Claims extracted
20
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
20%
4 of 20 hedged
("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
National Post's corrections and
hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
4
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
National Post contributor Ben Woodfinden has already given our readers a terrific summary of the Ontario Court of Appeal’s exasperated overturning of last summer’s grotesque bike-lane ruling in Cycle Toronto v. Ontario.
asserted
Woodfinden → give → Ontario
Most of you probably don’t need a recap of the litigation, but we’ll zip through one: in November 2024 the Ontario government decided to rip some bike lanes out of congested roads in Toronto, and passed a law allowing it to do so.
asserted
it → need → law
Cycling advocates sued on Charter of Rights grounds, claiming that the removal of the lanes would expose them arbitrarily to “grossly disproportionate” risk of injury and death.
asserted
removal → sue → injury
Superior Court Justice Paul Schabas conducted an extensive review of policy evidence and decided that the threatened bike lanes were, in fact, irremovable by the state.
asserted
lanes → conduct → state
Nearly all legal commentators saw this as an unprecedented Charter entrenchment of a positive benefit provided and maintained in the first place by the state — the permanent sacralization of some specific pieces of public infrastructure.
asserted
commentators → see → infrastructure
Nearly, you say?
asserted
you → say → ?
A bold, perhaps lone exception was the Globe and Mail’s Andrew Coyne, who supported the Schabas decision all along and has weighed in Wednesday morning with a half-hearted grumble about the appeal court’s reversal.
asserted
who → support → reversal
Coyne is angry at the multitude of lawyers and amateur analysts like me who complained that Schabas was creating a “right to bike lanes.”
asserted
Schabas → complain → lanes
Schabas, claims Coyne, has been wronged.
uncertain
Coyne → claim → ?
The cyclists who brought the case merely had a right to have a judge assess evidence of the likely effects of the bike-lane removal, use his superior utilitarian calculus to make a final policy decision superseding that of the legislature, and give it the force of law.
asserted
judge → bring → law
It’s not a right to bike lanes at all, though it may establish the existence and good repair of some bike lanes as an implication of rights in the Charter.
uncertain
it → ’ → Charter
No wonder everyone’s confused: it’s all very subtle.
Like Woodfinden, I’ll invite the reader to compare the quality of Coyne’s arguments to the ones in the Ontario Court of Appeal decision itself.
asserted
I → ’ → decision
What I’ll point out is Coyne’s stumble down a slope that he would ordinarily be capable of avoiding: he shamelessly makes a dinner out of the fact that the Ontario Court of Appeal ruling was written by a Conservative (Harper) appointee to the court, Justice Grant Huscroft.
asserted
ruling → point → court
He frowns at Huscroft’s “long lecture on the perils of judicial activism … full of ringing phrases just begging to be quoted.”
asserted
He → frown → phrases
It seems to me that the Coynean political tendency in favour of more judicial activism against those obnoxious provincial governments probably is a bit underrepresented in the popular press; the Globe’s own editorial board, after all, opposed the original Schabas ruling.
asserted
board → seem → ruling
The question for those who support the Right to Some Bike Lanes Under Some Circumstances is this.
asserted
who → support → Circumstances
Why were two Liberal appointees to the Ontario Court of Appeal perfectly content to apply their bare signatures to Huscroft’s resounding manifesto?
asserted
appointees → apply → manifesto
These fellow-travellers, Justices Michal Fairburn and Benjamin Zarnett, had the chance to write their own opinions, which could have been concurring ones, if they had some objection to Huscroft’s logic or phraseology.
uncertain
they → have → logic
If we adopt the American habit of sticking partisan labels on judges with super glue, as Coyne has, the only conclusion we can reach is that even good red-dyed Liberals might easily think that Schabas went too far and that judges should want no part of detailed policymaking and personal weighing of social-science evidence.
uncertain
judges → adopt → evidence
Since the whole thing’s probably going to the Supreme Court, that’s worth remembering.
asserted
that → go → Court
The Aporia
