'It's going to be fine': Trump rebuffs rising alarm over AI dangers, sparking outcry

Read the original at Los Angeles Times ↗
Cite

Wilner, M. (2026, September 12). 'It's going to be fine': Trump rebuffs rising alarm over AI dangers, sparking outcry. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-09-11/its-going-to-be-fine-trump-rebuffs-rising-alarm-over-ai-dangers-sparking-outcry

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Los Angeles Times · collected 2026-09-12 · by Michael Wilner

Quick Summary

President Trump dismissed growing concerns about the risks of artificial intelligence, stating, “It’s going to be fine,” despite warnings from researchers at major AI labs like Anthropic and OpenAI. This stance has sparked anxiety among scientists and lawmakers who fear that unchecked AI development could pose an existential threat. As Chinese President Xi Jinping prepares for a visit on September 24, the issue of AI regulation and international cooperation is expected to be high on the agenda.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-12, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

President Trump dismissed growing concerns about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence (AI), asserting that there is no need for additional regulation or "guardrails" on AI development. In posts on social media and comments to reporters, he claimed that the United States already has a sufficient safeguard in his presidency, stating, “The only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT.” Trump also accused unnamed forces of exaggerating risks and engaging in a "SICK conspiracy" against AI companies. This stance contrasts with calls from leading scientists and tech CEOs like Dario Amodei from Anthropic and Sam Altman from OpenAI, who advocate for slowing down the pace of AI development due to safety concerns. The disagreement comes as Chinese President Xi Jinping is set to visit Washington on September 24 for an official summit where AI will be a key topic of discussion between the two nations.

Written for “Trump AI Rants Condemning Critics” on 2026-10-27, grounded in this article and the 40 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump AI Rants Condemning Critics
Politics · 41 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 19% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 29% hedged 2 of 7 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles describe different events: one focuses on AI researchers' warnings about potential dangers of advanced AI development, while the other reports on President Trump's dismissal of such concerns.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 31% hedged 9 of 29 📰 publisher trust 69
“The articles describe different aspects of a broader topic (AI risks) but do not focus on the same specific incident.”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 5 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles describe different perspectives on AI safety concerns—one focuses on disagreements during bipartisan talks while the other covers Trump's response to rising alarm over AI dangers.”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 16% hedged 5 of 32 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns without focusing on the same specific incident or meeting.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 5 of 42 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles describe different events - one is about President Trump's stance on AI, and the other is an interview with Anthropic CEO discussing warnings about AI development.”
Noahpinion
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 18% hedged 21 of 117
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI safety concerns; Article A focuses on Trump's dismissal of AI dangers, while Article B discusses a researcher's resignation and public statements about AI risks.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 4 of 37 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles describe different perspectives on AI risks, with one focusing on President Trump's dismissal of concerns and the other on an Anthropic CEO acknowledging those risks.”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 32% hedged 12 of 37 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles discuss different aspects of concerns over AI, with Article A focusing on President Trump's stance and Article B on Sam Altman's warnings and China's response.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles report on President Trump dismissing concerns about AI dangers and asserting confidence in managing its development, covering the same speech or statement made by Trump.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 50% hedged 5 of 10 📰 publisher trust 65
“Article A reports on President Trump's stance on AI, while Article B discusses the impact of warnings from AI leaders on tech stocks.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
54
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
19%
10 of 54 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
95/100
Los Angeles Times's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
41
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-12 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Los Angeles Times · 238 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Michael Wilner
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Economists warn that Trump has overseen fiscal policy that would give the federal government fewer tools than it has had in the past to respond to a crisis.
🔮 Marco Rubio, the president’s secretary of state and national security advisor, has been silent on Trump’s decision to cut a deal with Moscow on diesel sales that could fuel Russia’s war against Ukraine.
🔮 Lawmakers and AI industry leaders have also called for guardrails on the nascent technology, which experts warn could soon surpass human understanding.
🔮 Xi Jinping’s remarks reflect growing concern within China over whether governments in Washington or Beijing will be able to contain a technology with potentially transformative capabilities, according to a U.S. official.
🔮 “Will a deal be made with Iran that lets them rebuild and create a far greater country than it ever was before — maybe one of the greatest in the Middle East or even the world?
🔮 Click here to listen to this article - - China’s spy chief warned that runaway AI capabilities could threaten Communist Party control. -
🔮 The president’s position has put him at odds with a growing chorus of industry leaders and bipartisan lawmakers warning that AI could soon advance beyond human control.
🔮 Chinese President Xi Jinping will visit Washington on Sept. 24 for an official summit and state dinner, with AI development expected to top the agenda.
🔮 Questions swirl over Trump’s pledge to give $5,000 payouts if GOP wins - Click here to listen to this article - - President Trump vowed to send every U.S. adult a $5,000 “Trump Dividend” if Republicans keep control of Congress, a stunning midterm gambit that would cost more than $1 trillion and need lawmakers’ approval.
🔮 But Americans may also confront higher costs at a time when inflation is already a stubborn problem for the Trump administration.
Also by Michael Wilner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Michael Wilner →

Topics

Anthropic China Chinese OpenAI Washington

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 6× Anthropic ORG · 4× Washington GPE · 4× China GPE · 2× Chinese NORP · 2× OpenAI ORG · 2× Xi Jinping PERSON · 2× Google ORG · 1× The Times ORG · 1× Treasury ORG · 1×

Narrative

“The fact is that the release of Mythos back in February spooked the federal government, both in terms of protecting government systems from cyberattacks and over the broader national security implications,” said Aalok Mehta, director of the Wadhwani AI Center at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-12
🔮 Chinese President Xi Jinping will visit Washington on Sept. 24 for an official summit and state dinner, with AI development expected to top the agenda.

Claims (54 extracted, 10 hedged)

‘It’s going to be fine’: Trump rebuffs rising alarm over AI dangers, sparking outcry - Click here to listen to this article - - President Trump said he had no concerns with the breakneck pace of AI progress. - asserted
he → go → progress
Chinese President Xi Jinping will visit Washington on Sept. 24 for an official summit and state dinner, with AI development expected to top the agenda. asserted
development → visit → agenda
President Trump is brushing aside growing concern among leading scientists and bipartisan lawmakers that artificial intelligence could soon pose an existential threat to humanity, fueling anxiety in Washington and Silicon Valley that the president may not fully grasp the urgency of the threat. uncertain
president → brush → threat
Alarm mounted throughout the summer as researchers at leading AI labs, including Anthropic, OpenAI and Google, found the pace of development far outstripping their expectations — and observed troubling behaviors that hinted at more serious risks ahead. asserted
that → mount → risks
But an online warning Tuesday from an Anthropic researcher who resigned in protest of its ongoing work has generated viral attention this week, prompting questions to Trump, who dismissed the concerns out of hand. asserted
who → resign → hand
“It’s going to be fine,” he told one reporter. asserted
he → go → reporter
“We’ll always have something to stop them. asserted
We → have → them
We’ll have a little gear. asserted
We → have → gear
In another exchange, traveling with reporters Thursday night, the president said he had no concerns with the breakneck pace of AI progress. asserted
he → travel → progress
“No, I don’t have any,” he said. asserted
he → have → any
“I have concerns that if we don’t win in AI, we’re going to be put in a very bad position.” asserted
we → have → position
Artificial intelligence anxiety reached new highs this week as industry leaders highlighted growing concerns that humans could lose control of the increasingly potent technology. uncertain
humans → reach → technology
A senior industry source told The Times that leading AI companies are focused less on convincing the president of the dangers ahead than on working with lawmakers on potential regulation, as the administration remains divided over how to proceed — and as Trump appears to lack a clear understanding of the risks. asserted
Trump → tell → risks
Among the president’s advisors, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and the Office of the National Cyber Director have expressed the greatest concern with the potential of an unchecked intelligence explosion, the source said. asserted
source → express → explosion
But “most of the administration is accelerationist,” the source added. asserted
source → add → administration
“It’s not clear the president understands the technology. asserted
president → ’ → technology
He may just be figuring out what all of this means.” uncertain
all → figure → this
Leading American AI companies have argued that government regulation would tie their hands in an arms race toward superintelligence against China, the only other major player in the field. asserted
regulation → lead → field
But the Trump administration signaled an interest in negotiating AI guardrails with China during the president’s visit to Beijing this spring, after Anthropic announced the development of a frontier model with extraordinary abilities to hack the world’s most advanced security systems. asserted
Anthropic → signal → systems
Chinese President Xi Jinping will visit Washington on Sept. 24 for an official summit and state dinner at the White House, with AI development expected to top the agenda. asserted
development → visit → agenda
A Trump administration once eager to gun for technological supremacy is now, for the first time, reckoning with the power AI could unleash if left unchecked. uncertain
AI → gun → power
The prospect of halting development seems far-fetched. asserted
prospect → halt → development
But some leading voices in the sector have proposed a moratorium on computing power used to train the most advanced models, giving time and space to develop research on interpretability — the study of how artificial intelligence actually thinks and acts. asserted
intelligence → lead → interpretability
The chief executive of OpenAI, Sam Altman, this week signaled to staff a willingness to unilaterally slow their work on frontier systems. asserted
executive → signal → systems
The company discovered in July that rogue AI agents had schemed in secret to break out of the virtual sandbox created to contain them, infiltrating the open internet and hacking a private company. asserted
agents → discover → company
Anthropic also announced this week concerning findings of human misuse of its models, including instances of unidentified individuals attempting to circumvent their security controls to build biological weapons. asserted
individuals → announce → weapons
One such incident was linked back to a military research complex. asserted
incident → link → complex
The company also said Iran has tried to use its models to target U.S. Navy ships. asserted
Iran → say → ships
In June, after Anthropic shared news of the development of its most powerful model, named Mythos, with the administration, Trump directed the establishment of a framework that creates some government oversight over the public release of the country’s most advanced AI systems. asserted
that → share → systems
The details of that framework, which was designed over the summer, remain classified. asserted
which → design → summer
“The fact is that the release of Mythos back in February spooked the federal government, both in terms of protecting government systems from cyberattacks and over the broader national security implications,” said Aalok Mehta, director of the Wadhwani AI Center at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. asserted
Mehta → spook → Studies
“The real question is whether this shift is happening fast enough,” Mehta added. asserted
Mehta → happen → ?
“Recent events — the repeated incidents of models escaping their sandboxes and hacking websites, the increasingly sophisticated coordination and communication among agents, and the concerns coming from lab insiders — has made this an even more urgent issue.” asserted
this → repeat → insiders
Leading AI companies have begun using their most advanced models to train new ones — a process known as recursive self-improvement that could eventually drive intelligence growth beyond human control. uncertain
that → lead → control
“If you have a superadvanced intelligence, it will be smart enough to kill us,” said Jacob Coxon, the resigned Anthropic researcher whose social media post attracted over 150 million views. asserted
post → have → views
“We can’t just unplug it because it could be copying itself over to other computers,” he told CBS News. uncertain
he → unplug → News
It could transfer itself over the internet to a different place, and then you unplug it here, but it’s actually still over there. uncertain
it → transfer → it
And maybe it makes 10,000 copies of itself and they’re all cooperating.” asserted
they → make → itself
He is just the latest senior researcher at a top AI company to sound the alarm. asserted
He → sound → alarm
Jacob Coxon, an AI researcher, issued a public warning that went viral about the dangers of artificial intelligence and quit his job in protest. asserted
that → issue → protest
…and 14 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support