Australians will be able to switch off social media algorithms under planned legislation

Read the original at BBC News ↗
Cite

Atkinson, S. (2026, September 7). Australians will be able to switch off social media algorithms under planned legislation. BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn9wyvxn95vo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

BBC News · collected 2026-09-07 · by Simon Atkinson

Quick Summary

Communications Minister Anika Wells plans to introduce draft legislation allowing Australians to opt out of social media algorithms. The proposed laws would require tech firms like Meta, Google, and TikTok to give users the option to turn off algorithms or face "substantial" penalties. A public debate has erupted over the proposal, with some opposition members calling it censorship and others expressing support in principle. The legislation is expected to be introduced this week and will also address issues of harmful content on social media platforms.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The Australian government is introducing new legislation that will give users the option to opt out of algorithms on social media platforms. Under the proposed Digital Duty of Care bill, companies such as Facebook and Instagram would be required to provide a pop-up message offering users the choice to turn off algorithms and see only content from friends and people they follow. If companies fail to comply, they could face fines of up to $109 million. The government aims to protect children under 18 from online harms, including eating disorders, bullying, and misogynistic or glorifying crime. This move follows Australia's world-first laws introduced in December last year that banned children younger than 16 from holding accounts on social media platforms.

Written for “Social Media Algorithm Crackdown” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 8 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Social Media Algorithm Crackdown
Politics · 9 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 25% hedged 1 of 4 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles report on the exact same law and proposed legislation, announced by Communications Minister Anika Wells on September 7, 2026”
Both report
The two articles are about a law proposed by Australian Communications Minister Anika Wells that would allow users to opt out of social media algorithms. Both reports mention that big tech companies, such as Meta Platforms, would be required to give users this option.
This one adds
The South China Morning Post article mentions the government's "digital duty of care bill", which is a specific part of the proposed legislation. This article also mentions that the opposition has raised doubts over enforcement.
The other adds
The BBC News article provides more details about the potential consequences of not enforcing the social media ban, including the fact that tech firms have not been fined for non-compliance despite consistent research showing high usage among under-16s.
Framing
The tone and language used by both articles are neutral, but the BBC News article presents a slightly more assertive narrative, explicitly stating that no tech firm has been fined for not enforcing the social media ban. The South China Morning Post article frames the proposal as a way to force big tech companies to offer chronological feeds, while the BBC News article focuses on the option to switch off algorithms.
Al Jazeera
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 2 of 13 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on the same draft legislation to be unveiled by the Australian government this week, requiring social media platforms to give users an option to turn off algorithms”
Both report
The two articles from Al Jazeera and BBC News both report on the Australian government's plan to unveil draft legislation requiring social media platforms to give users an option to turn off algorithms. The legislation aims to address concerns over the influence of these algorithms on user behavior. Communications Minister Anika Wells has confirmed that the plan is to give users this option.
This one adds
The Al Jazeera article does not provide specific information about tech firms being fined for non-compliance with the social media ban, but the BBC News article mentions that despite research showing most under-16s continue to use platforms after the ban was introduced in December, no fines have been issued. The BBC article also provides a bit more detail on the proposal, stating that Australians would be able to switch off algorithms "under draft legislation to be proposed this week".
The other adds
The Al Jazeera article provides a broader context for the proposal by mentioning its potential impact on social media use among teenagers and linking it to related articles such as the failure of Australia's under-16 social media ban. The Al Jazeera article also uses more assertive language, stating that "social platforms could be forced" to give users an option to turn off algorithms.
Framing
The two articles have similar framing in terms of asserting the proposed legislation and its impact on user behavior, but the Al Jazeera article tends to focus more on the broader implications and potential consequences, while the BBC News article provides a bit more detail on the proposal itself.
NPR
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 2 of 13 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on the same planned legislation being proposed by the Australian government, allowing social media users to opt out of algorithms.”
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 28 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on the exact same legislation proposal, released on September 8, 2026, with identical details and quotes from Communications Minister Anika Wells.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 24 📰 publisher trust 61
“Article A discusses fines for social media companies not keeping under-16s off their sites, while Article B discusses legislation to allow Australians to switch off social media algorithms”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 26 📰 publisher trust 66
“Both articles report on the government's plan to introduce draft legislation creating a digital duty of care for social media users in Australia, which includes allowing users to turn off algorithms and penalties for non-compliance.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 18% hedged 6 of 33 📰 publisher trust 68
“Both articles describe a new bill being proposed in Australia that would allow social media users to switch off algorithms, with similar details about the proposal and potential penalties for non-compliance.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 8% hedged 4 of 52 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes a settlement agreement between Meta and states, while Article B proposes draft legislation to require social media algorithms to be switchable by users”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
20
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
1 of 20 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
69/100
BBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
9
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

BBC News · 4027 article(s) · 5 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 5 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Simon Atkinson
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The Brisbane-based group, who confirmed their reunion last week, will kick off with four nights in their home city next September.
🔮 In six years' time, the 2032 Brisbane Olympics and Paralympics are set to stage rowing and canoe sprint events in this very stretch of water, which has just passed a technical assessment and been endorsed as safe and fair for athletes.
🔮 - Published Australians would be able to switch off social media algorithms under draft legislation to be proposed this week.
🔮 The 51-year-old, who attended the Court of Appeal via video link from prison, will be eligible to be freed after 33 years.
🔮 But crown prosecutor Jeremy McWilliams defended the use of a mobile phone tower expert, arguing the jury could use his evidence to decide whether Patterson had an opportunity to source death cap mushrooms, in the way it was alleged.
🔮 While discussing the melons Takaichi's team had presented to Albanese during her visit to Australia in May, the host of Bush Deep, comedian Nikki Osborne, quipped: "She brought two...
Also by Simon Atkinson
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Simon Atkinson →

Topics

Australia Australians Communications Google Meta

Subjects

Australians NORP · 4× Wells PERSON · 3× Australia GPE · 2× Angus Taylor PERSON · 1× Anika Wells PERSON · 1× Communications ORG · 1× Google ORG · 1× Liberal Party ORG · 1× Meta ORG · 1× TikTok ORG · 1×

Narrative

" But she admitted that so far no tech firm had been fined for not enforcing the social media ban, despite research consistently showing that the vast majority of under 16s who were on platforms before the ban was introduced last December, still use them.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 - Published Australians would be able to switch off social media algorithms under draft legislation to be proposed this week.

Claims (20 extracted, 1 hedged)

- Published Australians would be able to switch off social media algorithms under draft legislation to be proposed this week. asserted
Australians → publish → legislation
Communications Minister Anika Wells, who last year helmed the government's world-first social media ban for under-16s, said the digital duty of care laws would ensure "some basic safety protections on an industry that hasn't had to observe it". asserted
that → helm → it
If tech firms such as Meta, Google and TikTok did not give the option to turn off algorithms, they should face "substantial" penalties, she said. asserted
she → give → penalties
Some members of the opposition have criticised the proposal, with Liberal Party leader Angus Taylor saying he was "highly sceptical" and arguing the move could amount to censorship. uncertain
move → criticise → censorship
The government will be taking "expert advice" on whether users would have to opt in or out of the algorithms feeding them content online, Wells said. asserted
Wells → take → content
This means that, as with its social media ban, the government is looking to bring in legislation before fully hammering out the specifics of how it would work. asserted
it → mean → specifics
"We want to give Australians more choice over what they see on their social media feeds," Wells told the ABC on Monday. asserted
Wells → want → Monday
"We know that a lot of Australians appreciate the algorithm both for the enjoyment they get out of it or the utility that they get out of it, seeing local businesses in their suburb. asserted
they → know → suburb
"A lot of Australians will want to choose the algorithm. asserted
lot → want → algorithm
But we think that big tech should offer them the choice in the first place and they should respect that choice. asserted
they → think → choice
"Big tech is not a protected species and they should offer their customers basic safety standards. asserted
they → protect → standards
" But she admitted that so far no tech firm had been fined for not enforcing the social media ban, despite research consistently showing that the vast majority of under 16s who were on platforms before the ban was introduced last December, still use them. asserted
ban → admit → them
Some members of the opposition have said they support the idea in principle, but others argue it is an attempt to curtail freedom of speech. asserted
it → say → speech
Taylor told News24 he feared this was "an attempt by the government to censor social media" and that Labor should first try to plug holes in the social media ban. asserted
Labor → tell → ban
Speaking to Channel Nine's Today show, Wells said: "This isn't about censorship. asserted
This → speak → censorship
This is about identifying risks or making big tech identify the risks on their own platform and making big tech mitigate against those risks on their platform. asserted
tech → identify → platform
Last week, high-profile consent advocate Chanel Contos gave a speech at Australia's National Press Club calling on the government to seek an opt-in for algorithmic social media feeds, making it harder for tech firms to find a way round any reforms. asserted
firms → give → reforms
She argued algorithms were fuelling the prevalence of sexual violence in Australia and exposing young people to misogynistic "manosphere" material. asserted
algorithms → argue → material
The draft legislation is expected to be introduced in the coming days. asserted
legislation → expect → days
As well as addressing algorithms, it is also expected to put an onus on platforms to stop harmful content, such as illegal pornography and videos promoting disordered eating, from being shared. asserted
it → address → eating
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support