Photo via Toronto Star

National security vs. personal freedoms -- the debate continues 25 years later

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Contributor, F. K. (2026, September 11). National security vs. personal freedoms -- the debate continues 25 years later. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/national-security-vs-personal-freedoms-the-debate-continues-25-years-later/article_61a5477d-5a26-4c33-9796-28c21d748d20.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-11 · by Faisal Kutty Contributor

Quick Summary

Canadian Supreme Court Justice Ian Binnie described the conflict between human rights and national security as a clash of titans 25 years after the 9/11 attacks, which led to Canada rewriting its national-security laws in just two months. The Anti-terrorism Act created new terrorism offences and investigative powers, with some measures expanding into immigration, travel, banking, and other areas of ordinary life. A Toronto lawyer, who was counsel to Muslim civil-liberties organizations during this time, notes that while some changes were necessary, the harder question is which ones should be given back. The lawyer's own experiences, including a family member's encounter with emergency powers in India in 1975, inform their perspective on the importance of upholding constitutional rights and due process.
Written by AI on 2026-09-11, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, New York City's first Muslim mayor, Zohran Mamdani, faces controversy over his decision to attend memorial events despite calls from some victims' families and former Mayor Rudy Giuliani for him to stay away. Mamdani, who lost an older brother in the attacks, insists on honoring those affected by reading out names at Ground Zero. Meanwhile, nearly 110,000 signatures have been collected through a petition urging Mamdani not to attend, citing concerns over his past associations and appointments that some see as conflicting with the solemnity of the event. Despite this opposition, Mamdani is moving forward with plans to release more than 170,000 pages of documents related to air quality around Ground Zero in the months following 9/11, aiming to provide transparency on what the city knew about toxic conditions and how they handled it.

Written for “9/11 Memorial Controversies” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 169 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 9/11 Memorial Controversies
Politics · 170 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 2% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
National Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 31 of 246 claims Outlet record 60/100
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 82 claims Outlet record 68/100
Persuasion
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 7 of 98 claims
National Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 7 of 47 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 4 of 60 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of how 9/11 affected Canada and do not describe a single specific incident.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Centre further right than this Hedges 1 of 45 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles cover different topics: one is about security gaps in Canada's border offices, while the other discusses national security laws and their impact on personal freedoms, referring to events related to 9/11.”
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 26 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to 9/11 and its aftermath, with Article A focusing on Canada's national security laws post-9/11, while Article B critiques liberal media coverage of the event.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
49
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
2%
1 of 49 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
170
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 10784 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Faisal Kutty Contributor
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 How could someone be considered too dangerous to board an airplane but not dangerous enough to charge?
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Bill C-36, Canada Canadian Supreme Court the Anti-terrorism Act

Subjects

Canada GPE · 11× Muslim NORP · 3× Canadian NORP · 2× American NORP · 1× Arar PERSON · 1× Ian Binnie PERSON · 1× Supreme Court ORG · 1× Syria GPE · 1× Toronto GPE · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

Loss of liberty The question is whether measures introduced in an emergency should become permanent without having to show that the loss of liberty actually buys us greater security.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-11
🔮 How could someone be considered too dangerous to board an airplane but not dangerous enough to charge?

Claims (49 extracted, 1 hedged)

More than two decades ago, Canadian Supreme Court Justice Ian Binnie described the conflict between human rights and national security as “truly a clash of the titans.” asserted
Binnie → describe → titans
Twenty-five years after 9/11, Canada is still wrestling with that clash. asserted
Canada → wrestle → clash
Within three months of the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 innocent people, Canada had fundamentally rewritten its national-security laws. asserted
Canada → kill → laws
It created new terrorism offences and investigative powers and measures targeting terrorist financing and charities. asserted
It → create → financing
Expanded intelligence sharing and, eventually, a no-fly list followed. asserted
list → expand → sharing
National security increasingly reached into immigration, travel, banking and other areas of ordinary life. asserted
security → reach → life
Canada faced genuine threats and governments had an obligation to protect the public. asserted
governments → face → public
But emergencies have a way of shifting the boundaries of government power. asserted
emergencies → have → power
The harder question comes later: Which of those changes do we give back? asserted
we → come → changes
I had a front-row seat to that debate. asserted
I → have → debate
As a Toronto lawyer and counsel to Muslim civil-liberties organizations, I worked on challenges to Canada’s post-9/11 national-security regime. asserted
I → work → regime
I was counsel to organizations involved in the Maher Arar Inquiry and security-certificate cases before the Supreme Court. asserted
I → involve → Court
I worked on anti-terrorism issues and, in 2007, prepared a submission challenging Canada’s proposed no-fly list on behalf of more than two dozen organizations. asserted
I → work → organizations
A Canadian citizen returning home was detained by American authorities and rendered to Syria, where he was imprisoned and tortured. asserted
he → return → Syria
The inquiry exposed how inaccurate information supplied by the RCMP contributed to his ordeal. asserted
information → expose → ordeal
Intelligence had crossed a border much more easily than accountability. asserted
Intelligence → cross → accountability
Security certificates raised another problem: How do you defend yourself when the government can rely on secret evidence you cannot see? asserted
you → raise → evidence
Twenty-five years later, it’s important to remember that rights are not simply obstacles to security. asserted
rights → ’ → security
The rule of law is part of what we are supposed to be protecting. asserted
we → suppose → what
Otherwise, we risk protecting our own security by giving up someone else’s freedom. asserted
we → risk → freedom
Perhaps I was particularly sensitive to this because my encounter with emergency powers began long before 9/11. asserted
encounter → begin → 9/11
I was 6 when Indira Gandhi declared a state of emergency in India in 1975. asserted
Gandhi → declare → 1975
My father, a former editor of an opposition magazine, was wanted for his writings. asserted
father → want → writings
We moved from place to place before eventually sneaking out of the country and settling in Canada. asserted
We → move → Canada
At that time, I didn’t know the language of constitutional rights or due process, but I came to it through my law career. asserted
I → know → career
In Canada, limits were imposed. asserted
limits → impose → Canada
Courts pushed back. asserted
Courts → push → ?
Laws were amended and safeguards added. asserted
safeguards → amend → ?
And Canada did not go as far as the United States in important respects. asserted
Canada → go → respects
Those distinctions matter. asserted
distinctions → matter → ?
But much of the architecture survived. asserted
much → survive → architecture
Canada’s Passenger Protect Program (no-fly list) still exists. asserted
Program → exist → ?
Intelligence sharing remains deeply integrated across borders. asserted
sharing → integrate → borders
Immigration and national security remain intertwined. asserted
Immigration → remain → ?
The post-9/11 focus on terrorist financing also brought Muslim charities under heightened scrutiny. asserted
focus → bring → scrutiny
Loss of liberty The question is whether measures introduced in an emergency should become permanent without having to show that the loss of liberty actually buys us greater security. asserted
loss → introduce → security
I was asking that question when Canada’s no-fly list was introduced. asserted
list → ask → question
How could someone be considered too dangerous to board an airplane but not dangerous enough to charge? uncertain
someone → consider → airplane
Powers developed in response to one feared group rarely remain confined to that group. asserted
Powers → develop → group
Governments change. asserted
Governments → change → ?
…and 9 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support