AI deployment in businesses outpaces trust, study finds

Read the original at Semafor ↗
Cite

Capelouto, J. (2026, September 6). AI deployment in businesses outpaces trust, study finds. Semafor. https://www.semafor.com/article/09/02/2026/deployment-of-ai-in-businesses-outpaces-trust-study-finds

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Semafor · collected 2026-09-06 · by J.D. Capelouto

Quick Summary

A study commissioned by SAS found that 90% of executives from various countries and industries have implemented AI agents in their organizations, but only 66% trust these agentic AI systems to make decisions. The survey suggests a growing gap between AI deployment and trust, with more businesses adopting AI-powered tools than understanding how they work. The main reason for overriding AI decisions is a lack of explanation for how the system arrived at its conclusions, cited by respondents more frequently than incorrect outputs. This discrepancy highlights concerns about accountability and transparency in AI decision-making.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

About 2,700 "decision-makers" across 28 countries were surveyed by SAS, a software company. Nearly 90% said that artificial intelligence (AI) plays some decision-making role in their organizations. However, only 66% of respondents trusted AI that makes decisions on its own, known as agentic AI, while a slightly higher percentage of around 75%** trusted more general types of AI, such as those used for generating content. This gap between deployment and trust is attributed to the fact that users often don't understand how AI-powered tools work, with the top reason given for overriding an AI's decision being its failure to explain its reasoning, which was cited more than twice as frequently as simply rejecting the output because it was wrong.

Written for “Businesses and Artificial Intelligence” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Businesses and Artificial Intelligence
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Pentagon Asked OpenAI for Artificial Intelligence Designed to Rarely Say No different event · 90%
The Intercept
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 9% hedged 7 of 77 📰 publisher trust 97
“Article A discusses a general trend of AI deployment outpacing trust in businesses, while Article B reports on a specific request by the Pentagon for a custom AI tool from OpenAI”
The AI warnings are coming from inside the lab different event · 90%
Platformer
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses a general trend in AI deployment and trust, while Article B references a different topic (antitrust court losses) and is more opinion-focused”
Doomsday tech: Could AI really kill us all? different event · 90%
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 26% hedged 8 of 31 📰 publisher trust 71
“The articles describe different topics and events, with one discussing AI deployment in businesses and trust in AI, and the other discussing potential dangers of 'superintelligent' computer systems and regulation”
The Threat of AI Takeover Is Real different event · 80%
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 12 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A mentions a rogue AI system that attacked Hugging Face, while Article B discusses a survey on trust in AI and its deployment in businesses”
AI that works for Americans different event · 80%
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 5% hedged 3 of 55 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A is a general commentary on AI and its potential impact, while Article B reports on a specific study about trust in AI in businesses”
AI could pose 'existential' risk to humanity, UN rights chief warns different event · 80%
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 25% hedged 2 of 8 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A discusses a study on AI deployment and trust in businesses, while Article B reports on UN rights chief Volker Turk's warning about AI posing an existential risk to humanity, without mentioning the study or its findings”
AI Is at a Turning Point different event · 80%
TIME
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 2 of 39 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A discusses a general trend in AI deployment, while Article B mentions a specific recent incident involving an agentic model by OpenAI, but the dates and details do not match”
Alibaba sends AI ‘digital employees’ to work in rival apps from ByteDance, Tencent different event · 80%
South China Morning Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 22% hedged 2 of 9 📰 publisher trust 64
“Article A discusses a general trend of AI deployment outpacing trust in businesses, while Article B reports on Alibaba's specific launch of QoderWake tool and its digital employees feature”
Anthropic Staffers Again Sound the Alarm on AI Catastrophe different event · 80%
Mother Jones
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 18% hedged 8 of 44 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses a general trend of increasing AI deployment and decreasing trust, while Article B reports on a specific resignation and statements made by AI researchers about potential dangers of AI”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
4
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 4 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
60/100
Semafor's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Semafor · 1178 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-10-16
LA's 'Selling Sunset' real estate agency opens a Dubai office

Who wrote this

J.D. Capelouto
19 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 The New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America is divided over whether the AI industry is a destructive capitalist force that could kill everyone, or merely an overhyped capitalist hustle.
2026-10-21 · assertive framing · How AI divided a powerful chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America
🔮 Eventually, Perla said he wants to launch the “New York Token Exchange,” a marketplace for AI models in which thousands of models from thousands of hosting providers — any data center willing to run an open model — would compete to serve each request, turning AI tokens into a commodity that could be traded with futures, hedges, and price indices, like oil or electricity.
2026-10-16 · mixed framing · OpenRouter challenger closes seed round
🔮 More than half of the references to data centers on Fox News over the last two years would have left viewers with a favorable impression, compared to less than 10% on CNN and 5% on MS NOW, according to a new Semafor analysis of mentions of data centers on each network.
2026-10-12 · assertive framing · Fox stays positive on data centers even as public backlash grows
🔮 The AI bill is coming for governments and businesses, and no one knows whether the money will be there to pay it.
2026-10-02 · assertive framing · AI costs are rising for organizations, reports warn
🔮 Some analysts predict it could be the catalyst for agentic AI to leap from business to consumer applications.
2026-09-25 · assertive framing · Meta’s Muse taps into 'kidult' market
🔮 The Scene A prominent researcher is warning the world is on the verge of a massive transformation thanks to the emergence of a new technology that could drastically benefit society or cause massive destruction.
2026-09-18 · mixed framing · Fears about technology causing extinction are not unprecedented
🔮 El Hallak’s argument provides insight into the more technical case — as opposed to the geopolitical or ideological ones — for why AI doomerism may be overblown.
2026-09-17 · mixed framing · Nvidia’s case for taming AI agents
🔮 Over the summer, a hacker was able to deploy frontier AI models to breach a European IT and software company in less than 10 hours — something that would ordinarily take human hackers around two weeks, said Palo Alto Networks, which helped defend the firm against an extortion attempt.
2026-09-16 · assertive framing · Anatomy of an AI-powered hack
🔮 The attack tool, known as a worm, could allow someone to hijack WeChat accounts and spread automatically through victims’ contacts.
2026-09-15 · mixed framing · US firm alerts WeChat to AI hacking tool
🔮 The plans require rethinking safety “from the ground up,” CEO Marc Theermann told Semafor, since he wants to make robots that people will be comfortable hugging.
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · New startup looks to build robots for entertainment
Also by J.D. Capelouto
How AI divided a powerful chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America
2026-10-21 · Semafor
OpenRouter challenger closes seed round
2026-10-16 · Semafor
Fox stays positive on data centers even as public backlash grows
2026-10-12 · Semafor
AI costs are rising for organizations, reports warn
2026-10-02 · Semafor
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 19 articles by J.D. Capelouto →

Topics

SAS

Subjects

SAS ORG · 1×

Narrative

Businesses are rapidly rolling out AI-powered tools, but they’re not going to take off unless people actually know how they work: The top reason survey respondents gave for overriding an AI’s decisions was insufficient explanation of how it reached its answer — cited more than twice as often as the output simply being wrong.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
2026-09-07 · Semafor
AI deployment in businesses outpaces trust, study finds · assertive framing

Claims (4 extracted, 0 hedged)

Executives’ confidence in AI in the workplace falls as the technology gains autonomy. asserted
technology → fall → autonomy
In a new survey commissioned by software company SAS of 2,700 “decision-makers” across 28 countries, nearly 90% of respondents said agents play some decision-making role in their organizations. asserted
agents → commission → organizations
But only 66% said they trust agentic AI, compared to three-quarters who trust generative AI more broadly, showing that the deployment of AI in businesses is outpacing trust in it. asserted
deployment → say → it
Businesses are rapidly rolling out AI-powered tools, but they’re not going to take off unless people actually know how they work: The top reason survey respondents gave for overriding an AI’s decisions was insufficient explanation of how it reached its answer — cited more than twice as often as the output simply being wrong. asserted
output → power → answer
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support
Terms · Privacy · beta v2.0.0
Articles to 22 Oct 2026