Australia’s plan to let users opt out of social media algorithms | Explained

The Hindu · collected 2026-09-10 · by The Hindu Bureau
Read the original at The Hindu ↗

Summary

The Australian government has proposed a plan to give users control over social media algorithms, allowing them to opt out of personalized content and choose what they see online. The "My Feed, My Way" initiative will require tech firms to offer users a choice between algorithm-driven feeds and curated feeds with user-selected content. If the proposal passes, non-compliance could result in fines up to $79 million. The plan aims to address concerns over online safety norms, particularly for young users, by limiting exposure to harmful or addictive content.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-10, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
11%
3 of 28 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher trust
95.7
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
9
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-10 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

The Australian government is introducing new legislation that will give users the option to opt out of algorithms on social media platforms. Under the proposed Digital Duty of Care bill, companies such as Facebook and Instagram would be required to provide a pop-up message offering users the choice to turn off algorithms and see only content from friends and people they follow. If companies fail to comply, they could face fines of up to $109 million. The government aims to protect children under 18 from online harms, including eating disorders, bullying, and misogynistic or glorifying crime. This move follows Australia's world-first laws introduced in December last year that banned children younger than 16 from holding accounts on social media platforms.

Written for “Social Media Algorithm Crackdown” on 2026-09-10, grounded in this article and the 8 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but none of the 1 quote(s) it offered could be found in the article text, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 7509: no verified evidence · logged 2026-09-10

Story

📰 Social Media Algorithm Crackdown
Politics · 9 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times · 0.90 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 18% hedged 6 of 33 📰 publisher trust 94
“Both articles report on the exact same announcement by the Australian government about introducing a bill to allow social media users to opt out of algorithm-driven feeds, with both articles mentioning the date September 8, 2026”
South China Morning Post · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 25% hedged 1 of 4 📰 publisher trust 94
“Both articles describe the same proposed law by the Australian government regarding social media algorithms, with similar quotes from Communications Minister Anika Wells.”
NPR · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 2 of 13 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe the same proposed legislation announced by the Australian government on September 8, 2026, which aims to give social media users a choice to opt out of algorithms.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 26 📰 publisher trust 94
“Both articles report on the exact same event: the Australian government's plan to release draft legislation creating a digital duty of care for social media users, which includes rules about opting out of algorithms.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 15% hedged 2 of 13 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles describe the same proposed legislation in Australia, announced by the government and related to giving users an option to turn off social media algorithms.”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 20 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles report on the exact same legislation proposal, released on September 8, 2026, with identical details and quotes from Communications Minister Anika Wells.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 24 📰 publisher trust 97
“Article A discusses government fines, while Article B focuses on user opt-out of algorithms and release of draft legislation”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 8 📰 publisher trust 97
“Article A mentions fines and legislation, while Article B focuses on opt-out plan from algorithms”

Publisher

The Hindu · 144 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

The Hindu Bureau
19 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The Australian government has said that the new laws will place the burden on social media companies to provide a safe online experience for users.
🔮 Markets reacted after the U.S. military reported striking five Iranian tankers in response to attempted missile attacks on a Navy warship and after attacks by an Iranian-backed Houthi rebel group ignited fires at oil facilities in Saudi Arabia. Also read |India condems Houthi attacks on Saudi oil installations Brent increased from about $70 to $100 a barrel for much of March, April and May. In July, prices swung between $72 and $102 again, reflecting rising and falling hopes that the U.S. and Iran would agree on a plan that would allow stranded tankers to move oil out of the Persian Gulf safely.
🔮 The French capital's socialist Mayor, Emmanuel Gregoire, said on X that it was "unacceptable" that the Tower management agreed to the delegation's conditions, and said an investigation would be launched. BJP ties The Tower, which receives nearly seven million visitors a year according to its website, was closed all day on Monday (September 7, 2026), but will open as normal on Tuesday (September 8, 2026) according to a staff representative. BAPS, which is close to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), consecrated its first major temple in France on Sunday (September 6, 2026), near Paris. French Equality Minister Aurore Berge reacted angrily on X. "In France, we do not ask women to erase themselves.
🔮 The U.S. should understand that the rules of the game in war against Iran have changed “before it is too late”, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said on Sunday (September 6, 2026), a day after the U.S. struck several Iranian tankers in the Gulf. “From now on, any attack against Iran’s interests and security will receive a faster, heavier and more painful response,” he said in a speech published on his Telegram channel.
🔮 “The India-Belgium FTA would strengthen trade, create opportunities for businesses, young talent and investment, and make the Indian and European economies more resilient to global disruptions.
🔮 Flood risks will remain until two lakes upstream of the flood zone, one of which began overflowing on Friday (August 28, 2026), have fully drained, an official with Nepal’s Disaster Management Authority said.
🔮 “While we will respond to the Committee’s observations through the established procedure, the inter-Ministerial delegation, which was led by the Solicitor General of India, Shri Tushar Mehta, had already rejected the sweeping generalisations, unsubstantiated allegations, or tendency to exceed the Convention’s mandate during the review meeting,” the MEA stated.
🔮 About 70 employers had paid the $100,000 fee on a total of 85 visa applications as of late February, according to court filings, the Reuters reported How will H1-B visa fee hike impact Indians Those visas typically came with fees between $2,000 and $5,000 before the U.S. President’s order.
🔮 He further added, “The President has created the conditions to leverage every agency, every authority and action many assumed we would never summon.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by The Hindu Bureau
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 19 articles by The Hindu Bureau →

Topics

Australia Australian Australians eSafety the Digital Duty of Care

Subjects

Australia GPE · 3× Australian NORP · 3× DIGI ORG · 2× Meta ORG · 2× Anika Wells PERSON · 1× Australians NORP · 1× Facebook ORG · 1× Instagram ORG · 1× Parliament ORG · 1× eSafety ORG · 1×

Narrative

They will also have to protect them from harmful content, including content that promotes eating disorders, and hostile ideas about women and gender equality; glorification of crime or life endangering stunts; content that causes serious mental health distress; and pornography.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-10
🔮 The Australian government has said that the new laws will place the burden on social media companies to provide a safe online experience for users.

Claims (28 extracted, 3 hedged)

Australia has announced a plan to offer social media users greater control over their feed by providing them a choice to opt out of algorithm-driven feed. asserted
Australia → announce → feed
Part of the country’s push for greater online safety norms, the plan ensures that Australian users have more choice on what they see online. asserted
they → ensure → what
The draft legislation for the Digital Duty of Care was released on Tuesday (September 8, 2026) for targeted consultation. asserted
legislation → release → consultation
The Australian government has said that the new laws will place the burden on social media companies to provide a safe online experience for users. asserted
laws → say → users
“The digital duty of care will ensure online service providers – including some of the most powerful companies in the world – step up and do more to keep Australians safe from harm on their platforms,” said Australian Minister for Communications Anika Wells. asserted
Wells → ensure → Communications
These laws will include the “My Feed, My Way” initiative, which will allow users to make decisions about their algorithms. asserted
users → include → algorithms
Users can choose between their default feed, which includes personalised content, and a feed without the algorithm-prescribed content, and see posts of friends and creators they choose to follow. asserted
they → choose → friends
Tech firms will also have to send pop-up messages to both new and existing users offering them the choice over their feed. asserted
firms → have → feed
Apart from this, it also wants to empower eSafety, a government agency responsible for the regulation of online safety, to send removal notices to apps and websites. asserted
it → want → apps
Further, social media firms, AI chatbots, and gaming platforms will be required to protect users under the age of 18 from features that cause a negative behavioural impact, including addictive features. asserted
that → require → features
They will also have to protect them from harmful content, including content that promotes eating disorders, and hostile ideas about women and gender equality; glorification of crime or life endangering stunts; content that causes serious mental health distress; and pornography. asserted
that → have → distress
These firms have to document and identify measures taken to address identified risks of harm to users. asserted
firms → have → users
Non-compliance with these rules may attract fines to the tune of $79 million (₹750 crore). uncertain
compliance → attract → million
What will change and why is it needed? asserted
it → change → ?
The exact nature of the changes and what they will look like will only be known once Australia finishes consultations and introduces the legislation in Parliament. asserted
Australia → look → Parliament
The government is seeking feedback from digital platforms, industry bodies, civil society organisations and advocates on the draft laws Algorithms are a set of rules and calculations that determine what you will see online. asserted
you → seek → what
Basically, they use data based on your previous likes, comments, posts, and various other things to determine what posts you are served. asserted
you → use → posts
Social media firms use these algorithms to increase traffic to their platforms. asserted
firms → use → platforms
Researchers and experts have accused these firms of building in features that encourage “doomscrolling”, which in turn leads to addiction. asserted
which → accuse → addiction
Recently, Meta - which is the parent company of Facebook and Instagram - reached a $16.68 billion settlement to resolve claims brought by U.S. states that the company designed its platforms to addict children. uncertain
company → reach → children
While none of the Big Tech firms have directly commented on the legislation, The Guardian reported that DIGI, the lobby group representing tech companies including Meta, Snapchat, and Google, defended algorithms as helpful to users seeking diverse content. asserted
DIGI → comment → content
“We support an approach that gives people meaningful choice and control over the content they see, while managing safety risks,” a DIGI spokesperson reportedly said. uncertain
spokesperson → support → risks
Meanwhile, some members of the Opposition parties in Australia have expressed reservations and have flagged risks of censorship. asserted
members → express → censorship
However, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said, “This is not about giving government control, it is about giving people control. asserted
it → say → control
The European Union, which introduced the Digital Services Act in 2022, has a similar provision for users to opt out of personalised content on social media. asserted
users → introduce → media
However, it has been reported that the firms have not made it easy for users to change their settings. asserted
users → report → settings
In 2025, a rights group in the Netherlands took Meta to court for violating the DSA and not offering users a feed that is not based on profiling. asserted
that → take → profiling
The court ordered Meta to modify the platforms to comply and offer users simpler feed. asserted
court → order → feed
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support