Photo via Fox News

LIZ PEEK: AI alarm bells are ringing and Trump needs to take them seriously

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Peek, L. (2026, September 15). LIZ PEEK: AI alarm bells are ringing and Trump needs to take them seriously. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/liz-peek-ai-alarm-bells-ringing-trump-needs-take-seriously

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-09-15 · by Liz Peek analysis

Quick Summary

Liz Peek discusses growing concerns about artificial intelligence (AI) potentially turning against humans or surpassing human control. Industry insiders warn of AI's dangers, with one researcher estimating a more than 10% chance that AI could kill all humans within the next decade due to unchecked development. The article urges President Trump to work with tech leaders to establish safety measures, rather than letting Congress regulate the industry, to prevent economic and national security risks while avoiding technological stagnation compared to competitors like China.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Industry insiders are increasingly raising alarms about potential risks from artificial intelligence (AI), with Anthropic reporting in its September report that "suspected state-sponsored groups," financially motivated criminals, and commercial spyware vendors misuse AI. This includes activities like creating fake dating apps designed to defraud users and surveillance systems built to identify and monitor dissidents. Evan Hubinger, a science alignment lead at Anthropic, warned on X (formerly Twitter) that there is better than a 10% chance AI could kill all humans within the next decade. President Trump is urged to address these concerns seriously and work with tech leaders to establish credible safety measures before Congress moves to regulate the industry more heavily.

Written for “AI Warning Trump” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Warning Trump
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 9 of 49 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to AI but do not describe the same specific incident.”
NBC News
Hedges 2 of 40 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation concerns and warnings but do not describe the same specific incident or meeting.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 5 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI-related concerns, with Article A focusing on general warnings about AI safety and control, while Article B reports on a specific increase in hackers using blockchains for attacks fueled by AI.”
Semafor
Hedges 1 of 4 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss AI risks but cover different aspects: Article A reports on a specific warning by an Anthropic researcher backed by top AI pioneers, while Article B discusses broader concerns and calls for action from President Trump.”
Semafor
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI safety concerns without describing the same specific incident.”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 8 of 31 claims Outlet record 72/100
“Both articles discuss concerns about AI but describe different perspectives and contexts; Article A covers warnings from AI researchers in general, while Article B focuses on a call for President Trump to address these issues.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 10 of 54 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns around Trump's stance but describe separate occurrences with distinct emphases.”
Do It for Charlie Different event
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns and proposed actions rather than a single specific incident.”
Semafor
Hedges 5 of 32 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss related concerns about AI safety but describe different calls to action by different figures at distinct times.”
September 13, 2026 Different event
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 10 of 65 claims
“Article A describes Dario Amodei's essay about AI safety published on September 12th, while Article B is a commentary by Liz Peek urging President Trump to address AI concerns. They are related but describe different specific events.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
38
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
4 of 38 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6160 article(s) · 11 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 11 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Liz Peek
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Betting site Kalshi shows odds of 61% that Democrats will win control of the senate.
🔮 Four weeks from today, Americans will go to the polls and set the country’s course for the next two years.
🔮 Let me get this straight: Because President Trump launched Operation Epic Fury against Iran for the purpose of denying the mullahs access to a nuclear weapon — a red line that every U.S. politician has embraced in the past — and because Americans are paying more for gasoline and diesel than they were a year ago, voters are now set to elect anti-U.S., anti-Israel candidates who want to destroy the economic system and institutions that have made the United States the strongest, most prosperous nation on earth.
🔮 Today, President Trump will address the UN General Assembly.
🔮 Industry insiders warning that AI bots might kill us all are stoking our worst nightmares.
🔮 Piker has chalked up some wins, like being an early supporter of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, and some notable losses, like backing Francesca Hong, a gubernatorial candidate in Wisconsin who lost to a moderate Democrat despite polls showing her up by some 20 points.
🔮 Polls and prediction markets suggest they will not do so.
Also by Liz Peek
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Liz Peek →

Topics

Anthropic China Congress Democrats Republicans

Subjects

Anthropic ORG · 5× Congress ORG · 4× China GPE · 2× Dario Amodei PERSON · 1× Democrats NORP · 1× Evan Hubinger PERSON · 1× Hubinger PERSON · 1× Jacob Coxon PERSON · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× Trump PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Anthropic, in its September report on AI misuse, reported "suspected state-sponsored groups, financially motivated criminals, [and] commercial spyware vendors" misusing AI in cases ranging from faking "dating apps designed to defraud users to surveillance systems built to identify and monitor dissidents".
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 Industry insiders warning that AI bots might kill us all are stoking our worst nightmares.

Claims (38 extracted, 4 hedged)

Simmering concerns about AI agents going rogue, plotting against their owners and hacking outside companies, and new systems coming perilously close to being uncontrollable by humans, are boiling over. asserted
systems → go → humans
Industry insiders warning that AI bots might kill us all are stoking our worst nightmares. uncertain
bots → warn → nightmares
President Trump needs to take these fears about AI seriously, work with tech leaders to establish credible and enforceable safety measures, and get ahead of Democrats (and some Republicans) in Congress who want to regulate the industry. asserted
who → need → industry
Evan Hubinger, who describes himself as a "science alignment lead" at Anthropic, posted on X last week that he thinks the odds are better than 10% that AI could kill all humans within the next decade. uncertain
AI → describe → decade
He was responding to a post from colleague Jacob Coxon, who just quit his job at Anthropic and posted by way of explanation: "The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. uncertain
it → respond → decade
If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible — but, I hear the same people express fear after a colleague quit over safety fears." asserted
colleague → couch → fears
Hubinger wrote soon after: "To be clear, as we say in our latest Risk Report, I think the risk from present models is low. asserted
risk → write → models
What I am worried about is superintelligence arising from recursive self-improvement, as we have said is happening faster than we thought. asserted
we → worry → improvement
These posts gathered tens of millions of views and attracted concurring comments from other industry insiders. asserted
posts → gather → insiders
"Recursive self-improvement" means AI agents creating newer, better agents; once we cross that threshold, and we are apparently very, very close, it is easy to imagine those same agents surpassing human capabilities and allowing, in effect, the machines to take over. asserted
machines → mean → effect
Given a string of incidents over the past several months in which AI bots engaged in what Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei describes as "rare and unexpected examples of undesirable behavior," like damaging other entities and ignoring specific instructions — I believe them. asserted
I → give → them
It’s not just AI agents on their own that pose risks. asserted
that → ’ → risks
Anthropic, in its September report on AI misuse, reported "suspected state-sponsored groups, financially motivated criminals, [and] commercial spyware vendors" misusing AI in cases ranging from faking "dating apps designed to defraud users to surveillance systems built to identify and monitor dissidents". asserted
Anthropic → report → dissidents
But…regulating AI is not a job for Congress. asserted
regulating → regulate → Congress
Let Congress hold hearings and play politics, but halting industry development while legislators dither and posture is unacceptable. asserted
legislators → let → development
Congress will struggle to legislate safety features that have so far eluded the best brains in the business. asserted
that → struggle → business
In the meantime, technological advances would grind to a halt, enabling China to leapfrog U.S. innovators, and saddling this promising industry that is powering our economy with inestimable baggage. asserted
that → grind → baggage
That said, the public’s fears about AI must be addressed. asserted
fears → say → AI
What started with concerns over job losses and then the impact of massive data center construction on electricity rates and water consumption has now spread to mankind’s vulnerability to AI agents. asserted
started → start → agents
How could bots endanger humanity? uncertain
bots → endanger → humanity
Such malevolent behavior has long been the stuff of sci-fi movies; now it is being envisioned by industry workers who fear they are moving too fast to ensure our safety. asserted
they → envision → safety
President Trump downplayed the recent alarms as coming from "very negative forces" who are imagining scenarios that "won't happen." asserted
that → downplay → scenarios
He is rightly worried that setting up roadblocks would enable China to charge ahead. asserted
setting → set → China
Anthropic’s Amodei wrote in a recent essay that, "I agree with Secretary Bessent that a Chinese lead in AI would pose grave danger for the United States and the world." asserted
lead → write → States
Nonetheless, in his post, Amodei proposed a series of steps, including the requirement that each firm accept "embedded evaluators" into their businesses and give them "employee-like access to verify safety practices and report incidents." asserted
firm → propose → incidents
This seems a reasonable first step, akin to having regulators folded into bank offices; the practice encourages oversight and transparency and, as Amodei points out, a valuable second opinion. asserted
Amodei → seem → oversight
The Anthropic head also calls for regulating "pacing", or the development of ever-more-advanced systems. asserted
head → call → systems
This translates into restricting progress while analysts assess the risks associated with each step that takes us closer to "recursive self-improvement." asserted
that → translate → improvement
Establishing circuit-breakers to promote AI safety was made easier in recent days when four of the industry’s biggest players went public with their concerns. asserted
four → establish → concerns
Sam Altman, CEO of Open AI, Elon Musk, whose xAI company owns Grok, and Demis Hassabis, chairman and co-founder of Google DeepMind, joined Amodei in calling for a slowdown. asserted
company → own → slowdown
The Trump administration should immediately convene industry leaders to map out a plan for verifiable self-regulation, including Amodei’s "embedded evaluators." asserted
administration → convene → evaluators
The White House must demand the industry’s compliance and accountability. asserted
House → demand → compliance
President Trump will not help the industry or his own political standing by dismissing the public’s concerns or declaring pushback against AI a "hoax", as he did yesterday on social media. asserted
he → help → media
As we approach the midterms, Democrats (and some Republicans) will clamor for AI regulation. asserted
Democrats → approach → regulation
Representative Hakeem Jeffries, who is hopeful of becoming Speaker if Democrats win the majority in the House, is already demanding that lawmakers "act urgently"; former President Obama is urging Democrats to put the issue at the top of their agenda. asserted
Obama → become → agenda
Politico reports that "the chance of Congress rushing to action in the coming weeks is next to zero." asserted
Congress → report → zero
That gives the White House the chance to get ahead of this issue and help the industry establish believable and verifiable guardrails. asserted
industry → give → guardrails
It’s time. asserted
It → ’ → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support