Ted Morton: What happens next in Alberta depends on Ottawa

Read the original at National Post ↗
Cite

National Post. (2026, October 28). Ted Morton: What happens next in Alberta depends on Ottawa. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/what-happens-next-in-alberta-depends-on-ottawa

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

National Post · collected 2026-10-28 · by National Post analysis

Quick Summary

Ted Morton analyzes Alberta's recent referendum on potential secession, noting a 25% vote for Option B despite his personal stance against separation. He argues that while this indicates dissatisfaction with federal treatment but not immediate support for secession, future sentiment hinges on Ottawa’s actions, particularly regarding pipeline approvals and energy policies under Prime Minister Mark Carney. Morton predicts separatist sentiments will diminish if Carney follows through on pipeline projects and supports Alberta's economy; otherwise, those sentiments could resurface due to continued economic challenges and environmental opposition.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On October 28, 2026, the results of an Alberta referendum showed a 25% vote for Option B, which calls for a future referendum on secession. Ted Morton from the National Post expressed concern that this lower-than-expected but still significant support could be seen as irrelevant by the Canadian federal government led by the Liberals under Prime Minister Carney. Morton argues that if Alberta's dissatisfaction continues to grow at its current pace, the percentage of voters supporting secession could double in another decade, reaching 50%. The referendum also revealed strong support for policy and constitutional reforms among those who oppose outright separation, indicating widespread frustration with how Alberta has been treated by Canada.

Written for “Ottawa's Role In Alberta” on 2026-10-28, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans right for article 111607 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-28

Story

📰 Ottawa's Role In Alberta
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 2% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 19% hedged 7 of 37 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different events: one focuses on B.C.'s Conservative win, while the other discusses Alberta's referendum results.”
CBC News
⚖️ Centre further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 74
“The articles discuss related topics concerning Alberta politics but describe different occurrences and timeframes.”
National Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 8% hedged 3 of 39 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles discuss different referendums in Quebec and Alberta, though they are related to separatist movements in Canada.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 64
“While both articles discuss Alberta's referendum results, they describe different aspects and perspectives on the same broader topic rather than the identical specific incident.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 7% hedged 2 of 28 📰 publisher trust 74
“The articles discuss different aspects of the referendum results; Article A focuses on rural-urban divides, while Article B comments on the mixed message and implications of Option B's vote.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 8% hedged 5 of 60 📰 publisher trust 74
“Article A reports on the results of a referendum regarding immigration and constitutional changes in Alberta, while Article B discusses broader implications and concerns about Option B for secession following the referendum.”
National Post · 0.89 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 16% hedged 10 of 64 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Alberta referendum's aftermath and implications rather than the same specific incident.”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 4 of 96 📰 publisher trust 74
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Alberta referendum results and subsequent reactions, rather than describing the same specific incident or moment.”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 22% hedged 10 of 46 📰 publisher trust 74
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Alberta referendum aftermath; Article A focuses on potential polarization in immigration debates, while Article B analyzes the implications of the vote results for future relations between Alberta and Ottawa.”
Toronto Star · 0.85 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 55 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Alberta referendum; one focuses on an individual's reaction in Eckville, while the other is a broader commentary by Ted Morton.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
50
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
2%
1 of 50 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
National Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

National Post · 1182 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

National Post
34 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 And if the next decade is like the past decade, this number will double again.
🔮 Vancouver-based EarthDaily, which launched in 2021, will provide Earth observation data to NASA and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), who both assist in operating Landsat.
🔮 Their accounts illustrated how encounters with Jews and Israelis could challenge years of indoctrination.
🔮 In August, when it looked like a trade deal would bring American alcohol back to LCBO shelves, Campbell called to ask how the retailer could help Ontario producers mitigate the impact.
🔮 Air Canada security camera could have caught insider in Toronto airport gold heist but wasn’t working that day
🔮 Perhaps Canada could choose us back
🔮 On Oct. 27, 2026, Israelis will head to the polls for the first time in four years, in what many are describing as the most consequential election in the country’s history.
🔮 For the first time in nearly a generation, a Canadian election campaign is featuring a suggestion that maybe there should be some kind of restriction on elective abortions, writes Tristin Hopper.
🔮 That system was quietly dropped by former prime minister Justin Trudeau’s government in 2023 in favour of other metrics, such as preferences for certain professions and applicants who could speak French.
🔮 People who believe AI will be incapable of “consciousness” or “subjective experience” are wrong, Hinton says.
Also by National Post
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 34 articles by National Post →

Topics

Alberta Canada Edmonton Liberals Ottawa

Subjects

Carney PERSON · 10× Alberta GPE · 7× Canada GPE · 5× Aboriginal NORP · 2× British Columbia GPE · 2× Liberals NORP · 2× Albertans NORP · 1× Edmonton GPE · 1× Mark Carney PERSON · 1× Ottawa GPE · 1×

Narrative

My concern was — and is — that too low a vote for Option B sends a message to the rest of Canada that they don’t have to worry about Alberta; that the separatists are a noisy but politically irrelevant minority, and so the Carney Liberals can go back to business as usual.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-28
🔮 And if the next decade is like the past decade, this number will double again.
2026-10-28 · National Post
Ted Morton: What happens next in Alberta depends on Ottawa · assertive framing

Claims (50 extracted, 1 hedged)

The results for the Alberta referendum send a mixed message. asserted
results → send → message
The 25 per cent vote for Option B — for a followup referendum to secede — was lower than what I had hoped for, but about what I expected. asserted
I → secede → what
As I’ve stated repeatedly, I do not support Alberta separation, but I also do not support the status quo. asserted
I → state → quo
My concern was — and is — that too low a vote for Option B sends a message to the rest of Canada that they don’t have to worry about Alberta; that the separatists are a noisy but politically irrelevant minority, and so the Carney Liberals can go back to business as usual. asserted
Liberals → send → business
And if the next decade is like the past decade, this number will double again. asserted
number → double → decade
Which means 50 per cent, and a real problem, both for Canada and for Alberta. asserted
Which → mean → Alberta
My main takeaway from the referendum is that the same voters who voted 75 per cent to remain in Canada also voted around 50 per cent for the policy and constitutional reforms in questions 1 through 9. asserted
who → vote → 9
That is, they oppose separation, but they also do not think that Alberta has been treated fairly. asserted
Alberta → oppose → separation
Does that mean that the separation debate in Alberta is over? asserted
debate → mean → Alberta
Alberta’s constitutional vulnerability to predatory and damaging federal policies remains. asserted
vulnerability → remain → policies
But I predict the next chapter will depend more on what happens in Ottawa than what happens in Edmonton. asserted
what → predict → Edmonton
Prime Minister Mark Carney must turn his talk into actions; he must follow through on his “energy super-power” rhetoric and deliver on the now three new proposed pipelines to the West Coast. asserted
he → turn → Coast
If Carney does this, separatist sentiment will go into hibernation. asserted
sentiment → do → hibernation
Test No. 1 for Carney will be to meet his September 2027 deadline for final approval of the Pacific Link pipeline as a project of national interest. asserted
. → meet → interest
And not coincidentally, meeting this deadline would also almost guarantee that Albertans would give Premier Danielle Smith and the UCP a second majority government in the October election. asserted
Albertans → meet → election
But what if Carney does not deliver? asserted
Carney → deliver → ?
What if the U.S.-Iranian conflict ends; the Strait of Hormuz reopens; and the global price of oil goes back to $50 or $60 US/barrel? asserted
price → end → US
Will climate change replace energy security as Carney’s highest priority? asserted
change → replace → priority
Will reducing Canada’s CO2 emissions replace expanding Canada’s oil and gas exports to the rest of the world? asserted
reducing → reduce → world
Perhaps more worrisome, what happens after Carney? asserted
what → happen → Carney
The Liberal party will be here long after Carney goes out the door. asserted
Carney → go → door
If all of this goes in the wrong direction, the separation bear will come out of hibernation and roar again. asserted
bear → go → hibernation
The same Canadian organizations that supported Justin Trudeau’s climate change policies and helped to kill Northern Gateway, Energy East and Keystone are now just as strongly opposed to Carney’s new export pipelines. asserted
that → support → pipelines
So are their U.S. counterparts who funded much of the anti-pipeline litigation of the past decade. asserted
who → fund → decade
The recent Cowichan Tribes court decision in British Columbia has undermined traditional property rights not just in Richmond but in the entire province. asserted
decision → undermine → province
No private-sector companies are going to invest a dollar in British Columbia — much less in new West Coast pipelines — until this legal uncertainly is clearly resolved, and sooner rather than later. asserted
uncertainly → go → pipelines
The very judges who the Liberals have appointed have ignored the text of Section 35 of the Constitution — “existing Aboriginal and treaty rights” — and given it a retrospective application that has opened the door to hundreds of new lawsuits. asserted
that → appoint → lawsuits
And when these involve proposed pipelines, they don’t have to win the legal issues. asserted
they → involve → issues
And this is the likely fate of Pacific Link, unless Carney intervenes and refers the Cowichan Tribes issues directly to the Supreme Court of Canada, along with a request for an expedited ruling. asserted
Carney → intervene → ruling
While this tactic is not common, it is perfectly legal and has been done before. asserted
tactic → do → ?
And given the unprecedented media coverage of Carney’s energy super-power initiatives, a majority of the nine Supremes might just give him the ruling that he — and all Canada — needs. uncertain
he → give → that
This strategy would be strongly supported by Alberta and Saskatchewan. asserted
strategy → support → Alberta
Premier-elect Lorne Doerkson campaigned on promises to double the provinces’ natural gas production; expedite the building of Pacific Link; and repeal B.C.’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. asserted
Doerkson → campaign → Act
But Carney’s use of an expedited appeal to the Supreme Court would be strongly opposed by all Indigenous groups and would bitterly divide the Liberal party’s traditional base of supporters. asserted
use → oppose → supporters
Will Carney choose to go down this road? asserted
Carney → choose → road
Even if he does, will the Liberal party follow him? asserted
party → do → him
He understands the value of Alberta’s oil and gas to the rest of Canada even if his party doesn’t. asserted
party → understand → Canada
If Alberta were to leave, international investment would decline, and Canada would have a trade deficit rather our current surplus. asserted
Canada → leave → deficit
Canada’s GDP would shrink, and the Canadian dollar would weaken even further, making all imports more expensive. asserted
imports → shrink → ?
Without Alberta, the Canada Pension Plan would have to either raise contributions or reduce benefits. asserted
Plan → have → benefits
…and 10 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support