AI that works for Americans

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Kelly, J. (2026, September 4). AI that works for Americans. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/4710766/american-ai-policy-guardrails-innovation/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-04 · by Janet Kelly

Quick Summary

The article is written from the perspective of an organization called the Alliance for a Better Future. It argues that Americans are skeptical of AI due to concerns about its direction, citing reasons such as the tech industry's values being at odds with those of everyday Americans and the feeling that AI was not requested by the public. The key figure mentioned is 75%, representing the proportion of Americans who do not trust AI or its builders. The article advocates for a collaborative approach to governing AI, rather than relying solely on government regulation, and suggests that American ingenuity can be applied to address safety concerns through innovation and iteration.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-04, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The US government has not yet developed a comprehensive strategy to harness the potential benefits of artificial intelligence (AI), despite its significant impact on American life, which the article's author believes could be as transformative as cars, medicine, and electricity. According to the article, over three-quarters of Americans lack trust in AI or its creators, with several reasons contributing to this skepticism: concerns that AI is not being used for beneficial purposes, such as healthcare breakthroughs and job support, feelings of unease about another technology being imposed on them without their consent, and a perceived disconnect between the values of Silicon Valley and those of everyday Americans. The article suggests that addressing these concerns will be crucial in shaping America's future over the next 250 years.

Written for “AI Developments” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Developments
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 6 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles cover different topics and don't mention the same specific happening or incident.”
The Intercept
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 8 of 100 📰 publisher trust 97
“Article A discusses a general statement about AI's potential impact on American life, while Article B specifically describes an incident involving Anthropic and the Pentagon”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 24 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A mentions a general topic of AI and its potential impact on society, while Article B reports on a specific researcher leaving Anthropic due to concerns about the development of self-improving AI models”
How China Is Stealing America’s AI different event · 90%
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 10 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses the emergence of AI in general and Americans' trust issues with it, while Article B focuses on China's alleged theft of American companies' AI advancements”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 50% hedged 2 of 4 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A discusses a general topic about AI's potential impact on American life, while Article B reports on a specific statement made by an Anthropic researcher about AI developers' concerns and the subsequent quitting of one such developer”
Persuasion
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 56
“The articles mention different topics and events, with Article A discussing a government investment in Intel stock and Article B discussing artificial intelligence and public trust.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 8 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article B mentions a new California law passed earlier in the week, which is not mentioned in Article A”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 6 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses the potential of AI in general, while Article B specifically warns about threats of AI bioterrorism, indicating they cover different aspects of AI with no clear connection to a shared specific event”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A is a general commentary on AI and its potential impact, while Article B reports on a specific study about trust in AI in businesses”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 25% hedged 2 of 8 📰 publisher trust 68
“The articles cover a different aspect of AI and do not describe the same specific happening”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
55
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
3 of 55 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3243 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Janet Kelly
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 This will be the backdrop when Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives at the White House later this week to meet with President Donald Trump.
2026-09-23 · assertive framing · China stole our AI. Now Xi has to face Trump
🔮 Americans did not show up on any recent Election Day and vote for new technology that would bring sweeping changes to our way of life.
2026-09-04 · assertive framing · AI that works for Americans
Also by Janet Kelly
China stole our AI. Now Xi has to face Trump
2026-09-23 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

America American Americans Washington the Alliance for a Better Future

Subjects

Americans NORP · 7× American NORP · 5× America GPE · 3× China GPE · 1× Washington GPE · 1× the Alliance for a Better Future ORG · 1×

Narrative

A wave of doomerism has convinced many Americans that the only responsible move is to stop the technology, hand it completely over to Washington, or wait for Europe to write the rules for us.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-04
🔮 Americans did not show up on any recent Election Day and vote for new technology that would bring sweeping changes to our way of life.
2026-09-04 · Washington Examiner
AI that works for Americans · assertive framing

Claims (55 extracted, 3 hedged)

Americans did not show up on any recent Election Day and vote for new technology that would bring sweeping changes to our way of life. asserted
that → show → life
Yet AI is here, and its power demands a strategy that promotes innovation, protects the American dream, and shapes our next 250 years. asserted
that → demand → years
Artificial intelligence has the potential to be the most life-changing, life-giving, and life-saving technology the world has ever seen, exceeding even cars, medicine, and electricity. asserted
world → have → cars
But change happens at the speed of trust. asserted
change → happen → trust
Right now, more than three-quarters of Americans simply do not trust AI or its builders. asserted
quarters → trust → AI
One reason is that Americans aren’t convinced that AI’s power is pointed in the right direction. asserted
power → convince → direction
If the headlines were full of healthcare breakthroughs and tools that support people at work without threatening their jobs, they might feel differently. uncertain
they → support → jobs
Another reason: AI feels like yet another technology nobody asked for. asserted
nobody → feel → technology
It comes after a 15-year grab from social media for our attention and attachments, making parenting, focusing, and actually connecting harder than ever. asserted
parenting → come → attention
The tech industry seems to treat any reasonable safety measure as an attack on innovation, while ignoring the risk that their dreams could eliminate the American dream for millions. uncertain
dreams → seem → millions
We should reward entrepreneurs for their hard work and risk-taking. asserted
We → reward → work
But those who stand to gain the most immediate financial return, generally speaking, are not the best stewards of policy in any period of innovation. asserted
who → stand → innovation
At the Alliance for a Better Future, we start from a simple conviction: America’s greatness grows out of America’s goodness. asserted
greatness → start → goodness
The best of this technology can be unleashed to lift up every American, not just those who own it. asserted
who → unleash → it
A doctor who catches a diagnosis early and uses individualized gene mapping to treat it. asserted
who → catch → it
Hours of paperwork collapsed into minutes. asserted
Hours → collapse → minutes
An AI agent that manages home repairs, meal plans, and errands for busy parents. asserted
that → manage → parents
That can happen — if we work together to make it a reality. asserted
it → happen → ?
Which leaves two questions: how should AI be governed, and who does the governing? asserted
governing → leave → questions
Our children and grandchildren will live with those answers, so we need to get them right. asserted
them → live → answers
A wave of doomerism has convinced many Americans that the only responsible move is to stop the technology, hand it completely over to Washington, or wait for Europe to write the rules for us. asserted
Europe → convince → us
But America doesn’t give up because we have concerns. asserted
we → give → concerns
We build, test, iterate, and improve safety as we go. asserted
we → build → safety
We didn’t outlaw cars because they were dangerous. asserted
they → outlaw → cars
We built guardrails, brakes, and traffic lights, and the world followed. asserted
world → build → guardrails
Two truths should anchor what comes next: First, American AI has to earn trust. asserted
AI → anchor → trust
Aerospace has rules. asserted
Aerospace → have → rules
Medicine has rules. asserted
Medicine → have → rules
Trucking has rules. asserted
Trucking → have → rules
Nobody calls that socialism. asserted
Nobody → call → that
AI will have guardrails. asserted
AI → have → guardrails
The only question is whether those guardrails are written by Americans, for Americans, or handed to us by foreign regulators and Silicon Valley lawyers asking for our trust yet again. asserted
guardrails → write → trust
Second, American AI has to win around the world. asserted
AI → have → world
This technology will decide whether our way of life continues or dies. asserted
way → decide → life
Fully backed by its government, China is running hard with no intention of playing fair. asserted
China → back → intention
If we hesitate, we don’t get a safer world. asserted
we → hesitate → world
We get a world where the most important technology in human history is controlled by those intent on destroying our way of life. asserted
technology → get → life
Getting the balance right means being specific. asserted
balance → get → ?
Children and the elderly protected online from sexualized chats, suicide coaching, and scams. asserted
Children → protect → chats
Financial information kept private. asserted
information → keep → ?
…and 15 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support