Stanley Woodward, an associate attorney general at the Justice Department and former personal attorney to President Trump, addressed concerns about potential anticompetitive behavior in AI safety cooperation during a conference on international antitrust law. He clarified that coordination on cybersecurity is not seen as problematic under current guidelines but did not explicitly endorse broader coordination among rivals to slow AI development. Woodward noted that companies developing advanced AI have not requested meetings with the DOJ regarding antitrust concerns, offering some assurance to firms seeking to collaborate without regulatory interference.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-18,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
A senior Justice Department official on Thursday sought to clarify emerging antitrust questions surrounding artificial intelligence companies’ calls to slow development of the technology, saying cooperation on cybersecurity does not appear anticompetitive.
asserted
cooperation → seek → cybersecurity
Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward said at Fordham University in New York that the DOJ is reviewing whether to update existing guidance on cybersecurity cooperation.
asserted
DOJ → say → cooperation
But he stopped short of saying that firms merely coordinating to pace the safety and cybersecurity parameters of their products should require any DOJ oversight.
asserted
firms → stop → oversight
“It doesn’t occur to me that coordinating on cybersecurity or security is anticompetitive,” Woodward, a former personal attorney to President Donald Trump and ranking DOJ official, said during the 53rd annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy.
asserted
Woodward → occur → Law
Woodward added that the department’s Antitrust Division was open to meeting with companies, but that firms at the forefront of development in frontier AI labs had not requested a meeting about any antitrust concerns.
asserted
firms → add → concerns
The remarks offered some reassurance to companies seeking to cooperate on safety without explicitly endorsing a broader agreement among rivals to limit the pace of AI development.
asserted
remarks → offer → development
They also provided a more specific response after Attorney General Todd Blanche declined Tuesday to say whether such cooperation would require an antitrust waiver.
asserted
cooperation → provide → waiver
“I can’t address that,” Blanche said when asked if the companies need a waiver to coordinate.
asserted
companies → address → waiver
“What I can say is that to the extent that those companies are looking to regulate themselves or fix problems that they have, they should do that, but working with us is unnecessary.”
asserted
working → say → us
The debate comes after Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon said last week that he had resigned, in part because the “people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”
uncertain
it → come → decade
Coxon has since gone on dozens of news shows after his claims first surfaced in a Wall Street Journal report and viral post on X.
In response to Coxon’s claims, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has called for antitrust permission to allow competing AI developers to coordinate a slower pace of advancement, arguing that safety measures need time to catch up with increasingly capable systems.
The proposal has raised questions about how companies could work together to address shared risks while complying with laws intended to preserve competition.
uncertain
companies → go → competition
Existing federal guidance draws a distinction between sharing cybersecurity information and exchanging sensitive business information.
asserted
guidance → exist → information
In a 2014 joint policy statement, the DOJ and the Federal Trade Commission said legitimate exchanges about cyberthreats differ from sharing information about prices, output, or business plans that could raise antitrust concerns.
uncertain
that → say → concerns
President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has encouraged the industry to maintain its momentum rather than slow development, adding a political complication to companies’ efforts to coordinate a more cautious approach.
asserted
Trump → encourage → approach
The president’s chairman of the FTC, Andrew Ferguson, has also expressed similar skepticism about large AI companies seeking antitrust exemptions while supporting additional regulation.
asserted
companies → express → regulation
OpenAI’s top lobbyist, Chris Lehane, said Wednesday that the company had been working with Anthropic and Google on AI safety for several weeks and did not believe those discussions required an antitrust waiver, Bloomberg reported this week.
asserted
Bloomberg → say → waiver
Woodward’s prepared speech focused primarily on the division of antitrust enforcement authority between Washington and the states.
asserted
speech → prepare → Washington
He defended the Trump administration’s enforcement priorities and argued that federal officials should lead reviews of mergers with national consequences while working with states on local effects.
asserted
officials → defend → effects
“When a merger harms local markets, we want the states in the room,” Woodward said, referencing the administration’s support of Paramount’s request for states challenging its merger with Warner Bros. to “post a bond” to ensure transaction opponents “cannot abuse the judicial process.”
asserted
opponents → harm → process
“When it is national, we expect to lead — but we will work with our state colleagues to help us understand state and local impacts,” Woodward said.
asserted
Woodward → expect → impacts
But Woodward’s cybersecurity comments left unresolved how far AI companies could go beyond exchanging security information to jointly determine the pace of technological development, and when that could cross the line into more specific anticompetitive practices.
uncertain
that → leave → practices
The Aporia
