Two of the world’s top AI chief executives publicly agree on slowing AI development

NBC News · collected 2026-09-13 · by An Phung
Read the original at NBC News ↗

Summary

Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, and Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, have publicly called for slowing down AI development due to concerns about researchers' ability to understand and control increasingly powerful AI systems. Amodei’s nearly 4,000-word essay cites the autonomous hacking incident involving an OpenAI model as a critical turning point. Both CEOs advocate for deliberate pacing of AI advancements to ensure safety measures can keep up with technological progress.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-13, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
21%
5 of 24 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
94.9
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
5
Technology
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-13 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, which makes the Claude chatbot, published an essay calling for AI companies to slow their development pace due to concerns that advancements are outpacing researchers' ability to understand and control them. Hours later, Sam Altman from OpenAI endorsed Amodei's proposal and said his company would adopt one of Amodei’s suggested safeguards. Both CEOs stressed the need for independent third-party evaluators to help ensure AI safety measures keep up with technological progress. This push comes amid growing concerns that AI could develop capabilities posing significant risks within six to 12 months, including potentially taking over the entire internet. The call for slowing development has also received support from Elon Musk of xAI, emphasizing a collective industry effort towards responsible innovation.

Written for “AI Safety Concerns” on 2026-09-14, grounded in this article and the 4 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but all 3 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 8443: attributed speech only · logged 2026-09-13

Story

📰 AI Safety Concerns
Technology · 5 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 21% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
South China Morning Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 12 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI policy and development, not the same specific incident.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 3 of 24 📰 publisher trust 58
“The articles describe different events, with one focusing on a researcher quitting Anthropic and the other on CEOs agreeing to slow AI development.”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 17% hedged 2 of 12 📰 publisher trust 58
“Article A describes a researcher quitting and warning about AI risks, while Article B reports on CEOs agreeing to slow AI development.”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 29% hedged 2 of 7 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A describes a researcher's warning about irresponsible AI development, while Article B discusses a public agreement between CEOs to slow down AI advancement.”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses warnings from multiple AI researchers, while Article B specifically mentions public agreement between two CEO's about slowing AI development.”
Global News
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 37% hedged 11 of 30 📰 publisher trust 54
“Both articles report on Dario Amodei's public statement made on Saturday, where he calls for slowing down AI development to ensure safety measures can catch up.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 29% hedged 10 of 35 📰 publisher trust 96
“While both articles discuss concerns about AI development, they describe different aspects: one focuses on a researcher's resignation and fears, while the other highlights CEOs agreeing to slow down AI advancements.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 44% hedged 4 of 9
“While both articles discuss concerns over AI development, Article A focuses on Trump's stance and an Anthropic researcher quitting, while Article B reports on a public agreement by two top AI CEOs to slow AI development, which is a different specific event.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 67% hedged 2 of 3 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles discuss related issues concerning AI development but describe different events: one is an interview with a former researcher warning about AI, and the other involves CEOs agreeing to slow down AI development.”
NPR
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 15% hedged 12 of 79 📰 publisher trust 59
“While both articles discuss concerns over AI development, they describe different aspects: Article A focuses on a researcher's resignation and warnings, while Article B discusses CEOs publicly agreeing to slow down AI development.”

Publisher

NBC News · 210 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

An Phung
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain.”
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Anthropic Claude Google NBC News OpenAI

Subjects

Amodei PERSON · 7× Anthropic ORG · 6× OpenAI ORG · 4× NBC News ORG · 3× Altman PERSON · 2× Google ORG · 2× Dario PERSON · 1× Dario Amodei PERSON · 1× Hugging Face ORG · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, maker of the Claude chatbot, said in essay published Saturday that AI companies should deliberately “slow the pace” at which they improve their models, arguing that AI advances are moving faster than researchers’ ability to understand and control them. “We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models,” Amodei wrote.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-13
🔮 “Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain.”

Claims (24 extracted, 5 hedged)

The CEOs of two of the world’s leading AI companies are publicly agreeing that the race to build increasingly powerful AI systems needs to be slowed, continuing this week’s cascade of warnings from researchers working on the technology. asserted
race → lead → technology
Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, maker of the Claude chatbot, said in essay published Saturday that AI companies should deliberately “slow the pace” at which they improve their models, arguing that AI advances are moving faster than researchers’ ability to understand and control them. “We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models,” Amodei wrote. asserted
Amodei → say → models
“Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain.” asserted
we → seem → time
Hours later, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman endorsed the idea and said his company would adopt one of Amodei’s proposed safeguards. asserted
company → endorse → safeguards
“I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier,” Altman wrote on X, saying the issue had been a major topic of discussion at OpenAI in recent weeks. asserted
issue → agree → weeks
Altman has previously called for slowing AI development. asserted
Altman → call → development
In an Aug. 18 post on X, he said OpenAI had paused some advanced AI training to ensure it could meet its standards as capabilities improved. uncertain
capabilities → say → standards
Amodei’s call, laid out in a nearly 4,000-word essay, comes after researchers at Anthropic, OpenAI and Google publicly raised concerns about the pace of AI development and the competitive pressures that comes with it. asserted
that → lay → it
Amodei pointed to two developments that he said had changed his thinking: the increasing ability of AI systems to build more advanced AI, and a July incident in which autonomous AI agents powered by an OpenAI model hacked systems belonging to the AI company Hugging Face. asserted
agents → point → company
“It’s easy to dismiss this incident because no one was hurt and the economic damage was minimal, but in my opinion, a swarm that possessed greater capabilities but a similar level of misalignment could have caused catastrophic damage,” he wrote. uncertain
he → ’ → damage
Jacob Coxon, an Anthropic safety researcher who resigned this week, told colleagues in a message obtained by NBC News that he believed the industry’s approach to developing superintelligent AI amounted to a “gamble with our lives.” “From within, you’re just stuck in the race,” Coxon later told NBC News, describing the competitive pressures on AI companies. asserted
Coxon → resign → companies
“You can’t change the overall structural dynamics of the situation.” asserted
You → change → situation
“Private companies in a race don’t allow these people to end up doing good, and we could just sleepwalk into disaster,” he said. uncertain
he → allow → disaster
Two other researchers who recently left Anthropic and Google DeepMind told NBC News they had similar concerns. asserted
they → leave → concerns
Joe Benton, who used to lead a safety research team at Anthropic, warned that advances in AI could push development from its already “blistering” pace to an “uncontrollable” one. uncertain
advances → use → one
Josh Engels, a former Google safety researcher, offered an even starker warning. asserted
Engels → offer → warning
“There are no adults in the room,” Engels said. asserted
Engels → be → room
“People are trying their best, but there is no one coming to save us.” asserted
People → try → us
Amodei is proposing what he calls “pacing the frontier,” a three-part plan that he said would buy researchers more time without halting AI development. asserted
he → propose → development
He said Anthropic would begin embedding independent evaluators inside the company, giving them access to models, internal tools and researchers to assess risks. asserted
Anthropic → say → risks
Amodei called for similar oversight across leading U.S. AI companies, backed by federal regulation and eventually for international coordination. asserted
Amodei → call → coordination
The goal is not to stop AI progress, Amodei wrote, but to give researchers time to develop safeguards, better understand how increasingly capable systems work and test whether they can be reliable controlled. asserted
they → stop → safeguards
He estimated that slowing development could buy researchers one or two more years, time he argued could prove critical as AI systems become increasingly capable of contributing to their own development. uncertain
systems → estimate → development
“The stakes are too high for pacing to be an empty exercise — we need to use the time it gives us wisely,” he wrote. asserted
he → need → us
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support