Most Canadians support Carney’s counter-tariff measures, poll suggests

Read the original at The Globe and Mail ↗
Cite

Grandy, O. (2026, September 5). Most Canadians support Carney’s counter-tariff measures, poll suggests. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-canadians-views-trade-deal-nanos-research-survey/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Globe and Mail · collected 2026-09-05 · by Olivia Grandy

Quick Summary

A Nanos Research poll conducted for The Globe and Mail suggests that 85% of over 1,000 Canadians surveyed support Prime Minister Mark Carney's decision to impose retaliatory countertariffs on the US. The survey found that 80% also support Ottawa's plan to retaliate with dollar-for-dollar countertariffs, which are set to take effect on Tuesday. A significant majority of respondents (71%) said they are willing or somewhat willing to pay higher prices for everyday goods as part of Canada's response to US tariffs. Support for the countertariffs is highest in Quebec and Ontario, but lowest in the Prairies, where about 17% of respondents oppose rejecting the potential trade deal.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-05, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

American tourism organizations have been aggressively trying to attract Canadian visitors back to the United States through various promotional campaigns since President Donald Trump returned to office and imposed tariffs on Canadian products, causing an informal boycott of travel to the US. Josh Loewen, a Vancouver marketing executive, notes that after Trump’s re-election, Canadian travel to the U.S. dropped dramatically due to the president's rhetoric about making Canada the 51st state and the ensuing trade war. Despite slight improvements in border crossings from May to July, recent escalations—such as the imposition of up to 50% import taxes by both countries—have renewed doubts about any recovery. Loewen believes current efforts to win back Canadian visitors are futile until a new U.S. president takes office and eases tensions between the two nations.

Written for “US Canada Trade War” on 2026-10-21, grounded in this article and the 55 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Canada Trade War
Politics · 56 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
National Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 27% hedged 7 of 26 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on Prime Minister Mark Carney's decision to impose retaliatory countertariffs and block trade negotiations with the US, citing public support in Canada.”
TIME
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 11% hedged 5 of 45 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe the same trade negotiations breakdown and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's decision to impose retaliatory countertariffs, referencing the same issue at the same time.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 58 📰 publisher trust 53
“Both articles report on the same trade deal collapse and Ottawa's retaliatory measures against the US, with a shared timeline”
National Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 17% hedged 10 of 58 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on the same poll and its results, covering a single occurrence”
National Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 19% hedged 6 of 32 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles are dated September 5, 2026 and discuss Prime Minister Mark Carney's decision to impose retaliatory countertariffs on the US, indicating they cover the same specific event.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 11 📰 publisher trust 63
“Both articles report on the implementation of Canada's counter-tariffs against the US, with Article A discussing public support for this decision and Article B announcing its upcoming effect”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 16% hedged 14 of 89 📰 publisher trust 74
“Both articles describe the imposition of Canada's counter-tariffs on imported American goods as the trade dispute escalates, indicating they are reporting on the same specific incident.”
Global News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 19 📰 publisher trust 63
“Both articles report on the implementation of Canada's counter-tariffs on US goods in response to a trade war escalation, with identical language about dollar-for-dollar matching and Prime Minister Mark Carney's statements.”
Retaliation same event · 100%
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 43 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles report on Canada imposing retaliatory tariffs on US goods, starting on the same day, with similar details about the affected products.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 53
“Both articles report on the implementation of Canadian countertariffs on US imports, with Article A mentioning a poll suggesting support for this measure and Article B reporting that it has taken effect.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
3 of 28 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
53/100
The Globe and Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
56
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Globe and Mail · 850 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Olivia Grandy
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 About seven in 10 survey respondents said they were willing or somewhat willing to pay higher prices for everyday goods as part of Canada’s response to U.S. tariffs.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Canada Canadians Nanos Research U.S. the United States

Subjects

Canada GPE · 8× Canadians NORP · 7× U.S. GPE · 7× Carney PERSON · 4× Nanos PERSON · 4× the United States GPE · 4× American NORP · 2× Canadian NORP · 2× Nanos Research ORG · 2× Trump PERSON · 2×

Narrative

Nik Nanos, the chief data scientist for Nanos Research, said support for retaliatory tariffs is as high as the early days of the trade war at the beginning of last year, when American policies fuelled antipathy toward the United States and consumer boycotts of U.S. goods and travel.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-05
🔮 About seven in 10 survey respondents said they were willing or somewhat willing to pay higher prices for everyday goods as part of Canada’s response to U.S. tariffs.
2026-09-05 · The Globe and Mail
Most Canadians support Carney’s counter-tariff measures, poll suggests · assertive framing

Claims (28 extracted, 3 hedged)

Most Canadians support Prime Minister Mark Carney’s decision to walk away from trade negotiations with the United States and instead impose retaliatory countertariffs, even if it means paying more for goods, a new poll suggests. uncertain
poll → support → goods
A Nanos Research survey conducted for The Globe and Mail found that 85 per cent of more than 1,000 respondents said they support or somewhat support Mr. Carney’s rejection of the proposed trade deal with the Trump administration. asserted
they → conduct → administration
The survey also found that 80 per cent of respondents said they support or somewhat support Ottawa’s plan to retaliate with dollar-for-dollar countertariffs on a range of U.S. products, scheduled to take effect on Tuesday. asserted
they → find → Tuesday
Negotiations to avoid additional U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods fell apart last month when Mr. Carney ordered his officials to withdraw from talks and return home. asserted
Carney → avoid → talks
He later said the Americans introduced unreasonable demands on a range of issues, from French-language requirements to tariffs on trucks. asserted
Americans → say → trucks
Nik Nanos, the chief data scientist for Nanos Research, said support for retaliatory tariffs is as high as the early days of the trade war at the beginning of last year, when American policies fuelled antipathy toward the United States and consumer boycotts of U.S. goods and travel. asserted
policies → say → goods
“We’re back to a situation where the temperature is about as hot as it got when Donald Trump first said that Canada should be the 51st state,” Mr. Nanos said. asserted
Nanos → ’re → situation
About seven in 10 survey respondents said they were willing or somewhat willing to pay higher prices for everyday goods as part of Canada’s response to U.S. tariffs. asserted
they → say → tariffs
Yet, only time will tell how many Canadians will hold on to these views when “economic causalities start piling in” from the trade war, Mr. Nanos said. asserted
Nanos → tell → war
He added the near-consensus could be short-lived, mirroring the common trend of public opinion during wars. uncertain
consensus → add → wars
“That’s the risk for the Carney administration,” he said. asserted
he → ’ → administration
The online random survey sampled 1,037 Canadians from Aug. 30 to Sept. 2 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. asserted
survey → sample → 20
Respondents from the Prairies were comparatively less likely to support Canada rejecting the possible trade deal, at about 17 per cent. asserted
Canada → support → cent
Similarly, about 19 per cent of respondents from the region opposed Canada implementing countertariffs. asserted
Canada → oppose → countertariffs
“Albertans and folks in the Prairies, specifically, are more likely to have an affinity with the United States in terms of the importance of the bi-national relationship and the importance of the trade talks,” Mr. Nanos said. asserted
Nanos → have → talks
Still, he flagged that even in this region, nearly 77 per cent somewhat rejected the potential U.S.-Canada deal. asserted
cent → flag → deal
Overall, respondents expressed high levels of support for the country’s elbows-up posture: More than three in four said they had both sought out purchasing Canadian goods and avoided purchasing American goods or services in response to Mr. Trump’s comments. asserted
they → express → comments
Six in 10 Canadians are either confident or somewhat confident that Canada can protect its economic interests if a new agreement with the U.S. is reached, the poll found. asserted
poll → protect → U.S.
Meanwhile, about two-thirds also said they were worried or somewhat worried about the impact that tariffs will have on them and their families. asserted
tariffs → say → them
These coinciding views seem to reflect the “clear-headed” understanding Canadians have about the effects of a trade war, Mr. Nanos said. asserted
Nanos → coincide → war
“They know that you’re not going to enter into a tariff war with the United States without suffering.” asserted
you → know → States
Three-quarters of Canadians disagreed in some way that the U.S. is a trustworthy ally of Canada. asserted
U.S. → disagree → Canada
The lowest level of agreement (4.7 per cent) came from Quebeckers. asserted
level → come → Quebeckers
Mr. Carney has said that the U.S. tried to influence Canada’s language protections during the August trade talks. asserted
U.S. → say → talks
Despite the lack of trust, polling did suggest that some Canadians still believe there is a chance the relationship between the two countries could rebound. uncertain
relationship → suggest → countries
More than three in five expected Canada’s relationship with the U.S. to be better (22 per cent) or somewhat better (39 per cent) five years from now. asserted
relationship → expect → U.S.
Put another way, Mr. Nanos pointed out that only one in five respondents firmly said the relationship would improve after this time period. asserted
relationship → put → period
“Even the hope that Canadians have that things will get better to one extent or another in the next five years is tepid,” he said. asserted
he → have → years
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support