What Osama bin Laden failed to understand

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Salutin, R. (2026, September 11). What Osama bin Laden failed to understand. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/what-osama-bin-laden-failed-to-understand/article_bcda692c-5ca2-466f-9db9-ad9362d227c4.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-11 · by Rick Salutin

Quick Summary

The author reflects on the 9/11 attacks and Osama bin Laden's justification for them, which he claimed was a response to US freedom and democracy, citing the US-backed Israeli invasion of Lebanon as a catalyst. Bin Laden argued that by destroying the Twin Towers, Americans would "taste some of what we tasted" from their own suffering. The author disputes this narrative, arguing that it was inhumane and immoral to punish the innocent and that it failed to achieve its intended goal of deterring future violence. Instead, the US responded with aggressive military actions that led to further chaos and the rise of right-wing extremism.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-11, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, New York City's first Muslim mayor, Zohran Mamdani, faces controversy over his decision to attend memorial events despite calls from some victims' families and former Mayor Rudy Giuliani for him to stay away. Mamdani, who lost an older brother in the attacks, insists on honoring those affected by reading out names at Ground Zero. Meanwhile, nearly 110,000 signatures have been collected through a petition urging Mamdani not to attend, citing concerns over his past associations and appointments that some see as conflicting with the solemnity of the event. Despite this opposition, Mamdani is moving forward with plans to release more than 170,000 pages of documents related to air quality around Ground Zero in the months following 9/11, aiming to provide transparency on what the city knew about toxic conditions and how they handled it.

Written for “9/11 Memorial Controversies” on 2026-10-27, grounded in this article and the 169 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 9/11 Memorial Controversies
Politics · 170 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 2 of 72 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles mention the destruction of the twin towers on 9/11 and provide first-hand accounts from people who were there.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 7
“Both articles mention the destruction of the twin towers on 9/11 as a specific incident”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 5 of 164 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City and mention Stanley Praimnath, who survived from above the impact zone.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 14
“Both articles mention the 9/11 attacks as a key reference point, specifically mentioning the destruction of the twin towers in 2001.”
National Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 4 of 86 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles reference the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center”
TIME
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 42 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles mention the destruction of the twin towers on 9/11 and refer to it as a shared past event.”
Did We Win the War on Terror? same event · 100%
The Dispatch
⚖️ Centre further right than this 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 25 📰 publisher trust 61
“Both articles mention the 9/11 attacks and share a similar date, September 11th, suggesting they are discussing the same specific event.”
Zeteo
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 2 of 13
“Both articles refer to the 9/11 attacks on September 11, 2001, specifically mentioning the destruction of the twin towers and the aftermath.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 15% hedged 7 of 47 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles mention the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 6% hedged 7 of 120 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles mention the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center's twin towers in New York and occur exactly 25 years after the event.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 32 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
170
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 9935 article(s) · 27 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 27 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Rick Salutin
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 For six months to a year after the destruction of the twin towers in 2001, I found I couldn’t write about anything else.
2026-09-11 · assertive framing · What Osama bin Laden failed to understand
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

9/11 Al Jazeera Sweden U.S. al-Qaeda

Subjects

U.S. GPE · 7× bin Laden PERSON · 4× Al Jazeera ORG · 1× Bush PERSON · 1× CBS News ORG · 1× George W. Bush PERSON · 1× Osama bin Laden PERSON · 1× Sweden GPE · 1× al-Qaeda ORG · 1× the New York Times ORG · 1×

Narrative

There’s a deep hubris in thinking you can map out and produce historical effects, as bin Laden believed, whereas the results were the opposite, including the unleashing of populist demagogues (FWIW, not all populists are demagogues) who ginned up racism to seize power and break down centuries worth of (albeit vastly flawed) democratic institutions.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-11
🔮 For six months to a year after the destruction of the twin towers in 2001, I found I couldn’t write about anything else.
2026-09-11 · Toronto Star
What Osama bin Laden failed to understand · assertive framing

Claims (32 extracted, 1 hedged)

For six months to a year after the destruction of the twin towers in 2001, I found I couldn’t write about anything else. asserted
I → find → anything
I even wrote a column on how I couldn’t stop, as if some compelling mystery needed unravelling. asserted
mystery → write → column
You could’ve predicted it and you could’ve explained it. uncertain
you → predict → it
Still, U.S. President George W. Bush managed to muddle it. asserted
Bush → manage → it
Asked shortly after the event, while flitting erratically around the U.S. seeking safety, why it occurred, Bush said, “they” hate our freedoms and democracy. asserted
they → ask → freedoms
Osama bin Laden, head of al-Qaeda, asked, if that was so, why hadn’t they attacked Sweden? asserted
they → ask → Sweden
In 2004, he elaborated on motives in a video that ran on Al Jazeera as well as the New York Times and CBS News. asserted
that → elaborate → Jazeera
He said he “watched” as Israel invaded Lebanon in the early 1980s, backed by the U.S. navy, which bombarded hills and villages behind Beirut. asserted
which → say → Beirut
He recalled it so vividly that many of us thought he’d been there, though he meant on TV. asserted
he → recall → TV
“I couldn’t forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled … asserted
I → forget → scenes
And as I looked at those demolished towers … it entered my mind we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and … be deterred from killing our women and children.” asserted
we → look → women
It sounds human enough, even — in that peculiar way humans have of needing to feel vindicated — well-intentioned. asserted
humans → sound → way
It punished the innocent. asserted
It → punish → innocent
And it didn’t work. asserted
it → work → ?
It so didn’t work. asserted
It → work → ?
I mean that the U.S., institutionally and individually, didn’t learn the lessons bin Laden said he wanted to teach them. asserted
he → mean → them
(“Those to whom evil is done,” Auden corrected, “Do evil in return.”) asserted
Auden → do → return
So in response to 9/11, the U.S. attacked Iraq, lying about an Iraqi role in 9/11 quite deliberately, leading to carnage, vast migrations across the Arab world and Africa, precipitating racism and xenophobia in Europe and a rise of right-wing anti-immigration demagogues there and as far as Argentina and the U.S. asserted
U.S. → attack → Argentina
Not quite what bin Laden says he envisioned for the aftermath. asserted
he → say → aftermath
Why don’t we learn from history? asserted
we → learn → history
Because we’re enmeshed in it too, in our own versions that we pick up as we enter the world and can’t easily transcend. asserted
we → ’re → world
There’s a deep hubris in thinking you can map out and produce historical effects, as bin Laden believed, whereas the results were the opposite, including the unleashing of populist demagogues (FWIW, not all populists are demagogues) who ginned up racism to seize power and break down centuries worth of (albeit vastly flawed) democratic institutions. asserted
who → ’ → institutions
“History is a nightmare,” said Abraham Joshua Heschel, a teacher in my past. asserted
Heschel → say → past
He was writing in the context of the Biblical prophets who, in his view, rejected an approach based on historical factors and figures that were rooted mainly in power differentials. asserted
that → write → differentials
Heschel’s prophets preferred the pursuit of unadorned justice which, to be sure, entails its own dilemmas. asserted
which → prefer → dilemmas
In our own time, wise minds have tended to invest hope in democratic processes that include not just elections but education and discussion, in that pursuit. asserted
that → tend → pursuit
And what if bin Laden’s proclaimed objective had been achieved? asserted
objective → proclaim → ?
Americans would’ve suddenly realized it’s a bad thing to murder non-white people in distant lands! asserted
it → realize → lands
You’re then faced with the problem of ends and means. asserted
You → face → ends
Would that justify pulverizing the World Trade Center and all those in it — a truly academic conundrum that only seems to make sense in philosophy seminars and exists mainly to avoid moral issues, not confront and resolve them. asserted
that → justify → them
Yet if bin Laden lost, he also won, in the sense that the U.S. showed that his characterization of it was on target: racist, greedy, crazy religious, violent and corrupt. asserted
characterization → lose → target
As usual, Told Ya So, spoken in triumphant tones, is highly unsatisfying. asserted
Told → tell → tones
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support