Photo via TIME

How AI Backlash Shaped the 2026 Midterms

Read the original at TIME ↗
Cite

Booth, H., & Chow, A. R. (2026, November 4). How AI Backlash Shaped the 2026 Midterms. TIME. https://time.com/article/2026/11/04/midterm-elections-results-ai-industry-data-centers/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

TIME · collected 2026-11-04 · by Harry Booth, Andrew R. Chow

Quick Summary

In the 2026 midterm elections on November 3rd, a significant backlash against AI and data center expansion by voters resulted in major defeats for candidates backed by pro-AI industry groups. Democrats spent over $100 million on ads targeting Republicans’ ties to Big Tech, winning key races such as Ohio’s Senate election. Data center bans passed in multiple counties, and mayors supporting these projects were recalled. Pro-safety PACs outspent AI-backed ones, leading to victories for candidates like Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed who campaigned against data centers. This outcome reflects mounting anti-AI sentiment among voters prioritizing local impacts over existential concerns.
Written by AI on 2026-11-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In the 2026 US midterms, voters overwhelmingly rejected AI data center proposals, with 37 out of 41 ballot measures across nine states limiting or banning such projects passing on November 3rd. This outcome reflects a significant shift in public sentiment against rapid expansion in sectors like artificial intelligence and big tech infrastructure. Notably, Texas Governor Greg Abbott's suspension of approvals for data centers under his leadership had already slowed development, while the election results further exacerbate this trend by leaving nearly half of proposed AI data center additions across the US vulnerable to stricter local scrutiny and pushback. The results signal a broader shift towards tighter regulatory frameworks that could delay or hinder future projects, potentially impacting the industry's growth trajectory in the United States compared to competitors like China.

Written for “US Midterms Reject Data Centers” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 7 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Midterms Reject Data Centers
Politics · 8 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 1 claims Outlet record 62/100
404 Media
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 40 claims Outlet record 95/100
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses the outcome of AI-related midterms voting on Nov. 3, while Article B describes a memo issued after the election by an AI policy group.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 23 claims Outlet record 67/100
CBS News
Hedges 1 of 1 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI's impact on midterms; Article A focuses on potential risks from deepfakes, while Article B covers the outcome and voter sentiment.”
404 Media
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 4 of 43 claims Outlet record 95/100
“While both articles discuss AI's influence on the election results, they describe different aspects of the event: Article A focuses on a quote from Sam Altman and the repudiation of his worldview, while Article B discusses the broader impact of AI backlash on the midterm elections.”
NBC News
Outlet record 78/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI's impact on the midterms; Article A focuses on OpenAI's election war room, while Article B discusses broader industry impacts and specific voting outcomes.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 8 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss Democrats' use of anti-tech messaging in their election campaigns, Article A focuses on the increase in ad usage and content, while Article B discusses the overall impact and spending related to these ads.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 4 of 38 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss related topics concerning AI data centers and their impact on US midterm elections but do not clearly describe the same specific incident or outcome.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses public sentiment towards AI before the election, while Article B describes the actual impact of AI-related issues on voting results during the election.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
70
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
14%
10 of 70 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
TIME's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
8
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

TIME · 827 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Harry Booth
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 But on Nov. 3, that accelerationist wing could hardly have had a worse night.
2026-11-04 · assertive framing · How AI Backlash Shaped the 2026 Midterms
🔮 The incident seemed to confirm the AI safety community’s worst fears: as AI got smarter, it would circumvent efforts to contain it.
🔮 Like technology, the Santiago, Chile native moves fast, decamping to Mexico City less than a week after deciding Toku would enter the country.
2026-09-30 · assertive framing · Cristina Etcheberry
🔮 When Donald Trump arrived in Beijing in May, Xi Jinping was already on the offensive.
2026-09-22 · mixed framing · The Narrow Path to a Xi-Trump AI Deal
🔮 “We really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans!” added Evan Hubinger, who leads a department at Anthropic focused on ensuring AI acts the way its creators intend.
2026-09-15 · mixed framing · The AI Tipping Point
🔮 If that trend continues, and extends to AI research itself, Coxon fears it will kick off a feedback loop of further acceleration.
🔮 After OpenAI models broke out of containment and hacked into another AI company last month, OpenAI announced it would allow independent investigators to conduct an analysis of what went wrong.
Also by Harry Booth
Cristina Etcheberry
2026-09-30 · TIME
The AI Tipping Point
2026-09-15 · TIME
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Harry Booth →
Andrew R. Chow
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 But on Nov. 3, that accelerationist wing could hardly have had a worse night.
2026-11-04 · assertive framing · How AI Backlash Shaped the 2026 Midterms
🔮 I posit at the end of the film, it's as if he's betting on whether or not AI will lead us to a moment of extraordinary abundance or basically the end of life on Earth.
Also by Andrew R. Chow
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Congress Democrats NBC Ohio Republican

Subjects

Ohio GPE · 4× Republican NORP · 4× Husted PERSON · 3× Kansas GPE · 3× Congress ORG · 2× Democrats NORP · 2× Edgewater GPE · 1× Fla. GPE · 1× Iowa GPE · 1× NBC ORG · 1×

Narrative

Pro-safety PACs notched wins in Michigan (Thomas More Barrett faced $896,250 in opposition funding); Colorado (Manny Rutinel, who has called for a conditional moratorium, received $1.5 million from pro-safety groups); and Wisconsin (where Rebecca Cooke defeated Derrick Van Orden after a pro-safety group spent more than $880,000 opposing him).
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-04
🔮 But on Nov. 3, that accelerationist wing could hardly have had a worse night.
2026-11-04 · TIME
How AI Backlash Shaped the 2026 Midterms · assertive framing

Claims (70 extracted, 10 hedged)

For the past year, a faction of the AI industry bent on unfettered development looked poised to use its wealth to tip the 2026 midterms in its favor. asserted
faction → bend → favor
But on Nov. 3, that accelerationist wing could hardly have had a worse night. uncertain
wing → have → night
An NBC exit poll found that 56% of voters said that AI and data centers were a “crucial or major factor” in their vote for Congress. asserted
AI → find → Congress
Democrats spent more than $100 million on broadcast ads casting their Republican opponents as being overly cozy with Big Tech and data centers—and decisively won in many of those races, including Ohio, Kansas, and Iowa. asserted
Democrats → spend → Ohio
Data center bans or moratoriums passed in counties across the country, from Edgewater, Fla., to Bloomington, Ill., while the mayors of Piqua, Ohio and Yukon, Oklahoma were recalled for their previous support of data center projects. asserted
mayors → pass → projects
Data center and accelerationist super PACs failed to make a major dent in influencing elections through spending. asserted
PACs → fail → spending
One of the key candidates they spent money on, Darline Graham, lost to Annie Andrews, who nicknamed Graham “Data Center Darline” and called for a two-year moratorium on new projects. asserted
who → spend → projects
The accelerationists' ineffectiveness opened a pathway for “pro-safety” PACs to outspend them in key races. asserted
PACs → open → races
Several candidates backed by those groups, including Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed and Colorado’s Manny Rutinel, won. asserted
candidates → back → Sayed
Even with both chambers, Democrats need substantial Republican support to pass over a potential Presidential veto. asserted
Democrats → need → veto
But this election served as the stunning capstone in a year of mounting anti-AI populism, during which Donald Trump has spurred on the industry and said that opponents of data centers “want to end up being backwards and poor.” asserted
opponents → serve → centers
Now, Congress could haul executives before committees to answer questions and undo Republican efforts to block state-level laws. uncertain
Congress → haul → laws
Even without law change, politicians may think twice before siding with the AI industry. uncertain
politicians → think → industry
“Voters had their say tonight: they are overwhelmingly in support of AI safety and security, and very much against data centers and flock cameras,” says Brendan Steinhauser, a Republican strategist and the CEO of The Alliance for Secure AI. asserted
Steinhauser → have → AI
“The AI industry is going to have to get ready to deal with it because I think there's a big deluge of bills at the state and federal level coming their way.” Data centers became a political liability Americans would rather live near a prison, methadone clinic, or a nuclear power plant than an AI data center, according to comparative polling done by progressive research firm Blue Rose Research. uncertain
Americans → go → Research
Existential concerns about AI have grown, says Ali Mortell, the firm’s director of research, but data centers’ concrete local impacts—including higher energy bills, noise, and environmental concerns—were far more salient. asserted
impacts → grow → bills
Accordingly, Democratic candidates who opposed data centers more strongly than their opponents won in many races. asserted
who → oppose → races
In Ohio, Senator-elect Sherrod Brown ran millions of dollars of ads calling Husted “the face of data centers in Ohio." asserted
Brown → run → Ohio
Brown won by five percentage points. asserted
Brown → win → points
The National Republican Senatorial Committee even acknowledged that Husted’s ties to the industry were a problem, writing in an August memo that “more than any other thing in this race, data centers are the anchor hanging around Husted’s neck.” asserted
centers → acknowledge → neck
In Kansas, Cindy Holscher led in the governor’s race on Wednesday morning after running an ad calling for a pause on data centers until Kansas set guardrails to protect its communities, farms, jobs, and budgets. asserted
Kansas → lead → communities
Her opponent Ty Masterson had received $1.5 million from a data center super PAC. asserted
opponent → receive → PAC
In Arizona, Democrat Amish Shah, who pledged to “stop data centers from being built,” led Jay Feely, who said American data centers were necessary to beat China in the global AI race, on Wednesday morning. asserted
centers → pledge → morning
Comparisons suggesting that U.S. data centers use less water than the nation’s golf courses have done little to reassure voters. asserted
centers → suggest → voters
Developers’ promises to cover higher energy bills soften opposition but win few supporters. asserted
promises → cover → supporters
Trust in institutions is low, so when tech companies and politicians offer reassurance, Mortell says, “voters are not positioned to believe that's true.” asserted
that → offer → reassurance
An October Politico poll found that nearly half of Americans identify Republicans as the party most eager to build data centers. asserted
half → find → centers
But Democrats could find themselves on the other side of the backlash. uncertain
Democrats → find → backlash
In Wisconsin, Republican Tom Tiffany derisively called his opponent “Data Center David Crowley.” asserted
Tiffany → call → opponent
Crowley shifted toward tighter restrictions in October—and won. asserted
Crowley → shift → October
“There's not a clear divide between Democratic voters and Republican voters on how they're thinking about [data centers]. asserted
they → be → centers
Opinion has soured with everyone,” Mortell says. asserted
Mortell → sour → everyone
AI money backed both sides AI accelerationists also struggled to translate their considerable campaign contributions into electoral victories. asserted
accelerationists → back → victories
The super PAC Leading the Future was created with more than $100 million in funding to support pro-AI candidates in August 2025. asserted
PAC → lead → August
But because public skepticism of the AI industry has become so widespread, the PAC's financial contributions were met with backlash, creating headaches for candidates who received the money. asserted
who → become → money
According to one survey, three-quarters of likely voters said that they would be less likely to vote for a candidate if they found out they had accepted a donation from an AI super PAC. uncertain
they → accord → PAC
As the general election approached, big donors like OpenAI’s Greg Brockman and Ron Conway backed away from previously promised donations, and Leading the Future mostly kept their powder dry. asserted
Future → approach → powder
Elon Musk didn’t fare well either. asserted
Musk → fare → ?
The AI leader was the biggest donor in this cycle at $446 million, $168 million of which effectively went to supporting Ken Paxton in Texas. asserted
million → go → Texas
But Paxton was crushed by James Talarico, who has called for the ending of "sweetheart tax deals" for Big Tech and other guardrails. asserted
who → crush → Tech
…and 30 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support