31
Morning Update: Mapping new points of resistance
2026-08-28
Morning Update: Lake Ontario forever
2026-08-27
Morning Update: Rethinking resources as a trade weapon
2026-08-26
Morning Update: Ottawa bites back
2026-08-25
Morning Update: A new trade deal remains in the cards
2026-08-24
Morning Update: ‘You are at war when you get attacked’

Who wrote this

Lauren Krugel
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Boosting trade with a more diverse array of international partners would only plug part of the hole in Canada’s economy if the U.S. were to withdraw from the North American trade pact, says a new Deloitte Canada report.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Canada Deloitte Canada North American U.S. USMCA

Subjects

Canada GPE · 8× U.S. GPE · 6× USMCA ORG · 3× Deloitte Canada ORG · 2× Stewart PERSON · 2× Danielle Bochove PERSON · 1× Matthew Stewart PERSON · 1× North American NORP · 1× Trevin Stratton PERSON · 1× United-States-Mexico-Canada GPE · 1×

Narrative

“What we wanted to do is to get a better picture around what’s the impact if the worst happens and the (United-States-Mexico-Canada) agreement falls apart, and then how much can we offset of the negative impact?” report co-author Matthew Stewart, a partner at Deloitte Canada, said in an interview.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 Boosting trade with a more diverse array of international partners would only plug part of the hole in Canada’s economy if the U.S. were to withdraw from the North American trade pact, says a new Deloitte Canada report.

Claims (22 extracted, 3 hedged)

Boosting trade with a more diverse array of international partners would only plug part of the hole in Canada’s economy if the U.S. were to withdraw from the North American trade pact, says a new Deloitte Canada report. asserted
report → boost → pact
So Canada must look at measures beyond trade diversification to help make up the difference, such as removing interprovincial trade barriers and fostering new industries, wrote the authors of “Tariffs: A Rough Road Leads to New Destinations,” released Thursday. asserted
Road → look → Destinations
It lays out a best- and worst-case scenario for the domestic economy amid the cross-border trade maelstrom. asserted
It → lay → maelstrom
“What we wanted to do is to get a better picture around what’s the impact if the worst happens and the (United-States-Mexico-Canada) agreement falls apart, and then how much can we offset of the negative impact?” report co-author Matthew Stewart, a partner at Deloitte Canada, said in an interview. asserted
Stewart → want → interview
The worst scenario would be the dissolution of the USMCA, which the report’s authors call “a possibility that cannot be dismissed.” asserted
that → call → which
The U.S. accounted for about 70 per cent of Canada’s exports in 2025. asserted
U.S. → account → 2025
If that were to happen, Canada’s real gross domestic product would fall by 1.6 per cent, or $402-billion, over the next decade relative to the status quo baseline – U.S. tariff levels as of July 1 of this year and USMCA intact. asserted
product → happen → year
It projects employment would shrink by 163,000 jobs annually on average, dragging wages and consumer spending along with it. asserted
employment → project → it
“The bottom line is a severe but not cataclysmic impact on Canada’s overall economy, although perhaps cataclysmic for some sectors,” wrote Stewart and co-authors Danielle Bochove and Trevin Stratton. asserted
Stewart → write → sectors
Manufacturing would bear the brunt. asserted
Manufacturing → bear → brunt
Motor vehicles and parts would see a 28-per-cent plunge in real GDP compared to the baseline, while electronics, machinery and equipment would lose 21 per cent, rubber and plastics products 20 per cent and chemicals 13 per cent by 2036. asserted
electronics → see → 2036
The model also accounts for the oil and gas sector, which would no longer be shielded from a 10-per-cent global tariff imposed by the U.S. asserted
which → account → U.S.
Oil sales to the U.S. would drop 11 per cent and natural gas would see a 30-per-cent decline. asserted
gas → drop → decline
The best-case scenario would see Canada maintaining its existing free-trade agreements – including the USMCA – while forging new ones. asserted
Canada → see → ones
“The model suggests that the gains from export diversification, while encouraging, are smaller in scale than the consequences of the breakdown in preferential trade with the U.S. envisioned in Scenario One.” uncertain
gains → suggest → Scenario
Under this case, Canada’s real GDP would grow by 0.6 per cent, or $141-billion, in the next decade. asserted
GDP → grow → decade
Almost 53,000 jobs a year would be created. asserted
jobs → create → ?
The sectors most likely to gain in this scenario would be agriculture, particularly with greater trade with China and India, as well as manufacturing of various goods. asserted
sectors → gain → goods
The report’s authors argue Canada needs to do more than find new markets for established products. asserted
Canada → argue → products
“It also needs to lean into policies that enable greater self-sufficiency … by breaking down internal barriers and developing new areas of specialization at home that lay the basis to competitively serve world markets.” asserted
that → need → markets
The report highlighted Ottawa’s massive investments in defence and support for new export infrastructure and critical minerals refining as positive steps. Deloitte research from 2025 suggests that completely phasing out interprovincial trade barriers over five years would generate an additional $881 billion in economic output by 2040 and create 133,000 new jobs. “I don’t think all of this would be easily attainable, but I think we could at least achieve half of that,” Stewart said. uncertain
Stewart → highlight → that
“Together with the diversification and more open internal trade, we could offset most of the decline from a worsening situation with the United States.” uncertain
we → offset → States
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support