Three jurors from the Lindsay Clancy trial have spoken out about the mistrial, stating that all but one member were persuaded to find her not guilty by reason of insanity due to evidence of postpartum psychosis. The lone juror had reasonable doubt and refused to acquit, despite being interrupted while trying to fill out paperwork for a verdict. The jurors expressed concern that the lone juror's doubts did not align with his final decision, citing issues with his behavior during deliberations. According to the Due Process Clause of the US Constitution, proof beyond a reasonable doubt is required before a person can be convicted of a crime.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-09,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Story summary
The murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, 36, nears its conclusion after five weeks of proceedings at Plymouth Superior Court in Massachusetts. Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented testimony from over 80 witnesses, including mental health professionals who debated Clancy’s state of mind when she killed her three young children—5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan—in January 2023.
Clancy pleaded not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, arguing that postpartum psychosis made her unable to understand the wrongfulness of her actions. However, FBI psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff testified against this claim, suggesting Clancy had control over her actions and did not act under auditory hallucinations. Closing arguments are scheduled for Thursday, with jurors set to deliberate on charges including first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, or a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity.
Outside the courtroom, hundreds of supporters, mostly women, have gathered in solidarity with Clancy, highlighting systemic failures in maternal health care and support systems.
Written for “Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial” on 2026-09-12,
grounded in this article and the 77 other(s) covering the same event.
In short:
Three members of the Lindsay Clancy jury have detailed how the group could not reach a consensus, leading to a mistrial.
uncertain
group → detail → mistrial
Eleven members of the jury were persuaded to find her not guilty by reason of insanity, but one member would not acquit.
asserted
member → persuade → insanity
Although the trial ended without a verdict, prosecutors are free to start a new trial with a new jury.
asserted
prosecutors → end → jury
Three members of the Lindsay Clancy jury have spoken about failing to reach a consensus in an interview with US media.
asserted
members → speak → media
Warning: This story contains details of a crime that may be distressing for some readers.
uncertain
that → contain → readers
Foreperson Roni Carlson said all but one member of the jury were persuaded to find the defendant not guilty by reason of insanity, in an interview with NBC10 Boston.
asserted
defendant → say → Boston
After deliberating, Ms Carlson described being "excited" the jury had reached a consensus.
asserted
jury → deliberate → consensus
She began filling out the paperwork, but was interrupted by the lone juror.
asserted
She → begin → juror
"He had reasonable doubt, he admitted he had reasonable doubt,"she said.
asserted
he → have → doubt
"But he said 'I'm still not gonna say she's not guilty by reason of insanity'."
Lindsay Clancy was charged with three counts of first-degree murder over the deaths of her three children at their Boston home on January 24, 2023.
asserted
Clancy → say → January
The Massachusetts mother's attorney said she had lost control of her mind due to postpartum psychosis, while prosecutors argued she knew what she was doing and acted deliberately.
asserted
she → say → what
After six-weeks of testimony, the judge ultimately declared a mistrial when the jury could not come to an agreement.
uncertain
jury → declare → agreement
The three jurors interviewed, Roni Carlson, Kellie Farina and Paula Devlin, raised concerns the lone juror's doubt did not match his verdict.
asserted
doubt → interview → verdict
In the United States, the Due Process Clause in the constitution "requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt before a person may be convicted of a crime".
uncertain
person → require → crime
Ms Devlin described the lone juror as "very arrogant".
asserted
Devlin → describe → juror
"He really did not take on anything that anybody said,"she said.
asserted
anybody → take → that
She continued to describe an interaction where he asked jury members who are nurses about Ms Clancy's medication and the toxicology report.
asserted
who → continue → medication
But then, Ms Devlin said, "he just completely disregarded the information that they gave".
asserted
they → say → that
'Did she know right from wrong?'
asserted
she → know → wrong
Ms Carlson explained that the majority found Ms Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity due to the evidence presented regarding her character and mental health.
"
asserted
Clancy → explain → character
We weren't trying to figure out if she murdered the children, she did and she's admitting that
asserted
she → try → that
," she said.
asserted
she → say → ?
"We're trying to figure out did she know right from wrong at that time.
"
asserted
she → try → time
Everything proved she loved her children — from her journals to her mother-in-law — everything proved that she loved her children so she had to have snapped and not know what she was doing."
asserted
she → prove → what
The three women left the six-week trial as life-long friends, according to NBC10 Boston, saying they supported each other through the traumatic testimony.
Ms Farina described hearing Patrick Clancy's, Lindsay's husband, 911 call.
"It's something I will never not hear,"Ms Farina said.
uncertain
Farina → leave → call
"When we heard it again in the jury room we were crying again, we were just like 'my god, the desperation, the despair in his voice'.
asserted
we → hear → voice
"I felt that it was genuine."
asserted
it → feel → ?
Although the trial ended without a verdict, the case is not closed and prosecutors are free to start a new trial with a new jury.
asserted
prosecutors → end → jury
Plymouth County District Attorney Tim Cruz told reporters that no decision had been made on whether prosecutors would retry the case, but that his goal was always "getting justice for those three little babies".
asserted
goal → tell → babies
