J.D. Tuccille: Canada can win at trade by ignoring Trump

Read the original at National Post ↗
Cite

Jerema, C. (2026, August 25). J.D. Tuccille: Canada can win at trade by ignoring Trump. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/j-d-tuccille-canada-can-win-at-trade-by-ignoring-trump

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

National Post · collected 2026-08-25 · by Carson Jerema analysis

Quick Summary

J.D. Tuccille argues that Canada can succeed in its trade dealings with the US by ignoring Donald Trump's demands and instead adopting a policy of free trade. The US and Canadian leaders have engaged in a war of words over tariffs, but Tuccille believes that governments should get out of the way of people exchanging goods and services. According to economist Milton Friedman, who is cited in the article, protectionist policies like tariffs raise prices for customers and waste resources, while free trade promotes economic growth. The article suggests that Trump's administration is making a mistake by pushing for "reciprocal" trade deals, which are actually a form of protectionism.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-25, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Here's a summary of the news story:

Naheed Nenshi, the leader of the Alberta NDP, has urged Premier Danielle Smith to cancel or postpone the upcoming referendum on separating from Canada due to the ongoing trade war with the US. The referendum is scheduled for October 19 and will ask voters whether they want to start the process of holding a future binding vote on separation.

Nenshi's demand was met with skepticism by some, who noted that he had previously opposed the idea of a separation referendum. Premier Smith rejected Nenshi's request, saying that the trade war was an opportunity for Alberta and Canada to stand together against the US.

Meanwhile, other provinces are also considering their stance on the trade war. Alberta and Saskatchewan have rejected suggestions that they impose export levies on natural resources such as oil and potash in retaliation for US tariffs, with Premier Smith saying that such a move would be "disastrous" and would harm not just Albertans but also other provinces.

The federal government has announced its plan to impose countertariffs on hundreds of US exports, including clothing and apparel, appliances, and dairy products. However, it has removed seafood and fish products from the list of counter-tariffs due to concerns about broader economic harms. The US has warned that further Canadian retaliation will not be tolerated.

The trade war is also being used as a rallying cry by some who are opposed to separation. A pro-unity group called Forever Canadian has seen an increase in support and interest in its patriotic lawn signs, with over 11,000 viewers attending an online town hall meeting last weekend.

Written for “Canada US Trade Dispute Escalation” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 53 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Canada US Trade Dispute Escalation
Politics · 54 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 4 of 39 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles discuss the recent trade talks between Canada and the US, specifically mentioning President Trump's comments about a potential oil pipeline project”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 25% hedged 1 of 4 📰 publisher trust 77
“Both articles describe the breakdown of trade talks between Canada and the US on Friday”
Reason
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 19 📰 publisher trust 94
“Both articles describe the breakdown of trade negotiations between the US and Canada, resulting in the imposition of tariffs by Trump.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 17% hedged 1 of 6
“Both articles report on the collapse of trade talks between the US and Canada over the weekend”
National Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 48 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles mention the collapse of trade talks between Canada and the US, citing the same reasons and referring to the same time period.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 28 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles report on the breakdown in US-Canada trade negotiations and Trump's response to it”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 42 📰 publisher trust 77
“Both articles report on the same trade talks between Canada and the US, specifically mentioning the disagreement over Canadian content requirements for streaming companies”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 27 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles report on a trade war between US and Canada, with similar details about talks falling apart and tariffs being imposed”
August 24, 2026 same event · 100%
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 5% hedged 4 of 73
“Both articles report on the exact same incident: trade talks between Canada and the US falling apart due to disagreements over tariffs, which happened on Friday night (August 24, 2026)”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles report on a trade negotiation dispute between Trump and Canada, happening at the exact same time”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
National Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
54
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

National Post · 929 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Carson Jerema
48 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It’s a curious position for innovators who have made grand claims about their products’ potential and who could, presumably, simply drop their efforts if they believe the risks outweigh the benefits.
🔮 Monday night, Quebec may have created its own three-party problem.
🔮 Not that anyone would necessarily question Harper’s commitment to the country, but his entry into the debate was one federalists have been eagerly awaiting.
🔮 David Eby has looked at his election campaign struggling to find its feet and decided that while socialism is good, even more socialism would be better.
🔮 Looking at the polls, it is almost certain that Quebeckers will wake up on Tuesday to a Parti Québécois government.
🔮 This followed months of internal strife with several high-profile staff and MLAs either quitting or saying they wouldn’t run again.
🔮 The Coalition Avenir Québec was founded because a huge number of Quebecers wanted something neither the Parti Québécois nor the Quebec Liberals could give them.
🔮 Projected to rise to 5.4 per cent of GDP in 2026, the €43 billion ($68.7 billion) in proposed cuts for 2027 are designed to reduce the deficit to five per cent of GDP next year.
🔮 It would be difficult to disagree with that assessment.
🔮 We’ll also touch on Poilievre’s proposal for meaningful and lasting steps to address affordability, whether the Conservatives might support Bill C-39, and what they want to see and hear from the prime minister when it comes to the trade standoff with the U.S.
Also by Carson Jerema
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 48 articles by Carson Jerema →

Topics

America Canada Canadians Politico U.S.

Subjects

Carney PERSON · 4× U.S. GPE · 4× Canada GPE · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× Canadians NORP · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 2× Friedman PERSON · 2× America GPE · 1× Mark Carney PERSON · 1× Politico ORG · 1×

Narrative

Or, as the late British economist Joan Robinson wrote, “The popular view that free trade is all very well so long as all nations are free-traders, but that when other nations erect tariffs we must erect tariffs too, is countered by the argument that it would be just as sensible to drop rocks into our harbours because other nations have rocky coasts.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-25
🔮 The next massive blackout may happen because trade barriers raised the cost of preventing it beyond the industry’s ability to afford resilience.
2026-08-25 · National Post
J.D. Tuccille: Canada can win at trade by ignoring Trump · assertive framing

Claims (39 extracted, 1 hedged)

Prime Minister Mark Carney insists Canada is “at war” with the U.S. after trade talks between the two countries fell apart over the weekend. asserted
talks → insist → weekend
But the exchange of talking points instead of bullets is foolish and destructive enough, and evidence of the futility of managing trade rather than simply getting governments out of the way of people freely exchanging goods and services. asserted
people → manage → goods
For his part, U.S. President Donald Trump responded that “Canada wants the benefits of being a State, without being one.” asserted
Canada → respond → benefits
He complained that Canadians have “charged our great farmers, for many years, massive amounts of Tariffs. asserted
Canadians → complain → Tariffs
Amidst recriminations as to who caused the breakdown — Politico reports the talks “ultimately buckled under a combination of last-minute demands and political constraints on both sides” — the two national leaders are threatening new trade barriers in addition to preexisting tariffs. asserted
leaders → cause → tariffs
Pundits and policy experts are digging through such details as have leaked to figure out just where the deal went off the rails. asserted
deal → dig → rails
Strictly speaking, Carney is the more credible figure in the dispute since he’s right that “America has changed” and the U.S. government is trying to “put a series of tariffs on its closest allies and use economic integration as a weapon.” asserted
government → speak → weapon
Trump has been notably belligerent in the process of reshaping trade — as he is in all things — making Carney’s “war” talk somewhat believable. asserted
talk → reshape → things
But the parsing of trade demands and personalities misses a larger point. asserted
parsing → miss → point
While Donald Trump can be a bully and Carney retains his calm while sniffily complaining about insults to the sovereignty of his country, both of them, and their flunkies, have engaged in the presumptuous business of trying to negotiate the rules of exchange between millions of buyers and sellers in two countries. asserted
both → retain → countries
We’d all be far better off if even just one of them stepped aside and let matters work themselves out. asserted
matters → step → themselves
Decades ago, economist Milton Friedman noted that protectionists constantly hand-wave away arguments in favour of free trade as “fine in theory” while insisting that trade must be “reciprocal” — precisely the argument the Trump administration makes as it reworks already rule-burdened trade deals. asserted
it → note → deals
At a time when Japan was the feared economic behemoth that was supposedly going to eat the world, Friedman warned that tariffs “raise prices to customers and waste our resources.” asserted
tariffs → fear → resources
He argued that when the governments of other countries shield their markets from competition, instead of benefiting their economies they hurt their people and businesses. asserted
they → argue → people
“The wise course for us is precisely the opposite — to move unilaterally toward free trade. asserted
course → move → trade
If they still choose to impose restrictions, that is too bad but at least we have not added insult to injury.” asserted
we → choose → injury
Evidence for Friedman’s position is found in a recent New York Times article about the vulnerability of electricity grids, largely because of their dependence on expensive, hand-crafted power transformers that are difficult to replace. asserted
that → find → transformers
While U.S. companies are building manufacturing facilities and developing alternative transformer technologies, they’re hampered by tariffs on copper and aluminum. asserted
they → build → copper
“Costs are up almost 20 percent,” an industry executive told the Times. asserted
executive → tell → Times
“We need relief on all of the metals.” asserted
We → need → metals
The next massive blackout may happen because trade barriers raised the cost of preventing it beyond the industry’s ability to afford resilience. uncertain
barriers → happen → resilience
Just because Trump is an economic ignoramus who thinks economic activity can be successfully managed by government, despite a long history of evidence to the contrary, doesn’t mean that Carney should follow his example and contribute to the conflict. asserted
Carney → think → conflict
Quebec-born Vincent Geloso, an economics professor at Virginia’s George Mason University, argues that “Canada’s response to American tariffs should be incredibly simple: slash our own tariffs and trade barriers. asserted
response → bear → tariffs
He makes the same argument offered by Friedman, that tariffs hurt consumers and businesses in the countries that impose them. asserted
that → make → them
“How exactly does making Canadians poorer punish Donald Trump? asserted
Canadians → make → Trump
If the Trump admin wants to shoot itself in the foot, the Carney government is under no obligation to shoot Canadians in the face with a twelve gauge shotgun for the sake of ‘reciprocity.’” asserted
government → want → reciprocity
Or, as the late British economist Joan Robinson wrote, “The popular view that free trade is all very well so long as all nations are free-traders, but that when other nations erect tariffs we must erect tariffs too, is countered by the argument that it would be just as sensible to drop rocks into our harbours because other nations have rocky coasts.” asserted
nations → write → coasts
In a 2025 paper, Geloso pointed out that Britain benefited from repealing “Corn Law” tariffs on imported grain. asserted
Britain → point → grain
“The Corn Laws had the effect of keeping food prices in the UK 9% higher relative to world markets. asserted
Laws → have → markets
He added that most 19th century trade liberalization was unilateral, with no expectation that other nations would necessarily reciprocate. asserted
nations → add → expectation
Liberalizing nations quickly prospered. asserted
Liberalizing → liberalize → nations
Yes, it’s better when all governments get out of the way and let people and businesses exercise their right to engage in voluntary exchange without regard to borders. asserted
people → ’ → borders
But holding trade hostage to the intelligence, decency, and economic wisdom of political leaders in multiple countries is a sucker’s bet. asserted
holding → hold → countries
Inevitably, populists with neo-mercantilist ideas arise and burden their own people with tariffs while claiming to help them. asserted
populists → arise → them
In the days to come, people will spend much time digging for and through the details of the failed U.S.-Canada trade talks. asserted
people → come → talks
But that’s a waste of time. asserted
that → ’ → time
The only definition of “fair” that matters is what people voluntarily agree to in their own dealings. asserted
people → matter → dealings
If, under current management, the U.S. won’t embrace free trade policies that make everybody wealthier, Canada should do so on its own. asserted
Canada → embrace → own
Canadians would be freer and more prosperous by avoiding the American mistake of burdening commerce with tariffs and conditions. asserted
Canadians → avoid → tariffs
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support