OpenAI boss Sam Altman warns of two ways AI could go ‘very badly’ for humans — as China alleges ‘fear mongering’

New York Post · collected 2026-09-14 · by Taylor Herzlich
Read the original at New York Post ↗

Summary

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, issued warnings on X about potential dangers of artificial intelligence, including loss of control over the future to AI and excessive concentration of power in one entity. This comes as China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson called such concerns “fear mongering” similar to Cold War tactics. Tech stocks globally fell sharply amid investor fears that companies might need to slow down AI development, with notable declines seen in US firms like Nvidia and AMD, European companies ASML and Infineon, and Asian giants SoftBank and TSMC.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
37
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
32%
12 of 37 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
58.5
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-14 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, warned on X about two potential negative outcomes from advancements in AI: losing control over its future impact and excessive concentration of power. He emphasized being "unapologetically on Team Humanity." Meanwhile, the Chinese government accused US tech companies of spreading fear through Cold War tactics and disrupting global AI governance efforts. The dispute comes amid increasing competition between the US and China in the development and application of advanced AI technologies.

Written for “AI Risks And Global Politics” on 2026-09-14, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but 3 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 1 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 8915: no verified evidence · logged 2026-09-14

Story

📰 AI Risks And Global Politics
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 32% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 25% hedged 1 of 4 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles discuss different perspectives and warnings about AI safety from different individuals on distinct dates.”
Mother Jones
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 18% hedged 8 of 44 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles describe separate events involving different individuals and companies at distinct times.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 19% hedged 10 of 54 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles discuss different aspects of concerns over AI, with Article A focusing on President Trump's stance and Article B on Sam Altman's warnings and China's response.”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 21% hedged 5 of 24 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles describe different public statements from two separate CEOs about AI risks, not the same specific incident.”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses warnings from top AI developers generally, while Article B focuses specifically on Sam Altman's comments and China's response, describing distinct aspects of the broader issue.”
September 13, 2026 different event · 95%
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 15% hedged 10 of 65
“The articles discuss different individuals and their views on artificial intelligence safety risks at distinct times.”
NPR
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 23% hedged 6 of 26 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles discuss different individuals and organizations making statements about AI, with Article A focusing on Anthropic's CEO and Article B on OpenAI's boss, despite both touching on the theme of criticism from China.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles discuss different perspectives on AI warnings but describe distinct statements and reactions from China and US tech leaders.”
AI Is a Test of Our Maturity. *Gulp* different event · 95%
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 8 of 99
“The articles discuss different aspects and contexts related to AI concerns but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 77
“The articles describe different CEOs with distinct viewpoints on AI regulation and safety, not the same specific incident.”

Publisher

New York Post · 283 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)
2026-09-06
Long Island inmates in jail on drug charges use photo program to get clean
2026-09-06
‘Landman’ Season 3 Release Date Update: When Does ‘Landman’ Return With New Episodes?

Who wrote this

Taylor Herzlich
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “There are two ways AI progress could go very badly and that we must avoid.
🔮 An OpenAI spokesman couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.
Also by Taylor Herzlich
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

China Chinese Cold War OpenAI Team Humanity

Subjects

China GPE · 6× Altman PERSON · 4× Anthropic ORG · 3× OpenAI ORG · 3× Amodei ORG · 2× Chinese NORP · 1× Foreign Ministry ORG · 1× Guo Jiakun PERSON · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1× Team Humanity ORG · 1×

Narrative

OpenAI boss Sam Altman on Monday doubled down on his warnings about the safety risks of AI — even as the Chinese government called such alarm bells from US companies “fear mongering” it likened to “Cold War” tactics.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
🔮 “There are two ways AI progress could go very badly and that we must avoid.

Claims (37 extracted, 12 hedged)

OpenAI boss Sam Altman on Monday doubled down on his warnings about the safety risks of AI — even as the Chinese government called such alarm bells from US companies “fear mongering” it likened to “Cold War” tactics. asserted
it → double → tactics
“There are two ways AI progress could go very badly and that we must avoid. uncertain
we → be → that
First, we could lose control of the future to AI. uncertain
we → lose → AI
This is unacceptable; we are unapologetically on Team Humanity,” Altman wrote in a post on X just after midnight Monday. asserted
Altman → write → midnight
“Second, we could end up in a world with too much concentration of power. uncertain
we → end → power
If an extraordinarily powerful AI is used by one person or company to impress their worldview onto everyone else, the results could be extremely dystopian.” uncertain
results → use → everyone
The US and China have been locked in a fierce battle to pull ahead in the AI race, as tech leaders have warned that more powerful AI could allow China superior surveillance tactics, military battleground power and cybersecurity hacking capabilities. uncertain
AI → lock → tactics
“Fear mongering, confrontation, competition will just disrupt [the] process of global AI governance,” Guo Jiakun, a spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry, said Monday, according to a translation by Reuters. uncertain
Jiakun → disrupt → Reuters
An editorial by the state-backed Global Times compared calls for China to slow its AI advancements to a “Cold War” tactic. asserted
China → back → tactic
At a summit in New Delhi over the weekend, President Xi Jinping said China will take the lead when it comes to fostering global AI collaboration among developing countries. asserted
it → say → countries
President Trump shrugged off the concerns, saying Sunday that those predictions “won’t happen” and that the US is beating China in the AI race. asserted
US → shrug → race
On Monday, tech stocks around the world slumped as investors grew concerned that companies have sunk too much money into AI advancements and could see their profits tank if they are forced to slow development. uncertain
they → slump → development
Nvidia, AMD, SpaceX and Amazon plunged 3.7%, 5.2%, 1.4% and 2%, respectively. asserted
Nvidia → plunge → ?
In Europe, ASML, Infineon and Siemens Energy fell 5.6%, 6.5% and 7.3%, respectively. asserted
ASML → fall → Europe
Asian stocks like SoftBank, TSMC and SK Hynix plummeted 13.5%, 2.4% and 6.3%, respectively. asserted
stocks → plummet → SoftBank
In another tweet Monday, Altman gave his most detailed suggestions yet for the implementation of global AI safeguards, saying there needs to be federal regulations and suggesting ideas like independent auditors. asserted
Altman → give → auditors
“Every frontier lab must deliver on this, and there is no reason any of us should come to work if we cannot,” Altman wrote. asserted
Altman → deliver → work
“We think shared standards for misalignment, monitoring, and safety will lead to better outcomes. asserted
standards → think → outcomes
We look forward to collaborating with our colleagues across the industry to formulate the best version of these,” he added. asserted
he → look → these
“When we talk about ‘pacing,’ we do not mean ‘stopping.’ asserted
we → talk → pacing
Progress has been rapid and will continue to be. asserted
Progress → continue → ?
He added that government intervention will be crucial to secure international cooperation from global AI and tech firms – but this could prove a serious challenge. uncertain
this → add → firms
Anthropic and OpenAI had been gearing up for massive stock market debuts as early as this fall, but Altman said on Saturday that OpenAI would not be going public in 2026 due to safety concerns. asserted
OpenAI → gear → concerns
In his essay over the weekend, Anthropic’s Amodei discussed the risks of recursive self-improvement, or RSI, which is when AI models become smart enough to progress independently. asserted
models → discuss → improvement
“Since roughly this summer, AI has been advancing drastically faster, driven primarily by AI’s growing ability to build the next generation of AI,” Amodei wrote. asserted
Amodei → advance → AI
“Left unchecked, it could outrun our ability to understand and control these systems, and so must be pursued very carefully, if at all.” uncertain
it → leave → systems
He suggested a three-step plan that would not sacrifice “commercial advantage or the United States’ lead in AI.” uncertain
that → suggest → AI
The plan requires each top AI company to give “employee-like access” to external evaluators. asserted
plan → require → evaluators
He said Anthropic is now committing to this safeguard, and he also urged AI labs to create common safety standards, limit the rate of unchecked AI progress and work together around the world. asserted
he → say → world
But he acknowledged that this need for global cooperation could be the biggest problem, warning that some nations might not want to work together. uncertain
nations → acknowledge → cooperation
“I think that’s going to be very difficult because the incentives to pull ahead and the military advantage that you get from that are so large. asserted
you → think → that
And honestly, I don’t know if it’s possible, but we should try,” Amodei told CBS News’ “Sunday Morning.” asserted
Amodei → know → Morning
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warned of two ways AI could go "very badly" for humans. uncertain
AI → warn → humans
The movie's plot is robots and artificial technology eradicating humans on the planet. asserted
robots → eradicate → planet
Skynet, the company that created the artificial technology, started the nuclear war that began the demise of humans on the planet. asserted
that → create → planet
China shrugged off the warnings, comparing it to "fear mongering" and "Cold War" tactics. asserted
China → shrug → mongering
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei shared a lengthy essay over the weekend on AI safeguards. asserted
Amodei → share → safeguards
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support