If you don’t appreciate how quickly Democrats are entering attack mode against AI, just count the groups they’ve started since our last edition alone.
asserted
they → appreciate → edition
There’s Tomorrow Together, the new PAC formed by veterans of the Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris campaigns, working to make theirs “the party that wins on AI.”
asserted
that → ’ → AI
There’s Who Decides, launched by New York state legislator Alex Bores in the wake of his failed House bid, which became a proxy war between AI industry PACs.
asserted
which → ’ → PACs
Joining the list today: The Stop Bleeding the Future pledge.
asserted
pledge → join → Future
Developed by an array of progressive groups, it commits candidates to “refuse all money from” the most active AI industry PAC and to “condemn its efforts to stop commonsense AI laws.”
asserted
it → develop → laws
Its first signatories include Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, who had warned for months that the party needed AI policies that weren’t written by the companies.
asserted
that → include → companies
QuitGPT, the coalition that wrote the pledge, began circulating it in May.
uncertain
that → write → May
“We want to make them irrelevant and toxic,” Michael Baick, one of its organizers, said when we talked yesterday.
asserted
we → want → organizers
“We want any politician or staffer who gets an email from these guys to think: This is bleeding the future.”
asserted
This → want → future
They might not need much pushing.
uncertain
They → need → pushing
In the year since I covered voter anger at data center construction in Virginia, AI angst has moved from the political frontiers to center stage.
asserted
angst → cover → stage
I spent most of Tuesday at the Pro-Human Assembly, where Steve Bannon and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., anchored a day of nervous programming about the dangers of AI and the need for “guardrails” built by an accountable government.
asserted
Bannon → spend → government
“I don’t think a pledge should be limited to [the Leading the Future AI industry PAC], because they’re already finding ways to shift their money,” Bores told me.
asserted
Bores → think → me
“But they’re toxic to this debate.”
asserted
they → ’re → debate
Leading the Future chose not to comment on the “bleeding” pledge.
asserted
Leading → choose → pledge
Below the surface, there is a lot of contemptuous finger-pointing about where the anti-AI energy now coursing through the political-media landscape is coming from.
asserted
energy → be → landscape
What’s the role of Effective Altruism, and that movement’s money, in fueling “doomerism” that will advantage one company at the expense of another?
asserted
that → ’ → another
But we’re in the middle of an election, with ballots in the mail, and the Democratic Party’s conversation about this is pretty simple.
asserted
conversation → ’re → this
They see a president who isn’t popular, an industry that’s less popular, and — when those are combined — a very straightforward story about wealthy job-destroyers using their political access to put everybody at risk.
asserted
destroyers → see → risk
“I say to them that if you believe in democracy, if you believe that the people have a right to determine their future, stop pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into super PACs,” Sanders said at the conference.
asserted
Sanders → say → conference
Sanders was one of the first left-wing politicians to understand the backlash against data centers.
asserted
Sanders → understand → centers
The topic came up during his “Fight Oligarchy” tours.
asserted
topic → come → tours
He polled audiences on what was happening in their towns and what was making them anxious.
asserted
them → poll → towns
There are some Democratic skeptics of Sanders’ approach here, and his own thinking about the world-ending danger of AI — an idea that is pushed hard by Effective Altruists.
asserted
that → be → Altruists
But I am starting to see wide adoption of his people-versus-Silicon Valley approach.
asserted
I → start → approach
I expect to see more after Tuesday, when Senate Democrats sank the Clarity Act, the top priority of the cryptocurrency industry for the last two years, without much worry about the consequences.
asserted
Democrats → expect → consequences
Republicans could resurrect the bill after the midterms, but it’s not likely after a failure this big.
uncertain
it → resurrect → failure
The crypto industry spent more than $130 million on the 2024 elections to put friendly politicians in office, from both parties — out of necessity, because the filibuster wasn’t likely to get busted for their bill.
asserted
filibuster → spend → bill
Democrats like Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., and Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., got help from the PACs, on the expectation that they’d be amenable to collaboration if they won their 2024 races.
But the dynamics shifted quickly.
asserted
dynamics → get → races
The president and his family had made more than $1 billion from crypto.
asserted
president → make → crypto
How could Democrats go home and tell their voters that they’d enriched the president on behalf of an industry that funded their campaigns?
uncertain
that → go → campaigns
Gallego, speaking for a lot of Democrats, decided that Republicans care “more about making sure the president keeps making money than actually bringing regulations.”
asserted
president → speak → regulations
The anti-AI push comes from the same thinking.
asserted
push → come → thinking
The president can be counted on to denounce AI regulation.
asserted
president → count → regulation
That makes it easier to run against when he’s unpopular, and impossible to support when Democrats want to win their own primaries.
asserted
Democrats → make → primaries
“The industry still thinks soft dollars will buy them love, in part because of the mistaken belief that the crypto playbook is repeatable,” said Sam Silverman, a Democratic strategist advising candidates on AI messaging.
asserted
Silverman → think → messaging
“It’s not.
asserted
It → ’ → ?
Voters don’t give a f*ck about crypto.
asserted
Voters → give → crypto
When AI is the defining topic of the election, do you think taking millions from Marc Andreessen, Greg Brockman, and Joe Lonsdale will be palatable to the base?”
asserted
taking → define → base
Across the aisle, the president’s party is more divided over AI than it was over crypto.
asserted
it → divide → crypto
…and 8 more, not listed.
The Aporia
