Photo via Washington Examiner

The digital hanging of data centers: Big Tech’s most dangerous PR failure

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Toloczko, K., & Powell, S. (2026, September 15). The digital hanging of data centers: Big Tech’s most dangerous PR failure. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4724710/data-center-pr-failure-national-security-ai/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-15 · by Kerri Toloczko, Susan Powell

Quick Summary

Data center companies have faced significant public backlash and regulatory hurdles due to a lack of community engagement and proactive PR strategies. The article argues that without addressing legitimate concerns such as land use, electricity consumption, water usage, and noise pollution, data centers risk being seen as threats rather than assets to local communities. It emphasizes the broader national security implications of relying on American data infrastructure versus outsourcing it to countries like China, where technology is used for state control and surveillance.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Data center projects in the U.S. faced significant public backlash and regulatory hurdles before their cases could even go to trial. Proponents of these centers focused mainly on regulatory burdens and land use, neglecting to address concerns from local communities and engage with public affairs professionals who could help craft a positive message. With midterm elections approaching in November, both major political parties are wary of supporting data center initiatives due to the opposition they face from constituents worried about issues like electricity usage, water consumption, noise pollution, and environmental impact. Rational voices that could inform government and citizens on how these centers can be built responsibly and have a positive economic impact are largely absent in the current debate. Big Data companies assumed their projects were too critical for anyone to oppose but failed to build public support through engagement with local stakeholders.

Written for “Big Tech Public Relations Failure” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Big Tech Public Relations Failure
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Semafor
Hedges 0 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of data center issues without clearly referring to the same specific incident.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 14 of 41 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of data center issues without clearly referring to the same specific incident.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 7 of 64 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles discuss broader issues about data centers and opposition to them, but do not describe the exact same incident occurring at a specific time and place.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 1 of 21 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different aspects related to data centers but do not refer to the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 6 of 57 claims Outlet record 70/100
“While both articles discuss opposition to data centers and AI, they describe different aspects of the broader issue without focusing on a single specific incident.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss issues related to data centers, they describe different aspects and concerns. Article A talks about a general PR failure of data center owners, while Article B mentions a specific accusation against a company regarding AI use in lobbying for support.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss similar themes of opposition to AI data centers but describe different aspects and implications, not the same specific incident.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss related issues regarding data center opposition but appear to describe different incidents or broader trends rather than a single specific occurrence.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss data centers and opposition but do not describe the same specific incident, time, or place.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
42
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 42 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3836 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Kerri Toloczko
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 That is a powerful warning for Republicans and raises a question for voters: Are you choosing the candidate you believe will best serve your community or using your congressional vote to register your frustration with the president’s personality?
🔮 Big Data also figured that these centers are so critical that everyone would go along.
🔮 If not for a last-minute change of travel plans to guest on a late-night political talk show, I would have been on American Airlines Flight 77 when it was flown into the Pentagon by a group of demonic jihadi murderers.
Also by Kerri Toloczko
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
Susan Powell
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Big Data also figured that these centers are so critical that everyone would go along.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

America American Big Data China the Chinese Communist Party

Subjects

American NORP · 4× America GPE · 3× Americans NORP · 2× China GPE · 2× Big Data ORG · 1× U.S. GPE · 1× the Chinese Communist Party ORG · 1× the United States GPE · 1×

Narrative

The answer is simple — they are asking for help from local regulators and self-serving politicians rather than connecting with the public affairs community that has the expertise to craft and deliver messages that can make a difference.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 Big Data also figured that these centers are so critical that everyone would go along.
2026-09-15 · Washington Examiner
The digital hanging of data centers: Big Tech’s most dangerous PR failure · assertive framing

Claims (42 extracted, 0 hedged)

Data centers have faced a public hanging before going to trial. asserted
centers → face → trial
Proponents didn’t even have a chance to select a jury before their case was dismissed. asserted
case → have → jury
Singularly focused on regulatory burdens and land use, data center owners forgot that every plot of land has neighbors. asserted
plot → focus → neighbors
But data centers frighten all of them. asserted
centers → frighten → them
Big Data also figured that these centers are so critical that everyone would go along. asserted
everyone → figure → ?
They did not seek help in garnering public support or engage public affairs professionals to make their case in the skeptical and often hostile public square. asserted
They → seek → square
Both parties hate data centers, and politicians are ruminating about their positions on the issue. asserted
politicians → hate → issue
All they hear is yelling, and the rational voices that should inform government and citizens about how these centers can be responsibly built and have a positive impact are largely missing. asserted
centers → hear → impact
The debate is framed around land use, electricity, water, and noise. asserted
debate → frame → use
Those are legitimate concerns, and communities should express them. asserted
communities → express → them
But the broader question is: “Do we use American assets to fuel our technological and economic growth, or do we hand our data, dollars, and trust to unfriendly nations?” asserted
we → use → nations
America is entering an unprecedented technological race. asserted
America → enter → race
Artificial intelligence, biotechnology, quantum computing, and other emerging technologies will shape our economy, national security, and individual freedom. asserted
intelligence → emerge → economy
At the center of that race are data centers capable of storing, processing, and protecting the enormous amounts of information these technologies require. asserted
technologies → store → information
The relationships joining technology, government, and the individual operate under a profoundly different model. asserted
relationships → join → model
Personal information can become surveillance, and AI can become a tool of control. asserted
AI → become → control
Information is strategic intelligence that can be used to advance military and economic capabilities. asserted
that → use → capabilities
China sees our personal information as a tool of war. asserted
China → see → war
It is also using data centers to fuel its expensive hegemony. asserted
It → use → hegemony
That should strike fear in Americans as well as the companies creating and developing America’s digital infrastructure. asserted
That → strike → infrastructure
Keeping critical computing capacity and sensitive data in the United States is not merely an economic development strategy. asserted
Keeping → keep → States
There is a profound difference between a country where technology exists to empower individuals (us) and one where technology is harnessed to empower the state (them). asserted
technology → be → state
America’s data centers sit at the intersection of those two futures. asserted
centers → sit → futures
Communities should not surrender their right to ask tough questions about development. asserted
Communities → surrender → development
Data center proponents need to accept responsibility for their impact on surrounding infrastructure while offering to improve it. asserted
proponents → need → it
It’s a give-and-take process, like any other local policy issue. asserted
It → ’ → issue
Since many U.S. counties are resource-insecure due to aging and insufficient grids, data centers can bring reliability to the power grid if they are designed with this in mind. asserted
they → bring → mind
If we cannot provide the computing capacity needed for American innovation, companies and researchers will look elsewhere. asserted
companies → provide → innovation
AI and increased data flow aren’t going away. asserted
AI → increase → ?
Capital follows infrastructure, data follows capacity, and technological leadership follows data. asserted
leadership → follow → data
It is increasingly between American infrastructure governed by American laws and foreign infrastructure governed by systems that do not share our values. asserted
that → govern → values
Where are data center owners’ public commitments to protect Americans? asserted
commitments → protect → Americans
Where is the obligation to embrace responsible, positive growth? asserted
obligation → embrace → growth
Where is the explanation that the physical infrastructure of the digital age must be built here, where we own and control it? asserted
we → build → it
Why are data center owners not funding young people at tech schools or working with Mike Rowe’s Work Ethics Scholarship Program, as these centers will provide thousands of jobs for electricians, plumbers, and construction workers? asserted
centers → fund → electricians
The answer is simple — they are asking for help from local regulators and self-serving politicians rather than connecting with the public affairs community that has the expertise to craft and deliver messages that can make a difference. asserted
that → ask → difference
Data centers have an opportunity to make a case to the American public about how these facilities can provide jobs, improve national security, strengthen global tech leadership, and upgrade municipal services. asserted
facilities → have → services
America should not outsource its freedom. asserted
America → outsource → freedom
Data centers need to reach out to public affairs professionals, and to quote a phrase rampant on social media — “seek help!” asserted
centers → need → help
The global race for technology is also a race over who controls it, where it lives, and what value it serves. asserted
it → control → value
…and 2 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support