How to Prevent the Next 9/11

Read the original at The Free Press ↗
Cite

Barr, W. P. (2026, September 11). How to Prevent the Next 9/11. The Free Press. https://www.thefp.com/p/prevent-the-next-911-radical-islam-fisa-surveillance-bill-barr-michael-mukasey

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Free Press · collected 2026-09-11 · by William P. Barr

Quick Summary

The article discusses the prevention of terrorist attacks on US soil since 9/11, highlighting that while the government has implemented reforms and successfully thwarted many plots, Congress is now considering legislation that would limit the tools used to combat terrorism. The key numbers mentioned are 25 years, referring to the time since 9/11, and September 11 itself. The article takes a critical angle, warning that removing essential anti-terrorism measures could leave the country vulnerable to future attacks.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-11, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, New York City's first Muslim mayor, Zohran Mamdani, faces controversy over his decision to attend memorial events despite calls from some victims' families and former Mayor Rudy Giuliani for him to stay away. Mamdani, who lost an older brother in the attacks, insists on honoring those affected by reading out names at Ground Zero. Meanwhile, nearly 110,000 signatures have been collected through a petition urging Mamdani not to attend, citing concerns over his past associations and appointments that some see as conflicting with the solemnity of the event. Despite this opposition, Mamdani is moving forward with plans to release more than 170,000 pages of documents related to air quality around Ground Zero in the months following 9/11, aiming to provide transparency on what the city knew about toxic conditions and how they handled it.

Written for “9/11 Memorial Controversies” on 2026-10-27, grounded in this article and the 169 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 9/11 Memorial Controversies
Politics · 170 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 9% hedged 7 of 79 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles mention the 9/11 attacks and describe it as a significant terrorist incident on US soil”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 2 of 72 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles describe the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, at Ground Zero in New York City.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 20 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles reference the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks as their central topic and use phrases such as 'the attack on Pearl Harbor' and 'thousands of people were incinerated against a bright blue sky' to describe the event.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 1 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles mention the September 11 terrorist attacks of 2001 as the specific event being discussed.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 7
“Both articles describe the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 27 📰 publisher trust 68
“Both articles refer to the 9/11 attacks of September 11, 2001, which is a single specific event.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 8% hedged 4 of 48 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City as the central event”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 4% hedged 2 of 53 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles clearly describe the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 5 of 164 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles describe the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, from the perspective of Stanley Praimnath and referencing the same incident.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 2% hedged 1 of 49 📰 publisher trust 53
“Both articles describe the September 11 attacks in 2001 and its impact”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
15
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 15 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
96/100
The Free Press's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
170
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Free Press · 370 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

William P. Barr
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 And while monuments to the nation’s security and prosperity were reduced to rubble on television screens, Americans wondered, “Where will the next attack occur?”
2026-09-11 · assertive framing · How to Prevent the Next 9/11
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

American Americans FBI The September 11 attacks the Geneva Conventions

Subjects

FBI ORG · 3× American NORP · 1× Americans NORP · 1× Congress ORG · 1× ISIS ORG · 1× Lockerbie GPE · 1× U.S. GPE · 1× Western NORP · 1× al-Qaeda ORG · 1× the United States GPE · 1×

Narrative

And from the burned-out remnant of a vehicle parked beneath the World Trade Center when it was attacked in 1993, the FBI was able to identify the individuals who were responsible for the blast and uncover a further plot to bomb other major New York City landmarks.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-11
🔮 And while monuments to the nation’s security and prosperity were reduced to rubble on television screens, Americans wondered, “Where will the next attack occur?”
2026-09-11 · The Free Press
How to Prevent the Next 9/11 · assertive framing

Claims (15 extracted, 0 hedged)

In a matter of moments, thousands of people were incinerated against a bright blue sky. asserted
thousands → incinerate → sky
Passengers on a commercial flight became heroes, phoning hasty goodbyes to their loved ones before making an awesome sacrifice. asserted
Passengers → become → sacrifice
And while monuments to the nation’s security and prosperity were reduced to rubble on television screens, Americans wondered, “Where will the next attack occur?” asserted
attack → reduce → screens
Answering that question has been a singular preoccupation of federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies since the attacks. asserted
Answering → answer → attacks
It has required legal and institutional reforms, moral clarity, political courage and, above all, a clear-eyed vision of the nature of the threat. asserted
It → require → threat
The September 11 attacks were not merely criminal acts; they were acts of war, whose terms, targets, and rules of engagement were dictated not by the Geneva Conventions but by jihadists dedicated to the destruction of Western civilization. asserted
terms → dictate → civilization
In the wake of 9/11, the federal government implemented sweeping reforms in an effort to prevent an attack of that scale from ever happening again on U.S. soil. asserted
government → implement → soil
Now, a quarter-century later, we can look back with some satisfaction that September 11 was not a prelude to a blitz, and that many other attacks have been thwarted. asserted
attacks → look → blitz
But acknowledging our nation’s success in preventing another major terror attack does not mean that the job is finished. asserted
job → acknowledge → attack
Our enemies are still out there, still preparing for the next strike. asserted
enemies → prepare → strike
And yet Congress is now taking away some of the essential tools we have used to foil attacks by al-Qaeda, ISIS, and similar groups over the last 25 years. asserted
we → take → years
Until September 11, the United States had dealt with terrorist attacks mainly as criminal law enforcement matters. asserted
States → deal → matters
From the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, the FBI has worked with local law enforcement partners to build successful counterterrorism cases out of little more than charred fragments. asserted
FBI → work → fragments
Starting with shreds of a clothing label and a thumbnail-sized piece of plastic explosive recovered from the Scottish countryside, the FBI was able to trace the Pan Am bombing to two Libyan intelligence officers. asserted
FBI → start → officers
And from the burned-out remnant of a vehicle parked beneath the World Trade Center when it was attacked in 1993, the FBI was able to identify the individuals who were responsible for the blast and uncover a further plot to bomb other major New York City landmarks. asserted
who → burn → landmarks
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support