Photo via The Guardian

These midterms could effectively end the Trump era – but neither side is yet ready for what comes next | Nesrine Malik

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Malik, N. (2026, November 2). These midterms could effectively end the Trump era – but neither side is yet ready for what comes next | Nesrine Malik. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/02/us-midterms-donald-trump-democrats-us-politics

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-11-02 · by Nesrine Malik

Quick Summary

Nesrine Malik writes that upcoming midterm elections suggest a significant Democratic victory over Republicans, with polls indicating Trump has the lowest approval rating of any president going into midterms since Truman. Democrats are projected to win by 11 percentage points, potentially flipping the Senate and securing a large majority in Congress. The article discusses how such outcomes could mark the end of the "Trump era," though it warns that his influence will persist due to irreversible policies and lasting impacts on American politics and society.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The 2026 midterm elections are projected to result in significant Democratic gains, with polls suggesting a margin of 11 percentage points, the largest swing in almost two decades. This could potentially lead to Democrats flipping control of the Senate and securing a majority in Congress. Key issues driving this shift include President Donald Trump's low approval ratings and his controversial policies on immigration, trade, federal workforce reduction, and the Iran conflict. While these victories may signal the end of the "Trump era," the political landscape remains divided, with ongoing challenges ahead for Democrats as they navigate the aftermath of Trump’s presidency and its lasting impact on American politics.

Written for “Midterm Elections Impact Trump Era” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 122552 (high confidence, 4 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-02

Story

📰 Midterm Elections Impact Trump Era
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 3 of 29 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the midterms and do not describe a single specific incident occurring at a particular time.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 4 of 17 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss predictions and implications of the upcoming midterms but describe different aspects and sources; they are not reporting on a single identical incident.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A reports on a single poll's results about voter preferences for congressional control, while Article B discusses broader projections and implications of the upcoming midterms based on multiple polls and statistics.”
NPR
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 9 of 78 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss the upcoming midterms and their potential impact but do not describe a single specific incident occurring at a particular time and place.”
The Hindu
Hedges 2 of 6 claims Outlet record 77/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the upcoming midterm elections and their potential outcomes but do not describe a single specific incident occurring at a particular time and place.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 4 of 13 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss similar scenarios about potential Democratic gains in midterms but describe different aspects and outcomes, not the same specific event.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 6 of 45 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different stages and outcomes related to midterms but do not describe the exact same incident occurring at the same time.”
Euronews
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 15 of 86 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss the upcoming midterms and potential outcomes for Republican control, they describe different aspects and timelines of the election process.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 7 of 21 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the upcoming midterm elections and their potential outcomes but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 3 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss potential outcomes and implications of the upcoming midterm elections but do not describe the same specific event or incident occurring at a particular time and place.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
42
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
5 of 42 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1899 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Nesrine Malik
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The Democrats are projected to win by a margin of 11 percentage points, the largest swing by any party in almost 20 years.
🔮 This may feel like an overstatement – casualties have been relatively low, after all, compared with Gaza and Iran – but the gradual erosion of peace and security in places such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE has changed the region more dramatically than its leaders would like to acknowledge. The first audacious and unthinkable thing happened just over a year ago, when Iran fired missiles at an airbase in Qatar that hosts American troops, in retaliation for US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
🔮 Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, responded in his own speech by saying that Iran has been the victim of US terrorism and aggression, and would defend itself with the “utmost strength”.
🔮 In the other, Vanity Fair describes calls for Zohran Mamdani to not attend the 9/11 memorial ceremony as partly founded in “inchoate, emotional” impulses, that see “the city’s first Muslim mayor as a stand-in for the 19 Muslims who hijacked four planes and turned them into deadly weapons, part of the ‘them’ who attacked ‘us’.”
Also by Nesrine Malik
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Congress Democrats Iran Republicans Senate

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 8× Democrats NORP · 4× Democratic NORP · 2× Iran GPE · 2× Senate ORG · 2× Congress ORG · 1× David Wallace-Wells PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Harry Truman PERSON · 1× Republicans NORP · 1×

Narrative

But even as El-Sayed is on the verge of making history as the first Muslim senator in a state that is pivotal to the presidential race, he is either drawing lukewarm, reluctant endorsements from other senior Democrats or he is openly attacked, primarily on his position towards Israel, which he believes has committed genocide in Gaza and should be defunded.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02
🔮 The Democrats are projected to win by a margin of 11 percentage points, the largest swing by any party in almost 20 years.

Claims (42 extracted, 5 hedged)

The stats and polling all suggest one thing: the Republicans are set for a hammering in the midterms. asserted
Republicans → suggest → midterms
Donald Trump has the lowest approval rating of any US president going into a midterm election since Harry Truman. asserted
Trump → have → Truman
And it’s still dropping. asserted
it → drop → ?
The Democrats are projected to win by a margin of 11 percentage points, the largest swing by any party in almost 20 years. asserted
Democrats → project → years
It is possible that the Democrats flip the Senate and secure a large majority in Congress. asserted
Democrats → flip → Congress
Those majorities would make a material difference, perhaps finally establishing oversight of the policies Trump has brought in during his second term: immigration enforcement, trade disputes, gutting the federal workforce, the Iran war, to say nothing of his own family’s corruption. asserted
Trump → make → corruption
The tide seems to be turning, and one question is on everyone’s mind: is the Trump era really ending? asserted
era → seem → mind
“Nobody wants to jinx it,” wrote David Wallace-Wells of the New York Times, but: “All the signs we have suggest that, historic or not, these midterms are likely to mark the end of a political era.” asserted
midterms → want → era
What that gives way to is a much more complicated picture in which the US will be delivered from Trump himself, but remains a country riven and undermined by what he has unleashed. asserted
he → give → what
By the time he is gone, Trump will have been president for eight years, and a toxic force for more than 12. asserted
Trump → go → 12
Under one who shatters norms and forces himself into the centre of everything, Trump’s effect is as if he were president for decades. asserted
he → shatter → decades
He has already enacted policy that is nearly irreversible, things that can only be overturned with a huge amount of work and legislative wrangling and improbable bipartisan consensus. asserted
that → enact → work
USAID is gone. asserted
USAID → go → ?
Probably also gone are government departments effectively eliminated or incapacitated by Doge, the “department of government efficiency”. asserted
departments → go → efficiency
And most difficult to unspool is a war with Iran that, despite its promised, imminent end, is looking to be an open-ended conflict asserted
that → unspool → end
Even if the midterms augur a win for the Democrats in 2026, the country they will inherit will have been permanently shaped by Trump. asserted
they → augur → Trump
Trump is a singular figure who cohered an otherwise inchoate and disparate coalition, from white evangelical Christians to working-class Latinos to Silicon Valley billionaires. asserted
who → cohere → billionaires
Maga is a movement that is bound up with Trump, and feels increasingly weakened by his incumbency. asserted
that → bind → incumbency
Like Brexit and other insurgent movements, the galvanising anti-establishment power is lost when you are the establishment and have been for quite a long time. asserted
you → galvanise → time
Looking for new people to blame, new grievances to exploit, becomes less an exercise in rebellion, more in whining and negativity. asserted
Looking → look → whining
But whoever comes after Trump as a candidate, even if it is the black hole of charisma that is JD Vance, may still find some success using the same general pitch. uncertain
that → come → pitch
That combination of combativeness and fractiousness might still read as authentic and subversive to the base. uncertain
combination → read → base
It may even seem comparatively sharp and legible against the opaque generic blah-ness of the Democratic establishment. uncertain
It → seem → establishment
And that Democratic establishment itself is reason to worry. asserted
establishment → worry → ?
It is a ways to go yet, but the Democrats themselves seem unable to go either back or forward decisively. asserted
Democrats → go → ?
The party’s old guard is spent, either gerontocratic or gerontocracy-adjacent. asserted
guard → spend → ?
In the latter camp is Kamala Harris, whose last campaign summons not the hope of a fresh candidate in 2026, but an apparatchik who offers only continuity without gravitas. asserted
who → summon → gravitas
In the former, there is a cohort who now only project entitlement and the out-of-touch, glassy-eyed bloat of so many years of capital acquisition - Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Hillary Clinton. asserted
who → be → acquisition
Only Barack Obama still enjoys some sprightly relevance, and has used it to back Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, a candidate who is making that break with the past in a journey that Obama has cast as a passing of the baton. asserted
Obama → enjoy → baton
“He’ll finish the job we started,” Obama has said. asserted
Obama → finish → job
But even as El-Sayed is on the verge of making history as the first Muslim senator in a state that is pivotal to the presidential race, he is either drawing lukewarm, reluctant endorsements from other senior Democrats or he is openly attacked, primarily on his position towards Israel, which he believes has committed genocide in Gaza and should be defunded. asserted
he → make → Gaza
, Democratic congresswoman Haley Stevens, who El-Sayed narrowly beat last August to clinch the candidacy, has been taking big swipes at El-Sayed and his comments on Israel, and demanding he disavow election ads not even run by him, but by a leftwing group that backed him. asserted
that → beat → him
The result is an unseemly scuffle that resulted first in El-Sayed saying he did not want Stevens appearing with him at a party unity event held on Sunday, and culminated later that day with an extraordinarily disgraceful development: Stevens endorsed El Sayed’s Republican opponent, Mike Rogers. asserted
Stevens → result → opponent
Divesting from Israel has become a flashpoint that appears to be less about political and ideological positions than the emergence of a new orientation in the party that breaks from an old guard overtaken by rapid changes of attitude. asserted
that → divest → attitude
This was encapsulated by a quote from David Kramer, a Democrat who chaired Stevens’s primary campaign: “There’s a lot of talk about it being a big tent party, but sometimes we worry the tent is maybe devolving into a circus and we’re going to be pushed out.” asserted
we → encapsulate → circus
Kramer is also voting for Rogers for the Senate. asserted
Kramer → vote → Senate
And there you have it. asserted
you → have → it
Some Democrats would rather lose than win on the left’s terms and be pushed out. asserted
Democrats → lose → terms
All of this suggests a future in which Trump is no longer on the scene, but there is still enough residual momentum among Trump’s acolytes, and disarray within the Democratic party, to render a midterm surge a temporary setback for Trumpism, not the restoration of the old order or the beginnings of a new one. uncertain
surge → suggest → one
In fact, it’s worse than that, we have been here before in vastly better circumstances for the Democrats. asserted
we → ’ → Democrats
…and 2 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support