From ‘killing the golden goose’ to better than ever: Has Alberta's relationship with Ottawa changed?

Read the original at CBC News ↗
Cite

Dryden, J. (2026, October 17). From ‘killing the golden goose’ to better than ever: Has Alberta's relationship with Ottawa changed? CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-danielle-smith-mark-carney-ottawa-referendum-9.7384604?cmp=rss

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

CBC News · collected 2026-10-17 · by Joel Dryden

Quick Summary

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has shifted her stance from criticizing the federal government to praising recent moves towards better cooperation, expressing that Canada is working better than ever before. This change follows months of efforts by both Smith and new Prime Minister Mark Carney to address Albertans' concerns over energy sector policies and constitutional issues. However, separatist leader Keith Wilson dismisses these developments as "political platitudes" and argues that Carney's promises are insufficient after years of federal policy hindering Alberta’s economic growth and personal freedoms.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Summary unavailable.

Written for “Alberta Ottawa Relationship Shift” on 2026-10-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.35, but 2 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 1 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 87252: no verified evidence · logged 2026-10-17

Story

📰 Alberta Ottawa Relationship Shift
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 8% hedged 3 of 38 📰 publisher trust 63
“The articles discuss different aspects of Alberta's relationship with Ottawa over time; Article A focuses on the upcoming referendum and historical context, while Article B discusses recent changes in the relationship between Alberta and the federal government.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 6% hedged 3 of 52 📰 publisher trust 63
“The articles discuss different aspects of Alberta's relationship with Canada and its internal politics, not the same specific incident.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 6% hedged 3 of 51 📰 publisher trust 52
“The articles discuss different aspects related to Alberta's relationship with Ottawa and its separatist movement rather than describing the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 3 of 51 📰 publisher trust 63
“The articles discuss Alberta's relationship with Ottawa but cover different aspects: one focuses on a vote or plebiscite to gauge support for separatism, while the other discusses historical and current political conflicts and recent moves by Premier.”
Global News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 19% hedged 6 of 31 📰 publisher trust 63
“The articles discuss different aspects of Alberta's relationship with Canada and its internal politics, not a single specific event.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 34 📰 publisher trust 52
“Article A reports on a specific day's events during advance voting in Alberta's referendum with involvement from former premiers. Article B is an analysis of Alberta's relationship with Ottawa over time and does not describe the same specific incident.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles discuss different aspects of Alberta's relationship with Ottawa and do not describe a single, identical incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
84
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
6 of 84 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
73/100
CBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

CBC News · 1319 article(s) · 5 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 5 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Joel Dryden
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Some Albertans would argue more than its fair share.
🔮 Unlike the Brexit vote, which led to the U.K. leaving the European Union, Albertans will be asked Oct. 19 to choose one of two options: for the province to stay in Canada, or to hold a second binding referendum on separating from the country.
🔮 Danielle Smith rules out 2nd separation referendum if Albertans vote to remain Alberta would ‘pursue other things’ if immigration, constitutional questions rejected
🔮 Stephen Harper warns Alberta separatism will bring 'no benefit'
🔮 On Oct. 19, voters will be asked whether Alberta should remain a province of Canada, or whether the Government of Alberta should hold a second, binding referendum to separate from Canada.
🔮 Establishing independent Alberta would be costly, unpredictable: government-commissioned report
🔮 The Alberta Transition Council released the 214-page report on Thursday, laying out a series of proposals tied to how life in Alberta might look in the event of a future “yes” vote on independence.
Also by Joel Dryden
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Joel Dryden →

Topics

Alberta Albertans Liberals Ottawa the National Energy Program

Subjects

Alberta GPE · 11× Smith PERSON · 6× Ottawa GPE · 5× Albertans NORP · 4× Carney PERSON · 3× Keith Wilson PERSON · 2× Danielle Smith PERSON · 1× Jason Kenney PERSON · 1× Liberals NORP · 1× the National Energy Program ORG · 1×

Narrative

As detailed by Smith in March 2025, they were, in brief: - the oil and gas emissions cap; - returning oversight of the industrial carbon tax to the provinces; - the net-zero power regulations; - the EV mandate; - repealing Bill C-69, otherwise known as the Impact Assessment Act; - guaranteeing Alberta “full access” to oil and gas corridors; - lifting the B.C. tanker ban; - ending the prohibition on single-use plastics; and - “halting the federal censorship” of energy companies. A spokesperson in the premiers’ office said it considers seven of the nine “scrapped or reformed.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-17
🔮 Some Albertans would argue more than its fair share.

Claims (84 extracted, 6 hedged)

From ‘killing the golden goose’ to better than ever: Has Alberta's relationship with Ottawa changed? asserted
relationship → kill → Ottawa
Premier praises recent moves; separatist leader says they’re nothing but ‘political platitudes’ asserted
they → praise → platitudes
The relationship between Alberta and the federal government has faced its share of political and economic conflict over the years. asserted
relationship → face → years
Some Albertans would argue more than its fair share. asserted
Albertans → argue → share
From the drawing of the province’s boundaries to natural resource control to the creation of the National Energy Program to pipeline cancellations and political representation, generations of Albertans have expressed feelings of alienation. asserted
generations → express → alienation
Last year, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith added to the litany of rebukes of Ottawa from Alberta leaders over the years. asserted
Smith → add → years
(Her predecessor, Jason Kenney, once said the federal government was "killing the golden goose".) asserted
government → say → goose
After launching a panel tour to hear citizens' frustrations, Smith said, “You know what Ottawa can't help but be fixated on? ... Punishing our energy sector and layering on policies to keep it in the ground." She made those remarks nearly two months after the Liberals won a fourth-consecutive election under new leader Mark Carney. asserted
Liberals → launch → Carney
Members of the Alberta Next panel gathered for a public town hall meeting in Red Deer at the Westerner Park grounds on July 25, 2025. asserted
Members → gather → July
Fast forward to this fall, with Albertans poised to go to the polls in a referendum that could ultimately lead to a separation vote, and Smith is expressing a very different view. uncertain
Smith → fast → view
“I do think Canada is working better than it ever has,” Smith told CBC News, noting she will be voting for the province to stay put. asserted
province → think → News
The remarks follow months of Smith saying that, in her view, working out the differences between Alberta and Ottawa would be the key to quelling separatist sentiment, a blueprint she said is shared by Carney. asserted
she → follow → Carney
So what changed in the relationship between the province and Ottawa? asserted
what → change → province
For her part, Smith said that Alberta has “finally” found a government willing to move swiftly on major projects, such as the Pacific Link pipeline, while not “standing in the way” of Alberta developing its resources. asserted
Alberta → say → resources
Carney, the premier said, is a “different type of leader.” asserted
premier → say → leader
“I think he understands the Constitution. asserted
he → think → Constitution
I think he respects the constitutional division of powers,” she said. asserted
she → think → powers
“There’s areas that are federal jurisdiction, and areas of provincial jurisdiction. asserted
that → ’ → jurisdiction
That’s why, the premier argued, Albertans should vote to remain in Canada, with a newfound belief that federation can function fairly. asserted
federation → ’ → belief
But those who say the province needs to go its own way to realize its true potential see Carney’s promises as mere window dressing after years of policy that stymied economic growth and personal freedoms. asserted
that → say → growth
Constitutional lawyer Keith Wilson argued in favour of Alberta independence at a debate in Calgary held in late May. uncertain
Wilson → argue → May
“They’re just saying, 'Hey, we’re getting along.' asserted
we → say → ?
Well, what if they stop getting along?” said Keith Wilson, one of the most prominent leaders in the Alberta separatist movement. asserted
Wilson → stop → movement
“I am not satisfied to have the future of my children’s success and prosperity hinge upon whether the prime minister and a premier have a good personal relationship.” asserted
minister → have → relationship
No to the nine ('bad laws') In addition to the proposed Pacific Link pipeline and other federal investments, Smith has praised federal movement around what she calls the “nine bad laws” that she demanded be addressed in order to avoid an “unprecedented national unity crisis.” asserted
she → propose → crisis
As detailed by Smith in March 2025, they were, in brief: - the oil and gas emissions cap; - returning oversight of the industrial carbon tax to the provinces; - the net-zero power regulations; - the EV mandate; - repealing Bill C-69, otherwise known as the Impact Assessment Act; - guaranteeing Alberta “full access” to oil and gas corridors; - lifting the B.C. tanker ban; - ending the prohibition on single-use plastics; and - “halting the federal censorship” of energy companies. A spokesperson in the premiers’ office said it considers seven of the nine “scrapped or reformed. asserted
seven → detail → nine
“Investment is soaring and major projects are moving forward again. asserted
projects → soar → ?
This is proof of progress and a more collaborative relationship,” Ryan Fournier wrote in an email. asserted
Fournier → write → email
The federal government revised those policies amid criticism from some that the moves would claw back environmental protections and concern from others surrounding Indigenous consultation. asserted
moves → revise → consultation
Wilson isn’t satisfied with progress to date, citing, among other developments, a recent Alberta Court of Appeal ruling that stated the federal government’s Impact Assessment Act is still unconstitutional. asserted
Act → cite → ruling
“I’m sorry, but this is just … political platitudes, absent substantive action. asserted
this → ’m → action
If the prime minister was serious about these things, he would offer to change equalization,” he said. asserted
he → offer → equalization
“He would announce that he’s going to follow the court decision, and repeal Bill C-69 [the Impact Assessment Act]. asserted
he → announce → Bill
The Alberta Court of Appeal in Calgary is seen in this file photo. asserted
Court → see → photo
Earlier this month, it ruled the federal government's Impact Assessment Act is still unconstitutional. asserted
Act → rule → ?
Heather Exner-Pirot, director of energy, natural resources and environment at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa, said that Canada had a “terrible reputation” for investment due to policies implemented under former prime minister Justin Trudeau. asserted
Canada → say → Trudeau
“The corrections to the ‘nine bad laws’ … those are all meaningful, in that they have attracted investment,” she said. asserted
she → attract → investment
“You can always say that things aren’t perfect, or there’s things we can still do to improve competitiveness, but I don’t think anyone would have anticipated two years ago that we could be where we are here today.” uncertain
we → say → competitiveness
Earlier this month, the federal and Alberta governments announced that the proposed Pacific Link pipeline, which would carry one million barrels of oil a day from Alberta to the B.C. coast, had become the first project designated in the national interest. asserted
which → announce → interest
That classification means that federal approvals and regulatory reviews will be fast-tracked. asserted
approvals → mean → ?
…and 44 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support