Photo via Washington Examiner

Don’t blame data centers for Election Day defeats

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Marchand, R. (2026, November 5). Don’t blame data centers for Election Day defeats. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/4793002/data-centers-job-support-cost-of-living-election-energy-consumption-overstated/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-11-05 · by Ross Marchand

Quick Summary

The article argues against blaming data centers and artificial intelligence for recent electoral defeats faced by tech companies and billionaires. It counters the narrative suggesting these sectors lost popularity during the election by pointing out that voter concerns were driven more by economic issues such as inflation, rising interest rates, and fuel prices. The author emphasizes the positive economic impact of data center projects and AI advancements, calling on new lawmakers to address cost-of-living pressures while supporting technological innovation.
Written by AI on 2026-11-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans right for article 131964 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-11-05

Story

📰 Election Day Defeats Analysis
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 14 of 133 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses a specific $1.6 billion datacenter project in Menomonie, Wisconsin, while Article B addresses broader voter concerns regarding data centers and AI progress post-Election Day.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 14 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of public sentiment towards data centers and AI, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 8 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses the increase in anti-tech ads run by Democrats, while Article B addresses post-election narratives about data centers and AI and their impact on election results.”
TIME
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 10 of 70 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the election outcomes and reactions, not the same specific incident.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 7 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A reports on the specific election outcomes regarding data center ballot measures, while Article B discusses broader interpretations and reactions to those election results.”
Reason
Hedges 4 of 32 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A reports on ballot measures related to data centers in Ohio and other states, while Article B discusses broader voter concerns and reactions after Election Day that are not tied to a specific ballot measure or incident.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of political outcomes related to technology, but they are not reporting on the exact same incident or occurrence.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 6 of 39 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the impact of data centers and AI, with Article A focusing on Australia's economic concerns and potential downsides, while Article B addresses reactions to US midterm election results.”
New York Post
Hedges 7 of 35 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of election outcomes regarding data centers, with Article A focusing on pre-election hype versus reality and Article B addressing post-election narratives.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A reports on OpenAI's initiative to change public perception of data centers, while Article B discusses broader misconceptions about voters' anxieties regarding data center projects post-election.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
5
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 5 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4298 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ross Marchand
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The truth is that data center projects have created well-paying jobs across the country and AI-driven progress will fuel prosperity — if politicians and bureaucrats allow it.
2026-11-05 · assertive framing · Don’t blame data centers for Election Day defeats
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Americans an ‘AI Earthquake

Subjects

Americans NORP · 1×

Narrative

This is an easy (and lazy) narrative to push, but it misunderstands a considerably more complicated reality about voters’ anxieties — including inflation, rising interest rates, and increased fuel prices.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 The truth is that data center projects have created well-paying jobs across the country and AI-driven progress will fuel prosperity — if politicians and bureaucrats allow it.
2026-11-05 · Washington Examiner
Don’t blame data centers for Election Day defeats · assertive framing

Claims (5 extracted, 0 hedged)

In the immediate aftermath of the Election Day “blue wave,” one headline declared, “If This Was a Data Center Election, Data Centers Lost.” asserted
Centers → declare → wave
Another declared that this is nothing less than an “‘AI Earthquake,’ rebuking tech and billionaires.” asserted
this → declare → tech
This is an easy (and lazy) narrative to push, but it misunderstands a considerably more complicated reality about voters’ anxieties — including inflation, rising interest rates, and increased fuel prices. asserted
it → push → inflation
The truth is that data center projects have created well-paying jobs across the country and AI-driven progress will fuel prosperity — if politicians and bureaucrats allow it. asserted
politicians → create → it
Newly elected lawmakers must respond to the real issues facing Americans — most importantly, the soaring cost of living — and ensure that innovation continues to have a home in this great country. asserted
innovation → elect → country
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support