Lindsay Clancy juror says lone holdout fixated on amount of blood found in killer mom’s home

New York Post · collected 2026-09-11 · by Chris Nesi
Read the original at New York Post ↗

Summary

A juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial has spoken out about the lone holdout who forced a hung jury, stating that this individual became fixated on the amount of blood found in the bedroom where Clancy's children were killed. The holdout repeatedly mentioned "too much blood" despite being explained by experts about the expected pattern of blood spatter. According to juror Paula Devlin, the holdout refused to elaborate on his reasoning and instead focused on minor issues such as speaking out of turn during deliberations. This individual was one of three men on the 12-person jury.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-11, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
12
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
0%
0 of 12 hedged
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher trust
58.3
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
78
Crime & Law
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-11 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

The murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, 36, nears its conclusion after five weeks of proceedings at Plymouth Superior Court in Massachusetts. Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented testimony from over 80 witnesses, including mental health professionals who debated Clancy’s state of mind when she killed her three young children—5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan—in January 2023.

Clancy pleaded not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, arguing that postpartum psychosis made her unable to understand the wrongfulness of her actions. However, FBI psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff testified against this claim, suggesting Clancy had control over her actions and did not act under auditory hallucinations. Closing arguments are scheduled for Thursday, with jurors set to deliberate on charges including first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, or a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity.

Outside the courtroom, hundreds of supporters, mostly women, have gathered in solidarity with Clancy, highlighting systemic failures in maternal health care and support systems.

Written for “Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial” on 2026-09-12, grounded in this article and the 77 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 7925 · logged 2026-09-11

Story

📰 Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial
Crime & Law · 78 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Daily Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 9% hedged 6 of 69 📰 publisher trust 58
“Both articles describe the trial and deliberation of Lindsay Clancy, referencing a specific night (2023) when she strangled her children and attempted suicide.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles report on the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, specifically mentioning a mistrial due to an inability to reach a unanimous verdict and details about the deliberations of the jury.”
The Hindu
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 25 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles describe the Lindsay Clancy trial and its outcome, specifically mentioning a mistrial due to an 11-1 hung jury, with one article providing more context about the deliberations.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 8% hedged 3 of 40 📰 publisher trust 58
“Both articles discuss the same Lindsay Clancy murder trial and specifically mention the holdout juror who caused a mistrial, referencing the amount of blood found at the crime scene.”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 27 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles report on the aftermath and details of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, specifically referencing the mistrial and the lone holdout juror's reasoning for their decision.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 17% hedged 5 of 29 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles describe the same Lindsay Clancy trial jury deliberation and its outcome, specifically mentioning the mistrial due to a 11-1 hung jury”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 31 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles describe the aftermath and deliberation process of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, specifically mentioning an 11-1 hung jury”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 40% hedged 14 of 35 📰 publisher trust 58
“Both articles describe the same murder trial of Lindsay Clancy and specifically mention the 11-1 hung jury outcome.”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 3 of 22 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles cover the aftermath of a mistrial in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial, and reference events that occurred during deliberations.”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 21 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles report on the reaction to and discussion of the lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, mentioning the same trial context and events.”

Publisher

New York Post · 247 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-06
Long Island inmates in jail on drug charges use photo program to get clean
2026-09-06
‘Landman’ Season 3 Release Date Update: When Does ‘Landman’ Return With New Episodes?

Who wrote this

Chris Nesi
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “The main thing he focused on is sometimes we would all want to talk at once, and that was very upsetting to him,” Devlin recalled.
🔮 A researcher for one of the largest and most valuable artificial intelligence companies publicly quit while raising the alarm that the technology “could kill us all by the end of the decade.”
🔮 I think we got as good as we could get.”
Also by Chris Nesi
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Boston Duxbury Mass. NBC10 the Daily Mail

Subjects

Lindsay Clancy PERSON · 4× Devlin PERSON · 3× Clancy PERSON · 1× Duxbury GPE · 1× Kellie Farina PERSON · 1× Lindsay PERSON · 1× Mass. GPE · 1× Paula Devlin PERSON · 1× Paula Devlin’s PERSON · 1× the Daily Mail ORG · 1×

Narrative

Paula Devlin’s critique of the holdout echoes that of juror Kellie Farina, who went viral for accusing him of making deliberations difficult because “he had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-11
🔮 “The main thing he focused on is sometimes we would all want to talk at once, and that was very upsetting to him,” Devlin recalled.

Claims (12 extracted, 0 hedged)

A juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial said the lone holdout whose reluctance to acquit forced an 11-1 hung jury was fixated on the amount of blood found in the bedroom at the couple’s home. asserted
reluctance → say → home
Paula Devlin’s critique of the holdout echoes that of juror Kellie Farina, who went viral for accusing him of making deliberations difficult because “he had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.” asserted
Lindsay → echo → children
Devlin, 65, said the lone holdout, one of just three men on the 12-person jury, “thought there was too much blood for the wounds that she had” in the bedroom of Clancy’s Duxbury, Mass. home where she killed her three children. asserted
she → say → children
“We all asked him what he meant by that, because we heard experts talk about the blood spatter and explain to us how it all was what it was supposed to be,” she told the Daily Mail. asserted
she → ask → Mail
When pressed by the other jurors, Devlin said the holdout refused to elaborate or explain his line of thinking about the amount of blood and how it connected to the issue at hand. asserted
it → press → hand
She said the jury members “got along really well the majority of the time,” but that the unidentified holdout spent breaks watching videos on his phone or talking to his wife. asserted
holdout → say → wife
He also vented his frustration at the group when they spoke out of turn, she said. asserted
she → vent → turn
“The main thing he focused on is sometimes we would all want to talk at once, and that was very upsetting to him,” Devlin recalled. asserted
Devlin → focus → him
“He would get upset and say, ”Listen to what she’s saying, listen to what he’s saying, be respectful.” asserted
he → get → what
Paula Devlin, a juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial speaks out following the mistrial. asserted
Devlin → speak → mistrial
Lindsay Clancy was charged with strangling her three children to death before trying to take her own life by jumping from a window of their Massachusetts home. asserted
Clancy → charge → home
Facebook / Lindsay Marie Clancy Lindsay Clancy watches jury members as Judge William Sullivan polls them on Aug. 31, 2026, at Plymouth Superior Court. asserted
Sullivan → watch → Court
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support