The Supreme Court's Chief Justice John Roberts has been criticized for his handling of a case involving President Trump's plans to build a ballroom in the White House. Despite previously using his judicial authority to block Trump's tariffs and birthright citizenship executive order, Roberts dissented from a decision that allowed construction on the ballroom to proceed without congressional approval. The court's majority opinion cited unspecified "circumstances" as justification for allowing the project to move forward. This is in contrast to the court's handling of other high-profile cases under Trump's presidency.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-03,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
One of John Roberts' responsibilities as chief justice of the United States is to write an annual "Year End Report on the Federal Judiciary."
asserted
One → write → Judiciary
The 2025 edition of that report, which came out at the very end of last year, makes for interesting reading in light of what has happened at the U.S. Supreme Court so far this year.
asserted
what → come → Court
"The Declaration [of Independence] charged that George III 'has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries,'" Roberts observed in his 2025 report.
asserted
Roberts → charge → report
"The Constitution corrected this flaw, granting life tenure and salary protection to safeguard the independence of federal judges and ensure their ability to serve as a counter-majoritarian check on the political branches.
asserted
Constitution → correct → branches
This arrangement, now in place for 236 years, has served the country well.
asserted
arrangement → serve → country
"
You’re reading Injustice System from Damon Root and Reason.
asserted
You → read → Root
To "serve as a counter-majoritarian check on the political branches" is another way of saying that it is the role of the courts to stop the other branches of government from exceeding the scope of their proper authority.
asserted
it → serve → authority
Or, as James Madison once put it, it is the job of the courts to stand as "an impenetrable bulwark against every assumption of power in the legislative or executive."
asserted
it → put → legislative
Congress doesn't need much bulwarking against nowadays because the legislative branch is effectively AWOL.
asserted
branch → need → bulwarking
But the president has certainly given the courts plenty of work to do.
asserted
president → give → work
And the chief justice has, at least sometimes, followed through on the lofty words of his 2025 report.
asserted
justice → follow → report
Roberts has labored, though not always successfully, to provide the judicial check on a rogue executive that the founders both wanted and expected to see.
asserted
founders → labor → that
Roberts' successes on this front in the past year include leading the Supreme Court in overruling President Donald Trump's illegal tariff scheme and rejecting Trump's unconstitutional executive order on birthright citizenship.
asserted
successes → include → citizenship
A notable defeat for Roberts occurred earlier this week, however, in the case about Trump's White House ballroom.
asserted
defeat → occur → ballroom
The Constitution assigns to Congress the sole authority "To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever" over Washington, D.C.
asserted
Constitution → assign → Washington
And Congress, acting on that constitutional authority, has outlawed the construction of any "building or structure…on any reservation, park, or public grounds of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia without express authority of Congress."
asserted
Congress → act → Congress
Yet none of that has stopped Trump from demolishing a large part of the White House without any congressional approval in order to build his much-desired ballroom.
asserted
none → stop → ballroom
Roberts thought so.
asserted
Roberts → think → ?
But this time the chief justice found himself in dissent.
asserted
justice → find → dissent
Five members of the Court cohered around an unsigned per curiam opinion this week that allowed the construction on the White House to proceed for now because, in their view, the legal challengers who had sued to stop the ballroom likely lacked the requisite standing needed to sue in the first place.
asserted
who → cohere → place
Roberts, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, thought the challengers did satisfy the necessary standing requirements and therefore faulted his colleagues for effectively giving the green light to Trump's "likely unlawful" ballroom building spree.
asserted
challengers → join → spree
Legal standing is one of those handy doctrines that judges can selectively employ when they want to avoid ruling on the merits of a particular case, or when they want to defer to the government without coming right out and deferring openly.
asserted
they → employ → government
It's hard to tell in this case which one of those two reasons might account for the majority's actions.
uncertain
one → tell → actions
Roberts' dissent is much easier to parse.
asserted
dissent → parse → ?
He simply tried and failed to convince the Supreme Court to provide the judicial check on executive lawlessness that the Constitution demands.
asserted
Constitution → try → that
