Following Markup investigation, Congress finds data brokers cost consumers tens of billions of dollars

The Markup · collected 2026-09-04 · by Colin Lecher
Read the original at The Markup ↗

Summary

A congressional investigation triggered by reporting from The Markup and CalMatters has found that recent breaches at four major data brokers have cost American consumers over $20 billion in identity theft losses. The report, released by the Joint Economic Committee's Democratic minority, cited the two organizations' previous findings on data broker practices, including their use of a "no-index" tag to hide opt-out pages from search engines. This practice was exposed in an August article by The Markup and CalMatters, which prompted multiple companies to stop hiding these pages after being contacted for comment. Data brokers collect consumer information and sell it to other companies, often using invasive methods like tracking online activity.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-05, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
6%
2 of 34 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
94.1
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-05 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Data breaches at four major data brokers have cost American consumers more than $20 billion, according to a report released by the Joint Economic Committee. This estimate is based on identity theft linked to these breaches, which were investigated in part due to previous reporting by The Markup and CalMatters. The two organizations' investigation found that data brokers were hiding from search engines pages where Californians can request their personal data be deleted or stopped being sold. The Markup and CalMatters' reporting also revealed that companies are making it harder for people to delete their personal data online, which contributed to the estimated losses.

Written for “Data Broker Scandal Uncovered” on 2026-09-05, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.35 Confidence medium
Leaning score -0.35 for article 4322 (medium confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-05

Story

📰 Data Broker Scandal Uncovered
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Markup
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 17% hedged 13 of 75 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A describes an investigation by Congress into data broker breaches, while Article B is about California's attempt to protect student data and tech companies finding loopholes”

Publisher

The Markup · 20 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.118 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Colin Lecher
9 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The upshot, some believe, could be new forms of regulation, including at the federal level.
🔮 In a press conference this week on New York City’s $12 billion budget gap, Mayor Zohran Mamdani zeroed in on the previous administration’s artificial intelligence chatbot as one of “a number of different things we’re going to pursue for savings.”
🔮 But The Markup and CalMatters’ August story examined how several data brokers used code called the “no-index” tag on pages where consumers could exercise their right to opt out.
🔮 Kevin DeLuca, an assistant professor of political science at Yale University who has studied similar news sites, sometimes called “pink slime” news, told The Markup and CalMatters earlier this year that such sites may not be outright lying.
🔮 A new audit has found that websites across the internet may be failing to abide by California privacy law, ignoring a requirement to not track visitors who set a privacy control.
🔮 Meanwhile, the Defense Department has signed off on the earliest contracts for the “Golden Dome,” a proposal to build a missile-defense system above the United States that may eventually cost hundreds of billions of dollars.
🔮 The “no-index” code tells search engines like Google not to catalog those pages, making it less likely that anyone would see them.
🔮 If you don’t live in California, but have friends or family in California who would be interested in helping us investigate, please share this article with them.
🔮 This story was produced in partnership with Agência Pública as part of a series on how regulatory solutions adopted in Brazil could point the way for the U.S.
More on this subject from Colin Lecher
All 9 articles by Colin Lecher →

Topics

CalMatters California Democratic Klaxon Markup

Subjects

CalMatters ORG · 6× Markup ORG · 6× Hassan ORG · 3× California GPE · 2× Democratic NORP · 2× American NORP · 1× Congress ORG · 1× Joint Economic Committee ORG · 1× Klaxon ORG · 1× WIRED ORG · 1×

Narrative

Data brokers, as defined in the California law that requires brokers to provide consumers the so-called “opt out” pages, are companies that gather data on consumers, then sell that data to other companies who do not have a direct relationship with the consumers.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-05
🔮 But The Markup and CalMatters’ August story examined how several data brokers used code called the “no-index” tag on pages where consumers could exercise their right to opt out.

Claims (34 extracted, 2 hedged)

The Markup, now a part of CalMatters, uses investigative reporting, data analysis, and software engineering to challenge technology to serve the public good. asserted
Markup → use → good
Sign up for Klaxon, a newsletter that delivers our stories and tools directly to your inbox. asserted
that → sign → inbox
Breaches at data brokers have cost American consumers more than $20 billion, Congress’s Joint Economic Committee revealed Friday as part of an investigation triggered by The Markup and CalMatters. asserted
Committee → cost → Markup
The estimated losses stem from identity theft linked to just four recent data breaches involving major brokers, the committee said in a report. asserted
committee → estimate → report
Released by the committee’s Democratic minority, the document repeatedly cited reporting into data brokers from The Markup and CalMatters, done in collaboration with WIRED. asserted
document → release → WIRED
The committee followed up directly on the Markup and CalMatters’ reporting, which in August showed how data brokers were hiding from search engines legally-mandated pages where Californians can request that the brokers delete or stop selling their data. asserted
brokers → follow → data
We caught companies making it harder to delete your personal data online Dozens of companies are hiding how you can delete your personal data, The Markup and CalMatters found. asserted
Markup → catch → data
After our reporters reached out for comment, multiple companies have stopped the practice. asserted
companies → reach → practice
Shortly after that story was published, New Hampshire Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan, ranking member of the committee, sent a letter pressing some brokers to explain their practices. asserted
Hassan → publish → practices
In response, the report revealed, four major data brokers engaged with congressional staff and changed their practices to make it easier for consumers to control the use of their data. asserted
consumers → reveal → data
Data brokers, as defined in the California law that requires brokers to provide consumers the so-called “opt out” pages, are companies that gather data on consumers, then sell that data to other companies who do not have a direct relationship with the consumers. asserted
who → define → consumers
Typically, companies buy such information from data brokers for marketing purposes. asserted
companies → buy → purposes
Brokers can gather the data from information like public records, or more invasive methods like tracking online activity. asserted
Brokers → gather → activity
Though brokers hold potentially sensitive information on consumers, many Americans are unaware they exist. asserted
they → hold → consumers
Under the California law, data brokers that reach a certain size are required to register and provide a clear way for consumers to request that their information be removed, that it not be sold or that they get access to it. asserted
they → reach → it
But The Markup and CalMatters’ August story examined how several data brokers used code called the “no-index” tag on pages where consumers could exercise their right to opt out. uncertain
consumers → examine → right
The tag is used to tell search engines not to index the page, meaning the information may not be returned in search results. uncertain
information → use → results
The story noted that this created a barrier for consumers looking to block brokers from using their data. asserted
this → note → data
Many of the data brokers quickly removed the tag as the story was published. asserted
story → remove → tag
In response to that initial reporting, Hassan independently contacted five major brokers, asking for more information about their practices. asserted
Hassan → contact → practices
Only one registered broker, called Findem, declined to engage with staff or change its practices, the report said. asserted
report → register → practices
“Following Ranking Member Hassan’s requests, most companies took action to make their asserted
companies → follow → action
opt out and other privacy pages more visible for individuals, including by removing ‘no index’ code, adding opt-out links in more prominent locations, and publishing blog content that explains how consumers can exercise their privacy rights,” the report reads. asserted
report → opt → rights
“Ranking Member Hassan welcomes these actions as supporting greater protection for consumers against scams and other harms.” asserted
Hassan → welcome → scams
The report goes on to estimate the potential losses incurred by consumers because of recent data broker breaches, pegging the number at $20.8 billion. asserted
report → go → billion
Congressional staff found that hundreds of millions of people were exposed by just four major data broker breaches in the last 10 years. asserted
millions → find → years
The breaches counted were a 2017 Equifax incident, impacting 147 million people, as well as others involving Exactis in 2018, 230 million people, National Public in 2023, 270 million people and TransUnion in 2025, 4 million people. asserted
breaches → count → 2025
Using estimates of the number of people who experience identity theft after breaches, as well as an assumed median loss of $200 from thefts, the report arrived at the nearly $21 billion figure. asserted
report → use → figure
The report calls for action to prevent such losses in the future, including by filling gaps exposed by The Markup and CalMatters’ reporting on brokers. asserted
report → call → brokers
“The Committee’s findings underscore the need for clear, easy access to opt-out options and more rigorous oversight within the data broker industry. asserted
findings → underscore → industry
Especially given the Committee’s calculation that U.S. residents have lost more than $20 billion in recent data breaches, additional action is needed to protect Americans from scams connected to data brokers,” the report reads. asserted
report → give → brokers
“At a minimum, opt-out options should be easy to locate and use.” asserted
options → opt → minimum
A new state website allows Californians to remove their personal information from hundreds of brokers at once. asserted
Californians → allow → brokers
The Markup and CalMatters have a guide to using the website here. asserted
Markup → have → website
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support