The New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America is divided over whether the AI industry is a destructive capitalist force that could kill everyone, or merely an overhyped capitalist hustle.
uncertain
that → divide → everyone
The rift within the largest chapter of the left-wing organization centers on whether the New York DSA should acknowledge the possibility that AI could lead to mass automation and to systems that escape human control — the kind of warnings that gained traction after recent AI-powered hacks.
uncertain
that → center → hacks
Some tech leaders and Democratic politicians — including America’s leading socialist, Sen. Bernie Sanders — have warned that without guardrails, there’s a chance AI could lead to human extinction.
uncertain
AI → include → extinction
At the chapter’s convention on Nov. 14, members are expected to consider a resolution proposed in September by two graduate students and local DSA members: They warn that industry “negligence” creates “the potential for loss of control of AI agents to cause catastrophic harm.”
asserted
loss → expect → harm
But the group’s established Tech Action Working Group is not persuaded.
asserted
Group → establish → ?
Some in the self-described “techno-skeptical” committee that steers the chapter’s technology policy see things differently, arguing that dire warnings of doom are an attempt to inflate company valuations, and AI is already doing enough damage.
asserted
AI → describe → damage
Members of the group’s leadership proposed to amend that measure by removing clauses on automation, loss of control, and catastrophic risk: “AI alarmism and AI hype are the same story,” the group posted to Instagram in September.
asserted
group → propose → September
The resolution also calls for “the democratization and socialization of AI,” but the amendment deletes that phrase.
asserted
amendment → call → phrase
The socialist organization is now mired in procedural infighting.
asserted
organization → mire → infighting
Alexei Gannon and Zachary Jones, who wrote the original resolution, accused the TAWG of presenting its leaders’ views as the group’s official position, even though the group never formally voted on where it stands on AI risk.
asserted
it → write → risk
The TAWG, Gannon and Jones wrote in a Substack post, hasn’t held a membership meeting since March.
asserted
Gannon → write → March
“To equate worrying about catastrophic risk with buying a Silicon Valley narrative is to lump hundreds of DSA comrades… and 60% of the American public into the same bucket as Sam Altman and Elon Musk,” they wrote.
asserted
they → equate → Altman
Gannon and Jones declined to comment; the New York City DSA chapter and the Tech Action Working Group didn’t respond to requests for comment.
asserted
chapter → decline → comment
The DSA is also grappling with how to use the technology itself: The local chapter’s tech working group voted in January to ban using generative AI text, images, and video for “any DSA purpose.”
asserted
group → grapple → purpose
The national DSA’s tech committee this month adopted a policy that “neither endorses nor prohibits” AI coding tools for its own software.
asserted
that → adopt → software
The discourse in the DSA in many ways mirrors the broader debate confronting the American left over AI, as Democrats look to stake out a position on the issue ahead of the 2028 presidential election.
asserted
Democrats → mirror → election
How the DSA and other left-wing factions speak to voters about AI risk could shape what regulation looks like if Democrats retake Congress in the midterms, and which candidates win over the party’s AI-skeptic vote.
uncertain
candidates → speak → vote
I got a glimpse of how progressives are positioning on the issue at the People’s AI Assembly on Monday, organized by the AI Now Institute and More Perfect Union.
asserted
progressives → get → Institute
The event centered on the impacts of data centers, surveillance, and the concentration of power in a handful of companies.
asserted
event → center → companies
Sanders-esque warnings about AI threatening humanity weren’t a focal point, suggesting the DSA camp that’s more focused on mitigating present harms is setting the terms of the conversation, at least in New York.
“Even as we reckon with these larger societal questions, there are still rules that we can implement and hold these kinds of companies to account for,” New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a DSA member, told the crowd.
asserted
Mamdani → threaten → crowd
It was clear at the People’s AI Assembly that broad swaths of the left remain united on a number of AI-related fronts, including data centers, the concentration of corporate power, and the broader need for regulation and oversight.
asserted
swaths → remain → regulation
Brian Romero, a DSA member and incoming state assemblymember who has worked with the chapter’s tech working group in the past, framed the debate as a complex, fast-moving issue that factions across the political spectrum are having.
asserted
factions → work → spectrum
“It’s not unlike any other policy issue,” he said.
asserted
he → ’ → issue
As another attendee at the People’s Assembly told me: “It wouldn’t be the DSA if there wasn’t debate.”
asserted
It → tell → me
Notable
- Sanders is facing pushback from some on the left over his doomerist AI rhetoric, WIRED reported.
asserted
WIRED → face → rhetoric
“Some of us are looking at Bernie and saying, what happened?” one NYC DSA member said.
asserted
member → look → Bernie
- The broader DSA has no “consistent line on what elected socialists should advocate for regarding AI,” Zhao Levi, a DSA member, wrote in Cosmonaut in September, proposing a national working group to draft one for the 2027 national convention.
asserted
Levi → have → convention
The Aporia
