Chief Justice Roberts Goes Postal on Trump's USPS Rule

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Blackman, J. (2026, September 15). Chief Justice Roberts Goes Postal on Trump's USPS Rule. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/14/chief-justice-roberts-goes-postal-on-trumps-usps-rule/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-15 · by Josh Blackman

Quick Summary

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a brief majority opinion denying President Trump's request for an emergency stay in United States Postal Service v. California, stating that the government was unlikely to succeed on the merits and that equitable factors did not favor granting the stay. Justices Alito and Thomas dissented, arguing that the government should have been granted the stay, while Justice Kavanaugh agreed with them on the merits but joined Roberts's opinion denying relief based on equitable grounds. The article highlights Chief Justice Roberts’s approach in this case as different from his previous stance, suggesting a shift in handling cases involving Trump administration policies.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Postmaster General David Steiner announced that the U.S. Postal Service has halted work on a controversial computer system developed under President Donald Trump's executive order, aimed at limiting voting by mail. This decision follows Supreme Court rulings striking down the executive order and issuing injunctions against implementing it. The suspension was confirmed in an interview with The Associated Press, where Steiner, who previously worked as CEO of Waste Management, emphasized his agency’s role as independent from political directives despite navigating financial hardships and political turbulence caused by Trump's policies. Unlike Trump, who criticized the court decisions, Steiner avoided commenting on the rulings' merits or implications for voter eligibility ahead of critical midterm elections in November.

Written for “Trump Mail Voting Restrictions” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 46 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Mail Voting Restrictions
Politics · 47 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 9 of 73 claims Outlet record 95/100
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 9 of 43 claims Outlet record 95/100
Fox News
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 69/100
BBC News
Hedges 7 of 45 claims Outlet record 68/100
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 38 claims Outlet record 66/100
Reason
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 15 claims Outlet record 67/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 31 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Independent
Hedges 6 of 24 claims Outlet record 59/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
57
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
7 of 57 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
47
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1044 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Blackman
83 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Today the law firm of Weil Gotshal announced that it would wind down.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Farewell to Weil
🔮 And her unwillingness to participate in any disciplinary proceedings suggests something is amiss.
🔮 Longtime readers will recall that I took mileage runs to Singapore, Hong Kong, and Sydney to make status at the end of the year.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · 1,000,000 Miles on United
🔮 Let's hope that people across the media industry will take Josh Blackman's criticism to heart.
2026-10-27 · assertive framing · The Wall Street Journal Praises The Old Gray Lady
🔮 New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change.
2026-10-26 · assertive framing · Today in Supreme Court History: October 26, 1774
🔮 ] There have been many news reports suggesting that the United States Department of Justice may pursue denaturalization proceedings against Representative Ilhan Omar.
🔮 Nevertheless, the next two decades would vastly enlarge the president's powers as Congress' authority over the executive branch would be greatly diminished.
🔮 Justice Sotomayor, Justice Gorsuch, Justice Barrett, and Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
🔮 The regulations for Freedmen schools in Texas provided that classes would begin at 9 A.M. and "[t]he morning Exercises will commence with either the singing of an appropriate hymn, or prayer, or the reading of the Scriptures."
🔮 Kyle asks: Well, I don't know how much coverage of the court you read, but you may not be surprised to learn that one light motif is that you are brooding figure.
Also by Josh Blackman
Farewell to Weil
2026-10-28 · Reason
1,000,000 Miles on United
2026-10-28 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 83 articles by Josh Blackman →

Topics

California Court Missouri United States Postal Service the District Court's

Subjects

Alito PERSON · 9× Court PERSON · 9× Kavanaugh PERSON · 8× Trump PERSON · 6× Missouri GPE · 3× Roberts PERSON · 3× Barrett PERSON · 2× Thomas PERSON · 2× California GPE · 1× United States Postal Service ORG · 1×

Narrative

Indeed, this Court spent from late July to the end of August drafting nearly 40 pages of opinions, including two dissents, despite the Government's public notice that it would not publish a final rule while subject tothe injunctions, see 91 Fed. Reg. 44880, and its representation that it had a strong interest in issuing its rule in early- to mid-August to allow time to implement it.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 The majority couldn't be bothered to say anything more than a sentence.
2026-09-15 · Reason
Chief Justice Roberts Goes Postal on Trump's USPS Rule · assertive framing

Claims (57 extracted, 7 hedged)

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent This evening, the Court finally decided United States Postal Service v. California. asserted
Court → decide → California
Very often, the procedural posture of a case is described as tortured. asserted
posture → describe → case
This posture is torturous for everyone involved. asserted
posture → involve → everyone
Here, I'll offer a few high-level thoughts. asserted
I → offer → thoughts
First, the majority opinion, perhaps to its credit, offers two sentences of analysis. asserted
opinion → offer → analysis
The Government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge to the District Court's preliminary injunction. asserted
Government → succeed → injunction
And the equitable factors applicable for obtaining emergency relief from this Court do not favor a stay. asserted
factors → obtain → stay
I say perhaps, because the Court reaches out to decide the merits on the emergency docket without any analysis. asserted
Court → say → analysis
Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, offers a thorough analysis of why he thinks the government wins on the merits. asserted
government → join → merits
Justice Kavanaugh agrees with Justice Alito on the merits. asserted
Kavanaugh → agree → merits
The majority couldn't be bothered to say anything more than a sentence. asserted
majority → bother → sentence
This stay application has been pending on the docket for about eight days, but this issue has been percolating for months. asserted
issue → pende → months
Surely, Chief Justice Roberts could have whipped up a few sentences to explain why Trump loses. uncertain
Trump → whip → sentences
He made up a few such sentences in the ballroom case. asserted
He → make → case
All the Court had to write to deny the stay was that the equities did not favor emergency relief. asserted
equities → have → relief
Those are the grounds on which Justice Kavanaugh ruled. asserted
Kavanaugh → rule → which
But the Chief Justice didn't want this case to come back, so he reached the merits. asserted
he → want → merits
If there is no need to decide more, the Court should not decide more. asserted
Court → be → more
Except when Trump is involved. asserted
Trump → involve → ?
Regrettably, Justices Gorsuch and Barrett joined the Chief's drive-by shooting of Trump's policy. asserted
Gorsuch → join → policy
Second, let's turn to Justice Kavanaugh. asserted
's → let → Kavanaugh
It seems clear he will deny any application that urges sudden changes to election rules before the election. asserted
that → seem → election
I think there were serious questions about whether the litigants from Missouri had appellate standing. asserted
litigants → think → standing
Likewise, in the postal case, Justice Alito points out there are serious questions about standing. asserted
Alito → point → standing
But on the emergency docket, when the equities are strong enough, the Court can just ignore standing. asserted
Court → ignore → standing
Why did Justice Kavanaugh bother signaling his vote? asserted
Kavanaugh → bother → vote
In case after case, Kavanaugh finds a way to rule against Trump while saying he would rule for him if the facts were different. asserted
facts → find → him
Kavanaugh, having ruled that the equities cut against Trump, has no reason to say which way the merits go. asserted
merits → rule → reason
If Roberts and Kavanaugh were on the same wavelength eight years ago, now they are quite at odds when push comes to shove. asserted
push → come → shove
Fourth, it is curious why Alito and Thomas said nothing in the Missouri cases. asserted
Alito → say → cases
I thought of a passage from Mollie Hemingway's excellent new book on Justice Alito: asserted
I → think → Alito
Around the Court, Alito's chambers are seen as the "Green Berets," an elite unit that improves any position it enters. asserted
it → see → position
The justice often uses military lingo, explaining to his clerks, for example, that "I don't think we need to take point on that one" means "it's not worth sticking our neck out on that issue." asserted
it → use → issue
I guess it was not worth Alito sticking his neck out in Missouri, especially since Kavanaugh was locked in and the issue would not return to the Court. asserted
issue → guess → Court
But Alito thought it was worth taking point in the postal service case, especially since the litigation would continue in the lower courts. asserted
litigation → think → courts
Fifth, Justice Alito (as noted above) raises some important issues concerning standing. asserted
Alito → note → standing
To begin, the District Court issued a nationwide injunction based on claims asserted by several plaintiff organizations that likely lack standing. uncertain
that → begin → standing
These organizations first claim a direct organizational injury because the rule supposedly thwarts their ability to educate members about voting. uncertain
rule → claim → voting
Yet this theory of injury is based on "'a setback to the organization's abstract social interests'" and an effortto "spend its way into standing simply by expending money to gather information and advocate against the defendant's action[s]." asserted
theory → base → ]
Justice Gorsuch has made it his life's mission to root out offended observer standing and related doctrines, such a diversion of resource standing. asserted
it → make → standing
…and 17 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support