U.S. plan to live-stream execution by firing squad draws bipartisan, international outrage

Read the original at Los Angeles Times ↗
Los Angeles Times · collected 2026-10-09 · by Kevin Rector, Ana Ceballos

Quick Summary

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced plans to live-stream the December 3 execution by firing squad of Nidal Malik Hasan, who killed 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas in 2009. This decision has faced widespread condemnation from both Republicans and Democrats, as well as human rights officials, religious leaders, and legal experts, who view it as a form of punishment typically associated with authoritarian regimes rather than democratic nations like the United States.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-09, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Nidal Malik Hasan, the former Army major convicted of killing 13 people and injuring over 30 others in a 2009 shooting spree at Fort Hood, Texas, will be executed by firing squad on December 3, 2023. President Donald Trump authorized the execution following a recommendation from Secretary of War Pete Hegseth. The Pentagon confirmed that the execution will take place publicly and be livestreamed to ensure people understand "there are serious consequences for these types of things." Hasan's attack was the deadliest on a domestic military installation in US history, and he has been held at Fort Leavenworth since 2013 after exhausting all appeals. Retired Staff Sgt. Alonzo Lunsford, who survived being shot multiple times including once in the head during the incident, plans to attend the execution for closure. This marks the first US military execution by firing squad since 1945.

Written for “Firing Squad Execution Livestreamed” on 2026-10-09, grounded in this article and the 56 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 4 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 69138: no verified evidence · logged 2026-10-09

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
53
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
0%
0 of 53 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
95.1
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
57
Crime & Law
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-10-09 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Firing Squad Execution Livestreamed
Crime & Law · 57 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald · 0.87 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 9% hedged 3 of 34 📰 publisher trust 61
“Both articles describe the Pentagon's decision to livestream the firing squad execution of Nidal Malik Hasan on December 3, 2026.”
The Independent · 0.87 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 18% hedged 5 of 28 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles discuss the announcement made by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about the live-streaming of Nidal Malik Hasan's execution by firing squad on December 3, 2026.”
Euronews · 0.87 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 4 of 32 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles refer to the same upcoming execution of Nidal Hasan by firing squad and its livestreaming, announced by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.”
The Straits Times · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 24 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles discuss the U.S. military's plan to livestream the execution of Nidal Hasan by firing squad on Dec. 3, indicating they are reporting on the same specific event.”
Fox News · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 10 📰 publisher trust 70
“Both articles discuss the confirmed plan to livestream the firing squad execution of Nidal Malik Hasan at Fort Hood, Texas on Dec. 3, 2026.”
NPR · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 7 of 47 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles discuss the Pentagon's decision to livestream the firing squad execution of Nidal Malik Hasan on December 3, 2026.”
NBC News · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 19% hedged 4 of 21 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles discuss the same announcement by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about live-streaming the execution of Nidal Hasan for his Fort Hood shooting.”
National Post · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 25 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles discuss the announcement of livestreaming Nidal Hasan's execution by firing squad, scheduled for December 3, 2026.”
Toronto Star · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 3 of 31 📰 publisher trust 63
“Both articles describe Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's announcement to livestream the execution of Nidal Malik Hasan by firing squad on December 3, 2026.”
Global News · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 7 of 46 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles report on the Pentagon's decision to livestream the execution of Nidal Malik Hasan by firing squad, scheduled for December 3, 2026.”

Publisher

Los Angeles Times · 194 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Kevin Rector
10 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights said that “the livestreaming of an execution is tantamount to a public execution and would breach the absolute prohibition of torture.”
🔮 Fewer than half of Americans believe the upcoming midterm elections will be “free and fair,” amid a broader decline in confidence in vote counts, according to a new nationwide poll.
🔮 - Click here to listen to this article - - The administration could try to impose new regulations for the 2028 elections.
🔮 California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, whose office is helping lead the states’ challenge, said the rule changes seek to “rewrite more than 100 years of law” by making even brief use of public benefits in years past grounds for the federal government to deny a person’s application for legal permanent residency in the future — which he said was clearly illegal and would push tremendous costs onto states, counties and cities.
🔮 - The Supreme Court is expected to rule relatively quickly, given the emergency nature of the appeal.
🔮 California has led the legal charge against the rules, arguing they could cause chaos and disenfranchise millions of voters.
🔮 A Postal Service whistleblower says a rushed, error-filled computer system tied to President Trump’s new mail voting order could delay or block ballots for millions of Americans this fall.
🔮 “This mail-in voting rule is an unlawful overreach that shows just how far President Trump will go to control elections, but as I’ve said before, this fight is far from over and we are confident that the facts and the law are on our side,” California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said.
🔮 California leaders immediately noted the limits of the high court ruling and said they would file a lawsuit to prevent Trump’s desired changes from taking effect. “The Supreme Court just let the Trump administration move ahead (for now) with its plan to disenfranchise voters across the country.
🔮 Big-city mayors are giving poll workers panic buttons in case election skeptics question their work.
Also by Kevin Rector
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 10 articles by Kevin Rector →
Ana Ceballos
18 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights said that “the livestreaming of an execution is tantamount to a public execution and would breach the absolute prohibition of torture.”
🔮 The international scholars then take jobs and grants that could go to Americans.
🔮 President Trump told a crowd in Texas on Wednesday night that he would not allow Iran to attack San Diego or Los Angeles, a comment that came two days after he made off-the-cuff remarks suggesting the West Coast cities could be struck.
🔮 On Monday, he blamed the Golden State for the rising cost of gas prices, claimed without evidence that its elections are rigged, and at a Nebraska rally suggested Iran could “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego.
🔮 Rather than prioritizing visits to battleground districts, which will decide which party controls Congress, Trump is rallying in Republican strongholds such as Texas, Oklahoma and Alabama, betting that his presence will be enough to energize a base that may be thinking about sitting out the election because his name isn’t on the ballot.
🔮 Lawmakers and AI industry leaders have also called for guardrails on the nascent technology, which experts warn could soon surpass human understanding.
🔮 Xi Jinping’s remarks reflect growing concern within China over whether governments in Washington or Beijing will be able to contain a technology with potentially transformative capabilities, according to a U.S. official.
🔮 Trump wrote that his proposed arch near the National Mall would be used as a military complex for drones and snipers.
🔮 The dynamic within the GOP reflects several competing factors: the need to attract new voters in districts made more purple by California’s redistricting, the hope that Trump can rally the base while candidates focus on swing voters, and the fear among Republicans that the president’s flagging approval ratings could cost them crucial seats in the midterms.
🔮 Questions swirl over Trump’s pledge to give $5,000 payouts if GOP wins - Click here to listen to this article - - President Trump vowed to send every U.S. adult a $5,000 “Trump Dividend” if Republicans keep control of Congress, a stunning midterm gambit that would cost more than $1 trillion and need lawmakers’ approval.
Also by Ana Ceballos
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 18 articles by Ana Ceballos →

Topics

Defense Democrats Republicans Texas U.S.

Subjects

Hasan PERSON · 4× U.S. GPE · 4× Texas GPE · 3× Defense ORG · 2× Democrats NORP · 2× Hegseth PERSON · 2× Iran GPE · 2× Nidal Malik Hasan PERSON · 2× Pete Hegseth PERSON · 2× Republicans NORP · 2×

Narrative

When the Supreme Court last year rejected an Alabama inmate’s request to be killed by firing squad rather than with nitrogen hypoxia, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor — joined by fellow liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson — dissented, writing, “Boyd asks for the barest form of mercy: to die by firing squad, which would kill him in seconds, rather than by a torturous suffocation lasting up to four minutes.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-09
🔮 The United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights said that “the livestreaming of an execution is tantamount to a public execution and would breach the absolute prohibition of torture.”

Claims (53 extracted, 0 hedged)

U.S. plan to live-stream execution by firing squad draws bipartisan, international outrage asserted
plan → stream → outrage
- Click here to listen to this article - - Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the Pentagon plans to live-stream the Dec. 3 execution of Nidal Malik Hasan, who killed 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009. - asserted
who → click → 2009
Republicans and Democrats, human rights officials, religious leaders and legal experts condemned the broadcast plan. asserted
Republicans → condemn → plan
In confirming his plans to live-stream Fort Hood mass shooter Nidal Malik Hasan’s military execution by firing squad on Dec. 3, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called it a “no brainer” punishment for a “radical Islamist terror attack” on U.S. service members. asserted
Hegseth → confirm → members
“We’ll make sure that people are able to watch it, that it’s public, because people need to understand [that] there are serious consequences for these types of things,” Hegseth said in an interview with the Real America’s Voice network. asserted
Hegseth → make → network
Others across the country and around the world — Democrats and Republicans, human rights experts, legal scholars and military and religious leaders — condemned it as a barbaric throwback to an era when executions were cast as entertainment, and as the world’s leading democracy adopting a form of punishment carried out in modern times only by authoritarian regimes and terrorist organizations. asserted
executions → condemn → regimes
“Hasan should face the death penalty, but making his execution public and streaming it? asserted
execution → face → it
Beyond disgusting,” Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) wrote on X. “Public executions are what oppressive dictatorships like Iran and Afghanistan do. asserted
dictatorships → write → Iran
It should not be happening in America.” asserted
It → happen → America
“I absolutely support the sentence of death, but live-streaming executions is what jihadists do. asserted
jihadists → support → what
America is better than that,” Rep. Austin Scott (R-Ga.) wrote. asserted
Scott → write → that
The United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights said that “the livestreaming of an execution is tantamount to a public execution and would breach the absolute prohibition of torture.” asserted
livestreaming → say → torture
The head of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said it would “further undermine the moral fabric of our nation and be a blight on the conscience of its people.” asserted
it → say → people
The suspect, stable after being shot himself, is accused of killing 13 and wounding 30 at the Texas Army base. asserted
suspect → shoot → base
It’s not clear whether he is the author of inflammatory comments on the Web. asserted
he → ’ → Web
Matthew Robinson, a criminal justice professor at Appalachian State University and author of a book on U.S. capital punishment titled “Death Nation,” said he was “appalled” by the plans. asserted
he → title → plans
“It strikes me as meant to be entertaining.” asserted
It → strike → me
He said the last military execution was in 1961, and the last by firing squad was in 1945. asserted
last → say → 1945
Hasan was an Army psychiatrist and major who in 2009 entered a medical building on the Texas military base with a laser-sighted handgun, shouted “Allahu akbar” — Arabic for “God is great!” — and opened fire, killing 13 people and injuring 32 others. asserted
God → enter → others
He has since spoken of being a “martyr” if executed. asserted
He → speak → ?
President Trump, an outspoken proponent of the death penalty for years but also a past critic of public executions in places like Iran, has signed off on Hasan’s execution but not addressed Hegseth’s plans. asserted
Trump → sign → plans
The White House did not respond to a request for comment. asserted
House → respond → comment
Vice President JD Vance, who is Catholic, said Friday that people should remember that Hasan “brutally murdered a lot of innocent people.” asserted
Hasan → say → people
But he also said he would not watch a live-stream of the execution, and expressed doubt that is “actually going to happen.” asserted
that → say → doubt
On his first day in office this term, Trump issued an executive order requiring federal agencies to restore the death penalty to prominence. asserted
Trump → issue → prominence
In April, the U.S. Department of Justice announced it had taken steps to do so, including by “expanding the protocol” to include firing squads. asserted
it → announce → squads
Five states currently allow firing squads to carry out executions: Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah. asserted
squads → allow → executions
The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly turned down appeals contending such executions amount to “cruel and unusual punishment,” which is barred under U.S. law. asserted
which → turn → law
South Carolina executed three men by firing squad last year. asserted
Carolina → execute → squad
When the Supreme Court last year rejected an Alabama inmate’s request to be killed by firing squad rather than with nitrogen hypoxia, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor — joined by fellow liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson — dissented, writing, “Boyd asks for the barest form of mercy: to die by firing squad, which would kill him in seconds, rather than by a torturous suffocation lasting up to four minutes. asserted
which → reject → suffocation
The Constitution would grant him that grace. asserted
Constitution → grant → grace
Last week, a Tennessee inmate named Christa Pike survived what was meant to be a lethal injection of the barbiturate pentobarbital. asserted
what → name → pentobarbital
Other states have also struggled with executions by lethal injection in recent years. asserted
states → struggle → years
Much of the criticism of Hegseth’s plan for Hasan has centered not on the method of killing, but on the live-streaming of it. asserted
Much → center → it
Robin M. Maher, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, said the center has “no record of any execution being live streamed,” and is “not aware of any regulation or precedent for a military execution to be live streamed on the internet or otherwise made widely available to the public.” asserted
execution → say → public
Fox News commentator Howard Kurtz wrote: “I’m sensing revulsion on the left and right, not so much for killing a death row prisoner — although firing squad seems extreme in the modern age — but for the Pentagon to live-stream it, turning this into a horrifying TV show to entertain the masses. asserted
Pentagon → write → masses
Daniel LaChance, an associate history professor at Emory University and author of the book “Executing Freedom: The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment in the United States,” said the last public execution in the U.S. occurred in 1936, when a Black man convicted of rape was hanged in Kentucky — which still allowed public executions after most states had abandoned the practice. asserted
states → execute → practice
That execution was “by all accounts a grotesque carnival” and “sort of like a gladiatorial contest brought to life in the 20th Century, where the crowd was surly, shouting,” LaChance said. asserted
LaChance → bring → Century
That the Trump administration is seeking to turn capital punishment into a public spectacle once more, LaChance said, is out of line with decades of thinking on the issue, but in line with Trump’s own ethos about crime and punishment. asserted
LaChance → seek → crime
And when executions moved into the bowels of prisons in the early 20th century, they were really becoming bureaucratic affairs, run by experts, carried out in front of a small group of professionals and clergy,” LaChance said. asserted
LaChance → move → professionals
…and 13 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support