Anthropic allies are behind ‘independent’ groups ringing alarm bells about AI

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-17 · by Hudson Crozier

Quick Summary

The Washington Examiner reports that two nonprofit groups, Tarbell Center and Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR), which warn about AI risks, are linked to Anthropic’s allies including Dustin Moskovitz, Jaan Tallinn, and Paul Christiano. These organizations have ties to Anthropic through funding or advisory roles and promote skeptical journalism and risk assessments related to AI technology. The article questions the independence of these groups given their connections to Anthropic, suggesting potential bias in how they frame discussions around AI regulation and safety.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Anthropic, a prominent technology firm in artificial intelligence (AI), has allies backing two nonprofit organizations: Tarbell Center and Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR). These groups have become key players in discussing potential risks associated with AI, advocating for skeptical journalism and risk evaluations. Tarbell Center is linked to Dustin Moskovitz, cofounder of Meta and a significant Democratic donor, as well as Jaan Tallinn, a Skype cofounder; METR connects Moskovitz, Tallinn, and Paul Christiano, an AI researcher involved in Anthropic's growth.

In recent developments, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei endorsed METR’s role as “third-party evaluators,” promoting them to assess Anthropic’s tools and other major AI companies. This move is aimed at addressing concerns within the industry regarding unchecked power dynamics among smaller groups influencing AI policies. The Tarbell Center also runs a fellowship program that integrates tech reporters into established news outlets to produce critical AI coverage, aiming to bring more transparency to the field.

Written for “AI Alignment Groups Funding” on 2026-09-18, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 16495: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-09-17

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
18%
6 of 33 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
96.1
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

Story

📰 AI Alignment Groups Funding
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 1 📰 publisher trust 71
“Article A describes an interview where Anthropic's CEO calls for third-party evaluators in AI safety, while Article B discusses organizations backing Anthropic and its regulatory agenda, which is a different event.”
AI Is a Test of Our Maturity. *Gulp* different event · 95%
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 8 of 99
“Article A discusses a specific event (Pro-Human Assembly) with mentions of speakers like Steve Bannon and Bernie Sanders, while Article B reports on the backing of AI-skeptic organizations by Anthropic allies without mentioning the same specific assembly or event.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 7% hedged 1 of 14 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles discuss different initiatives by Microsoft and independent groups tied to Anthropic regarding AI caution, not the same specific incident.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 25 📰 publisher trust 61
“The articles describe different organizations and initiatives related to AI safety but do not refer to the same specific incident or time.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 1 📰 publisher trust 71
“Article A discusses a biosecurity expert's opinion on Anthropic's report about blocking bad actors from using its AI models for harmful purposes, while Article B talks about organizations with ties to Anthropic that are issuing warnings about AI risks. These articles discuss different aspects of the broader topic of AI misuse and oversight.”
Is AI Really an Existential Threat? different event · 95%
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 1 of 17 📰 publisher trust 93
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns; one is a discussion about existential threats and regulation, while the other focuses on the backing of nonprofit groups issuing warnings about AI.”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 32 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and public perception but describe distinct events or activities related to AI companies and nonprofit groups.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 1 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles describe different aspects of AI-related activities involving various figures but do not report on the same specific incident.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 24% hedged 13 of 54 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses Jacob Coxon's resignation and warnings about AI at a Silicon Valley conference, while Article B talks about organizations backed by Anthropic allies issuing warnings about AI risks.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 8% hedged 4 of 48 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Democratic response to AI concerns and do not describe the same specific incident.”

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 504 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Hudson Crozier
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Demonstrators in Lochiel have climbed a tree set to be torn down, blocked vehicles, sat on equipment, and celebrated their actions on an Instagram account called “Rally for the Valley.”
🔮 He announced METR’s team would act as “third-party evaluators” assessing Anthropic’s tools and encouraging every major AI company to take this “key step.”
🔮 “As Osama bin Laden personally (and correctly) concluded, al-Qaeda would have collapsed after 2001 without the secret deal and Iran’s key support for al-Qaeda in the years following 9/11, and al-Qaeda’s subsequent ability to execute terrorist attacks depended upon Iran being al-Qaeda’s “main artery for funds, personnel, and communication,'” plaintiffs wrote, quoting a private letter from bin Laden that the U.S. released after killing him in 2011.
🔮 Bowie converted to Islam about five years ago, adopted the name “Aisha Saif,” and got the government’s attention by posting messages on social media such as “I will poison these infidels,” investigators said.
Also by Hudson Crozier
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Anthropic METR Tarbell The Tarbell Center the Washington Examiner

Subjects

Anthropic ORG · 12× METR ORG · 5× Tarbell ORG · 5× the Washington Examiner ORG · 5× Christiano ORG · 3× Moskovitz PERSON · 3× Alignment Research Center ORG · 2× Long-Term Benefit Trust ORG · 2× Tallinn PERSON · 2× The Tarbell Center ORG · 2×

Narrative

“We don’t think any small group should have authority over what happens with AI, and our goal is to get information from inside these companies out into the public domain – external investigators can help bring more information to light (as we saw in our report on the Hugging Face [hacking] attack).”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 He announced METR’s team would act as “third-party evaluators” assessing Anthropic’s tools and encouraging every major AI company to take this “key step.”
2026-09-17 · Washington Examiner
Anthropic allies are behind ‘independent’ groups ringing alarm bells about AI · assertive framing

Claims (33 extracted, 6 hedged)

A pair of organizations issuing warnings about the possible dangers of artificial intelligence are backed by allies of the technology firm Anthropic and its regulatory agenda. asserted
pair → issue → firm
The nonprofit groups Tarbell Center and Model Evaluation and Threat Research have emerged as key players in the public debate surrounding AI risks and potential policy, promoting AI-skeptical journalism and risk evaluations, respectively. asserted
Center → emerge → journalism
The Tarbell Center has ties to Meta cofounder and longtime pro-Democrat donor Dustin Moskovitz and Skype cofounder Jaan Tallinn, while METR is connected to Moskovitz, Tallinn, and AI researcher Paul Christiano, a Washington Examiner review of public statements found. asserted
review → have → statements
All three tech leaders played roles in Anthropic’s rise to success. asserted
leaders → play → success
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei raised eyebrows by promoting METR as an AI safety solution in an essay this month. asserted
Amodei → raise → essay
He announced METR’s team would act as “third-party evaluators” assessing Anthropic’s tools and encouraging every major AI company to take this “key step.” asserted
team → announce → step
The Tarbell Center, for its part, runs a fellowship program placing tech reporters at legacy news outlets to publish coverage of AI, the Washington Examiner previously reported. asserted
Examiner → run → AI
The Washington Examiner itself has discussed placing a reporter in its newsroom with Tarbell in the past, interviewing prospective candidates, although nothing ultimately came to fruition. asserted
nothing → discuss → fruition
“Tarbell exists to strengthen independent, rigorous journalism about AI,” a Tarbell spokesperson told the Washington Examiner. asserted
spokesperson → exist → Examiner
Tarbell does not determine what fellows cover, how they approach a story or what conclusions they reach and our funders have no editorial role in the journalism we support. asserted
we → determine → journalism
“The fellows supported by Tarbell produce a varied body of work,” the spokesperson said. asserted
spokesperson → support → work
“This includes reporting that reaches a wide range of findings and conclusions.” asserted
that → include → findings
The push comes as members of Congress fiercely debate how to ensure AI does not harm society, while Anthropic skeptics warn the company’s inner circle is vying for a monopoly over the public policy discussion to advocate its preferred restrictions on the technology. asserted
circle → come → technology
Moskovitz and Tallinn were both early investors in Anthropic shortly after its 2021 founding, according to multiple reports. uncertain
Moskovitz → accord → reports
Christiano was an initial trustee for Anthropic’s Long-Term Benefit Trust in 2023 and founded Alignment Research Center, which has directly assisted Anthropic’s work, according to past statements from the tech researcher and Anthropic. uncertain
which → found → researcher
Christiano later stepped down from Anthropic’s Long-Term Benefit Trust to join the Anthropic-backed AI Safety Institute, a regulatory advisory agency for the U.K. government. asserted
Christiano → step → government
Anthropic did not respond to the Washington Examiner’s requests for comment. asserted
Anthropic → respond → comment
“We do not accept donations by frontier AI companies or their employees, and our funders have no say in the projects we work on,” METR President Chris Painter told the Washington Examiner. asserted
Painter → accept → Examiner
He pointed to a prior statement in which he said his organization’s work does not promote “doomer” narratives about AI. asserted
work → point → AI
“We share the concern that there won’t be meaningful independent oversight of these companies,” Painter told the Washington Examiner. asserted
Painter → share → Examiner
“We don’t think any small group should have authority over what happens with AI, and our goal is to get information from inside these companies out into the public domain – external investigators can help bring more information to light (as we saw in our report on the Hugging Face [hacking] attack).” asserted
we → think → attack
METR’s website says nine AI developers have adopted its “Responsible Scaling Policies,” which help decide when continuing to develop certain systems would be “too dangerous” without protective measures. asserted
continuing → say → measures
The group warns that third-party entities such as itself are needed because “it seems very plausible that advanced AI systems could pursue goals that are at odds with what humans want.” uncertain
humans → warn → what
Moskovitz donated in 2022 to Christiano’s Alignment Research Center, which was a precursor to METR — although the donation was restricted from benefiting METR directly, the nonprofit group told the New York Post. asserted
group → donate → Post
Tallinn, meanwhile, has given more than $150 million to hundreds of projects that include METR, according to Time magazine. uncertain
that → give → magazine
AI’s media watchdog The Tarbell Center’s affiliations with Anthropic supporters similarly run deep. asserted
affiliations → run → supporters
The Tarbell Center’s largest donors include Coefficient Giving, a group led by Moskovitz, as well as Tallinn’s Survival and Flourishing Fund. asserted
donors → include → Moskovitz
The center also lists Anthropic cofounder and head of policy Jack Clark as a speaker in its fellowship program, promising “a variety of perspectives from experts in both journalism and AI.” asserted
center → list → journalism
Nevertheless, the nonprofit organization‘s website says it aims to hold “the companies and people building it to account.” asserted
it → say → account
Critics have described Tarbell-backed journalists’ narratives about possible AI harms as exaggerated. asserted
Critics → describe → harms
“As models grow more sophisticated, many experts fear they could aid terrorists in unleashing new pandemics, empower malicious actors to carry out devastating cyberattacks, or further enable authoritarian regimes to tighten their grip on society,” the center’s site reads. uncertain
site → grow → society
“More advanced systems could also upend the economy, potentially leading to mass unemployment or social unrest.” uncertain
systems → upend → unemployment
The group emphasizes that it does not take direct donations from companies such as Anthropic or individual employees working for them. asserted
it → emphasize → them
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support