Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News
· collected 2026-09-06 · by Shane Wright
The Albanese government is proposing fines of over $100 million for social media companies that fail to keep under-16s off their sites, with a bill set to go before the Senate on Tuesday. The proposed legislation includes fines of up to $109.2 million and aims to give more power to eSafety Commission chief Julie Inman Grant to target social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. Communications Minister Anika Wells has urged the Senate to pass the bill quickly, citing the removal of over 5 million under-16s accounts from social media sites. The proposal has sparked concerns about government censorship and the impact on free speech, with Liberal leader Angus Taylor and Opposition communications spokeswoman Sarah Henderson expressing reservations.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-06,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event.
Social media companies could be slugged with fines of more than $100 million if they fail to do more to keep under-16s off their sites under an Albanese government bill set to go before the Senate on Tuesday.
uncertain
they → slug → Tuesday
The fines are part of a push to give more power to eSafety Commission chief Julie Inman Grant to target sites such as Facebook, Instagram and TikTok for not lifting efforts to abide by Australia’s ban on young people accessing social media.
asserted
people → give → media
It forms a key part of a broader assault on social media platforms with draft laws that would force companies to take action that would prevent the platforming and sharing of harmful content, including illegal pornography, on their sites.
asserted
that → form → sites
At the start of July, the government introduced to parliament an urgent bill it said would boost the eSafety Commission’s information gathering powers.
asserted
it → introduce → powers
That bill was sent to a Senate committee that, despite misgivings by non-government members, ticked off its approval.
asserted
that → send → approval
That bill, which includes fines of $109.2 million for breaching new laws to prevent under-16s from accessing social media sites, will go to the Senate on Tuesday.
asserted
which → include → Tuesday
The government has come under fire over the large number of young people still on social media sites, despite its mandating of age verification.
asserted
government → come → verification
But Communications Minister Anika Wells said more than five million under-16s accounts had been removed.
asserted
accounts → say → ?
She urged the upper house to back the bill as quickly as possible.
asserted
She → urge → bill
“Australian kids and parents needed these laws eight weeks ago, but the Coalition and Greens teamed up to send our four-page bill to an eight-week inquiry,” she said.
asserted
she → need → inquiry
“The Coalition and the Greens ignored the pleas of parents who want social media companies held to account for harming Australian kids.
asserted
companies → ignore → kids
“We have to put politics to the side and pass this bill this week, so the eSafety Commissioner can hold social media companies accountable.”
asserted
companies → have → bill
The large fines at the heart of the under-16 ban will form part of the so-called “digital duty of care” reforms that the government is expected to release for public comment later this week.
asserted
government → form → comment
The proposed legislation has the potential to split the Coalition between those who want to protect free speech and those who believe some social media outlets are deliberately causing harm among young people.
asserted
outlets → propose → people
Liberal leader Angus Taylor on Sunday said while he had not seen the draft laws, he was worried about an “attempt by government to censor social media”.
asserted
he → say → media
He was more focused on the laws going to the Senate this week, noting the continued use by under-16s of social media.
“It’s not working.
asserted
It → go → media
So then going off and starting off on some other thing, which risks being censorship of the internet, enormous ministerial discretion around censorship on the internet …
asserted
which → go → internet
If that’s what’s being proposed, we’re sceptical,” he told News24.
asserted
he → ’ → News24
Opposition communications spokeswoman Sarah Henderson expressed deep reservations about the proposal and how it would give more powers to the government to regulate Australians’ freedom of expression.
asserted
it → express → expression
“While we will consider the government’s exposure draft, the proposal for new ministerial powers to make regulations governing categories of online harms without parliamentary oversight is a serious threat to free speech,” she said.
asserted
she → consider → speech
“While tougher action is required to combat serious online harms and empower Australians to take greater control over what they see online, the digital duty of care, as currently proposed, appears to be a dangerous step in the wrong direction.
asserted
duty → require → direction
But opposition home affairs spokesman Jonathan Duniam said there might be merit in users not being force-fed an algorithm for their social media.
uncertain
users → say → media
“Provided the detail stacks up and it doesn’t unnecessarily impede on people’s rights and freedoms, empowering individuals to make a choice about what they consume is absolutely where we should be at,” he told the ABC’s Insiders program.
asserted
he → provide → program
“Empowering parents to do the same for those that are in their custody, their kids, should absolutely be something we consider.”
asserted
we → consider → custody
