End of USMCA would be ‘severe but not cataclysmic’ for Canada’s economy, Deloitte says

Read the original at The Globe and Mail ↗
Cite

Krugel, L. (2026, September 6). End of USMCA would be ‘severe but not cataclysmic’ for Canada’s economy, Deloitte says. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/economy/article-economic-impact-of-us-exit-from-usmca-deloitte-report/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Globe and Mail · collected 2026-09-06 · by Lauren Krugel

Quick Summary

A Deloitte Canada report predicts a "severe but not cataclysmic" impact on the country's economy if the USMCA is withdrawn, with a 1.6% drop in real GDP and 163,000 lost jobs annually over the next decade. The worst-case scenario projects significant losses for specific sectors, including motor vehicles (-28%), electronics (-21%), and oil and gas (-11% sales to the US). In contrast, the best-case scenario assumes Canada maintains existing trade agreements while forging new ones, leading to a 0.6% increase in real GDP and job creation. The report's authors argue that diversification alone is insufficient and that Canada needs to pursue policies enabling greater self-sufficiency through interprovincial trade and industry development.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Deloitte Canada released a report titled "Tariffs: A Rough Road Leads to New Destinations" on Thursday, analyzing the potential economic impact if the United States were to withdraw from the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement). The report outlines both best-case and worst-case scenarios for Canada's economy. In the worst case, where the USMCA dissolves, Canada’s real GDP would decrease by 1.6%, equivalent to a loss of $402 billion, as the U.S. currently accounts for about 70% of Canadian exports. To mitigate such an economic hit, Canada must explore measures beyond trade diversification and look into removing interprovincial barriers and fostering new industries. Deloitte’s Matthew Stewart, a partner at the firm, emphasized that understanding these impacts is crucial to prepare for potential negative outcomes.

Written for “USMCA Impact On Canada” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 USMCA Impact On Canada
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 53
“Both articles report on Canada imposing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion in US imports, which took effect on the same day”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 45 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses a hypothetical scenario of US withdrawal from the North American trade pact and its potential effects on Canada's economy, while Article B reports on Canada's tariffs going into effect in response to soured relations with the US, which occurred after the date of Article A”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 36 📰 publisher trust 53
“Article A discusses a hypothetical scenario where USMCA is withdrawn and the potential effects on Canada's economy, while Article B refers to an ongoing trade war between Canada and the US with no mention of USMCA withdrawal”
National Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 32 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses a Postmedia Leger poll about Canadian sentiment towards a tariff war and US President Trump, while Article B mentions Deloitte Canada's report on the economic impact of a potential US withdrawal from the North American trade pact.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 19% hedged 6 of 32 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses a disagreement between the two governments over Mark Carney's account of US changing the terms of an agreement, while Article B does not mention this incident and instead focuses on the potential economic impact of US withdrawing from the North American trade pact”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 16% hedged 14 of 89 📰 publisher trust 74
“Article A discusses a hypothetical scenario of the US withdrawing from the North American trade pact and its potential economic impact, while Article B reports on actual counter-tariffs taking effect and escalating the trade dispute”
Retaliation different event · 90%
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 43 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A discusses a hypothetical scenario where the US withdraws from the North American trade pact, while Article B reports on Canada slapping retaliatory tariffs on US goods in response to an unspecified action”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses a hypothetical scenario where the US withdraws from USMCA, while Article B reports on an ongoing trade war between the US and Canada with tit-for-tat tariffs”
National Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 11 of 78 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses a hypothetical scenario about the effects of USMCA withdrawal on Canada's economy, while Article B describes real events in July-August 2025 regarding trade tariffs and Palestine recognition”
TIME
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 2 of 67 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A discusses a hypothetical scenario of the US withdrawing from the North American trade pact, while Article B reports on Canadian consumers boycotting U.S. products as part of an ongoing trade war”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
22
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
14%
3 of 22 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
53/100
The Globe and Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Globe and Mail · 862 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Lauren Krugel
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It’s been a relatively quiet decade in Alberta’s oilsands, but the federal and provincial governments believe a new West Coast pipeline coupled with policy shifts might help turn up the volume.
🔮 Carney, Smith say new West Coast pipeline could get oil companies building again This time, sector is ready to heat up without the headaches, leaders say It's been a relatively quiet decade in Alberta's oilsands, but the federal and provincial governments believe a new West Coast pipeline coupled with policy shifts might help turn up the volume.
🔮 CALGARY - Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy says it would be shocking to the average American to see the United States invade Canada.
🔮 The serene alpine setting will stand in stark contrast to the theme of this year’s Global Business Forum conference: “thriving in chaos.”
🔮 “They would laugh you out of the room,” said the fourth-generation southern Alberta wheat grower.
🔮 Boosting trade with a more diverse array of international partners would only plug part of the hole in Canada’s economy if the U.S. were to withdraw from the North American trade pact, says a new Deloitte Canada report.
Also by Lauren Krugel
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Lauren Krugel →

Topics

Canada Deloitte Canada North American U.S. USMCA

Subjects

Canada GPE · 8× U.S. GPE · 6× USMCA ORG · 3× Deloitte Canada ORG · 2× Stewart PERSON · 2× Danielle Bochove PERSON · 1× Matthew Stewart PERSON · 1× North American NORP · 1× Trevin Stratton PERSON · 1× United-States-Mexico-Canada GPE · 1×

Narrative

“What we wanted to do is to get a better picture around what’s the impact if the worst happens and the (United-States-Mexico-Canada) agreement falls apart, and then how much can we offset of the negative impact?” report co-author Matthew Stewart, a partner at Deloitte Canada, said in an interview.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 Boosting trade with a more diverse array of international partners would only plug part of the hole in Canada’s economy if the U.S. were to withdraw from the North American trade pact, says a new Deloitte Canada report.

Claims (22 extracted, 3 hedged)

Boosting trade with a more diverse array of international partners would only plug part of the hole in Canada’s economy if the U.S. were to withdraw from the North American trade pact, says a new Deloitte Canada report. asserted
report → boost → pact
So Canada must look at measures beyond trade diversification to help make up the difference, such as removing interprovincial trade barriers and fostering new industries, wrote the authors of “Tariffs: A Rough Road Leads to New Destinations,” released Thursday. asserted
Road → look → Destinations
It lays out a best- and worst-case scenario for the domestic economy amid the cross-border trade maelstrom. asserted
It → lay → maelstrom
“What we wanted to do is to get a better picture around what’s the impact if the worst happens and the (United-States-Mexico-Canada) agreement falls apart, and then how much can we offset of the negative impact?” report co-author Matthew Stewart, a partner at Deloitte Canada, said in an interview. asserted
Stewart → want → interview
The worst scenario would be the dissolution of the USMCA, which the report’s authors call “a possibility that cannot be dismissed.” asserted
that → call → which
The U.S. accounted for about 70 per cent of Canada’s exports in 2025. asserted
U.S. → account → 2025
If that were to happen, Canada’s real gross domestic product would fall by 1.6 per cent, or $402-billion, over the next decade relative to the status quo baseline – U.S. tariff levels as of July 1 of this year and USMCA intact. asserted
product → happen → year
It projects employment would shrink by 163,000 jobs annually on average, dragging wages and consumer spending along with it. asserted
employment → project → it
“The bottom line is a severe but not cataclysmic impact on Canada’s overall economy, although perhaps cataclysmic for some sectors,” wrote Stewart and co-authors Danielle Bochove and Trevin Stratton. asserted
Stewart → write → sectors
Manufacturing would bear the brunt. asserted
Manufacturing → bear → brunt
Motor vehicles and parts would see a 28-per-cent plunge in real GDP compared to the baseline, while electronics, machinery and equipment would lose 21 per cent, rubber and plastics products 20 per cent and chemicals 13 per cent by 2036. asserted
electronics → see → 2036
The model also accounts for the oil and gas sector, which would no longer be shielded from a 10-per-cent global tariff imposed by the U.S. asserted
which → account → U.S.
Oil sales to the U.S. would drop 11 per cent and natural gas would see a 30-per-cent decline. asserted
gas → drop → decline
The best-case scenario would see Canada maintaining its existing free-trade agreements – including the USMCA – while forging new ones. asserted
Canada → see → ones
“The model suggests that the gains from export diversification, while encouraging, are smaller in scale than the consequences of the breakdown in preferential trade with the U.S. envisioned in Scenario One.” uncertain
gains → suggest → Scenario
Under this case, Canada’s real GDP would grow by 0.6 per cent, or $141-billion, in the next decade. asserted
GDP → grow → decade
Almost 53,000 jobs a year would be created. asserted
jobs → create → ?
The sectors most likely to gain in this scenario would be agriculture, particularly with greater trade with China and India, as well as manufacturing of various goods. asserted
sectors → gain → goods
The report’s authors argue Canada needs to do more than find new markets for established products. asserted
Canada → argue → products
“It also needs to lean into policies that enable greater self-sufficiency … by breaking down internal barriers and developing new areas of specialization at home that lay the basis to competitively serve world markets.” asserted
that → need → markets
The report highlighted Ottawa’s massive investments in defence and support for new export infrastructure and critical minerals refining as positive steps. Deloitte research from 2025 suggests that completely phasing out interprovincial trade barriers over five years would generate an additional $881 billion in economic output by 2040 and create 133,000 new jobs. “I don’t think all of this would be easily attainable, but I think we could at least achieve half of that,” Stewart said. uncertain
Stewart → highlight → that
“Together with the diversification and more open internal trade, we could offset most of the decline from a worsening situation with the United States.” uncertain
we → offset → States
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support