If you take recent statements by some artificial intelligence (AI) executives at face value, they’re demanding that governments stop them before they destroy the world as they call for regulation and oversight.
asserted
they → take → regulation
It’s a curious position for innovators who have made grand claims about their products’ potential and who could, presumably, simply drop their efforts if they believe the risks outweigh the benefits.
uncertain
risks → ’ → benefits
Their position seemingly ignores the reality that, if they get their way, dissenters will almost certainly move their highly mobile work to jurisdictions that maintain a light regulatory touch.
asserted
that → ignore → touch
But it all makes more sense when you remember that established businesses have a history of asking politicians to impose red tape burdens that pose barriers to entry for upstart competitors.
asserted
that → make → competitors
“We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models.
asserted
we → slow → models
Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain,” Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei wrote last month.
asserted
Amodei → seem → time
He proposed “giving ongoing, employee-like access to a team of embedded third-party evaluators” and called “on governments to require other frontier companies to match.”
asserted
governments → propose → companies
He also asked for “government support” for AI companies in democratic countries “to establish common safety standards” and to “attempt to coordinate with authoritarian governments.
asserted
He → ask → governments
Recommended Videos
All the red-tape-friendly executives cited concerns about the technology including “AI’s growing ability to build the next generation of AI,” in Amodei’s words, as well as incidents in which AI agents got out of hand and executed unauthorized actions, including cybersecurity attacks.
asserted
agents → cite → attacks
They’re the sort of perils that AI researcher Jacob Coxon claims “could kill us all.
uncertain
Coxon → ’re → us
But none of these corporate leaders have proposed dropping research and development in the field.
asserted
none → propose → field
That tells us that they see the technology’s likely benefits as outweighing potential dangers.
asserted
they → tell → dangers
So, why would they want politicians to inflict red tape on a cutting-edge field that government regulators are extremely unlikely to understand?
asserted
regulators → want → field
It helps to know that Amodei and company are echoing the conduct, and probably the motivations, of businesspeople of the past.
asserted
Amodei → help → past
Responding to Amodei’s statement, Independent Institute Research Fellow Christopher J. Calton called out “the commonly held progressive myth that conniving Robber Barons do everything they can to impede the state’s noble effort to regulate them, but nothing could be further from the truth.”
uncertain
nothing → respond → truth
He added: “What does Big Business have to gain from regulation?
asserted
Business → add → regulation
Calton cited the work of experts who found that the expanding regulatory state of the last century-plus was largely a tool of corporate interests, not reformers.
asserted
state → cite → interests
“Competition was unacceptable to many key business and financial interests,” the late leftist historian Gabriel Kolko concluded in his book, The Triumph of Conservatism.
asserted
historian → conclude → Conservatism
“As new competition sprang up, and as economic power was diffused throughout an expanding nation, it became apparent to many important businessmen that only the national government could rationalize the economy.”
uncertain
government → spring → economy
Calton added that “(t)he corporatist state reached its apex during the New Deal, when President Franklin Roosevelt invited executives from the nation’s largest companies to Washington to draft their own protectionist regulations under the ultimately unconstitutional National Industrial Recovery Act.
asserted
Roosevelt → add → Act
Mammoth corporations were in a better position to absorb regulatory costs than their competitors, and price controls made it impossible for smaller operations to undercut them.”
asserted
operations → absorb → them
In 2009, for the Foundation for Economic Education, historian Burton W. Folsom detailed how the New Deal and its National Recovery Administration (NRA) sided with cartelized businesses against small competitors (and against some independent-minded large ones, like the Ford Motor Company).
asserted
Deal → detail → Company
In Jersey City, New Jersey, Jacob Maged, a tailor, was arrested for charging $0.35 to press a suit when regulators wanted him to charge $0.40.
asserted
him → arrest → 0.40
“Not only was Maged thrown in jail, he was also slapped with a $100 fine.”
asserted
he → throw → fine
(That’s over $2,400 in modern money).
asserted
That → ’ → money
Folsom added that “(n)o merchants wanted to pay fines or go to jail, but the more than 500 NRA codes often imposed such quirky regulations that it was hard for many to comply.
asserted
many → add → regulations
That is, it’s hard for small start-ups to stay within the law.
asserted
ups → ’ → law
It’s easier for a large, established company with platoons of lawyers and relationships with government bureaucrats to comply with red tape.
asserted
company → ’ → tape
Amodei’s call for regulation implicitly acknowledges the challenge he sees from competition as he argues that AI poses risks and then warns of “a race to the bottom, spurred by commercial incentives.”
asserted
AI → acknowledge → incentives
In fact, many economists and regulatory experts saw this moment coming.
asserted
moment → see → fact
“The unfortunate iron law that industry generally prefers regulation that advances its interests and walls out competition will prove true of AI regulation specifically,” the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Clyde Wayne Crews predicted in 2020.
asserted
Crews → prefer → 2020
“(E)stablished players — especially given the head start of the government contracting and military presence in AI — will appreciate federal approaches that just so happen to forestall those nettlesome upstarts with a different idea, even when those new ideas advance safety or accountability.”
asserted
ideas → give → safety
Amodei and company’s call for AI regulation risks not just smothering entrepreneurs but also hobbling the free world.
asserted
call → risk → world
Alleged fear of AI and calls to “slow the pace” of development are peculiar fixations of the West that aren’t necessarily shared elsewhere.
asserted
that → allege → West
“Unlike in the United States, no one in China seems to be openly fretting over the prospect of humanity being destroyed by artificial intelligence soon,” CNN’s John Liu reported last month.
asserted
Liu → seem → intelligence
“The wide adoption of AI in today’s China underscores the country’s embrace of the novel technology.”
asserted
adoption → underscore → technology
AI executives will, undoubtedly, continue to peddle scare stories as they call for government to save us from their own companies and products.
asserted
government → continue → companies
But they’re almost certainly less concerned about dangers to humanity than they are about threats to their market share.
asserted
they → ’re → share
The Aporia
