Californians can protect their personal data with one click. Help us test if it works

The Markup · collected 2026-08-24 · by Colin Lecher and Mohamed Al Elew
Read the original at The Markup ↗

Summary

California residents can now use a tool called DROP to request that data brokers delete their personal information and stop tracking them. Starting in August, data companies are required to process these requests. The California Privacy Protection Agency has established this platform for consumers to send instant requests to hundreds of data brokers at once. CalMatters and The Markup journalists Colin and Mohamed want readers' help testing the effectiveness of DROP by using it themselves and reporting back on their experiences with data brokers.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-24, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
16
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
0%
0 of 16 hedged
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher trust
94.9
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
2
Technology
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-08-24 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Californians can now request their personal data be deleted from hundreds of data brokers with just one click through a new platform called DROP, which was launched by the California Privacy Protection Agency at the beginning of this year. Data brokers collect sensitive information on consumers, including location data, purchase history, and medical records. The new tool allows consumers to send instant requests to data brokers to delete their data and stop tracking them, and brokers are required to process these requests starting in August. The California Privacy Protection Agency created this platform after an investigation by The Markup and CalMatters found that many companies were making it difficult for consumers to request their personal data be deleted, including using code that prevented those pages from appearing in search results on Google. Since the investigation was published, multiple companies have stopped hiding these pages. This new platform aims to make it easier for Californians to protect their personal data and hold data brokers accountable.

Written for “California Data Protection Law” on 2026-08-31, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 2034 · logged 2026-08-27

Story

📰 California Data Protection Law
Technology · 2 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
National Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 34 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles cover unrelated topics, with one discussing AI theft of news content and the other about personal data protection in California”
The Markup
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 10% hedged 16 of 159 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles cover different topics and do not describe the same specific happening”
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 23 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses a new way for Californians to protect their personal data, while Article B discusses data centers and Flock surveillance cameras, without mentioning any relation to the data protection initiative”
The Markup
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 9% hedged 2 of 23 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles report on the same effort by California to protect personal data, with the same entities involved (The Markup, CalMatters) and a direct mention of an investigation”
Platformer
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 8% hedged 6 of 71 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles cover different topics: data protection in California and Meta's child safety failures”
The AI Data Center Moral Panic different event · 100%
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 20 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses California's new data protection method, while Article B talks about the national debate over data centers and a trade war with Canada”
Reason.com
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 29% hedged 7 of 24 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles mention different topics and companies (CalMatters/Data brokers vs Flock Safety/ALPR cameras), indicating they are covering distinct events”
The Markup
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 12% hedged 9 of 78 📰 publisher trust 95
“Although both articles mention California's new laws, Article A is focused on protecting children online, while Article B focuses on protecting personal data in general”
TIME
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 6% hedged 6 of 107 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses a new way for Californians to protect their data, while Article B mentions data centers and a change in leadership stance on them, but no mention of California's rollout or effectiveness”

Publisher

The Markup · 6 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.103 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Colin Lecher
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The “no-index” code tells search engines like Google not to catalog those pages, making it less likely that anyone would see them.
🔮 If you don’t live in California, but have friends or family in California who would be interested in helping us investigate, please share this article with them.
🔮 This story was produced in partnership with Agência Pública as part of a series on how regulatory solutions adopted in Brazil could point the way for the U.S.
More on this subject from Colin Lecher
Mohamed Al Elew
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 If you don’t live in California, but have friends or family in California who would be interested in helping us investigate, please share this article with them.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

CalMatters California Hello World The Markup the California Privacy Protection Agency

Subjects

California GPE · 4× CalMatters ORG · 2× Colin PERSON · 2× Mohamed PERSON · 2× The Markup ORG · 2× Californians NORP · 1× Hello World ORG · 1× the California Privacy Protection Agency ORG · 1×

Narrative

Hello World is a special edition newsletter that goes deep into our original reporting, our own interactions with technology and the questions we put to big thinkers in the field.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-24
🔮 If you don’t live in California, but have friends or family in California who would be interested in helping us investigate, please share this article with them.

Claims (16 extracted, 0 hedged)

Hello World is a special edition newsletter that goes deep into our original reporting, our own interactions with technology and the questions we put to big thinkers in the field. asserted
we → go → field
Hello there, Our names are Colin and Mohamed, and we’re both journalists at CalMatters and The Markup. asserted
we → ’re → CalMatters
If you haven’t heard yet, California is offering a new way for people to protect their data — and we want your help tracking its rollout and effectiveness. asserted
we → hear → rollout
Data brokers are largely unknown companies that make a business out of collecting often-sensitive data on consumers. asserted
that → make → consumers
That data can include where you and your family are at all times, what you buy, what medications you’re taking and much more. asserted
you → include → medications
Starting at the beginning of this year, the California Privacy Protection Agency allowed residents of the state to sign up for the Delete Request and Opt-out Platform, or DROP. asserted
residents → start → Platform
The tool lets consumers send an instant request to hundreds of data brokers, asking them to delete their data and stop tracking them. asserted
consumers → let → them
The brokers are required to start processing those requests in August. asserted
brokers → require → August
We reported on the tool’s launch, and as new requests are processed, we’ll keep following the story. asserted
we → report → story
CalMatters and The Markup want to keep tabs on whether data companies comply with DROP, and that’s where we need your help. asserted
we → want → help
Californians have the right to know about the personal information a business collects about them and to control how it is used and shared. asserted
it → have → them
We’ll walk you through how to exercise those rights with some of the largest data brokers in the country and how to share what they tell you with us. asserted
they → walk → us
Then, after the DROP deadline, we’ll walk you through how to do it again, and we’ll help you figure out if the information companies have about you changed, grew, or was deleted. asserted
companies → walk → you
If you live in California, get started by following the steps in this article. asserted
you → live → article
If you don’t live in California, but have friends or family in California who would be interested in helping us investigate, please share this article with them. asserted
us → live → them
We appreciate the help! asserted
We → appreciate → help
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support