California Governor Gavin Newsom signed 13 new bills aimed at protecting children's safety online, including Assembly Bill 1709 which requires social media platforms to prevent minors under 16 from accessing addictive features. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) describes this specific bill as a "privacy and free speech nightmare," arguing that it will likely force tech companies to use invasive age-verification methods such as government ID uploads or biometric scanning, with non-compliant firms facing fines of up to $50,000 per minor. The legislation also establishes an e-Safety Advisory Commission tasked with recommending further legislative changes each year to enhance protections for minors online.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-12,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph
rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 8383: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-09-12
California, a state once brimming with optimism for a free and open internet, is now leading the country in online safety regulation.
asserted
California → brim → regulation
On Thursday, California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed 13 bills into law "strengthening California's nation-leading protections for children online.
asserted
Newsom → sign → children
The laws will impose stricter regulations on AI chatbots, a moratorium on certain AI-enabled toys, and pricey penalties on social media companies that knowingly cause harm to children.
asserted
that → impose → children
One of the laws, Assembly Bill 1709, is a particularly "massive privacy and free speech nightmare," according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).
uncertain
One → accord → Foundation
The law requires social media platforms to "implement reasonable measures to ensure that users under 16 years of age are not offered or provided any addictive feature on the covered platform."
asserted
users → require → platform
While these provisions intend to protect children, the EFF notes that the law's implementation may have the opposite effect, as it would compel tech companies to implement age-gating measures to determine user ages.
uncertain
it → intend → ages
In a letter urging Newsom to veto the legislation, the EFF also warned that because the law "does not specify how verification should occur without requiring additional proof," it will "result in platforms using the most invasive forms of age verification, such as requiring government-issued ID uploads or biometric scanning."
asserted
platforms → urge → uploads
Companies that fail to comply would face civil penalties of up to $50,000 per affected minor for a knowing violation and up to $25,000 per minor for a negligent violation.
asserted
that → fail → violation
The law also creates an e-Safety Advisory Commission, an "expert body" that would research and enforce internet safety law.
asserted
that → create → law
Although the law states that the commission only exists for administrative purposes, it also says the commission shall report "recommendations for legislative changes to enhance the protection of minors online" to the Legislature and governor each year.
asserted
commission → state → Legislature
These "experts" are to possess special knowledge from a variety of fields, including online safety, public health academia, marginalized youth advocacy, child psychology, and K-12 education.
asserted
experts → possess → safety
Unsurprisingly, First Amendment advocates and lawyers are not included on this list, as their expertise would likely thwart the state's regulatory push.
asserted
expertise → include → push
Common Sense Media founder and CEO Jim Steyer told The New York Times that Newsom's newly signed laws "will set a standard for the whole nation."
asserted
laws → tell → nation
Steyer will likely be proven right.
asserted
Steyer → prove → ?
State and federal lawmakers appear eager to adopt more restrictive online safety laws, as Americans from across the political spectrum say they want the government to shield young minds and eyeballs from alleged online harms.
asserted
government → appear → harms
According to a recent Pew Research Center poll, a majority of Americans support banning social media for children under 16.
uncertain
majority → accord → 16
Restricting internet freedom is only becoming more popular, even as the fallout from online safety legislation abroad should dissuade Americans from giving the state more power over the online world.
asserted
fallout → restrict → world
As Reason's Elizabeth Nolan Brown has reported, the United Kingdom's Online Safety Act has effectively age-gated large swaths of the internet, "putting up roadblocks for people who want to read about world news, view classic art, listen to music on Spotify, chat with friends on Discord, play video games, find information about quitting smoking, or join antimasturbation groups.
asserted
who → report → groups
Opponents of these laws need not worship Big Tech or use social media or AI chatbots at all.
asserted
Opponents → worship → media
While lawmakers insist that these apps are addictive and impossible to control without government intervention, apps can be deleted, and families and individuals can make their own choices about internet use.
asserted
families → insist → use
A socially led anti-tech movement is different than a governmentally imposed censorship regime.
asserted
movement → lead → regime
Unfortunately, California lawmakers fail to recognize this distinction, and they have taken it upon themselves to make the internet less free for all users.
asserted
internet → fail → users
