How Canadian content on streaming platforms became a trade issue with the U.S.
Streaming giants like Netflix and Disney have long opposed efforts to promote Cancon
The fight between Canada and the United States on trade isn’t just about dairy, car parts and natural resources.
asserted
fight → stream → dairy
It’s also about what appears on your Netflix homepage.
asserted
what → ’ → homepage
The Globe and Mail, citing a senior government source, reported Sunday that U.S. negotiators demanded Canada drop requirements for American streaming companies to promote Canadian content, including French-language content.
asserted
companies → cite → content
The federal Liberal government refused.
asserted
government → refuse → ?
"We were not prepared to compromise on our sovereignty, the protection of the French language, and our culture,” Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a speech on Saturday after trade talks collapsed.
asserted
talks → prepare → Saturday
The demand is the latest in a years-long dispute involving the Canadian government on one side and American streaming giants and the U.S. government on the other.
asserted
demand → involve → other
So how did we get here?
asserted
we → get → ?
Ottawa has long required broadcasters to promote and support Canadian content (Cancon), all the way back to song quotas for AM radio stations.
asserted
Ottawa → require → stations
In 1991, the government brought in the Broadcasting Act.
asserted
government → bring → Act
The law states that "the Canadian broadcasting system shall be effectively owned and controlled by Canadians" and that the Canadian broadcasting system should "serve to safeguard, enrich and strengthen the cultural, political, social and economic fabric of Canada."
asserted
system → state → Canada
But decades later, the rising popularity in Canada of streaming platforms such as Netflix, YouTube, Amazon Prime and Spotify raised questions about Cancon and broadcasting rules.
asserted
popularity → rise → Cancon
Video and audio streaming services were not, for example, required to support and promote Cancon, but their TV and radio counterparts were.
Looking to address the imbalance, the former Trudeau government brought forward a bill in 2022 to update the Broadcasting Act, called the Online Streaming Act.
asserted
government → require → Act
"Canadian broadcasters have invested in and introduced us to the incredible Canadian programs that so many of us love.
asserted
many → invest → us
We are updating our laws so online streamers have to contribute in a similar and equitable way,” a 2022 government news release said.
asserted
release → update → way
Ottawa set to reveal tariff counter-measures as Trump, Ford trade insults
Tens of thousands of jobs, half a point off GDP: Canada-U.S. trade war by the numbers
The legislation was controversial from the start, with the government and supporters saying it was a necessary evolution of Canada’s media laws in the digital age, while opponents expressed concerns that it was overreach and an attempt to regulate the internet.
asserted
it → reveal → internet
American streamers and digital media companies opposed the legislation fiercely.
asserted
streamers → oppose → legislation
The bill passed with amendments and became law in April 2023, but the government delegated much of its interpretation — including how much money streamers would have to contribute to Cancon — to Canada's broadcast regulator, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC).
asserted
streamers → pass → regulator
But getting streaming companies to pay up has been a long and confusing saga.
asserted
companies → get → ?
In 2024, the CRTC decided that online streaming services with revenues of over $25 million would have to put five per cent of their Canadian revenues toward the Canadian broadcasting system, such as local radio and television news, and French-language and Indigenous content.
asserted
services → decide → news
Big streaming companies such as Netflix and Disney Plus launched court challenges, and a Federal Court of Appeal judge said they would not have to make the payments until the court heard the case.
asserted
court → stream → case
Despite this, in May of this year, the CRTC announced that it would increase the payments to 15 per cent of revenue for online broadcasters.
uncertain
it → announce → broadcasters
The U.S.-based Motion Picture Association (MPA), which represents companies like Netflix, Paramount Pictures, Prime Video, Walt Disney Studios and others, was not happy and even called the move a trade violation.
"
asserted
which → represent → move
The Motion Picture Association strongly condemns the CRTC’s decision to impose unprecedented, unnecessary, and discriminatory investment obligations on American streaming services operating in Canada," MPA said in a statement.
asserted
MPA → condemn → statement
"This burdensome framework unfairly targets global streamers with requirements that directly violate Canada's obligations" under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement.
asserted
that → target → Agreement
Ottawa says CRTC's higher tax on streamers risks price hikes for Canadians
Ottawa plans to end 'Netflix tax,' replace with public Canadian content funding: document
A few weeks later, the government directed the CRTC to rethink the increase.
asserted
government → say → increase
The government, including Carney, expressed concern that the levy would raise prices.
asserted
levy → include → prices
Ottawa also said it would issue a new policy directive to adjust how the CRTC is implementing the Online Streaming Act.
asserted
CRTC → say → Act
The MPA welcomed the move, while dozens of Canadian cultural sector organizations asked the government to keep the requirement in place.
asserted
dozens → welcome → place
In a court document dated July 17, the attorney general’s office said the government intends to eliminate the payments entirely and replace them with taxpayer funding.
asserted
government → date → funding
Earlier, in June 2025, the government abolished the digital services tax (DST), which required foreign and domestic large businesses to pay tax on some revenue earned from engaging online users in Canada.
asserted
which → abolish → Canada
The government cited trade negotiations with the U.S. for the move.
asserted
government → cite → move
The Online Streaming Act also requires online streaming services to make it easier for Canadians to see and access Canadian content on their platforms, including French- and Indigenous-language programming.
asserted
Canadians → require → programming
The CRTC will start a consultation on how best to do that this fall.
asserted
CRTC → start → that
Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa and Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law, writes on his website that the fact the government has backed down on payments while also saying Canadian culture is non-negotiable is telling.
asserted
culture → write → payments
The government appears to be "open to cutting mandated payments for culture and news, but not moving on the power to regulate how culture is distributed and promoted," he said in a post.
asserted
he → appear → post
"If true, that represents a significant shift since the cultural sector has long viewed payments as a cornerstone of cultural policy.
asserted
sector → represent → policy
Last year, the Quebec government introduced Bill 109, titled "An Act to affirm the cultural sovereignty of Québec and to enact the Act respecting the discoverability of French-language cultural content in the digital environment.”
asserted
government → introduce → environment
The bill forces streaming giants to add French-language content and make it more easily accessible to users.
asserted
it → force → users
It became law in December 2025.
asserted
It → become → December
But why is the American government so invested in the issue that it could become a sticking point in trade negotiations?
uncertain
it → become → negotiations
…and 2 more, not listed.
The Aporia
