Story summary
Andy Burnham, newly elected leader of the Labour Party, delivered his first speech as leader at the party's conference in Liverpool on Wednesday. The speech was emotional and covered bold policies such as reforming social care and electoral systems, drawing mixed reactions from attendees and media outlets.
Burnham choked up while discussing his father who recently passed away, a moment that resonated deeply with the audience. He admitted to wanting to move faster on cost-of-living measures but stressed fiscal honesty about what Britain can afford. The speech was seen by some as one of the most memorable in recent years, with former BBC political editor Andrew Marr comparing it favorably to Tony Blair's speeches.
Critics like Mail Online’s Quentin Letts were less impressed, describing the emotional tone and policy promises as overly sentimental and sugar-coated. Meanwhile, supporters praised Burnham for his relatability and commitment to addressing working-class concerns, potentially appealing to voters who had drifted away from Labour under Keir Starmer.
The speech also touched on plans for electoral reform, aiming to introduce proportional representation in Westminster elections, a significant change since 1918. This move is seen as part of Burnham's strategy to transform the UK’s political system fundamentally, though some within the party are wary about such dramatic changes given current fiscal constraints and public opinion.
Written for “Andy Burnham Labour Speeches” on 2026-10-05,
grounded in this article and the 24 other(s) covering the same event.
“He’s offering what no other politician has offered for a long, long time.
asserted
politician → offer → time
He actually feels like he’s one of us,” was how Neil, a geography teacher, described Andy Burnham in our focus group on Thursday night.
asserted
Neil → feel → night
Neil wasn’t alone in his praise: this group of Labour 2024 voters – some of whom had drifted to Reform, the Tories and Greens during the Starmer era – provided the most positive reception for a politician since Boris Johnson at the height of his Covid-vaccine bounce.
asserted
some → drift → bounce
Talent manager Megan said: “He feels more relatable to people from a working–class background.”
asserted
He → say → background
Simran, another teacher, added: “He’s obviously better than the others in the short timeframe that he’s been in his position.”
asserted
he → add → position
Linda, who works in banking, went further, saying: “He actually sounds like a person that’s there, not just for himself, but for all of us, which none of the others prior to him came across that way.”
asserted
none → work → him
That praise for Burnham stood in stark contrast to his predecessor Keir Starmer who was, as contracts manager Craig put it, “just a shambles from the moment they won the election up until he left”.
asserted
he → stand → election
None of the group felt it would have been better to keep the former PM in place.
asserted
it → feel → place
Labour’s conference also seemed to have cut through the noise of the attention economy.
asserted
conference → seem → economy
Most had picked up at least something from the prime minister’s speech and liked what they had heard.
asserted
they → pick → what
After seeing the clip where Burnham spoke emotionally about the death of his father, the group, in contrast to some online criticism, appreciated a politician willing to show his human side.
asserted
group → see → side
On Burnham’s pledge to revisit the UK’s relationship with the EU there was an overwhelming feeling Brexit had been a disaster.
asserted
Brexit → revisit → EU
Most in this group had voted to remain, but even those like Darren, a field manager at a utility company who had voted Leave, felt cheated:
asserted
who → vote → Leave
“The amount we got told we were putting into the EU, I thought we could stand on our own two feet …
uncertain
we → tell → feet
we got told quite a few things, and it didn’t quite happen.”
asserted
it → tell → things
Interestingly, for most of the group it was less the economic impact of Brexit that worried them but instead the sense of isolation in an increasingly dangerous world and a less reliable US.
asserted
that → worry → world
But, and here is the caveat, once it came to the specifics of what rejoining may involve the group were far more cautious.
uncertain
group → come → what
Many felt if Britain could rejoin on its old terms it would be a “no brainer”.
uncertain
it → feel → terms
But the participants now worried that Britain would end up with a worse deal as punishment.
asserted
Britain → worry → punishment
Neil said: “I voted remain, but we’ll get utterly shafted if we rejoin … what do they gain?”
asserted
they → say → what
Others described feeling 50/50 and nervous about where we’d end up.
asserted
we → describe → ?
If this group is anything to go by, Burnham’s biggest fight won’t be in the principle but the details.
asserted
fight → go → principle
What about Burnham’s other, more controversial, pledge that the triple lock would be reformed to pay for social care?
asserted
lock → reform → care
The discussion here revealed two things.
asserted
discussion → reveal → things
First the rise in wages is less salient to people than other bits of the lock; most of the group felt as if their wages had not kept up with inflation for a long time anyway, so pensioners would not really lose out.
asserted
pensioners → feel → time
As Linda put it: “My salary has not been increasing that greatly.”
asserted
salary → put → it
Second, reforming care is a real priority.
asserted
reforming → reform → care
For Tariq, who works in the pharmaceutical industry, this was an example that “sometimes you need to take hard decisions”.
asserted
you → work → decisions
But the mood definitely shifted when the group were played a clip from Unite leader, Sharon Graham, opposing the move.
asserted
group → shift → move
Suddenly some participants worried this was “taking off pensioners” while others asked “couldn’t the highest earners fund it instead”.
asserted
earners → worry → it
And the group were even more negative when they read former Institute for Fiscal Studies chief Paul Johnson’s analysis that triple lock reform wouldn’t pay for a national care service in the near term and so taxes would have to rise.
asserted
taxes → read → term
None of the group were willing to pay more taxes, personally, for care.
asserted
None → pay → care
Simran said: “If the income tax increases any more, you’re going to find people are going to migrate.”
asserted
people → say → ?
Joanne, who works in dentistry, added: “I feel rather selfish about it because I don’t want to pay any more tax ... people just can’t afford to live a decent life at the moment.”
asserted
people → work → moment
This led to a wider discussion about the budget and people’s worries that, while Burnham had done some “small things”, was it just going to be, as Linda put it, “robbing Peter and paying Paul”.
asserted
Linda → lead → Paul
If this group is anything to go by, Burnham is impressing the voters who put Labour into office in 2024, and has earned his party a rehearing that Starmer simply could not.
uncertain
Starmer → go → rehearing
But beyond the top line, big questions remain on the details.
asserted
questions → remain → details
The Labour leader can be happy with the reception for Tuesday’s speech but definitely cannot afford to rest on a post-conference glow in the battle for public opinion on his plans.
asserted
leader → afford → plans
(Participants’ names have been changed)
asserted
names → change → ?
The Aporia
